LoyceV,
shit man! looks like you've really sodomized your computer now, uhm
I apologise for that LoyceV . I'm not sure how you can return your system
to how it was now. Again sorry about that. Probably best if I shutup now.
I've been planning a reinstall for a long time, guess I'll have to really do it now. I'm just not sure what distribution to use yet, I seem to like none of them anymore lately. I'll just try Mint. |
|
|
|
Interesting topic  I've been thinking the same, but for my kids' college funds. The amound needed can be anywhere from infinite (bitcoin worthless) to a fraction of a bitcoin (bitcoin worth millions of dollars). Either way, you're 7 years too late buying now. Like any price-guess-topic, I think it's safe to say bitcoin won't increase 100,000 times in price again as it did the past 7 years. Of course, like all investments, it's wise to diversify. Although bitcoin has outperformed the stock market in the past year, that is no guarantee for the future. |
|
|
|
|
Throw a dice. If it hits 6 three times in a row, call it rigged. Keep throwing the dice until you reach this hellish number!
|
|
|
|
LoyceV May I see the output of '' ls -larths /usr/lib*/libOpenCL.so* ```
Depending on the distro the location of that library will be different.
If you do have the library a simple symbolic link may be all that you need
for vanitygens build machinery to find it.
root@Laptop:~# ls -larths /usr/lib*/libOpenCL.so*
ls: cannot access /usr/lib/libOpenCL.so*: No such file or directory
root@Laptop:~# locate libOpenCL
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 I tried this: root@Laptop:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu# cp -a libOpenCL.so.1* /usr/lib But it still doesn't compile (same error): test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ make oclvanitygen
cc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -lOpenCL
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:22: recipe for target 'oclvanitygen' failed
make: *** [oclvanitygen] Error 1 Okay this did the trick to compile: I installed "ocl-icd-opencl-dev". It did have to remove one Nvidia-driver though, but after this, compile worked fine. Next problem is getting this to work. test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ ./oclvanitygen 1test
Difficulty: 264104224
clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001
clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001
Available OpenCL platforms: Since the drivers were so bad, seems like I'm not running Nvidia-drivers for my screen at the moment. |
|
|
|
it works like a charm on ubuntu 14.10.....  [/quote] I'm running 14.04 (long term release). Do you have a Geforce 840M or another brand? |
|
|
|
Install the OpenCL SDK, how that's done will depend on your graphics card, operating system, where you installed stuff, etc. I've been trying all kinds of things, but didn't get it to work. Same error. Any chance a reinstall with another (which one?) Linux-distribution can make this easier? I expect GPU-vanity will find 1 more character in the same time as CPU-miner, so it would be very nice to get to work. |
|
|
|
I have a question again: The original Makefile contained this: And thus it didn't compile oclvanitygen so I added this: most: vanitygen oclvanitygen keyconv Is this the right track? If I try to compile, it gives this: cc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -lOpenCL
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:22: recipe for target 'oclvanitygen' failed
make: *** [oclvanitygen] Error 1 Any suggestions? |
|
|
|
And this is the result of a bad laptop GPU (the one in your laptop is probably also much better): $ ./oclvanitygen 1K1773R
Difficulty: 15058417127
[1.68 Mkey/s][total 71303168][Prob 0.5%][50% in 1.7h]
I'm going to post here and ask for information I can probably find in the topic, but I'm not yet done reading the 130 pages Where do I download oclvanitygen? Google doesn't really help me, and the one download I found looked like a shady website. I'm running Ubuntu Linux, and get around 200-300 kKeys/s out of my CPUs (depending on system load).There's one 6 digit address I'd love to find, but it takes 30 days for 50% chance, and once I find this, I'll come up with other wishes. I'd love to use my GPU (03:00.0 3D controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM108M [GeForce 840M] (rev a2) and hope to get much better performance that way. Can someone send me in the right direction to get this to work?I feel stupid now. All the time searching for oclvanitygen I couldn't find it, I type just "download vanitygen" in Google and it gives me https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen ... Turns out I had it all along, it just didn't compile. I'll play around and report performance here if I get it to work. |
|
|
|
I think even above $40 is possible if BTC spikes, that money needs to go somewhere and Litecoin is the best candidate there
Litecoin is the fourth cryptocurrency when it comes to market capitalization, so why would Litecoin be the likely candidate? |
|
|
|
Having too many paper wallets might pose an operational risk. The risk is that you might lose some of them or even forget about those that have too few BTC. If your private key generation method is solid there is really no point in having more keys than necessary. I still want to make paper wallets, and I was thinking of keeping a PDF as a backup, of course with a decent GPG-password, and still in an offline location. One thing I only recently realized is that a paper wallet needs to be spend at once, as it's unclear where the change would go to. And after using it, it's no longer considered cold storage, as the private key has been used, so you need to make a new one. For this reason it is useful to make several paper wallets, so you only use the amount you need and leave the rest untouched. |
|
|
|
And yet you keep coming back  Don't blame the host for your gambling addiction. Yet, no one besides you understands what exactly the proof you brought forward is supposed to highlight.
He's must think 88% bets can't lose. Just like he must think Martingale has a higher chance of doubling than going all-in at once. |
|
|
|
I use offline wallet on protected USB stick with linux OS.
Do you make backups of that stick? I recently had to replace a 3 year old good-brand stick, because it simply stopped working. This stick contained movies, if it was bitcoin it could have been an expensive loss. |
|
|
|
I do not understand why we have to pay for 4 cent per transaction tough, isn't that too much?
Around the year 2140 the block reward is gone. The years before that, it's like 4 satoshi only. The design includes for more and more transactions, hence and increasing miners fee, to replace the block reward. Currently the miners fee is around 1% of what the miners get, in the future it will be a larger percentage. Who decides the 0.0001 should be the optimal miners fee? It's an open market: miners are free to pick the transactions with high fees first. |
|
|
|
Litecoin is incredibly undervalued.
It should be at least $14 right now, that is; BEFORE THE TRUE EXPLOSION/MOON RACE STARTS.
LTC minimum $18 this year. Could reach $75.
I don't think this will happen, but just in case I hold a few LTC in my wallet |
|
|
|
|
I was wondering about the same thing, as I've recently joined my first signature campaign. I have known they exists since I joined bitcointalk, I just didn't know it pays that much for doing the thing I do anyway: posting!
And as any other advertising, they wouldn't do it if it wouldn't generate profit.
You could use an existing signature campaign with your own referral link, so you can see exactly how much visitors and possible earnings it generates. Of course you can't do this while you are in an active campaign, as the referral can't be changed when you're in a campaign.
|
|
|
|
Am i right in saying that wallets exist without bitcoin core knowing about them? Yes i think i am right in saying all the bitcoin public address technically exist anyway and so do their private keys, most of them just havn't been used yet Most of them will never be used. http://directory.io/ shows all possibilities, and the number of pages nicely illustrates how unlikely it is to find the same private key twice. |
|
|
|
A smart contract is an app that sits on the blockchain and waits to be called. It will only run if it's requirements are met. That's about it. You can write code so that the app is intelligent. I can see why it's called a smart contract but the terminology can be confusing. They're just apps (or dapps - decentralized apps).
If this is too simplistic then correct me!
I watched a presentation about it on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_LK0t_qaPoThe guy presenting more or less says "we don't really know what it is", but the possibilities are amazing. Half way through the presentation I got a Skynet-feeling: "a world wide computer that cannot be turned off or reset". But of course it's not that evil, it just runs very small pieces of code. Regardless the price, I'm going to experiment with the scripting language. |
|
|
|
My Arabic speaking friend told me that world Islam itself means "PEACE"
http://muslimvoices.org/word-islam-meaning/ says: "In Arabic, the word “Islam” means submission or surrender " and "a Muslim surrenders his or her will to Allah in return for peace". So it may give peace to muslims after giving up on free will, but what about the rest of the world who doesn't believe it? |
|
|
|
|
I choose b) Gaze at the stars
My Bitcoin address is: 1CDtTNXkXXaEonr6z6UV4Qk2dUouKf679V
My Ethereum address is: 0xf129cf0e16429b33cbb586049b794a6ffd2cb5ea
|
|
|
|
How did you double spend it? I sent the transaction from blockchain phone app. You think it's possible to double spend?
I extracted all private keys (3 in my case) connected to the inputs for the transaction from my bitcoin-qt client, imported them one by one in an empty wallet, and spend it from there. It took some time to be picked up by the network from there. I assume you have some way of getting your private keys. But it may be easier to at least wait a bit longer, it took me 2 weeks before I gave up waiting. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
