Hey devs, mind throwing us a bone about whatever development you got cooking? It almost seems to me as if you have left us chopcoiners to fend for ourselves in the arena. We're having fun of course, but it doesn't hurt to keep us in the loop, and you could attract more players that way too. Win-win.
^^ What this guy says ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I've noticed 2 changes recently: 1. Faucet-arena got like twice as fast, which made the game much more challenging and less boring. But "W" did not work on small balls, as they moved faster than the ejected mass (that speed should have doubled too I guess). 2. The next day it was slower again, but small balls merge in 5 seconds. Big balls still take like 30 seconds. It is still like this today. It stopped teaming for a few days, but they've adapted fast and are back now. This mode gives some new advantages and also some disadvantages, so in general it is a nice change.
|
|
|
Unfortunately faucet halved since 2 days, so it's not worth it anymore...
|
|
|
It's quite simple: if a company pays for the reviews, you can't trust them. Of course Trustpilot only gets business if it provides happy reviews.
|
|
|
You think they are in buisness because their websites are "fair" your joking right? Here is a defenition of provably fair " algorithm which can be analyzed and verified for fairness on the part of the service operator." thats right, the number is not generated until you place a bid, only then is the seed "randomly" generated, you dont see a problem with that? Its no different then calling head or tails on a coin flip, right after it was flipped already, and you can visually see the coin.
Don't blame the site for not understanding how provably fair works. If you can't handle loss, don't gamble the money! Talk about a one-issue-bitcointalk-account...
|
|
|
Propagandalf: First let me say I still hate you ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) You're a very good player and I usually run away when I see you ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) You still eat me (some of my often used names: ARROW/B613/"no name") anyway. Second: I totally agree with you! I've been thinking about no-names no-colors too, but already it's hard to see who's who when someone with the same color and a lot of blobs gets close or on top of my blobs. But currently I enjoy attacking those teams more than winning...
|
|
|
is it possible to take same hash after changing both server seed and random seed?
Short answer: no. Long answer: the required computation power exceeds all imagination. So no. Did you know that ALL bitcoin private keys can be found on this website? http://directory.io/ ! Just pick the right page, and you'll find wallets containing thousands of bitcoins. There are only 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675 pages so you can imagine it's quite hard to find the right page... It's the same with hashes: creating a hash out of a seed is easy. Creating a seed that fits that specific hash is virtually impossible. Which is the whole purpose of using a hash.
|
|
|
NLNico (who knows much more about this than I do) and ndnhc have explained already how hashes work. The server hash includes the random seed, and you can not adjust the random seed at will while keeping the same server hash. That being said, this scam accusation is what it is: an accusation, and nothing more than that. Nice twist BTW, I did not tell you to open a spam-accusation-topic, I told you the hashes were discussed in the existing topic here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=687571.msg12137676#msg12137676Now the factsMod Loyce here. Before I became moderator at rollin.io, one Mod (asd) lost his Mod-status due to his rage issues. This was about half a year ago. Since then he's been spamming rollin's Chatter Box. He uses his own internet provider with dynamic IP addresses, anonymous proxies, and VPNs to do so. Rollin Admin has been more than kind to him, much more than he deserves in my opinion, and countless users and Mods have tried to talk to him. He has money problems, drinking problems, gambling problems, drugs problems, and so on. He blames everybody except himself, especially Admin, and keeps saying he wants his money back. Once he has money, he gambles until he loses it again. Then the rage starts. This spam in chat goes on for days in a row, as it's very easy to make a new account on rollin. Sometimes it stopped, for instance when he had a temporary job, but he always comes back. I'm saying this in public now, as it explains why this person wants to accuse rollin falsely. I'm not so worried about his privacy, as "asd" does not tie him to any real life connection. Everybody who has ever used rollin's Chatter Box knows who I'm talking about though. asd: get help!
|
|
|
If no valid username is received from dfaassen (former Rollin username TheRealSP) within next 24 hours from this post, the prize shall be awarded to the next in line.
I do not understand what he meant ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) TheRealSP changed his username, so he cannot receive his prize. His current username is unknown.
|
|
|
Edit: When I try to order something on eBay, it says "The card you entered cannot be used for this payment. Please enter a different credit or debit card number."...
I loaded it with 1 euro and then 9 euro. Balance was 10 euro, now: 9.03 euro! It doesn't show any outgoing transactions... interesting so the card not actually working? anyone else? I have it and have used it successfully (I did have to contact the card support since it didn't work the first few times). I can confirm I have used the card today. I used it to pay parking. And indeed, I contacted support several times. Last time I tried to buy fuel with it, it didn't work. Possibly because the limit is too low to get fuel, as it usually makes a reservation before getting the fuel. For now it works.
|
|
|
Open my avatar on Notepad or any other text editor. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Well played ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I did throw it in a HEX-editor long time ago, but didn't read all the way to the bottom... Happy New Year rollin and players! Congrats to the winners ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
At noon, you look at the clock in your bedroom. The big hand is on the six and the little hand is in between the 4 and the 5. What time is it?
It's time to fix your clock ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
The site is partially in Russian?
|
|
|
username: Loyce Thank you!
|
|
|
Let me edit my own answer in a new post, as it doesn't add up ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Q. An emperor wants to find the cleverest of all men in his country to appoint him as his minister. There were three who made it to the last. The emperor places a crown on each of their heads, such that each man could see all of the other crowns, but none their own. Each crown was either gold or silver. The emperor gave his word to the wise men that at least one of them was wearing a gold crown; and that the contest would be fair to all three men. They were also not allowed to speak to each other. The emperor declared that whoever stood up and correctly announced the color of his own crown first would become his new minister. The men sat for a very long time before one stood up and correctly announced the answer. What did he say, and how did he figure it out?
If someone would see two silver crowns, he would know he wears gold. This didn't happen, as they sat for a very long time, which means there are at least two golden crowns. This means that one two person s see one silver and one gold crown, which means they still don't know a thing. That leaves the one person who sees gold only, he knows he is wearing silver. Hence he anounces: Iwear silver on my head and becomes minister. Username: Loyce
|
|
|
What can I say, I've been around since Feb 17, which means I really like rollin ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Username: Loyce
|
|
|
At current rolling speed the end result will be 1,835,958,571 bets.
My latest estimate: 1,827,270,769 bets.
|
|
|
Loyce: low low low low low low high low If more than 8 are needed: high high high, all high ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
balance 6234 mb (1/2 = 3117mB)
wagered = 98456mB = lvl 6 = 0.9% house edge
first roll: 3117mB on 49%; loss total wagered: 101573mb = lvl 7 =0.88% house edge = -3117mB profit
second roll : 3117 mB on 49% , @ 0.88 house edge win
= +3188.2 mB profit
total session profit = -3117mB + 3188.24571mB
=+71.24571mB
Loyce here, I agree ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Although you could argue the house edge 0.9% is totally irrelevant for the first roll. House edge only matters if you win. Bonus Solution: X could get an extra 12 m BTC profit by entering the Bet for it Contest Code S1, either one of the bets would qualify. That would bring the total profit to 83.24571 mBTC ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Bet for it Contest Code : S1
Win (profit) or lose more than 50 mBTC in a single bet. Prizes. 12 mBTC x 10 winners*
I'm going for the consolation prize ![Embarrassed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif) This was my first click, 55 mbtc >11: red ![Embarrassed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif) I keep telling myself to hit the greedy button! Oh well, 12 mBTC happily needed ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Loyce: low low low low low low high low I got these from chat roll, please roll the same ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) If more than 8 are needed: high high high, all high ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|