i think neoscrypt can see a farther optimization or fix don't know, because right now you need 2GH on the core to have 1MH, which is too much, also very power hungry compared to other algo
it should in theory touch 1M without that heavy oc, and around 1200 with oc, in fact in linux(using djm34 version) it reach 1150 with the same oc
so use djm version ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) (and report me the 1080 hashrate also) unfortunately i don't have linux, what i know is that there are guy right now reaching above 1MH with 1800 core, and i'm stuck at 900 with the same oc, something is wrong here Actually I'm getting more than 1 Mh/s with the lowest TDP possible (125W) on linux. So the difference must the the OS or the drivers.
|
|
|
damn, I'm already an hour installing vs2013 and cuda7.5 Will it work with 7.5 or I need 8RC?
worked for me with cuda 7.5 but on linux.
|
|
|
Hi everyone, is there a lbry nvidia miner app yet? thx
Latest tpruvot's, version 1.8. I compiled it from git and it works. Not sure there are binaries out there, though.
|
|
|
crackfoo pls add siacoin or lbry its profit!!!!
lbry is loaded now but could use some testers. I'm testing it now: vardiff doesn't seem to work. EDIT: looks fixed now PEOPLE please join the lbry algo as we have a TTF of 2 days :-D lotta lotta profit but need more hashrate.
|
|
|
Thank you so much! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) but how to compile this kind of file? i'll try with the windows notepad edit: it worked but with no increase of the hashrate performance did you remove the old .bin files? Yes i did, my hashrate with the normal .CL file is 392kh/s and with your .CL file it was 340kH/s try to play with worksize and gpu threads. besides, I wrote the original .cl file as well. I've tried -w 64 -g 2 and it is 210kH/s ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) what card? did you try using the old .cl again and see if the results are consistent? it's a r9 270, i did and the hashrate was normal I'm sorry sir I do not have that card to test with. Maybe the old .cl file is better for cards smaller than a 280x.
|
|
|
Thank you so much! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) but how to compile this kind of file? i'll try with the windows notepad edit: it worked but with no increase of the hashrate performance did you remove the old .bin files? Yes i did, my hashrate with the normal .CL file is 392kh/s and with your .CL file it was 340kH/s try to play with worksize and gpu threads. besides, I wrote the original .cl file as well. I've tried -w 64 -g 2 and it is 210kH/s ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) what card? did you try using the old .cl again and see if the results are consistent?
|
|
|
Thank you so much! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) but how to compile this kind of file? i'll try with the windows notepad edit: it worked but with no increase of the hashrate performance did you remove the old .bin files? Yes i did, my hashrate with the normal .CL file is 392kh/s and with your .CL file it was 340kH/s try to play with worksize and gpu threads. besides, I wrote the original .cl file as well.
|
|
|
Come join me on testing the sib miner. I only have 4.5 Mhash and look to find a block every 2.5 hours. Could really use some backup ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Here I am! :-) but are you gone?
|
|
|
Thank you so much! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) but how to compile this kind of file? i'll try with the windows notepad edit: it worked but with no increase of the hashrate performance did you remove the old .bin files?
|
|
|
My results on lbry.
750 ti with o/c :49-50 mh/s 970 with o/c : 131-132mh/s 1070 with o/c (2000mhz core):222-224mh/s
7970-280x o/c : 50-51mh/s 290 with oc :66 -67 mh/s
what is your usage on the 1070? 99%? Nvidia seems good! What miner are you using for Nvidia cards?
there is no open source for nvidia yet, so i guess he is using the private one 1070 @ %94-95 it seems possible to improvee.Sure private miner. Tpruvot will publish it in two days, then I will have a look and see if I can improve it further, and eventually push the commits. Recently he's done a very good job so don't hold your breath ;-)
|
|
|
that wallet cryptocoderz said was 90% done months ago where is it? lol what a shitcoin
if you really didn't like the coin you would have left weeks ago, espcecially since you said you aren't holding any ESP. instead you are trolling ahead, which means the coin is interesting and is a serious competitor to some other coin. now choose what to do next.
|
|
|
what algo? were you mining all the time?
|
|
|
Many more coins have been given away for free than mined. I think it is much fairer than most other coins.
|
|
|
Sorry Sir but I've tested both the 980ti and 970 and they are also slower. Please tell nanashi to rebase his work on latest djm34 or tpruvot (which is the same as djm but with pascal fixes which in my case are slowing down maxwells).
|
|
|
I compiled it with cuda 7.5 and it worked pretty fine on 1070, but it is slower on maxwell. Besides, the nanashi version is slower on all my cards.
What the max speed was you enable to get from one 1070 on neoscrypt? 1020 - 1040 Kh/s at 125 W
|
|
|
you can try 1.8 version of epsylon3 i remember he ported the djm34 version in the last version of his miner
Thanks! But I will need to compile with new cuda framework installed. My old compile machine is dead now and I have no time to build new one (( Will wait for official windows binary release from tpruvot/epsylon3 I compiled it with cuda 7.5 and it worked pretty fine on 1070, but it is slower on maxwell. Besides, the nanashi version is slower on all my cards.
|
|
|
Nanashi Meiyo Meijin released CCminer 1.7.6-r10. (1.7.6-r9 was released a while ago.) It increases the performance in Neoscrypt for Pascal, Maxwell. Lyra2RE and Lyra2REv2 are same in older versions. So Poolside hashrate problem and miningrigrentals bugs are not resolve. Benchmarks in GTX980r10(cuda8.0) 653kH/s 190W r10(cuda7.5) 645kH/s 190W r9(cuda8.0) 494kH/s 170W sp1.5.80(cuda7.5) 599kH/s 188W djm34(cuda6.5) 638kH/s 194W ( http://cryptomining-blog.com/6450-new-ccminer-fork-from-djm34-with-faster-neoscrypt/) Benchmarks in GTX1080r10(cuda8.0) 1013kH/s r9(cuda8.0) 412kH/s Windows Binaries (1.7.6-r10) : https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmd5NYbLOB2bQlOtSource Code (1.7.6-r10) : https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aud1FauQ46vHhmh5NYbLOB2bQlOtIn this zip file, ccminer_CUDA8.exe is by compiling in CUDA 8.0. So it needs the latest Nvidia GeForce drivers. ccminer.exe is by compiling in CUDA 7.5 and suitable for compute capability 5.0 or less of the GPU.(ex.750, 750ti, Kepler or Fermi) thanks but why comparing the hashrate with the old djm34 version? the new one is much faster. EDIT: according to crypto mining blog, the 1070 gets less than 900 Kh/s with this fork, I get much more with standard tpruvot's. EDIT2: someone should tell that japanese guy he's working on old stuff.
|
|
|
An S7 can only mine sha256 coins, not espers. Couldn't you update the software to some none standard thing and use it for another algo? I think I have seen it done before No, it's an ASIC, the chips are tailor made to run a fixed algo.
|
|
|
An S7 can only mine sha256 coins, not espers.
|
|
|
|