It's never possible to increase altcoins by investing ICO or IEO. The best process is trading, when market dump again and again. Trading is more good than holding or proof of staking. Others process is waiting in dump market. You know in bear market all coin price will dump, so sell then wait.

I think that it is because their isn't any major promotion being done by any prominent enough figures. On top of that, people just flat out are unaware of Bitcoin. Only those who frequent the world wide web (internet) and are tech enthusiasts (in one way, shape or form). My mother or grandmother doesn't have a clue what cryptocurrency is nor have they heard of it, say maybe a short news clip on tv that nobody really pays much attention to. Many aren't aware of Bitcoins existence and unless its backed by celebrities & politicians most wont bother touching it being that their fiat works just fine for them.

I don't understand what OP mean, is he saying the fire that broke out in Australia was caused by mining bitcoin? Or was caused by bitcoin miner? This is so stupid and hilarious way of thinking  dude what are you thinking?  , people have been mining bitcoin since 2009 including Australia too and fire never broke out since then OMG this is stupidity

Decentralized cryptocurrencies take power and control away from the government.  They can just print as much fiat currency as they want, but they can't control the number of Bitcoins created.

Sure, Halving is very important to bitcoin and this entire market. The price of Bitcoin increases after each halving, so the next halving will take place in May will certainly help bitcoin reach higher values. Right now Fomo has helped bitcoin reach $ 8700 and it will continue to increase in the near future. Until the halving begins, I believe that the price of Bitcoin will surpass ATH in 2019

Exactly, many people get it wrong and think that bitcoin is some kind of charity or a tool bridge the wealth gap and reduce it but really it's not like that. Bitcoin is just the same as any other currency out there and the fact that majority of bitcoins are now hold by the whales (there are many articles elaborating this topic) its like an obvious answer that bitcoin is by no mean a tool to solve the wealth gap and to propose fair distribution of wealth.

Im using bitcoin for a different way im using it as my source of income and its not P2P transaction either because my country doesn't have businesses that accepts bitcoin payments that's why in order to purchase goods and products, i need to convert it to fiat. The lack of services accepting bitcoin is the reason i need to rely in fiat currency, i hope in the near future i could see cryptocurrency being use as global payments for anything.

There are several strategies that can be used if we have large capital and what you mentioned is one of them. Buying several types of potentially altcoin is a good strategy.

Although we all know that almost all the prices of altcoin will go down when the price of bitcoin goes down and vice versa. If we have a lot of capital, then it would be better not to spend it on one purchase because we also have the opportunity to buy some additional altcoin if the price is lower than the first purchase.

I agree with your discourse, that it is true Bitcoin in use for alternative payment tools, and I think for the development of Bitcoin will always improve in the future because it would not be possible Bitcoin will deteriorate if seen from the user and more fans.

I think the most important is not how to obtain it, but although they give you free coins/tokens but how they maintain their coin in market. And something like that only make new coin that don't make good benefit in market for traders, or maybe for their investors.

First of all, I've watched a minute and already do not agree with the video.

They say dollars are representation of market items owned by you. So when you own a dollar bill you don't own just paper but a record of ownership that is equal to woning an item of value.
Not really. An item of value is widely accepted and will continue to be. If you have a bottle of alcohol, you can be 100% sure that it will continue to be valuable whatever happens. Even in a state of war or recession people will want alcohol to clean their wounds, start a fire, create molotov cocktails, prepare medicine, clean paint marks, or simply get drunk. Try doing the same with paper money. They are only a representation of items of value in a perfect world, where the government is in power, there's no war or civil unrest, and the economy is booming.

If you're going to reduce the supply in half surely the market price of bitcoin is going to be affected for surely it will result to an increase in the market price since the demand and supply is not going to balance even today compare it if you are going to make the supply in half but for sure it was just the market price that is going to be affected it is still the same. Theoretically it will be difficult to get bitcoin at that rate and market price could already be double.

I have seen this argument but was more of stable coin to Fiat. I like to adopt what the big guns in the market do when keeping their profits,which is putting your profit in fiat. Though there might be tax implication with some countries when fiat is used but fiat in this bear market had been more reliable, maybe because tether lost it at a point and Dollar was more consistent that ever.

Let's put it in another situation like this... It's like you're saying you can't achieve freedom because there is government controlling you with laws. But in reality, you still have freedom even if there's rules and regulations. Same situation with it. You cannot say that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency can't be decentralized just because internet is centralized. I disagree with this. You use internet with crypto. Even if others can control the internet, it doesn't mean they can control cryptocurrency since they are still decentralized in nature.

Personally I see huge potential in bitcoin too. But as what many have mentioned. It's still too early to decide for things. Anyway, whatever comes out on top is always for the better. So we don't have to compete and contrast to see who'll wins. Bitcoin's win pretty much means a win for cryptocurrency too. And if bitcoin ends up being the best coin there is in the future then it will be good news. Otherwise I'm just going to hope for a prosperous cryptocurrency world.

In this case, the necessary projects disappear too, it is very hard to achieve something new without financial support from the markets. The long bear market caused a more problems for reliable projects too, surviving projects don't care about the bad market conditions.

I think it is very difficult for states to support bitcoin. What could be the reason for supporting Bitcoin? The states that will support Bitcoin must have a very large stock of bitcoin. Bitcoin economies can turn upside down.

Very good point that few people mentioned: regulators can only target CEX and VASPs (see what the FATF report argues), neither DEX, nor P2P transactions. Atomic swaps and similar innovation will develop. We can even expect a two-tier industry: regulated CEX for "normal" traders, and unregulated DEX for informed and privacy-centric traders (large hodlers and whales one can imagine). This is not impossible. But it would at odd with regulators' goal to fight against anonymity and implement a technologically neutral regulation.
My opinion is :

Regulated CEX for the masses
Unregulated DEX for informed traders
Self-regulation of IEO and STO by self-regulating organizations and private firms (such as CipherTrace). We can imagine firms like coingecko establishing good practices and quality standards, ratings, etc. BTW, they already do it.

To sum up: regulation may trigger a segregation process between types of users, with significant impacts on innovation. Self-regulation must be considered seriously

I think I can give you much more useful info.
A few weeks ago someone from government said we are going to implant a new bard crypto unit worth much more than BTC.
and people can start investing on it
Unfortunately many people started to invest there while still there is actually no new coin. they just say they are doing it...
no the answer is a big NO. BTC never sold at this price there

Price fluctuations may be an indicator of investor sentiment. Hashrate, though, is often seen as the better market number to watch in order to truly evaluate Bitcoin adoption, and recent hashrate statistics indicate that adoption continues to grow.

By all accounts, Bitcoin has had quite a tumultuous year. After starting the year more than 80% down from its all-time high, BTC recovered significantly before once again losing several thousands of dollars in value.

Source link here

For me, I think this could be another "unsure" prediction or analysis.

Although the hashrate of Bitcoin has increased significantly, this isn't guaranteed that Bitcoin will be having a big bull run when halving draws near. Remember that there are still scammers out there like PlusToken, lurking from the shadows, waiting to strike when BTC moons, then they dump a lot of their assets to bring the market down again.

I can't be sure if the increased hashrate of Bitcoin would really become "bullish" because the market today is so unpredictable. What do you guys think?