Excuse me but the $10 million raised for BCAP tokens are just a small part of the $50 million total that Blockchain Capital is raising. As for the others $40 million it will be raised in traditional fashion. And you were confusing 2 personn here. So ?
Excuse me but I'm not confusing two Marinas, the other U$40 has already been raised, and 20% of something is not a small part. So ! So, the Surgeon General (or equivalent if you're most likely not from the US) is on record in stating that smoking a month's supply of weed in one day is detrimental to one's posting prowess if by happenstance one had such prowess to begin with, else the quality of one's posting decreases exponentially, either of which demonstrated with the wonderful prose I quoted, one holding #1 till I replied in kind, albeit not kindly. Remember, I'm not the bad guy in this thread, hence you should be defending me, not the real bad guys with gibberish, clearly depicting that you don't a have a clue as to what the fuck you're talkin' 'bout.
off topic
Anyone knows what is happening with poloniex?
In poloniex ,i never passed the limit of 2000$ par day (( tier 1 ))
Now they locked my account and they force me to enter to tier 2 verivication level for to be able to withdrawal my holdings!
Be careful.....
Poloniex was used to process Argon Group's commission from those who paid via bitcoins. Poloniex also funded bitcoin wallet addresses making up over 85% of those who participated in BCAP's ICO. Argon Group already processed their BTC to fiat while they're still "exactly estimating" the amount of tokens Investards purchased. Madness! |
|
|
|
why is "Patrick" Dai still in this project?
as long as he's in, it'll be known as a scam.
It's a damn shame that many Chinese people who frequent the websites where this ico is offered probably don't follow bitcointalk, smithandcrown, or icocountdown. Probably the only money they will be able to scam will come from China #Rektum +1.. but seems Qtum is not a scam.. i think their angel investors are not stupid.. also check this post.. seems people also call vitalik a scammer.. also people call jack ma a scammer earlier. http://www.newsbtc.com/2016/08/17/gregory-maxwell-vitalik-buterin-ran-quantum-computer-scam/Gregory Maxwell: “Vitalik Buterin Ran A Quantum Computer Scam”Being a public figure in the cryptocurrency world comes with prestige and personal attacks. Vitalik Buterin, the visionary of Ethereum development and coding genius, has been active in the world of technology for quite some time now. Before he even created Ethereum, however, he was working on building a computer program to solve NP-complete problems. Or as some people would like to call it, vaporware. NP-complete problems are decision problems revolving around computational complexity theory. While the entire explanation of this concept can be found on Wikipedia, it is safe to assume this will one of those concepts that is always subject to substantial debate. Vitalik Buterin And The Quantum Computer Scam Interestingly enough, Vitalik Buterin used to be involved in this particular field of expertise before he started working on Ethereum. In fact, he was working on a software tool to address these NP-complete problems in polynomial time. Building such a solution from scratch is both time-consuming and costly, though. According to an archived post from Gregory Maxwell, Buterin was collecting investments from people to fund the creation of this computer program. However, Maxwell strongly feels this was nothing more than an attempt to fund vaporware. In fact, a post on Qntra refers to his idea for this computer program as “a quantum computer simulation scam”. Gregory Maxwell explained this vaporware scam as follows: “Vitalik’s project immediately before Ethereum is that he was collecting investments from people to fund building a computer program to solve NP-complete problems in polynomial time, supposedly by simulating a quantum computer. (Never mind that even real QC aren’t conjectured to be able to do that, nor does ‘simulation’ make any sense; unless BPP == BQP that’s not even possible, and virtually all experts agree the complexity classes are probably not equivalent). He built up a reputation for himself writing tech explainers of other people’s ideas usually without any attribution (until someone complains), making him look like the author.” And Then Ethereum Was Born That is a rather interesting take on things. Complex ideas and concepts are difficult to explain, let alone making anyone see the need to address them. Yet for some reason, Buterin felt he had the tools at his disposal to convince people to give him money for this project. It remains unclear as to why he failed in doing so, though. Regardless of the reasoning, it didn’t take Vitalik Buterin long to come up with a new idea. Ethereum, before it was even released to the public, raised several millions of dollars in investments. To some people, the whole concept of Ethereum is still hit-and-miss, as the code can be exploited in multiple ways. The DAO attack and replay attacks are just two of the examples. That being said, no one is saying Ethereum is vaporware. Interesting concepts can be built on top of this source code that will change our society as a whole. But this whole ordeal goes to show there is a difference between creating concepts and stealing other’s ideas. anyone know this story? Gregory Maxwell: “Vitalik Buterin Ran A Quantum Computer Scam” I've a weird-ass theory that may or may not hold water, but here goes nonetheless. It's possible that VB didn't invent anything, but is being used as the voice for the real creators, they taking advantage of VB's issues (seriously, I'm not versed as to what condition VB has, so apologies in that regard). None of this passes the smell test, the same for BCAP -> https://medium.com/@ico_dna/bcap-token-offering-stone-cold-investment-bonkers-9987e6ca5f31. In another life, VB could've been this guy -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG9CB31aOT0, or more seriously this guy -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8EJ_rISoaMThis is not meant as a diss toward VB if I'm mistaken in my assessment, but worth thinking about given that one does not simply go from espousing a quantum computer scam to being the creator of Ethereum while donning mismatched socks. Nite, all. |
|
|
|
Hey I have went through the article its seems good and more informative about BCAP. I think this is the best place to fund your bitcoin as investment. I will suggest to my friends, if any looking for it. What a fuckin moron! Get's paid from BCAP to display its sig, then comes here claiming to have read this entire thread, then doubles down with saying he's gonna tell all his friends about this great investment when it's clearly revealed in this thread that he claimed to have read is no longer available. AND I'M THE FUCKIN ASSHOLE IN THIS THREAD. Fuckin amazing! Meanwhile, feast your retarded eyeballs on this: https://medium.com/@ico_dna/bcap-token-offering-stone-cold-investment-bonkers-9987e6ca5f31 |
|
|
|
Any massive updates in the making, Chantha Owen Lueung? |
|
|
|
All, we are on track to convert crypto to USD within three working days after the closing which falls on Friday 14th April. Once it's done a separate announcement will be made.
There were questions here about Argon Group and TokenHub. TokenHub is Argon Group's issuance platform. It is also meant to have the database of ICOs. Not all of the ICOs listed on TokenHub are advised by Argon Group. In fact, as of now it is only BCAP ICO listed on TokenHub that is advised by Argon Group, the rest are not. Hope it clarifies some of the questions.
Prior to the BCAP's ICO, TokenHub listed 5 other entities detailing their respective ICO's giving cred to BCAP's ICO. After BCAP's ICO, the other 5 ICO were immediately deleted from your platform. Now, you are saying that of all the ICO listed on TokenHub, ONLY BCAP's ICO is advised by Argon Group, but the rest are not, THE REST consisting of there not being a THE REST because AG expunged them. Look at the list: 31: https://tokenhub.com/ico/31 ~ Humaniq ~ April 6 - April 27 32: https://tokenhub.com/ico/32 ~ Melonport ~ February 15 - March 16 33: https://tokenhub.com/ico/33 ~ WeTrust ~ March 2 - April 14 34: https://tokenhub.com/ico/34 ~ TaaS ~ March 27 - April 27 35: https://tokenhub.com/ico/35 ~ Embermine ~ April 13 - May 13 Time was taken to once index them, giving each a unique [URL] number. If they were never advised by Argon Group, then why the fuckin hell were they even listed on your platform? If it just were for funsies, then why the fuck didn't you list Qtum, or a myriad others, all of which them, too, AG didn't advise? Here's what I think. This dog and pony show was designed for ONLY one purpose - to launder money via cryptocurrencies. How close am I? Allow me to answer that. Pretty fuckin close! Can't wait till AG releases the promised txIDs. |
|
|
|
Gleb, I finally got the ADD time span to read your sausage post.
Bunk.
Did you see the news about Dr Wright's $300 million deal with Nchain?
My source came through - your bogus source was a no-show.
You owe me apples! Romanian apples.
Romanian apples purchased and crated. Now, would you be so kind as to publicly provide your mailing address so that I ship them to you.  |
|
|
|
A lot ppl here seem to smoke crack....
Yes, it's us crack smokers protecting Newbie assholes like yourself. You're such a retard for investing in an entity specifically designed to fund their pet projects, thus double-dipping into your kind investment while you sit back and hope for a scant ROI. You have no fuckin idea what you invested in or why a third-party thingy made up of Russians acted as the intermediary for this ICO, then immediately after the ICO ended, the following were expunged from the website: 31: https://tokenhub.com/ico/31 ~ Humaniq ~ April 6 - April 27 32: https://tokenhub.com/ico/32 ~ Melonport ~ February 15 - March 16 33: https://tokenhub.com/ico/33 ~ WeTrust ~ March 2 - April 14 34: https://tokenhub.com/ico/34 ~ TaaS ~ March 27 - April 27 35: https://tokenhub.com/ico/35 ~ Embermine ~ April 13 - May 13 I now suggest you go and get a blowjob from a snappy turtle since you love pain so much.  Maybe look at Aragon.one / Cofound / Tokenmarket to get a better idea. Well, let's see if I can bring myself up to speed, with perhaps then educating the rest of us during the interim. https://tokenhub.com/^^^ When I hover over "About Tokenhub" (red arrow) it shows the URL as https://argongroup.com/about (the other red arrow; opted to use the same color so not to confuse anybody  ) On https://argongroup.com/about I - now we - learn ... The Group develops technical placement solutions including digital tokens powered by advanced smart contracts, which we operate through a digital asset placement and brokerage platform called TokenHub. We are developing NYCEX, a digital asset and crypto-currency exchange, which will be on the cutting edge of technology and compliance. Leading up to BCAP's ICO there were 6 entities embracing their program so later to be trading on their exchange, NYCEX, owned by Stan or Nick depending on which TLD you visit. After BCAP's ICO, all but BCAP remained attached to TokenHub, the other 5 expunged. WHY! Is it because the TokenHub only had one purpose, namely for BCAP's ICO? That's my guess. What's yours? |
|
|
|
A lot ppl here seem to smoke crack....
Yes, it's us crack smokers protecting Newbie assholes like yourself. You're such a retard for investing in an entity specifically designed to fund their pet projects, thus double-dipping into your kind investment while you sit back and hope for a scant ROI. You have no fuckin idea what you invested in or why a third-party thingy made up of Russians acted as the intermediary for this ICO, then immediately after the ICO ended, the following were expunged from the website: 31: https://tokenhub.com/ico/31 ~ Humaniq ~ April 6 - April 27 32: https://tokenhub.com/ico/32 ~ Melonport ~ February 15 - March 16 33: https://tokenhub.com/ico/33 ~ WeTrust ~ March 2 - April 14 34: https://tokenhub.com/ico/34 ~ TaaS ~ March 27 - April 27 35: https://tokenhub.com/ico/35 ~ Embermine ~ April 13 - May 13 I now suggest you go and get a blowjob from a snappy turtle since you love pain so much. |
|
|
|
In December 2010 Hal said Bitcoin would need a second layer payment system (*cough* sidechain) lighter weight, more efficient, faster, etc. A few months later, lo and behold, the first bitcoin clone pops up (at a time when only a few people in the world new how to clone bitcoin) is a bitcoin twin and the creator's name is Thomas. Pop quiz: What was the name of that coin? Just more coincidences. Actually there is a very good reason for Bitcoin-backed banks to exist, issuing their own digital cash currency, redeemable for bitcoins. Bitcoin itself cannot scale to have every single financial transaction in the world be broadcast to everyone and included in the block chain. There needs to be a secondary level of payment systems which is lighter weight and more efficient. Likewise, the time needed for Bitcoin transactions to finalize will be impractical for medium to large value purchases.
Bitcoin backed banks will solve these problems. They can work like banks did before nationalization of currency. Different banks can have different policies, some more aggressive, some more conservative. Some would be fractional reserve while others may be 100% Bitcoin backed. Interest rates may vary. Cash from some banks may trade at a discount to that from others.
George Selgin has worked out the theory of competitive free banking in detail, and he argues that such a system would be stable, inflation resistant and self-regulating.
I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash. Most Bitcoin transactions will occur between banks, to settle net transfers. Bitcoin transactions by private individuals will be as rare as... well, as Bitcoin based purchases are today.
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_SelginSelgin's principal research areas are monetary and banking theory, monetary history, and macroeconomics. He is one of the founders, along with Kevin Dowd and Lawrence H. White, of the Modern Free Banking School, which draws its inspiration from the writings of Friedrich Hayek on denationalization of money and choice in currency. A central claim of the Free Banking School is that the effects of government intervention in monetary systems cannot be properly appreciated except with reference to a theory of monetary laissez-faire, analogous to the theory of free trade that informs the modern understanding of the effects of tariffs and other trade barriers. The free bankers argue that, viewed in light of such a theory, financial crises and business cycles are largely attributable to misguided government interference with freely-evolved and competitive monetary arrangements, including legislation granting central banks exclusive rights to issue paper currency.
Selgin is also known for his research on coinage, including studies of Gresham's Law and of private minting of coins during Great Britain's Industrial Revolution, and for his advocacy of a "productivity norm" for monetary policy—a plan that would have policymakers target the growth-rate of nominal gross domestic product at a level that would allow the overall price level to decline along with goods' real (unit) costs of production. According to Selgin, by preventing mild deflation in response to productivity gains, monetary authorities risk inadvertently fueling unsustainable booms or economic bubbles, setting the stage for consequent busts and recession.
His twin brother is author and illustrator Peter Selgin. |
|
|
|
29: https://tokenhub.com/ico/29 ~ Blockchain Capital ~ April 10 - May 10 31: https://tokenhub.com/ico/31 ~ Humaniq ~ April 6 - April 27 32: https://tokenhub.com/ico/32 ~ Melonport ~ February 15 - March 16 33: https://tokenhub.com/ico/33 ~ WeTrust ~ March 2 - April 14 34: https://tokenhub.com/ico/34 ~ TaaS ~ March 27 - April 27 35: https://tokenhub.com/ico/35 ~ Embermine ~ April 13 - May 13 Gleb Gamow, I don't know if you live on welfare or if you have a job, but this shit has to stop. You can't spend your life in this fucking thread, WE GOT YOUR POINT, and since the ICO is finished, if we get scammed, IT IS OUR OWN DAMN FAULT. So please shut up and get a life already
No, you don't get the point! Yes, this ICO is finished, but what about the other 5 ICOs listed above stemming from the same outfit which were utilized indirectly in giving BCAP cred. I dare you to click one of them links, you fuckin moron! One more thing, if we don't do due diligence, then it's our damn fault when future Investards get scam in this space. So please, shut the fuck up and join me, asshole, while I make a call to see why my welfare check is late this month, direly needed so that I can finally move outta this abandoned van down by the Colorado River (Arizona side).  Meanwhile, explain this ... https://gust.com/companies/nycex_ |
|
|
|
Why is my token balance keeps fluctuating after the ICO has ended and the fund has been locked? this is not normal thing. BCAP team should please correct this anormally
What part of Marina's exact estimate don't you understand? |
|
|
|
What is a bcap telegram, and how does one get kicked out of it, may I ask? I am truly perplexed.
What a fuckin idiot! You didn't seem to not have any prob finding, then joining their sig campaign, yet can't do a simple search on Google to find the answer to your perplexed question, of which here's the answer -> https://t.me/vctoken. I'm just gonna leave this here for the pearly swine fucker to lay down in his own shit [post]: You marked as Signature Campaign (Spam/Abuse). Blatant signature spammer with the inability to read before posting. Sometimes they may write up seemingly on-topic posts. Post bursting (e.g. ~90 seconds between posts). Regardless, I do not condone this type of behavior. Reference: Post history. [SOURCE]
My reference's you must delete all post intended. and try to acknowledge and do a appeal. Oh yeah, here's a future banned sig spammer. Didn't understand this at all. If a hero member is still posting with such poor quality as to get negged, does anyone really believe they're going to ramp up anything but post length? Quality is hard to improve for these people. Agree that campaign earnings should be subordinate to the real desire to post simply to engage in discussion. |
|
|
|
that was quick. just like matchpool. but not as quick as cosmos. so when is the launch?Here, allow me to help you since you obviously didn't read the fuckin article that you quoted: https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-regulated-venture-fund-ico-finishes-10-mln-sale-in-two-daysSales of the fund’s BCAP tokens was originally set to last one month starting April 10, but all $10 mln worth were already gone as of press time April 11. Tokens will be issued on May 10.
29: https://tokenhub.com/ico/29 ~ Blockchain Capital ~ April 10 - May 10 31: https://tokenhub.com/ico/31 ~ Humaniq ~ April 6 - April 27 32: https://tokenhub.com/ico/32 ~ Melonport ~ February 15 - March 16 33: https://tokenhub.com/ico/33 ~ WeTrust ~ March 2 - April 14 34: https://tokenhub.com/ico/34 ~ TaaS ~ March 27 - April 27 35: https://tokenhub.com/ico/35 ~ Embermine ~ April 13 - May 13 Here's the challenge of the day - click any five of the above sans #29 - Blockchain Capital - and report back here with you're findings [or lack thereof]. I'll wait. Fair Warning: You'll wet your pants!
Due to the lack of input by them astute Investards, allow me to nudge you fuckers: Here, jackoff all over this "cache" URL -> https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:B_EurEOtY80J:https://tokenhub.com/%3Fmodal%3Dsign_up%26from%3Dbcc+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Here's the real reason why Mega Watt is expanding it's operation in Washington state: https://www.nwppa.org/ebulletin/announcement/On January 18, [2016,] Chelan County PUD (Wenatchee, Wash.) commissioners directed staff to address six issues that were identified in public listening sessions regarding a proposed rate for high-density loads.
After more than a year of study, PUD commissioners are considering a new electric rate for operations with intense energy use of 250 kilowatt-hours per square-foot or more per year such as bitcoin miners. David Carlson was being proactive in spreading his entity's miners across several locales so to circumnavigate the proposed changes the board was alluding to, further, putting some entities in different names, yet, perhaps, under the same auspices. Genius! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
