Isn't there a plan to remove wasteful Proof of Work from this coin and make it a nice staking coin, so we can earn like interest for the coin we own, directly in the wallet?
It's planned for the future. A proof of reliability scheme (somewhat similar but not exactly) like PoS. It seems all thread discussion in the last few months has been dominated by those GPU miners that few people seem to use anyway. Let's hope this phase ends soon and the interesting things start getting developed Please realize that fair mining is important to The future of Espers. If a simple miner getting about 50% of POW reward daily, the coin will not be widely spread. That's true, but the common balance which wealth tends to is unavoidable. The distribution curve will be the usual one. And mining is not the only way to aquire coins. Just think of a fiat currency: there is only one entity mining but the distribution curve is just the usual one. Mining is a job like others. Rant finished: there are at least three people (two of them are some of the most expert miner developers) working to make the miner available to everybody, so just wait a little bit more. People are rushing to the new miner because they calculated the revenue based on the current diff. If the miner works for everyone, the diff will be up and the plans screwed :-) |
|
|
|
The 390 g1 gaming comes with a 6 pin and a 8 pin connector.
6pin= 75Watt
8pin= 150Watt
Motherboard 66 watt
MAX power is 291 watt, but the wall readings is abit higher. (Powered usb risers)
there is nothing stopping the card to draw more than those "max" values. only thing that matters is power meter at the wall plug. yes in fact in that cse some of those thing, will simply melt away and, again, pure Mh/s don't matter: it's efficiency that matters (Mh/s)/W, unless you run on free power. |
|
|
|
The 390 g1 gaming comes with a 6 pin and a 8 pin connector.
6pin= 75Watt
8pin= 150Watt
Motherboard 66 watt
MAX power is 291 watt, but the wall readings is abit higher. (Powered usb risers)
there is nothing stopping the card to draw more than those "max" values. only thing that matters is power meter at the wall plug. |
|
|
|
Error: clSetKernelArg of all params failed
GPU failure
with a renamed wolf-espHawaiigw64l4lg2tc32320nf10.bin
with sgminer --kernelfile wolf-esp
and error -63
with wolf-espHawaiigw64l4ku0.bin
with sgminer -k hmq1725 --kernelfile wolf-esp
under win10
and SAME with r9 280x under win7
sgminer.exe --algorithm hmq1725 --kernelfile wolf-esp -o pool:port -u user -pass -I 18 Try that on the command line. --algorithm hmq1725 is the key there - right after sgminer.exe thanks for help but i tested it while ago error -63 and sometimes -54 if i play with -k --algorithm and sgminer.exe or sgminer-esp-win64 Remove the bin files - use the CL source. You renamed a .bin file - don't need to do that with source. Just remove them all. Del *.bin Indeed. I think there is a stale bin file in the sources - that might be the cause of the issue. |
|
|
|
may be community need swap( means to descrease total supply in scale 1000:1) to trade this coin? yobit has zero volume others exchanges too.. (
There is good trade activity on Cryptopia ESP/LTC pair. |
|
|
|
from my tests, the 1070/1080 can handle without real ui slow down a higher default intensity (on my miner), the problem is we reach a software/cuda limit with memory offsets when doing that.
So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...
Are you talking about neoscrypt or in general? |
|
|
|
|
Cryptopia had a glitch, should be OK now.
|
|
|
|
|
I could easily run Wolf0's miner since the first release and I'm not alone, so basically people are complaining that they are not good enough to run it.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Wolf0 this is a huge present for all opencl devs!
|
|
|
|
|
280x: best kernel is Wolf0's which is available as bin only.
Memory clock: set is as low as possible, less power used and higher core overclocking possibility.
Link to the sources: original is currently not working but some posts ago I provided alternatives.
Solo mine: yes.
|
|
|
|
yep, in fact i just reimported the last djm/VTC version with a lot of cleanup (but no real code changes). I didnt had the time/patience before (sp and klaus already did that) its much better on linux, but windows results are weird... well actually i only have the pascal cards on my dev machine and its a pain to compare  980ti 190 W, linux Djm34: 920Mh/s Tpruvot latest: 760 Mh/s |
|
|
|
I need some help, i want to buy a GPU to mine Espers, but i don't know which GPUs does work mining Espers. (The only one i know is my R9 270 that is currently working)
My R9 270x is also working on the old windows binary, but I get the same errors reported by others with the new Wolf0 version. I also tried to compile under linux ubantu on another computer but make fails with error about multiple targets? I have been able to compile other sgminers. Remove all .Po and .Plo files, they contain windows paths with drive letters: the colon character is special in a Makefile. Those files should be removed from the git as well. |
|
|
|
|
Is there any info on the pow algo? how does POWT work?
|
|
|
|
it can not be done for win 7, win 7 is doomed, new pascal does not work there, on win 10 it work already so dunno why you are complaining there, same for lyra2v2 it work good(41MH with a 1070 is almost 90% more than a 970)
the only problem is neos, which i can not expain since ethereum is working, and neo is still there broken(win 10 also) when it is even less memory intensity
the neoscrypt game is all about how the memory is accessed. latest djm34 version is highly optimised in that regard. the 1070 must have some differences in memory access which is triggering the slower behavior. a 1070 should come to my door tomorrow or monday, then I will make some tests on linux. |
|
|
|
I'm sure the devs will fix it soon.
Besides, it's pretty easy to compile on linux, no need to be a dev.
I've compiled sgminer on windows in the past but only using mingw (which is a pain), maybe using visual studio it's much easier.
My rig runs on ubuntu, will it work? Can you share your files? I'm a total noob with Linux since I only used Windows. Of course it'll work. Since your rigs are on linux, you surely will have done something like this before: git clone ...... sh autogen.sh ./configure make just like with any other sgminer fork |
|
|
|
Anyone got the miner working yet? I have given up for now as I dont like to have my rigs sitting idle when they could be mining something else.
No, I tested it on 280x, 290, 290x, 370 and 380 and it don't work. I talked to wolf and the error can be related to the fact that they don't released the bin file. I compiled the sources on linux, including the opencl code, it works pretty fine. maybe there is something wrong with the windows exacutable. Could you share some hashing number? R9 290x @800/1250 did about 3.15 Mh/s using about 200 W of power. (I'm not mining with it now) Thanks! That is impressive, but unfair for the majority of people are not coders and can't get this miner to work... I'm sure the devs will fix it soon. Besides, it's pretty easy to compile on linux, no need to be a dev. I've compiled sgminer on windows in the past but only using mingw (which is a pain), maybe using visual studio it's much easier. |
|
|
|
Anyone got the miner working yet? I have given up for now as I dont like to have my rigs sitting idle when they could be mining something else.
No, I tested it on 280x, 290, 290x, 370 and 380 and it don't work. I talked to wolf and the error can be related to the fact that they don't released the bin file. I compiled the sources on linux, including the opencl code, it works pretty fine. maybe there is something wrong with the windows exacutable. Could you share some hashing number? R9 290x @800/1250 did about 3.15 Mh/s using about 200 W of power. (I'm not mining with it now) |
|
|
|
Anyone got the miner working yet? I have given up for now as I dont like to have my rigs sitting idle when they could be mining something else.
No, I tested it on 280x, 290, 290x, 370 and 380 and it don't work. I talked to wolf and the error can be related to the fact that they don't released the bin file. I compiled the sources on linux, including the opencl code, it works pretty fine. maybe there is something wrong with the windows exacutable. |
|
|
|
What king of coin I have to mine with 2 GPU HD7970 in order to have maximum profittability ?
thx
you can go to: https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp to see the most profitable to mine. It is Ethereum at the moment. it seem like a lot of people are mining decred...so must be profitable too...or holds tons of promise....does that algo run at higher temps? it's pure gpu, no ram usage, so lower than scrypt and higher that some random access memory algos. but since miners tune their rigs based on efficiency, it shouldn't be important for you, unless you have cooling issues: in that case just undervolt a bit. |
|
|
|
[2016-07-07 00:44:31] 1 miner thread started, using 'blake' algorithm.
[2016-07-07 00:44:31] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://litecoinpool.org:3333
[2016-07-07 00:44:32] Stratum difficulty set to 1024
[2016-07-07 00:45:03] Stratum difficulty set to 128
[2016-07-07 00:45:58] Stratum difficulty set to 16
[2016-07-07 00:46:52] Stratum difficulty set to 4
[2016-07-07 00:46:58] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 1506635 kH/s nooooo
[2016-07-07 00:46:58] reject reason: target-miss
[2016-07-07 00:47:12] accepted: 0/2 (0.00%), 1495049 kH/s nooooo
[2016-07-07 00:47:12] reject reason: target-miss
[2016-07-07 00:47:18] accepted: 0/3 (0.00%), 1492134 kH/s nooooo
[2016-07-07 00:47:18] reject reason: target-miss
[2016-07-07 00:47:21] accepted: 0/4 (0.00%), 1490488 kH/s nooooo
[2016-07-07 00:47:21] reject reason: target-miss
[2016-07-07 00:47:25] accepted: 0/5 (0.00%), 1488478 kH/s nooooo
[2016-07-07 00:47:25] reject reason: target-miss
[2016-07-07 00:47:27] accepted: 0/6 (0.00%), 1487836 kH/s nooooo
[2016-07-07 00:47:27] reject reason: target-miss
[2016-07-07 00:47:31] accepted: 0/7 (0.00%), 1485438 kH/s nooooo
[2016-07-07 00:47:31] reject reason: target-miss
sry for my english
i'm rellay new to mining can someone explain to me. is it reject due to internet connection or algorithm thx inadvance
Looks like you are trying to mine litecoin using blake algorithm. You should switch to scrypt algo. Or better use an asic. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
