If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin? Show us the numbers. https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked. I said numbers. But you don't have any. So you throw out random bullshit in an attempt to distract people and cover up the fact that your position is objectively wrong. Why do you keep thinking you can get away with this? We have been through this clown circus too many times by now. Go argue it with NASA. Tell them about your rat theory revelation. I am sure they will be fascinated.
|
|
|
To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
Flat earther and moon landing can not be linked together. Two different dimension to argue. The earth is flat for the fools who do not have any idea about how gravity works, who do not know anything about basic physics. But moon landing was/is questionable and a lot of them make sense. NASA is a big business centre. I have a general rule not to debate with anyone on the internet who thinks or says: • the earth is flat • the moon landings were faked • cigarettes don’t cause cancer So 2 out of 3 ain’t bad. It is a beautiful day here and I hope you have a good one.
|
|
|
If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin? Show us the numbers. https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
|
|
|
If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin? I do believe in science and math, that's precisely why I don't believe in a man made environmental change. It's an unproven hypothesis. According to the Chinese government, there is no link between cigarettes and cancer. Western cigarette companies continue to argue in US courts that the link between cancer and cigarettes is only speculative. Do you agree that cancer being caused by cigarettes is an unproven hypothesis?
|
|
|
$33 million worth. In other words, Bitmain is worth about 12% of the Quadriga exit scam.
|
|
|
If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?
|
|
|
I even named my small toy trebuchet.
Well then.
|
|
|
Well that sounds fair enough to me
|
|
|
Perhaps my guideways are not as rigid as you might think (or I have portrayed).
I have picked a number as a signpost but as we both know on any given day the actual price can be at least 20% higher or lower (or both) without breaking a sweat.
|
|
|
It will probably take a least a year after the halvening for the price to fully respond to the supply side shock. So 2021 not 2020. New ATH at the very end of 2020 if we are lucky.
|
|
|
Would you say, hypothetically, if BTC prices are able to convincingly break above $4k, then 1) such prices will not necessarily get repelled at the $4,200 level again, or 2) maybe have the next challenge at $4,500 or 3) there is no real resistance until getting in the upper $4k arena or sub $5k arena?
Hitting and holding $4k will be a huge victory but nothing will be easy after that either. I have previously said it will take until December for us to reach and hold $6k and we will have to fight every step of the way. This will be a war of attrition and accumulation. It will not be pretty but it will be upward on average.
|
|
|
I wonder how much anxiety there is about breaking above $4k?
Odds seem in favor of it, currently.
On the other hand, should we just be taking up other hobbies for a few months.. and maybe we bounce in a kind of narrow range? What would that range be? $3,600 to $4,200?
It seem to me that there is a desire to bounce between $4,000 and $4,500 - your results may vary.
........... aaaaaaaannnnnnnddddddd the next 12 hours are critical.
The bearline sits at $4k. We won’t take $4k without a fight. But we have a golden cross on the 50 / 100 MA to lift us into the fight. (Crossing of yellow and orange lines).
|
|
|
So the geniuses at 4chan have been charting the HitBTC cold wallet?
That’s beautiful.
Hypothesis: major exchange cold wallets are running low on coins as the market bottoms and coins move to strong hands. Supply is being constrained.
Would be worth checking if Bitstamp / Bitfinex wallets are looking a bit thin.
Edit: note very slight recent dip in Bitmex wallet V8 post above.
|
|
|
Texas bill proposes to make it illegal for residents / companies to accept a cryptocurrency transaction unless you have positively identified the sender. Also makes it illegal for Texas to accept any payment in a cryptocurrency which does not natively support identity verification. Sec. 662.0002. VERIFICATION OF IDENTITY REQUIRED.
(a) Before accepting payment by a digital currency, a person must verify the identity of the person sending payment. A person is not required to verify the identify of a person sending payment if the payment is sent by a verified identity digital currency. (b) This state may not use a digital currency that is not a verified identity digital currency. https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/86R/billtext/html/HB04371I.htmBob not going to be happy. Note: this is a proposed law. It has not been passed. But I would be getting on the phone to my representative about this.
|
|
|
wait wat. surely 'cunt' is pejorative in all flavours of English bar some Aussie banter?
It's not just the Aussies but the Brits too. Even some Canucks who wish to project a Brit/Aussie affectation. The important thing is to never use it with a woman, only men can be called cunts. Funny. Women can call men pricks but men can't call women cunts. However, women can call women cunts.
|
|
|
Bad cunt is perjorative. Good cunt is affectionate.
Good cunt is pussy. Calling a good cunt a pussy is perjorative Edit: backing up Jimbo here - goofball not to be used lightly in the wrong company
|
|
|
Never trust someone who has to put in a 2 hour YouTube video what could have been spelt out in 2 - 3 paragraphs of text.
|
|
|
wait wat. surely 'cunt' is pejorative in all flavours of English bar some Aussie banter?
It's not just the Aussies but the Brits too. Even some Canucks who wish to project a Brit/Aussie affectation. The important thing is to never use it with a woman, only men can be called cunts. Funny. Women can call men pricks but men can't call women cunts. Bad cunt is perjorative. Good cunt is affectionate.
|
|
|
|