Are you a donator? No.
Then you will not get my latest beta binary.
As for the leaked binaries (with sofisticated malware) you have to ask the people who leaked my bins. They are violating the GPL. not me
|
|
|
I was about to release signatum #6 with 35MHASH on the gtx 1070. But the release will be delayed. The opensource is still slower than sp-mod #3 from 25 July. (2 weeks old) More than 50% of the miners use my kernels to mine signatum: http://yiimp.ccminer.org/site/miners (click on skunk) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FvKG4F1J.png&t=663&c=t00y_BNc2EViQw) here is a screenshot of sp-mod #3 (25 july): ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2Fdfaebe590821806de4869310efe544b4.png&t=663&c=udd6s9iDepi4zw)
|
|
|
The point is that I am not violating any GPL licence. Your Git has also been empty for almost a year. I am still active in the ccminer development, and you are not.
Why do you bitch in my thread?
|
|
|
And why didn't you do it yourself?
I stopped open-sourcing because (...) I am not talking about opensourcing. I am talking about distributing of private binaries with new algos and more speed that you have made youself. If you do that, people might want to donate to you if they get a boost in their mining income. That would be in violation of GPL license, otherwise by showing/sending the source that would make it worthless. You know that, you do it for years. Anyway, we have different perception of this so called community project... But you still sell GPL licensed code, without providing sources But I am not distrubuting my private kernels. Beta version are sendt out for free to my donators for testing purposes and feedback. I don't see where this break with the licensing.. Once in a while my work is stolen and put out on the internet with open links (usually packed with some nasty malware).
|
|
|
And why didn't you do it yourself?
I stopped open-sourcing because (...) I am not talking about opensourcing. I am talking about distributing of private binaries with new algos and more speed that you have made youself. If you do that, people might want to donate to you if they get a boost in their mining revenue.
|
|
|
The best optimizer in the world playing dumb ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) I dont know, you tell, how can it? My work is in all of your kernels, but the credit is not there. Epsylon copied my work from my fork, and then you fork him. Now I fork you. My fork can mine Signatum, yours cannot. Then it's not your fork anymore is it? All the kernels in my fork is faster than in your fork. Your old code is obsolete and not profitable anymore.
|
|
|
Private binaries of my fork, not yours.
Your fork cannot mine signatum right? So how can it be your fork?
|
|
|
I don't sell anything. People donate for my work in the ccminer opensource project, and I give them access to private binaries. My private binaries are not made for distribution.
|
|
|
the new drivers for nividia are bad for the 1080ti, my results are worse now, below 15MH with the same settings as before
For spreadcoin I have released version 13 repack with more speed on the latest driver. Did you get it?
|
|
|
And why didn't you do it yourself? Why do you bitch in my thread? It's almost been 1 year since your last commit to the ccminer opensource project.
When I run your ccminer with ccminer -skunk
It doesn't work does it?
|
|
|
The current zcash implementation in ccminer 2.1 is missing stratum code to connect to other pools than yiimp based pools. I have boosted the gpu code to run +15% faster. Unreleased. My kernelcode is working fine with nheqminer..
|
|
|
You release nothing. You copy every algo that Epsy has released that you put in "your" miner.
I relased Skunk sp-mod #1 before there was an opensource ccminer implementation of skunk. My release is not even based on the same repo as Epsylons fork. My release was very profitable for the donators. The first buyers should have roi'd many times already.
|
|
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. bla bla bla...
based on your work? lol... your are still the funny reality twisting guy as usual... https://github.com/alexis78/ccminer => Forked from tpruvot/ccminerThe tpruvot fork is full of my kernel optimalizations, but instead of approving my pullrequests, he copied my work. We have had a paralell opensource fork for years. The tpruvot fork 2.1 has a bether API implementation, more stable stratum code, bether support for the NVSMI, and bugfixes. But slower kernels. I forked version 1.5 and have included some of the fixes.
|
|
|
No pools , and no gpu miner (that I know of).
I didn't lie. I didn't find a pool, there are no pools on the announcement thread. Check for yourself in the first post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1966621Gpu miners exist, but most of the new coins you see today doesn't support mining with the JSON-RPC html protocol (getwork()) in the wallet. This meens that without a pool, you cannot use ccminer or sgminer to solo-mine. I linked 2 new coins and asked for pools, and it turned out that they had pools already.
|
|
|
You are the last person to tell that no gpu miner for nist5 exist.
Gpu miners exist, but most of the new coins you see today doesn't support mining with the JSON-RPC html protocol (getwork()) in the wallet. This meens that without a pool, you cannot use ccminer or sgminer to solo-mine. I linked 2 new coins and asked for pools, and it turned out that they had pools already. Here is my original mesage.
|
|
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash. Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.
Lie! Alexis was the first to implement shared mem technique that gives the significant boost In nist5? nope. Alexis improved AES by moving some of the precalc tables from shared mem to the level 1 cache. This give a significant boost in most of the X algos. (x11,x13,x15,x17) The nist 5 isn't using AES.
|
|
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.
Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.
|
|
|
384.94 driver.
ccminer64 (best on 1080 and 1080ti)
use -i 26 in the batfile, -500 on the memory and oc the core as much as possible. 100% tdp
On the 1060 and 1070 use the ccminer.exe file (32 bit) for best results.
|
|
|
|