I do not think that a local disaster, such as an earthquake, could significantly affect the cryptocurrency in this region. Usually, an earthquake occurs quickly and does not last long, perhaps even some tremors for several days. If the state is not able to quickly eliminate the consequences of an earthquake, it is assisted by various international organizations. Most likely, during the disaster period, the Internet will be unavailable, and therefore no one will be able to use the cryptocurrency. Then, in the disaster zone, it may rise in price for some time, there is no doubt about that. However, this will not last long.

Cryptocurrency will never replace fiat. It is unreal and not necessary. A common currency will always be in demand and we cannot do without it. Yes, and it makes no sense to remove the usual currency, it is better to use the advantages of cryptocurrency and ordinary currency.
In addition, the cryptocurrency is generally not able to replace the national money, since the cryptocurrency has no relation to the economy of a particular state. She can only walk in parallel with the national money.

Yes, I agree with you. Banks are now actually part of the state and serve the economy and the implementation of the country's budget. Therefore, nothing will happen to the banks. They will continue to work successfully and will always have their clients, since they will always serve the accounts of business structures. After legalization of cryptocurrency by the state, banks will also provide various services in cryptocurrency.

Why do you think that bitcoin has no tax? In many countries, a tax on profits from cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, has been successfully introduced, and it quite really works. A good example is Japan, where last year for an incomplete year, the profit from the use of cryptocurrency gave an increase of 0.6 percent of the country's gross income.
Bitcoin can only deregulate the state’s economy if it is used instead of national money. The circulation of cryptocurrency, along with the national money can only benefit the state.

No government will actively support Bitcoin, and even more so, will not give up their national money to switch to using Bitcoin. If only one state existed in the world, then it would be possible. Also, the transition to the full use of cryptocurrency is possible in the event that all states unite along the lines of the European Union, that is, when the economies of states and their financial systems actually unite. In other cases, the state will not be able to fully switch to the use of decentralized cryptocurrency, since it cannot be tied to the economy of a particular state.

No, I do not think that the ever centralized cryptocurrencies of various states will replace the usual paper money of these states. Most likely, the states will create their own centralized cryptocurrencies to use the advantages of cryptocurrencies, however they will only go in addition to the national money of this state. Perhaps the state will create them in opposition to decentralized cryptocurrency. However, I do not think that the centralized cryptocurrency of these states will harm the use of decentralized cryptocurrency. Rather, on the contrary, people will be more interested in decentralized cryptocurrency as well, having seen the state support their cryptocurrency.

That who did not do, and Bitcoin cannot be stable by nature. Even today we could observe a very sharp increase in the price of Bitcoin to $ 7,500 and again, the restoration of its price to $ 6,630. There was a negative information about the USDT and it immediately began to drop and, apparently, buy Bitcoin
  Therefore, it is so temporarily began to grow in price.
In order for Bitcoin to be stable in price, it would have to be centralized and adjust its price, which is unacceptable for Bitcoin.

Yes it may well be. Ethereum may well replace Bitcoin in its leadership with cryptocurrency. Almost everything depends on Bitcoin itself, how much it will be improved and will be competitive among other cryptocurrencies. If this does not happen and it will continue to have a throughput of seven transactions per second, it is unlikely that it will last a long time among the leaders.

Bitcoin is not able to stabilize the economy of a particular state, in any case, significantly affect this process. If he goes along with the national money of the state, he will be able to bring some benefit to this state. He cannot replace the national money of the state. This would have a very negative impact on the economy of any state, so no state will ever do that.

If are mined all 21 million bitcoins, nothing much will happen. However, it should be borne in mind that by 2140 a lot will change. Bitcoin is unlikely, if it lasts until that time, it will be the same as now. This will be a completely different bitcoin. By this time, the technology will go far ahead and the cryptocurrency will change dramatically, and maybe it will even be replaced by something more advanced. Moreover, we will not know this all the same.

If Bitcoin does not scale and it will have its current throughput of seven transactions per second, then it will gradually lose its popularity and at the same time its price. It will also decrease its level of capitalization and when other coins bypass it in terms of capitalization, it will lose price dominance over other types of cryptocurrency and at the same time lose its place as the leader of cryptocurrency. Most likely, Bitcoin will continue to exist, but its price will not be very high and it will be used for large transaction costs.

In any case, the cryptocurrency can not eradicate poverty. Cryptocurrency in itself does not create wealth. In fact, it only redistributes them. According to the law of conservation of energy, if in one place something is added, in another it will necessarily decrease. Poverty can be gradually overcome only by technologies that accelerate or increase the growth of material goods.

I myself grew up in the USSR. I know well the ideology of socialism, and from today's position I can say that socialism is just a utopia, an unfulfilled dream of idiots. It seems that it was just a dead end development of society. It gradually distorts values and unofficially introduces a double morality. Socialism in the name of the people destroys its people. It is better to simply develop, improve and humanize a society without any ideological superstructures.

Yes, I also think that the price of Bitcoin at $ 12,000 may be the maximum by the end of this year. The closer we come to the end of the year, and the market stands still, the more we realize that there may not be much growth in the cryptocurrency market this year. This will be one of the most stagnant years in the development of cryptocurrency.

A certain increase in the price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies at the end of the year should be in any case. The only question is how high this increase will be. The closer we come to the end of this year, the less hope we have for a significant increase in the market during this period. Of course, almost all previous forecasts about a significant increase have already melted and we hope at least that Bitcoin will reach $ 10,000 in its price by the end of this year.

Decentralized cryptocurrency, as a rule, is not provided with anything and its price is not supported by anyone. This is different from ordinary currencies, the price of which is regulated by central banks. Therefore, any changes in the market regarding the demand or supply of cryptocurrencies are immediately displayed on its price. Volatility is very good for traders, it constantly revives the market, but because of this state it is not very willing to legalize it, and high volatility is a serious obstacle to the full implementation of cryptocurrency in business.

Yes, I like the idea of a smartphone with a built-in bitcoin wallet and heightened security measures from hackers. I also read that it will be possible to store altcoins there. This is generally good, since I often use a smartphone to work with cryptocurrency.

In principle, unregulated status is also not bad. Especially if you know that there are some good bills in the legislature. Ukraine will soon have elections: at the end of March next year, presidential, and at the end of October - in the Verkhovna Rada. Before and after elections, deputies usually pass good populist laws. Therefore, it is possible that they will soon be accepted about cryptocurrency.

I fully agree with your arguments. The bounty hunters used to be blamed for the fall in prices of new tokens, which for the first time hit the exchange. Now they are to blame for the fact that they lower the cost of bitcoin and ethereum. In my opinion, this is too much. And all due to the fact that bounty hunters receive from one to several percent of the produced number of new tokens. First, early investors have more chances and opportunities to lower the cost of a new token, immediately selling a new token purchased at a big discount on the exchange at the price of ICO. Secondly, coins are created to be bought and sold. If they are not in motion but stored in purses, they will simply be forgotten and they will be useless.

Bitcoin and another cryptocurrency is still at the stage of legalization by the states. This process is long and when it ends and the cryptocurrency will be legalized by most states, only then will the infrastructure for its practical application develop very quickly and people will be able to use it directly in practice to buy various goods and provide services. Until the time for this has come.