SUQA is getting delisted on Cryptobridge in 2 weeks because we will have 2 mandatory wallet upgrades first one at the end of this month and the second one Late March Hard-Fork time. CB is asking 0.5 btc for each upgrade while there is no volume there so we decided to get delisted from Cryptobridge on our own! Please send your SUQA funds to TradeOgre, Coinexchange or Stex! Thanks SUQA Foundation  How can delisted on Cryptobridge increase the price? The BTC guys dropped in price below 4k, and Suqa falls lower and lower. No need to tell stories about the "young coin" and "other coins are also falling," investors ask you for your coin. Voljanin - you might want to read the post again. He never said it will increase the price. Yes everything is dropping. If you cant handle it cash out and let the big boys make the money long term He already cashed out long time ago and got banned from the discord server for making FUD everyday. The more we ban him the more he comes back with a different name. What he wants to do is he wants to hurt the project because he sold early and lost. Now he wants other investors to lose and he has so much free time in his life so keeps FUD'ing from everywhere. His first discord nickname was mysmile so that everyone will know. Looks like he is going to keep continuing his FUD and we will have to live with him for a while. What he doesn't see is how the team is working and trying to improve or he sees it but he is angry because he sold early. |
|
|
|
team is working nonstop no matter what happens
After such work 'team' the price will go below 0 sat. You can regain confidence in SUQA only at a price higher than 100-150 sat
Only 3 months left until the launch of SIN. See you in 3 months if you can wait! |
|
|
|
Trust for Suqa is increasing day by day for SIN. Now the 30 days time-locked coins are increased to 71.4 million. Thank you for the great support!  Yes, I, as an SUQA investor, who bought them at 170 sat is VERY pleased with their price at 49-50 sat  If you are an investor then you must see how the team is working nonstop no matter what happens. If you be patient enough you will see the benefits after the SIN launch even if you get a SIN node or not. We will deliver everything what is written in the Roadmap V2! https://suqa.org/file/2018/12/suqa-roadmap-v2.pdfThanks |
|
|
|
What is the SUQA blockchain size? How much does it take place on the hard drive?
450 MB so far! |
|
|
|
|
Icemining is back online!
|
|
|
|
Great evidence to build up more trust on the SUQA team. If coins in the fund sell at one time, they will put the SUQA price under massively pressure. The developers funds will not be used for SIN nodes for 1 year and it will be used only for development purposes and spendingsd will be monthly from that wallet. Everybody can track of the wallet just after the hard fork time so there will be much more trust for the project. We are making the hardfork to be legal as non security and we want our members to win from the SIN nodes. We don't think for ourselves. SIN will be the most fair node system that is announced months before for people to get ready for this and the developer funds will not be used so it will be just for the majority of the SUQA believers which will create new riches in April after the hard-fork! For 1 Year? ... Earlier in the post, your team members state that it will NOT be used for SIN nodes, period! Which is it? #crysx You don't want us to take advantage of the SIN nodes even after 1 year. I think we deserve to use our funds after all these hard work and the developer funds will also be spent for 1 year for running and maintaining SUQA and it will be much less after 1 year. We are also reducing the developer fee to 1% on hard fork-time. That is fine then, we will not use our funds for SIN never but it also shows the guarantee that the SIN nodes will be profitable after 1 year and more  Don't make this as an attack - it isn't ... I didn't say what you claimed, and I certainly am not against the team using the funds. You all well deserve it. I AM saying that if you are going to post something, and become ambiguous about it, then it leads to confusion AND distrust in the team AND the project. Something I would not like to see with SUQA especially with Pallas on the team. So you will need to set in concrete (or at least change TO what you WILL do - regardless of outcome), which it is EXACTLY what you will do. You are either using the funds for SIN nodes, or you are not. You are either cashing some of the funds in to pay for certain areas of the development, or you are not. You are either keeping the coins locked away, or you are not. Which ever way you decide is best to move forward for the BENEFIT of the project, especially when the team needs to meet payments, then you should state it, plan it and follow through with it, even if there are changes made down the track. In the previous posts, one of YOUR team members stated they will NOT use the funds for SIN nodes, then YOU post that you will but only after a year. State what is going to happen, and agree with the WHOLE team what it should be THEN post what it will be. Even if it changes later in the year, at least at THIS time you ALL agree on what needs to be done, and there will be NO confusion that the community will experience because two team members can't agree on what should be said publicly or not. The community that you have worked so hard to build and the community that trust your word with what you do. Just be consistent, no matter what you do. NOW do you understand what I am saying? #crysx You are right. There was a misunderstanding because i thought we could also benefit from SIN after 1 year. The problem of coins transforming to split systems from pow only is if the developers have most of the funds then they could use it for their nodes in the beginning get the most high ROI and do whatever they want with them but after 1 year the developer funds will not win high ROI because of all the nodes will be full and the reward will be yearly around 30% give or take. Also the developer wallet after 1 year will not mean anything because there will be more richer wallets because of SIN while keeping low inflation but you are right first we said we will not use it means we will not use it. Sorry for the confusion. To make everything clear. The developer funds will not be used in the SIN nodes never. They will be used just like how they are used right now. For development and continuous progress of the SUQA project. We will be providing the developer wallet under one wallet address so keeping track of it from the community will be easy. They are divided to different addresses right now because they are time-locked but just after the hard-fork we will provide our 1 developer wallet address to be seen in the explorer as top wallet. We will also keep releasing financial articles for monthly spendings to our community so like everytime, everything will be transparent. Thanks Many thanks for clearing this up. I am still very new to all of this and would appreciate if you can enlighten me on the future of SUQA. I have been mining the coin since early October and been very happy with the team and the community. The questions I have to help me understand the direction that SUQA is going are: 1. After the hard fork and the SIN nodes are available, you can use your SUQA to purchase a node. Is the node a device that you then share with other members depending on how much you spend with 100,000 coins being the minimum. 2. Will we still have the same wallet or will we have to upgrade to another wallet? 3. Will we be mining the SUQA coin as we are now after the hard fork? 4. Can we buy a node with our locked coins or do we need to use unlocked coins? Many thanks. Hello and thanks for the great support. 1. After the hard fork if you want to use the SIN nodes then you need to lock 100K minimum. You will need to setup a linux machine with a static ip or rent a vps for your nodes to be running.I think the VPS's are around 2.8 euro monthly. If you lock for Mid SIN for 500K or for Big SIN for 1 million, you will still only need 1 VPS or a linux machine with a static ip. You will have a private key that you can use from anywhere to setup your device but we suggest you to keep it running once it is setup to not lose any block rewards. 2. You will need to upgrade tot he brand new wallet but your current funds will be there just like before. 3.Yes you will be mining SUQA as you are now just after the hard-fork. 4. You can not use the locked coins but every 2 minutes from the blocks the nodes will pay you just like mining so if you are an early adopter you will get back your coins way early from the block rewards. Thanks cryptotamer01 Thank you very much answering my questions and now have a much better understanding as to how the SINs will work. Not really a Linux user so will just keep mining with the GPU's. Anytime! |
|
|
|
Great evidence to build up more trust on the SUQA team. If coins in the fund sell at one time, they will put the SUQA price under massively pressure. The developers funds will not be used for SIN nodes for 1 year and it will be used only for development purposes and spendingsd will be monthly from that wallet. Everybody can track of the wallet just after the hard fork time so there will be much more trust for the project. We are making the hardfork to be legal as non security and we want our members to win from the SIN nodes. We don't think for ourselves. SIN will be the most fair node system that is announced months before for people to get ready for this and the developer funds will not be used so it will be just for the majority of the SUQA believers which will create new riches in April after the hard-fork! For 1 Year? ... Earlier in the post, your team members state that it will NOT be used for SIN nodes, period! Which is it? #crysx You don't want us to take advantage of the SIN nodes even after 1 year. I think we deserve to use our funds after all these hard work and the developer funds will also be spent for 1 year for running and maintaining SUQA and it will be much less after 1 year. We are also reducing the developer fee to 1% on hard fork-time. That is fine then, we will not use our funds for SIN never but it also shows the guarantee that the SIN nodes will be profitable after 1 year and more Don't make this as an attack - it isn't ... I didn't say what you claimed, and I certainly am not against the team using the funds. You all well deserve it. I AM saying that if you are going to post something, and become ambiguous about it, then it leads to confusion AND distrust in the team AND the project. Something I would not like to see with SUQA especially with Pallas on the team. So you will need to set in concrete (or at least change TO what you WILL do - regardless of outcome), which it is EXACTLY what you will do. You are either using the funds for SIN nodes, or you are not. You are either cashing some of the funds in to pay for certain areas of the development, or you are not. You are either keeping the coins locked away, or you are not. Which ever way you decide is best to move forward for the BENEFIT of the project, especially when the team needs to meet payments, then you should state it, plan it and follow through with it, even if there are changes made down the track. In the previous posts, one of YOUR team members stated they will NOT use the funds for SIN nodes, then YOU post that you will but only after a year. State what is going to happen, and agree with the WHOLE team what it should be THEN post what it will be. Even if it changes later in the year, at least at THIS time you ALL agree on what needs to be done, and there will be NO confusion that the community will experience because two team members can't agree on what should be said publicly or not. The community that you have worked so hard to build and the community that trust your word with what you do. Just be consistent, no matter what you do. NOW do you understand what I am saying? #crysx You are right. There was a misunderstanding because i thought we could also benefit from SIN after 1 year. The problem of coins transforming to split systems from pow only is if the developers have most of the funds then they could use it for their nodes in the beginning get the most high ROI and do whatever they want with them but after 1 year the developer funds will not win high ROI because of all the nodes will be full and the reward will be yearly around 30% give or take. Also the developer wallet after 1 year will not mean anything because there will be more richer wallets because of SIN while keeping low inflation but you are right first we said we will not use it means we will not use it. Sorry for the confusion. To make everything clear. The developer funds will not be used in the SIN nodes never. They will be used just like how they are used right now. For development and continuous progress of the SUQA project. We will be providing the developer wallet under one wallet address so keeping track of it from the community will be easy. They are divided to different addresses right now because they are time-locked but just after the hard-fork we will provide our 1 developer wallet address to be seen in the explorer as top wallet. We will also keep releasing financial articles for monthly spendings to our community so like everytime, everything will be transparent. Thanks Much appreciated ... It would be a real pity if the Development Team couldn't benefit in terms of getting the funds to continue. We (CWI) couldn't continue if we had absolutely none of the funds to continue, as would many many MANY others in the development field. Clarifying is always a good thing, much appreciated. #crysx Likewise... |
|
|
|
Great evidence to build up more trust on the SUQA team. If coins in the fund sell at one time, they will put the SUQA price under massively pressure. The developers funds will not be used for SIN nodes for 1 year and it will be used only for development purposes and spendingsd will be monthly from that wallet. Everybody can track of the wallet just after the hard fork time so there will be much more trust for the project. We are making the hardfork to be legal as non security and we want our members to win from the SIN nodes. We don't think for ourselves. SIN will be the most fair node system that is announced months before for people to get ready for this and the developer funds will not be used so it will be just for the majority of the SUQA believers which will create new riches in April after the hard-fork! For 1 Year? ... Earlier in the post, your team members state that it will NOT be used for SIN nodes, period! Which is it? #crysx You don't want us to take advantage of the SIN nodes even after 1 year. I think we deserve to use our funds after all these hard work and the developer funds will also be spent for 1 year for running and maintaining SUQA and it will be much less after 1 year. We are also reducing the developer fee to 1% on hard fork-time. That is fine then, we will not use our funds for SIN never but it also shows the guarantee that the SIN nodes will be profitable after 1 year and more Don't make this as an attack - it isn't ... I didn't say what you claimed, and I certainly am not against the team using the funds. You all well deserve it. I AM saying that if you are going to post something, and become ambiguous about it, then it leads to confusion AND distrust in the team AND the project. Something I would not like to see with SUQA especially with Pallas on the team. So you will need to set in concrete (or at least change TO what you WILL do - regardless of outcome), which it is EXACTLY what you will do. You are either using the funds for SIN nodes, or you are not. You are either cashing some of the funds in to pay for certain areas of the development, or you are not. You are either keeping the coins locked away, or you are not. Which ever way you decide is best to move forward for the BENEFIT of the project, especially when the team needs to meet payments, then you should state it, plan it and follow through with it, even if there are changes made down the track. In the previous posts, one of YOUR team members stated they will NOT use the funds for SIN nodes, then YOU post that you will but only after a year. State what is going to happen, and agree with the WHOLE team what it should be THEN post what it will be. Even if it changes later in the year, at least at THIS time you ALL agree on what needs to be done, and there will be NO confusion that the community will experience because two team members can't agree on what should be said publicly or not. The community that you have worked so hard to build and the community that trust your word with what you do. Just be consistent, no matter what you do. NOW do you understand what I am saying? #crysx You are right. There was a misunderstanding because i thought we could also benefit from SIN after 1 year. The problem of coins transforming to split systems from pow only is if the developers have most of the funds then they could use it for their nodes in the beginning get the most high ROI and do whatever they want with them but after 1 year the developer funds will not win high ROI because of all the nodes will be full and the reward will be yearly around 30% give or take. Also the developer wallet after 1 year will not mean anything because there will be more richer wallets because of SIN while keeping low inflation but you are right first we said we will not use it means we will not use it. Sorry for the confusion. To make everything clear. The developer funds will not be used in the SIN nodes never. They will be used just like how they are used right now. For development and continuous progress of the SUQA project. We will be providing the developer wallet under one wallet address so keeping track of it from the community will be easy. They are divided to different addresses right now because they are time-locked but just after the hard-fork we will provide our 1 developer wallet address to be seen in the explorer as top wallet. We will also keep releasing financial articles for monthly spendings to our community so like everytime, everything will be transparent. Thanks Many thanks for clearing this up. I am still very new to all of this and would appreciate if you can enlighten me on the future of SUQA. I have been mining the coin since early October and been very happy with the team and the community. The questions I have to help me understand the direction that SUQA is going are: 1. After the hard fork and the SIN nodes are available, you can use your SUQA to purchase a node. Is the node a device that you then share with other members depending on how much you spend with 100,000 coins being the minimum. 2. Will we still have the same wallet or will we have to upgrade to another wallet? 3. Will we be mining the SUQA coin as we are now after the hard fork? 4. Can we buy a node with our locked coins or do we need to use unlocked coins? Many thanks. Hello and thanks for the great support. 1. After the hard fork if you want to use the SIN nodes then you need to lock 100K minimum. You will need to setup a linux machine with a static ip or rent a vps for your nodes to be running.I think the VPS's are around 2.8 euro monthly. If you lock for Mid SIN for 500K or for Big SIN for 1 million, you will still only need 1 VPS or a linux machine with a static ip. You will have a private key that you can use from anywhere to setup your device but we suggest you to keep it running once it is setup to not lose any block rewards. 2. You will need to upgrade tot he brand new wallet but your current funds will be there just like before. 3.Yes you will be mining SUQA as you are now just after the hard-fork. 4. You can not use the locked coins but every 2 minutes from the blocks the nodes will pay you just like mining so if you are an early adopter you will get back your coins way early from the block rewards. Thanks |
|
|
|
Great evidence to build up more trust on the SUQA team. If coins in the fund sell at one time, they will put the SUQA price under massively pressure. The developers funds will not be used for SIN nodes for 1 year and it will be used only for development purposes and spendingsd will be monthly from that wallet. Everybody can track of the wallet just after the hard fork time so there will be much more trust for the project. We are making the hardfork to be legal as non security and we want our members to win from the SIN nodes. We don't think for ourselves. SIN will be the most fair node system that is announced months before for people to get ready for this and the developer funds will not be used so it will be just for the majority of the SUQA believers which will create new riches in April after the hard-fork! For 1 Year? ... Earlier in the post, your team members state that it will NOT be used for SIN nodes, period! Which is it? #crysx You don't want us to take advantage of the SIN nodes even after 1 year. I think we deserve to use our funds after all these hard work and the developer funds will also be spent for 1 year for running and maintaining SUQA and it will be much less after 1 year. We are also reducing the developer fee to 1% on hard fork-time. That is fine then, we will not use our funds for SIN never but it also shows the guarantee that the SIN nodes will be profitable after 1 year and more Don't make this as an attack - it isn't ... I didn't say what you claimed, and I certainly am not against the team using the funds. You all well deserve it. I AM saying that if you are going to post something, and become ambiguous about it, then it leads to confusion AND distrust in the team AND the project. Something I would not like to see with SUQA especially with Pallas on the team. So you will need to set in concrete (or at least change TO what you WILL do - regardless of outcome), which it is EXACTLY what you will do. You are either using the funds for SIN nodes, or you are not. You are either cashing some of the funds in to pay for certain areas of the development, or you are not. You are either keeping the coins locked away, or you are not. Which ever way you decide is best to move forward for the BENEFIT of the project, especially when the team needs to meet payments, then you should state it, plan it and follow through with it, even if there are changes made down the track. In the previous posts, one of YOUR team members stated they will NOT use the funds for SIN nodes, then YOU post that you will but only after a year. State what is going to happen, and agree with the WHOLE team what it should be THEN post what it will be. Even if it changes later in the year, at least at THIS time you ALL agree on what needs to be done, and there will be NO confusion that the community will experience because two team members can't agree on what should be said publicly or not. The community that you have worked so hard to build and the community that trust your word with what you do. Just be consistent, no matter what you do. NOW do you understand what I am saying? #crysx You are right. There was a misunderstanding because i thought we could also benefit from SIN after 1 year. The problem of coins transforming to split systems from pow only is if the developers have most of the funds then they could use it for their nodes in the beginning get the most high ROI and do whatever they want with them but after 1 year the developer funds will not win high ROI because of all the nodes will be full and the reward will be yearly around 30% give or take. Also the developer wallet after 1 year will not mean anything because there will be more richer wallets because of SIN while keeping low inflation but you are right first we said we will not use it means we will not use it. Sorry for the confusion. To make everything clear. The developer funds will not be used in the SIN nodes never. They will be used just like how they are used right now. For development and continuous progress of the SUQA project. We will be providing the developer wallet under one wallet address so keeping track of it from the community will be easy. They are divided to different addresses right now because they are time-locked but just after the hard-fork we will provide our 1 developer wallet address to be seen in the explorer as top wallet. We will also keep releasing financial articles for monthly spendings to our community so like everytime, everything will be transparent. Thanks |
|
|
|
They are both official you can use them both. Your choice. |
|
|
|
Great evidence to build up more trust on the SUQA team. If coins in the fund sell at one time, they will put the SUQA price under massively pressure. The developers funds will not be used for SIN nodes for 1 year and it will be used only for development purposes and spendingsd will be monthly from that wallet. Everybody can track of the wallet just after the hard fork time so there will be much more trust for the project. We are making the hardfork to be legal as non security and we want our members to win from the SIN nodes. We don't think for ourselves. SIN will be the most fair node system that is announced months before for people to get ready for this and the developer funds will not be used so it will be just for the majority of the SUQA believers which will create new riches in April after the hard-fork! For 1 Year? ... Earlier in the post, your team members state that it will NOT be used for SIN nodes, period! Which is it? #crysx You don't want us to take advantage of the SIN nodes even after 1 year. I think we deserve to use our funds after all these hard work and the developer funds will also be spent for 1 year for running and maintaining SUQA and it will be much less after 1 year. We are also reducing the developer fee to 1% on hard fork-time. That is fine then, we will not use our funds for SIN never but it also shows the guarantee that the SIN nodes will be profitable after 1 year and more |
|
|
|
Great evidence to build up more trust on the SUQA team. If coins in the fund sell at one time, they will put the SUQA price under massively pressure. The developers funds will not be used for SIN nodes for 1 year and it will be used only for development purposes and spendingsd will be monthly from that wallet. Everybody can track of the wallet just after the hard fork time so there will be much more trust for the project. We are making the hardfork to be legal as non security and we want our members to win from the SIN nodes. We don't think for ourselves. SIN will be the most fair node system that is announced months before for people to get ready for this and the developer funds will not be used so it will be just for the majority of the SUQA believers which will create new riches in April after the hard-fork! |
|
|
|
Hello, this message to indicate that I have unfortunately been the victim of a fake site for the SUQA web wallet (in early December). This fake site was " https://web.suqa.org" (now closed). The address I created on this site (which turned out to be that of a hacker) was: *** Except for the last outgoing transaction (about 15 SUQA, made this December 30th, to my new address ***), all previous outbound transactions were made by the hacker. Is there a way to get back on his track? Thank you for your help, it's not because it was small amounts that we should not do everything against this type of scammer. There is no fake site and you are no victim. Please reach @cryplander from discord with your old web wallet address and we will solve it! https://discord.gg/qrtU7Y9Thanks a lot for your help, I just sent a message on Discord  No Problem. I just replied you back |
|
|
|
Thanks for your hard work for improving opensource! |
|
|
|
Hello, this message to indicate that I have unfortunately been the victim of a fake site for the SUQA web wallet (in early December). This fake site was " https://web.suqa.org" (now closed). The address I created on this site (which turned out to be that of a hacker) was: ShoBvsXF1wNopdJQ3tJzVZEFKUbQeMELED Except for the last outgoing transaction (about 15 SUQA, made this December 30th, to my new address SMghrpPW7QkjZqCxSaSiEPRNfQTD1J7be9), all previous outbound transactions were made by the hacker. Is there a way to get back on his track? Thank you for your help, it's not because it was small amounts that we should not do everything against this type of scammer. There is no fake site and you are no victim. Please reach @cryplander from discord with your old web wallet address and we will solve it! https://discord.gg/qrtU7Y9 |
|
|
|
It is very painful for me, as an investor, to buy a coin for 170, to look at the current rate. The difficulty dropped from 20k + to 2-3k. People are gone.
The developers cheated with the entrance to the stock exchange from which the rate plummeted and continues to fall by 30% per week.
It is not necessary to tell fairy tales that 'all coins also fall,' investors ask you for your coin. Distribution of awards further squandered the course.
Everything started so well, but it ends very sadly.
We are the most transparent team in the whole crypto industry. You should be angry to bitcoin or write on the bitcoin forum for the fall. SUQA is a 4 months old crypto project and like in all the crypto projects there were early miners and investors with big wallets but you are right they are all gone now and SUQA got cleansed and purged. We are just getting started with very big new developments and technologies that will blow away the industry. If you are in this for a quick buck and do not even care what development is going on then you need to wait after the hard-fork which is only 3 months away. If you really follow the project and believe its success then you should know that difficulty being dropped is actually good for the miners who believe in the project. I suggest you to not look at your trading screen until the hard-fork is done and judge the project not after 4 months but after 8 months! More than 60 million coins are time locked for 30 days with great trust even though the interest decreased! http://suqaexplorer.com/richlistYou contradicted yourself in the same message .... how do you know that people have been purged? maybe it's just the team that has sold its corners and is waiting for other investors to come back and sell the rest. you should stop talking about transparency and speculation on the same post. So, a so-called new technology should emerge but nothing else about it, do not you think there are hundreds of such phrases among the fraudsters of the cryptocurrency world? I do not fud, I ask that you believe but bring in proofs for pity ... If you followed closely then you would know what has been going from your newbie account. Early Chinese Miners with big wallets got banned from threat and fud and that is why i called it a purge because they got angry and they have been selling. This is something all new coins experience in the beginning of their projects. Please read all the articles. https://medium.com/@suqa/on-founders-fee-transparency-431a16550058https://medium.com/@suqa/suqa-monthly-financial-statement-december-2018-7004fbc6b268Calculate what is left from the founders fee. Now read this article and find out how much SUQA we are willing to sacrifice not using on the SIN nodes. https://medium.com/@suqa/suqa-roadmap-version-2-e8d3b2fe7804We will reduce the developer fee from 9.08% to 1% and the last thing that you are going to accuse us is being a fraudster. This is not a new project or an ico project with no premine. It has already been 4 months with 441 million mined coins with a community reaching more than 30K people on all channels. SUQA.ORG Website has monthly visitors of 147K https://www.similarweb.com/website/suqa.org#overviewWhat are you talking about? Even you will be shocked after the SIN integration and i will be very glad if you will write your comments again around late April but this time with a minimum jr member account with more knowledge please! |
|
|
|
It is very painful for me, as an investor, to buy a coin for 170, to look at the current rate. The difficulty dropped from 20k + to 2-3k. People are gone.
The developers cheated with the entrance to the stock exchange from which the rate plummeted and continues to fall by 30% per week.
It is not necessary to tell fairy tales that 'all coins also fall,' investors ask you for your coin. Distribution of awards further squandered the course.
Everything started so well, but it ends very sadly.
We are the most transparent team in the whole crypto industry. You should be angry to bitcoin or write on the bitcoin forum for the fall. SUQA is a 4 months old crypto project and like in all the crypto projects there were early miners and investors with big wallets but you are right they are all gone now and SUQA got cleansed and purged. We are just getting started with very big new developments and technologies that will blow away the industry. If you are in this for a quick buck and do not even care what development is going on then you need to wait after the hard-fork which is only 3 months away. If you really follow the project and believe its success then you should know that difficulty being dropped is actually good for the miners who believe in the project. I suggest you to not look at your trading screen until the hard-fork is done and judge the project not after 4 months but after 8 months! More than 60 million coins are time locked for 30 days with great trust even though the interest decreased! http://suqaexplorer.com/richlist |
|
|
|
I see data management in the roadmap something like Sia  . Please stay away from that crypto space. It is crowded and hard to compete!!! SUQA Private Networking will be different than SIA, Storj and any other Data Management Cloud Storage Service because it will not be cloud storage. Details of the Private Networking will be provided after the hard-fork in late March. |
|
|
|
This project seems to be doing really well, the new SIN nodes are something to aim for - can you confirm how this is going to work please? I am mining but will I need 100k? How do I deposit this closer to the time?
Hello. You will need 100K SUQA for 1 SIN but you don't have to lock your coins for SIN but you can also wait for the price increase of your coins. The best thing for you to do right now is keep getting interest from time-locks and mine more SUQA coins for more profits in April 2019 time. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
