auf bitcoinupdate.com ist soeben die neue Episode 22 des wöchentlichen Podcasts erschienen. Diesmal sogar mit Jingle. Wir freuen uns über Feedback!
Die Themen diesmal:
- MtGox offline für über 4 Stunden - Bitfloor schließt, Bankkonto gesperrt - Bitcoin 24, Hausdurchsuchung - MtGox trading volume all-time-high - PirateBay akzeptiert Spenden in Bitcoin - BFL liefert Jalapeno demo unit aus - Julian Assange erzählt Google CEO Eric Schmidt von Bitcoin - Western Union und MoneyGram überlegen Bitcoin zu verwenden - Sealand zieht Bitcoin in Erwägung - bitcoin.de plant Kooperation mit Bank
|
|
|
Why are We committed to a hard fork next month?
because of the BDB locking problem in 0.7. basically, we want to at least allow 1 MB blocks as intended.
|
|
|
i have not seen this yet, but NPR planet money did bring two very fair pieces on Bitcoin in their audio podcast. And they are also sponsored by banks.
|
|
|
fyi, we are doing a WEEKLY bitcoin podcast since about half a year.. it is currently in german, though, and we did a shoutout to the daily bitcoin don't disappoint us and keep throwing out these great episodes. you can check it out at http://bitcoinupdate.comwe are in a continous process of making it more professional. once we reach a level we are confident with, we will actively promote it..
|
|
|
Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter
|
|
|
just to throw in some doubt: have you verified that the random number generator has enough randomness? that there is no known secret seen involved in the key generation?
|
|
|
is 1AnixjBYxpTzAmfSa8kRdBiUaSGV2e9d26 the cold wallet address eventually?
if so, there is hope - maybe not all is lost.
my deposit which i traded for eur and tried to withdraw yesterday went there.
|
|
|
aktuell ist die seite down.
hat jemand eine ahnung was hier los ist?
|
|
|
fef5386ffa462507127b3e315d46567d84858827cee2f8e102788e4064d255c1
RAmen!
|
|
|
i think i am going to claim the instawallets for my friends and relatives. i even think i can provide the signed messages for most of them.
does anyone think this will be a problem if i claim multiple wallets to my name?
|
|
|
i certainly respect your opinion, but there is a third possibility: overwhelmed by success. tons of people use their service everyday, and i am certain they make good profit off that. they would be really stupid if they decide to rip of every 100th customer. so my advice: if you have a legitimate claim and enough evidence continue trying to reach them, eventually they will answer. if that does not work in a few days, present the whole evidence (with sensitive info greyed out) to the community. a little shitstorm does wonders
|
|
|
wow, this makes an interesting story. SDL always comes up with all kinds of in-depth bitcoin knowledge.
that makes me think -> SDL==SN
|
|
|
i have to admit i have given loaded instawallets (with trivial amounts back then) to friends as gifts. now i have to contact them and lead them though the recovery. looking forward to the start of the claims process.
|
|
|
/push neue folge (7.4.) unseres bitcoin podcasts online: http://bitcoinupdate.com/Bitcoin Central Hack DDoS Angriffe auf Mt.Gox BTCguild knapp bei 50% der Hashleistung Drama in der Welt der Altcoins Neuer Antrag für das Bitcoin trademark Torbroker: anonymous stock exchange Datenleck bei Coinbase Bitcoin in der Presse Bitcoin Vortrag von Peter Surda
|
|
|
because Bitcoin is so simple
|
|
|
his arguments are not totally outlandish. they are a bit far-reaching, since they imply governments are putting in substantial effort in auditing the blockchain. this will eventually happen, but not today. His argument against "structuring" relies on a very literal application of fiat money laws to bitcoin. For technical reasons most transactions appear structured already, and today this is not illegal.
|
|
|
It is expected that only 0.003 BTC will be available per human being on this planet. As such it would be only fair if you sell some of your hoard. There are other people who need Bitcoin too. So do the right thing and sell some.
well, we could also drastically reduce the number of humans available so we have more bitcoins per person. the historic average durign the middle ages would be 42 bitcoins per human.
|
|
|
|