|
Fork check:
"Block(#5500): Size: 515.00 B TD: 29988735007845 {\nMinerHash: 6226291973fb57316f73d30de6bfea74566e0ed3a92d3860837a0ae1c32c30ba
use the command debug.printBlock(5500); to see if you have the same result
|
|
|
|
Block(#3000): Size: 1.03 kB TD: 7303265854897 {\nMinerHash: 69d3e8b2025acc809c8866794d8fb4ca3727de5650bca32b87a35b5320693ced... anyone with the same hash? "Block(#3000): Size: 1.03 kB TD: 7303265854897 {\nMinerHash: 69d3e8b2025acc809c8866794d8fb4ca3727de5650bca32b87a35b5320693ced if we're forked we're in this together  |
|
|
|
I might be on a fork, can someone do debug.printBlock(2800); My output starts with this: "Block(#2800): Size: 513.00 B TD: 6419825011057 {\nMinerHash: 29b462a6576f074b94a2663e902a58330261b39e3862a9a0002aa4fe6315e4f2 Am I in the right spot? defaced I assume you're on the prime chain  can you check this for me? |
|
|
|
I might be on a fork, can someone do debug.printBlock(2800); My output starts with this: "Block(#2800): Size: 513.00 B TD: 6419825011057 {\nMinerHash: 29b462a6576f074b94a2663e902a58330261b39e3862a9a0002aa4fe6315e4f2 Am I in the right spot? |
|
|
|
|
Besides bitcoin I've used dogecoin to buy many goods, real and virtual.
|
|
|
|
|
Wonder if this will be yet another ponzi scam like 99.99% of cloud "mining" schemes that have ever existed? Odds are good.
|
|
|
|
If proof has been presented then you should have no issue pointing to the person who I have stolen from, nor advising the amount I have stolen. o.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171059.msg12404224#msg12404224There you go. You scammed, you got caught, you returned the money. And we know there are many more out there that aren't aware you scammed them and they are entitled to a refund. Do you think if you robbed a bank, got caught and returned the money, they would let you go? (Proof has been presented yet again to QS. But I'll take bets that QS will ask for proof yet again...)  Why don't you explain how exactly that is me scamming? Both of the people who I refunded explicitly said that they did not feel that I was scamming. I demand that you retract your statements or else you will be liable for libel. You are a troll and a coward. You are afraid to stand behind what you say (or else you would have provided an address that I can serve you). You are afraid to make similar statements about tomatocage because you are afraid of him. This is despite the fact that he has engaged in the exact same activity. You pick on those who you think are not able to counter any of your generalized arguments. You ignore any factual arguments yet instead rely on buzzwords to try to make a point. You consistently take the easy way out. Why do you think it is that you have huge amounts of negative trust when viewed from depth 3 or 4? It is because you were able to troll others hard enough for them to appear to be a scammer, but have no way of fighting back and left you retaliatory negative trust and eventually abandoned their accounts. You are against people making informed decisions for themselves, you are against free markets, you are a disgrace to bitcoin, and most importantly, you are a disgrace to this community.  |
|
|
|
|
If it's such a good method, why would you dilute it by selling to other people?
Sounds like selling plans to a perpetual motion machine.
|
|
|
|
|
Difficulty rose quite a bit today.
|
|
|
|
Lol. You did not find my alt. you were tipped off about Panthers being my alt. You were told to delete the PMs (and so would the person who you were messaging) so the PMs would be deleted from the forums DB. However both you and the person you were colluding with vastly underestimated me.
Pathetic. Goodbye. |
|
|
|
More justifications for the 2.7 years of coin premine go here.
11 million, 60 million, hell take it all. It will have no value on any exchange either way. No value means no money for you and no ability to work on it fulltime. Take a far smaller premine, lock it up in contracts released once a month (you say you want a wage right, not an up front moneygrab) and buy orders will actually be placed on exchanges, and you will be able to work on it fulltime. I consider this a rather insightfull comment. This currency can actually self regulate its own premine (unlike previous bitcoin clones). If the devs were to lock up the funds in the block chain and set a release mechanism at set points in time it would go a long long way to building trust. Especially if the first pay out was set a month or two in the future. Some aditional contracts could be set up for bounties etc. It is what we are doing. Its all in the OP No you are granting yourself 10% at launch, the point made by the previous poster was you should delay that at least a while, until it is not such a large % of the total supply. I appreciate the fact that as "gas" or crypto fuel this is not the same concept as a pure currency, but as the reality is it will have some monetary value which you could sell on an exchange. The point is if you want to build trust that should not be available immediate upon launch and at the time of the release should not be a large % of the total supply. This action in conjunction with acontract controling the release is the act that builds trust. My recomendation is propose somthing more like: at any point the relase is no more than 5% the total supply to yourselves, and the first drop does not happen for at least a few weeks. If you want to control additional contracts with releases for bounties thats great too, but you have 10% at launch right now that could be dumped. I see nothing contrary to this. If you want to use the 10% as a "wage" thats totally legitimate, but then do it as an ICO and then let contracts implement a thawing out period to distrubute those funds to the ICO participants over a period of time as well. We are exploring other ideas. One idea that has popped up in our slack chat was to take the 1.1m we are getting up front and locking up 1m in a founders dao and have it drip to us on a regularly basis that way the community funds are spent completely democratically and independently of the founders reserve. Which would leave 100k initially to pay bounties with. I think this solution is a better one and I hope you go through with it. A stronger market for the Expanse token means a stronger Expanse network. |
|
|
|
Hello,
what about adding some Ethereum charts? (Poloniex, Kraken). Would be great. Thanks!
I also came to request this. Ether has had massive volume on these exchanges. |
|
|
|
The fact that the development team compares this coin and it's massive premine to Ethereum and somehow thinks that people are going to swallow 11 million coin premine based on 'It's just like Ethereum they also premined' (But without the team, vision, 20k BTC ICO and corporate projects) is a joke. What part of 11 MILLION premine killing the coin don't you get? No one cares if it's 'community owned', it's 100% unnecessary, and the 'But we all work full time on this' is just laughable as an excuse for giving yourself free money.
With the 4x longer block time than Ether, and literally NO word on what makes this coin 'better for your purposes' than Ether a Premine over 100k is a complete no-go for most people. Look at what happened to Shift (the first Ether copy-paste) and block-times, price and premine. Yeah, it's pretty much dead already because there is NO profit to be made from mining with 250k coins hanging in the air and price tanking.
TLDR: 'Fairly distributed' , 11 million coin premine. ROTFL!
I have to agree with this, and I could be wrong but I don't think Shift's 250k premine has had that much of an effect on the market. Without a block explorer that can show info on accounts it's hard to tell. |
|
|
|
|
5000 satoshis for 100%. Final offer.
|
|
|
|
I am testing out atomic swaps of LTC and to do this, I needed to make custom p2sh redeemscripts.
It is working fine with BTC, but with LTC even though it was accepted into the getrawmempool, it is not being confirmed
txid: 3b90916d8442342813c4b6415f699cdd2846f668881c7ce8f5966a16a3bf47f3
010000000183565265d738d7afa08440294d62060ad9cec3394bd92eda5ca788488291a71301000 0006a47304402205b06b4a4471314cc423214088bd6c75546a0c3765d61405e6e2550674a474e17 022043b73e6357381fbd9c8ac81dcc364e34d46560983bfdb08b162f54f019ec3b180121031e8ab 7edc770169773bb1716904b70ed79a171d11e9af75340949c8949d72a26ffffffff02204e000000 00000017a914557ae5bf81ec20138026548ddca5654ac8af27cf87d2fa0703000000001976a9141 c660332b01b497e9f3e8a04da866e66bd99505e88ac00000000
It might be due to lack of txfee, but not sure if it should have been accepted locally without enough fees.
My question is if txid 3b90916d8442342813c4b6415f699cdd2846f668881c7ce8f5966a16a3bf47f3 has propagated into other nodes or if it is just stuck in my node.
I would appreciate if somebody could run getrawmempool and see if this txid is there. If it is, this would be an attack vector to overflow the rawmempool globally.
The more advanced question is why it isnt being confirmed.
James
Not there  blockr.io saw it: http://ltc.blockr.io/tx/info/3b90916d8442342813c4b6415f699cdd2846f668881c7ce8f5966a16a3bf47f3as did bchain.info: https://bchain.info/LTC/tx/3b90916d8442342813c4b6415f699cdd2846f668881c7ce8f5966a16a3bf47f3But a couple of other explorers did not have a page for the transaction. |
|
|
|
|
Let's compare:
Expanse, 11,000,000 premine with 1,100,000 available immediately. Block target 1 minute and 8 EXP block reward. 4,207,680 EXP mined per year. Time to match premine = 2 years, 7 1/2 months
Ethereum, 72,000,000 premine to prerelease investors, devs, contributors, and their foundation. Block target 15 seconds and 5 Ether block reward. 10,519,200 Ether mined (and staked in future) per year. Time to match premine = 6 years 10 months
Shift, 250,000 premine. Block target 12 seconds (in theory, its first post says average blocktime is higher) and 3 SHF block reward. 7,889,400 (theoretical) mined (or staked in future) per year. Time to match premine = 12 days.
Edit: Shift target is 11 seconds, so math is slightly off, but you get the picture.
|
|
|
|
A fork to a fixed 8MB blocksize isn't needed now but might be a good stopgap next year if a better blocksize increase implementation can't be made and agreed upon by consensus. You're nothing but a new account with no credentials, no coding skill, and have very poor English reading comprehension. So don't count me in on your list |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
