Nicolas Cimon joins Dusk Network as Strategic Advisor We are delighted to announce that Nicolas Cimon, Managing Director of Cross Border Consulting, and former Senior Associate in Securities, is joining the Dusk Foundation as a Strategic Advisor for the Dusk Network. Nicolas Cimon has 20 years of experience in the legal and consulting business working in Canada and Europe and serving clients in Europe, Middle East and Africa. Nicolas worked as a securities lawyer for Ogilvy Renault (now Norton Rose Fulbright) in Canada and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in France. He was involved in major initial public offerings of securities, issuance of debt and hybrid securities and takeovers of publicly listed corporations in Canada, US and Europe. In particular, Nicolas was involved in the IPO of the pan-European exchange Euronext. As a consultant, Nicolas is executing strategic recruitments for international law firms, investment banks and leading blockchain technology companies. Nicolas graduated in law at Laval University in Quebec, Canada and completed an MBA at Laval University and Universidad Nacional de Córdoba in Argentina. He is fluent in English, French and Spanish. The Dusk Foundation will benefit strongly from his expertise as a legal counsel in the securities industry to navigate through the different legal systems and setting up the standard for a decentralized privacy network and Security Token Offerings. How to learn more about Dusk NetworkThe Dusk Network is a project coordinated by the Dusk Foundation. We are a decentralized ecosystem entirely focused on providing the perfect trade-off between privacy and transparency. Dusk protects privacy and fits regulations in payments, communications and asset transfers. Please consider joining us at the following media: Wow! Congratulations! when such people with great experience and knowledge join the project it makes the project better! Actually, the adhesion of people like Cimon, provided with capacity and experience, bring to any project an extra potential, especially with imminent regulations and adverse market situations, is someone to contribute during and even after sale, in the long term work . Congratulations what a resume he has.. i did become a little bit jealous after the things he did:) canada, various europe locations, argentina.. that i can say he is a global person.. |
|
|
|
Yes a vesting period is also used sometime to avoid quick dump. But if the project has realy a good potential i think it’s not mandatory, the price will stay good if the possibiities of the project are good. So it depend a lot of the team.
There is really the strong point in the project, which is the team's hard and continued work, this guarantees us from any outside, although there is some derailment of investors hurrying, recoveries and then repurchase, for the potential presented bots are flooded the page above:) i trust to a project more when there is a vesting period like 6 months or 1 year for developers, it blocks quick hit and runs.i know its a free world but its unfair that dumping a huge load of tokens when you are working for it. |
|
|
|
So how about funding free electricity and fuel, something that will contribute society I bet there are many researcher around the world who needs funding.
Providers of electricity and fuel won't like this so i don't think we will see this in the near future Yeah, such patents immediately buy up and do not give consent for the production of such engines, I don't think anything can change at least until the oil and gas reserves run out. low-cost electricity (solar panels, wind), fuel produced by organic waste, electrical machines are all scientific projects that bring our society towards to a greener future and should be funded, but the big companies that earn with the the sale of oil will certainly be contrary, i hope scientificcoin make their own choices based on the validity of the projects and not under the various pressures of the others They even can create a section for green projects, sustainability obsessed rich people can come to platform with advertisement like this:) |
|
|
|
So how about funding free electricity and fuel, something that will contribute society I bet there are many researcher around the world who needs funding.
Providers of electricity and fuel won't like this so i don't think we will see this in the near future |
|
|
|
Or maybe they tried to get funded by venture capitalists but they failed at it, we will never know. For sure the easier way right now is trough an ICO / token generation event whatever you wanna call it
Yeah last year we have seen lots of projects funded themselves by icos after failing raising enough money for their investments. |
|
|
|
I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.
But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.
Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error. It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this. I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus? 50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project. Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it. I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before. For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea. |
|
|
|
I know a lot of private coins already (Dash, Monero, Zcash, Spectrecoin, Deeponion). What advntages you offer before this coins?
None of those coins has features which will allow to transfer data safely, this is one of the major difference they are trying to sell Also there is a table in this thread shows the main differences between mentioned project, maybe that table is in whitepaper too? Actually, we asked a table about that, but there is none so far. Probably you are remembering that. Don't know if the table was posted here but there is one in the FAQ section of their website. https://dusk.network/faq/Yes that's table i'm talking about, it compares all the dusk's competitions have known for so far, big ones. |
|
|
|
Ehealth seems to be present in a lot of event, it’s very nice that the team has that visbility and continue to work on it. I think in long term the project can really have a nice potential, if the team has the ability to manage it and deliver something.
They are capable of managing and delivering project they claimed. they have a loooot of time to do it also, so i have no doubts at this point from ehealth besides lack of comms. |
|
|
|
I know a lot of private coins already (Dash, Monero, Zcash, Spectrecoin, Deeponion). What advntages you offer before this coins?
None of those coins has features which will allow to transfer data safely, this is one of the major difference they are trying to sell Also there is a table in this thread shows the main differences between mentioned project, maybe that table is in whitepaper too? No, it is not in the whitepaper. maybe i remember wrong but i do surely remember that table:) i'd pin it to first page and show difference between the projects. |
|
|
|
  Hi everyone! CEO Hикoлaй Кpючкoв выcтyпил c пpeзeнтaциeй o пpoeктe eHealth First нa Invest Battle Forum в Mocквe [нa pyccкoм языкe]
CEO Nickolay Kryuchkov made the presentation about eHealth First on the Invest Battle Forum [in Russian]
Find out more! https://youtu.be/8w7NQZiPOnowow long time no see nkryuchkov , we'd love to see you more in this thread giving us updates about the project. don't forget us |
|
|
|
They told that they will give more details about Boinc algorithm. Did they already do and i missed it, or still waiting?
I'm also waiting for it, don't think they published anything about the algorithm just yet, however hope they will soon. Yeah, as a technical person I am also waiting for more information on this topic. I agree that they should give some details about how it would work. That info should be easy to understand for non-expert people in the field since most of the potential investors will not be experts. I am sure they will give us such thing as soon as possible. This project has a community manager that will help us to make things clearer. which we are not seeing in these days, from the start of the bear season, community managers are having hard time getting a job but sn coin team is showing difference in this area too. As for me, many projects are nowadays like dead worms, and only a few of them are still trying to move around. Do not lose hope that sooner or later the market will be recover, and then all best projects projects will come to life again, I'm sure ScientificCoin project will be in too. Exactly, market will recover, hope we can see it this year. But even if market would be stable at the current price, SN coin could do their work. high potential coins shows difference in almost every market condition, as you said SN coin can show this difference. |
|
|
|
|
their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total
|
|
|
|
How much was raised so far? Just trying to understand what kind of response is getting at this point
Looks like 2.4+ million Yes, as we can see on the main site, they are already raised $2.4millions+. The hard cap will be $30m and the main sale is still alive now. Btw, the softcap is at $2m which is already gainned! Having achieved more than its softcap target is a good indication that investors prefer this project over others and I guess because it has good merits. I didn't see the news of the softcap reach, that's very good. I forgot, when will the sale end? That's a big amount nowadays. I think is going to be difficult for them get a bigger amount in the public sale. But the market can turn around i think, its showing some signs about turning around but this is crypto who knows. |
|
|
|
They told that they will give more details about Boinc algorithm. Did they already do and i missed it, or still waiting?
I'm also waiting for it, don't think they published anything about the algorithm just yet, however hope they will soon. Yeah, as a technical person I am also waiting for more information on this topic. I agree that they should give some details about how it would work. That info should be easy to understand for non-expert people in the field since most of the potential investors will not be experts. I am sure they will give us such thing as soon as possible. This project has a community manager that will help us to make things clearer. which we are not seeing in these days, from the start of the bear season, community managers are having hard time getting a job but sn coin team is showing difference in this area too. |
|
|
|
I agree about your opinions for the competition, thats always good for the market and the consumers. And i also agree about the scientific coin project covers a larger base than health monitor etc.
Health Monitor is a single research project which needed some funding for the go-to-market. Scientificcoin is a much broad project that will help many research projects to be funded. yeah, scientific coin is like a crowdfunding for projects like health monitor as far as i understand. |
|
|
|
|
I agree about your opinions for the competition, thats always good for the market and the consumers. And i also agree about the scientific coin project covers a larger base than health monitor etc.
|
|
|
|
Market seems to be in balance atm.. good time to progress on crypto projects...
maybe some news about the next thing on the roadmap?
someone?
We will have to wait and see, there have been no info about the mvp, so chances are therenis going to be nothing. If somebody knows how to contact the team directly would be a good question to ask. I think they aren't active anywhere at the moment, at least not here and on telegram. It's quite odd but hopefully the reason is they are working hard in the background and soon will come up with good news. At least they were giving some partnership news, conference news or introducing the new people in team back then. Now total silence.. |
|
|
|
I know a lot of private coins already (Dash, Monero, Zcash, Spectrecoin, Deeponion). What advntages you offer before this coins?
None of those coins has features which will allow to transfer data safely, this is one of the major difference they are trying to sell Also there is a table in this thread shows the main differences between mentioned project, maybe that table is in whitepaper too? |
|
|
|
How much was raised so far? Just trying to understand what kind of response is getting at this point
Looks like 2.4+ million Yes, as we can see on the main site, they are already raised $2.4millions+. The hard cap will be $30m and the main sale is still alive now. Btw, the softcap is at $2m which is already gainned! Having achieved more than its softcap target is a good indication that investors prefer this project over others and I guess because it has good merits. I didn't see the news of the softcap reach, that's very good. I forgot, when will the sale end? |
|
|
|
Only things ICO rating websites are good for are the overview of projects and general information about the project. The ratings themselves seem to be random if not bought or based on nonsense like the number of social media accounts.
I can't agree more. They have a little use as you said but they don't show anything about how good or bad the project is. I see them as a way to see what's new and looking at a project at a glance. nothing more. I use them to get an idea of the potential of the project. Many sites accept money in return for a good rating so you should be careful all the time, Yeah i agree that too, investing an ico due to its rating from a website is naive in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
