Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 07:19:21 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 141 »
281  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Official Anoncoin Information, FAQ & Description thread. I2P/Tor explained [Mod] on: June 21, 2014, 05:25:03 PM
Hey ya'll, I've added ANC to my new Multipool. Would love to have some miners stop by and mine! 0% fees while in beta!

xpool - BTC Multipool

 
PROP reward system
BTC Payouts
Scrypt & SHA256 Algo's
DDoS Protected
High Performance Backend
Simple setup and usage
0% Fees while in BETA
To mine:
Cheers and Happy Hashing!

It would be better and I would use your X11 multipool if it actually paid out in ANC.
282  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: June 20, 2014, 12:32:05 AM
I've been mining a few days on the pool and have recently received a ~0.2BTC payout even though I set it pay out every 1BTC.  I haven't received any NMC payments yet though?

I would check your settings.  Make sure it "took" when you signed the message using your Bitcoin client.  Just making the changes on Eligius is only half of it.  By default you enter the payout queue after 0.04.  Go back into the stats section and make sure you set it for 1BTC, and added a Namecoin payout address.  

Follow this:  http://eligius.st/~capa66/utl/my_eligius/index.html

Whenever I sign the message it says - Invalid timestamp!

Edit:  Sorted it now, I just needed to F5 and reenter the NMC wallet address, ty.
283  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: June 19, 2014, 06:53:51 PM
I've been mining a few days on the pool and have recently received a ~0.2BTC payout even though I set it pay out every 1BTC.  I haven't received any NMC payments yet though?
284  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][The Original Multipool - Scrypt/SHA256/Scrypt-N/X11] multipool.us on: June 19, 2014, 02:00:12 PM
What share difficulty should I set for ~3(MH/s) on X11.  Also if I set Cryptsy integration to full auto how do you set it to auto trade to BTC and auto payout.
285  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - Secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency on: June 15, 2014, 02:21:13 PM
Whenever I run the deamon on *buntu 13.10 my DNS goes down for every browser.  As soon as I stop the deamon all my browsers start working again.
286  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [55 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: June 09, 2014, 07:56:04 PM
how can i run my antminers1 with this
http://mmpool.org/user/dlpoint
 plz tell me me
stratum pool address
username and password also plz

stratum+tcp://mmpool.org:3333
dlpoint
d=16 is password

Isn't the d=16 the difficulty setting or do you need to add a password to use the difficulty setting?
287  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Official Anoncoin Information, FAQ & Description thread. I2P/Tor explained [Mod] on: June 08, 2014, 08:45:39 PM
I know devs must be quite occupied with zerocoin and i2pd implementations (good luck with that by the way). Still I feel a comment from them on the following topic is rather important.

What you plan to do about scrypt ASICs coming to scene and the increased possibility of a 51% attack?

As of today Anoncoin has little more than 1 GH/s of network hashrate. Scrypt ASIC manufacturers are promising devices delivering up to 250 MH/s for the second or third quarter of the current year. Thus, it will be quite easy for an individual miner to do a 51% attack (even now it's easy for a multipool).
Are you planing something to prevent this? Changing PoW to an ASIC resistant algorithm like scrypt-n or to Multi-PoW like Myriad? Changing to PoS or PoW/PoS?

In order to integrate zerocoin an hard fork will be needed. Shouldn't you use this opportunity to also address the PoW issue?

Sorry if this has been asked before. If so, please point me to your previous answer.
Currently there is no ASIC resistant algorithm expect XPM (as its complicate to calculate different kinds of chains including the sieving itself).
I think changing to another PoW is a good idea, but not some "butthurt GPU miner algo". ie, no scrypt-jane/scrypt-n/similiar.

For example, if you look at the scrypt coins when they change their N parameter for the scrypt() call, there are years between switches so you can just create an ASIC for current N. Once N is changes, the ASIC technology is so old that nobody will use them anymore.

Of course i do have alot of GPUs myself too, but i aint greedy. I dont want to say "lets use this algo (so i can mine it with my GPUs, hehehe)" as otherwise this coin would be just worthless like all the others.


One thing which protects against 51% attacks is MergedMining. The downsides is, you can mine anoncoins for free as you dont have to choose between coin X and ANC (in case we stay with scrypt and both are scrypt coins).
Therefore value itself would drop dramaticly and we would screw over all our investors.

Il talk with Gnosis about some Ideas i have wrt PoW algo and with meeh about PoS in general.

Sry for spitting out such a huge post, it had to be said.

I think merged-mining is the way to go and maybe reduce the block reward if needed to maintain the price.  Or possibly go X11 if you want to keep it all GPU mined, but again I'd suggest merged-mining.  No permissions from other coins devs is needed to implement merged-mining BTW.  Also X11 ASIC's will come out sooner rather than later.  So you may as well just go straight to merged-mining on Scrypt and like I said you could always reduce the block reward.
288  Economy / Securities / Re: [796.com] RedStarMining.com - the oldest public mining security [15.0(TH/s)] on: May 30, 2014, 11:12:14 PM
The new thread set up by the RSM staff in my absence - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=564908.0
289  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: April 21, 2014, 04:07:56 PM
Hi all, I am undermining 1.6 Thash in Cex.io and usually to about 0.14 BTC per day but the last day is down to 0.098, do not seem to have risen despite the difficulty has been a great fall, anyone knows what can be devido.

And if there are any more effective pool I would love to know.

thanks

http://mmpool.org/

~nh

I would recommend that pool also for merge-mining.  If you don't care about alt-coins then find the nearest P2Pool server with the best ping time for you - http://p2pools.org/btc
290  Economy / Securities / Re: Red Star Mining est. January 2012 on: April 10, 2014, 02:24:50 PM
I can confirm that this is the new thread to take over in my absence.  RSM has spent over three years earning trust on this forum.  They've set this up as a self moderated thread but hey this is a forum and no one is stopping anyone else from creating other threads about RSM.  So please ignore the 'have a go hero' making RSM out to seem to be a scam.  Like I said I was told the Q1 financial and actions statement may be out by as early as next week.  I'll try to show my face in the thread when I can and will try to read every post.
291  Economy / Securities / Re: [796.com] RedStarMining.com - the oldest public mining security [15.0(TH/s)] on: April 10, 2014, 01:27:48 PM
Unfortunately due to ongoing health problems that I have been suffering for over a decade now I am unable to continue an active role at RSM for the time being.  Investors and shareholders please don't worry though as it's been a team of seven staff and directors at RSM for a good while now.  So I really believe that things can continue doing well into the future.  As i originally founded RSM I am still going to hold the veto rights to the three prohibited motions.  Although in the case I was in hospital and unreachable for a prolong period of time then evolvex will hold those veto rights to the three prohibited motions in my absence.  I've been told the Q1 financial statement should be issued maybe as early as next week.  I'll try to edit this post to include a link to a new thread which will be opened by one of the other seven board and staff members.  Where a link to the Q1 statement will be posted by maybe as early as next week.

It was a big struggle founding RSM even with all the help I received and the first two years was very tough going.  Although since last September after increasing the board and staff members RSM has done very well.  Long may it continue doing well in my absence.
292  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Vircurex Class Action Lawsuit on: April 09, 2014, 02:53:54 PM
They never raised the price of alt-coins.  Users we're selling off their BTC and LTC that was to be frozen into alt-coins.  So that they could cash their balances.  You got an inflated price for your alt-coins and should have read into why you was getting an inflated price for them.
293  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: April 08, 2014, 09:22:28 PM
I know this has probably been discussed loads of times before in the thread but it is now buried.  I know the CPP starts ten days after your delivery is late.  My rig pre-order was supposed to be delivered in the fourth week of March.  So is it ten normal days after it's late the CPP starts being calculated or ten business days.  Also if it was supposed to be delivered in the fourth week of march when do you start counting the ten days?  The Saturday of the fourth week of march, the Sunday or the Monday of the following week.  Also it's 10% every ten days or did they actually mean every ten working days?  I feel Bitmine played on the mistranslation on purpose to gain extra customers.  Like my pre order stated March Fourth week which in English means the week of March the 4th.  Not the fourth week of March.
March fourth week is the fourth week of march. The count seems to start on saturday. It's not working days, it's 7 days per week.

So for a pre-order due in the fourth week of March the first 10% of the CPP is due on April the 18th then 20% due on April the 28th?  While I could file for a refund at the end of May if not already shipped?
294  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: April 08, 2014, 08:23:22 PM
I know this has probably been discussed loads of times before in the thread but it is now buried.  I know the CPP starts ten days after your delivery is late.  My rig pre-order was supposed to be delivered in the fourth week of March.  So is it ten normal days after it's late the CPP starts being calculated or ten business days.  Also if it was supposed to be delivered in the fourth week of march when do you start counting the ten days?  The Saturday of the fourth week of march, the Sunday or the Monday of the following week.  Also it's 10% every ten days or did they actually mean every ten working days?  I feel Bitmine played on the mistranslation on purpose to gain extra customers.  Like my pre order stated March Fourth week which in English means the week of March the 4th.  Not the fourth week of March.
295  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: http://www.pyramining.com/ - Discussion thread (no advertising here) on: April 05, 2014, 02:35:31 PM
I'm all for staying with P2Pool to help decentralisation.  If you mine 24/7/365 then the variance will even its self out. 
296  Bitcoin / Group buys / Red Star (Bitcoin and Litecoin) Mining on: April 05, 2014, 02:28:47 PM
We currently have one 2TH/s Bitmine rig on pre-order which is currently late.  We have five KNCminer Neptunes from the very first batch on pre-order.  Plus we also have four 90MH/s Alpha Viper Scrypt rigs on pre-order from the very first batch.  Although we may be refunding the deposit on two of them due to the current drop in Bitcoin prices.  As we currently can't afford to pay for all four at current Bitcoin prices.  Along with all those pre-orders our wallet currently holds nearly BTC30.00.  You can buy our shares here - https://796.com/rsm?op=market - this is our blog URL - http://www.redstarmining.com/ - and this is our original forum thread link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63257.0

We aim to reinvest 90% of all profits after costs into new hardware etc.  With the other 10% being issued as a monthly dividend.  This is also our third year of operation so you can feel more comfortable about us not just running off in the middle of the night.  Instead of cancelling and refunding two of our Alpha Viper batch #1 deposits we may offer them as a separate group buy managed by RSM.
297  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: April 05, 2014, 02:11:38 PM
This is the KNCminer thread can everyone please take their off topic posts to other more suitable threads or start your own thread.  This thread is garbage now and the only KNC talk is by haters who probably don't even have a KNC device or pre-order.
298  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: April 04, 2014, 12:51:03 AM
as far as i know
in short: device shows you the hashrate including hardware errors
pool shows only matching hashrate.
thats the discrepancy

Yes, but when I switch off the Turbomode and let it run at nominal 800 GHs, then eligius shows only about 650 GHs...

so not sure what's happening here...
it's like I have to let the devices run in Turbomode so that I reach the nominal 800 GHs at all.

What's your ping time to Eligius?  If it's high you could be losing shares.  If it is due to high response times and not just your internet pipe then I'd try a local P2Pool public server - http://p2pools.org/btc -  Although P2Pool can take up to 72hrs to show your correct hashrate.

hm, eligius.st doesn't let me ping it, I get 100% packetloss when I do a ping on a computer that is in the same network like my two miners.

but doesn't that have to do with the fact that they are being DDOS allthetime lately?


Well if you can't get average ping times maybe just use basic geography on far away the servers are.  If the Eligius server is local'ish to you then I'd check your internet connection throughput and traffic management.  The closer the server is to you is always important when it comes to things like missing shares due to response times.  As long as your connection has a good enough upload speed and throughput.
299  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: April 03, 2014, 09:17:37 PM
as far as i know
in short: device shows you the hashrate including hardware errors
pool shows only matching hashrate.
thats the discrepancy

Yes, but when I switch off the Turbomode and let it run at nominal 800 GHs, then eligius shows only about 650 GHs...

so not sure what's happening here...
it's like I have to let the devices run in Turbomode so that I reach the nominal 800 GHs at all.

What's your ping time to Eligius?  If it's high you could be losing shares.  If it is due to high response times and not just your internet pipe then I'd try a local P2Pool public server - http://p2pools.org/btc -  Although P2Pool can take up to 72hrs to show your correct hashrate.
300  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [DRK] Hardware Hashrates on: April 02, 2014, 01:30:47 PM
Just got my 280X Toxic up to 2.319MH/s with the following

aticonfig --od-enable --adapter=all --odsc=1225,1925
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 141 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!