Your welcome. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) sp Does that 53 release have added features over the release 53 I got a week ago.? thx
|
|
|
(b) $1500/week is low for a good US programmer. http://money.usnews.com/careers/best-jobs/software-developer/salary2013 average software dev salary was over $92k/year ($1769/week), and the ones who can crank out a 50% improvement on the Monero miner are closer to that top 10% figure -- think $150k/year and up. The bounty also doesn't include benefits and the other nice things offered by a standard employer. I think I can make the monero miner 100% faster. but the AMD miner from claymore is too good to make it worth the effort. I work fulltime in a company that pays $xxx,xxx dollars a year. Optimizing CCminer is just a hobby I do in my sparetime after work. Donate some beers, and I am happy. I sent you 10 beers sp...don't get drunk. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) R53 working good 1.5 mh/s more over my 6 card 750ti rig compared to R43 on quark. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
@tbearhere Can you post your hashrate/card for Scrypt-Jane:16 on Vista? Would be funny to find that Vista matches the performance on Linux (or betters it?), while recent Windows versions all suck! ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) What does Linux do with the 750ti ?
|
|
|
Hello I had setup SharkCoin mining pool at http://sak.ltc.pp.uastratum at port 3333 Welcome... Server locate at .de Peyments one per hour from 1 sak Fee 1% Why is you pool down? thx ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
wrong section dude
oc do you have a SHARK pool setup? nope, there are lots already ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) thx oc ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
wrong section dude
oc do you have a SHARK pool setup?
|
|
|
For scrypt based coins ccminer is set to only use 88% of the maximum video RAM in case of Windows and 98% in case of Linux by default: device_backoff[i] = is_windows() ? 12 : 2; It is there for safety so it won't crash for people who wish to mine on their main card. One of the changes I always do before compiling is to change that value to 1 for Windows to allow it to use 99% of memory and if you don't have a monitor attached to your card and not running something that is using VRAM needlessly, it won't crash. Not even while autotuning. I used that since cudaminer days so I have no idea about the hashrate difference anymore. Now that we're entering the territory of cards with 3GB+ video memory it's worth noting that 32-bit ccminer can't utilize more than 3GB. 64-bit can utilize it all but 64-bit is also noticeably slower so for cards like the 970 it doesn't worth it but for the 980 Ti it might - for algos that scale with memory amount (not access) like Scrypt-Jane. Afaik, 32-bit softwares can actually utilize more than 3GB video memory but only if the data is also stored in the system RAM which is generally not optimal for mining. Edit: 200 pages! Congrats and keep up the good work sp_ (sent a few beers your way). How does one apply that? device_backoff = is_windows() ? 12 : 2;
thx
Format for the ternary operator is expression ? if_true : if_false; Being a noob at this....I better leave this alone. Thx Wolf0 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) EDIT: Just curious how one goes about this.
|
|
|
For scrypt based coins ccminer is set to only use 88% of the maximum video RAM in case of Windows and 98% in case of Linux by default: device_backoff[i] = is_windows() ? 12 : 2; It is there for safety so it won't crash for people who wish to mine on their main card. One of the changes I always do before compiling is to change that value to 1 for Windows to allow it to use 99% of memory and if you don't have a monitor attached to your card and not running something that is using VRAM needlessly, it won't crash. Not even while autotuning. I used that since cudaminer days so I have no idea about the hashrate difference anymore. Now that we're entering the territory of cards with 3GB+ video memory it's worth noting that 32-bit ccminer can't utilize more than 3GB. 64-bit can utilize it all but 64-bit is also noticeably slower so for cards like the 970 it doesn't worth it but for the 980 Ti it might - for algos that scale with memory amount (not access) like Scrypt-Jane. Afaik, 32-bit softwares can actually utilize more than 3GB video memory but only if the data is also stored in the system RAM which is generally not optimal for mining. Edit: 200 pages! Congrats and keep up the good work sp_ (sent a few beers your way). How does one apply that? device_backoff = is_windows() ? 12 : 2;
thx
|
|
|
@tbearhere Can you post your hashrate/card for Scrypt-Jane:16 on Vista? Would be funny to find that Vista matches the performance on Linux (or betters it?), while recent Windows versions all suck! ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) See if I can post it tomorrow...but Scrypt-Jane:15 I get 1.24 mh per 750ti if that's any help for now.
|
|
|
[...] the amount of vram isn't a bottleneck in any algo, rather memory bandwidth [...]
With Scrypt-Jane at high n-factors (and possibly with Scrypt-N too, that one I have no experience with), greater amounts of VRAM make a huge difference. Sidenote: only for Linux, since Windows sux and can't ever fully utilize the VRAM. I suppose these are somewhat the exception, since most other algos don't really care for memory quantity at all. Yes the latest versions of windows does... but my vista does 3 x what windows 8.1 does on hashrate with Scrypt-Jane 16.
|
|
|
to answer the question, just look at how much memory you use on your card, if you are close to the 4gb limit, might help if not well it won't... (the amount of vram isn't a bottleneck in any algo, rather memory bandwidth) actually memory bandwidth is higher, so that's part might improved a bit things up anyhow, probably better to wait, there are some rumors which say that the price will go down a bit... That's the problem ...I can't wait much longer. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) But thx djm
|
|
|
The source got released, but he has done a private neoscrypt kernal that does 750khs/s on the 980 up from 630.
My free opensource sp-modded version is only around 7% faster than 630. around 680khash
now doing 820kh/s on the 980 496kh/s on the 780 196kh/s on the 750ti (my 750ti was just doing 165kh/s before...) Good improvement. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) How do I get the updated miner djm? you pray ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I contributed....do you want more beers. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Yes thx I thought I was looking at a 980 ti with 4GB and that's why I got confused. ![Embarrassed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif)
|
|
|
The source got released, but he has done a private neoscrypt kernal that does 750khs/s on the 980 up from 630.
My free opensource sp-modded version is only around 7% faster than 630. around 680khash
now doing 820kh/s on the 980 496kh/s on the 780 196kh/s on the 750ti (my 750ti was just doing 165kh/s before...) Good improvement. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) How do I get the updated miner djm?
|
|
|
why its impossible to mine anymore??even if I mine with my xeon im not able to find one block and the blockchain don't move at all...
Are you able to mine them yet? I can if I want. Do you have the right conf file?
|
|
|
If I may... Quark algo would be better. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Sharkcoin has 24 hours volume of 10,619.33 BTC in china. That is $2 637 713 per day in turnover on one exchange alone. If the 65BTC mined every day is dumped the price will stay. https://www.coinhills.com/market/sak-cny/jubi/Quarkcoin had a turnover yesterday of 29.58 BTC on cryptsy.. ($7306,26) if the mined 0.057 BTC per day is dumped the price will stay. Yup sp been trying to get cryptsy to list it but coinmarket cap isn't listing it probably it should be #3 coin right now.
|
|
|
wallet?
x11 ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
|