Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 10:37:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 ... 262 »
2801  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: March 13, 2018, 08:21:24 AM
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hello my username is arkond and today 13.03.2018 verif me please and stake my bitcoin adress here
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
1naTGzAkSPdHGf8z6oLU1ZdVnmV9fy7bU
H8yAoEdD3XkHv4kEbI3bjGcGLVDbi2xCMLOnfhjWkF0PFY/hpdKY6QxHz3nNvm2mCJXvmNr8enZRey8mVjRQlTs=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

quoted and verified
2802  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: March 13, 2018, 08:12:36 AM
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
justicesquadron
13 march 2018
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
19XPG8UzP4GKfSPud84jbL5oYPCHaPo6Sx
INF/STooH7YKjQocIOQ2vms8H3h33GTdVA18VaXSGbWHKnTuM5HWxWCZP9o1xfMn+6R4AJ76Qu6lMwC4KamSCL8=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

quoted, i'll edit this post after i verified the message

EDIT: message verified with https://tools.bitcoin.com/verify-message/
2803  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: deposit cash to btc atm. not showing up now? on: March 13, 2018, 07:58:52 AM
my bitcoin transaction is not showing up. i wonder why? i look at bitaccess and it doesnt show any numbers. everything says 000. i remember seeing it block cypher then the next day it shows 0000.. what is wrong? this happen to me through coinsource where i waited 2 weeks. today it has been 5 days already.

i deposited through a bitaccess atm. any one with experience?

I haven't used an ATM yet (ever), did they give you a receipt? If so, this this receipt contain a transaction id? If you don't care about your privacy, could you share the address you entered and/or the transaction id?
With the amount of information you shared, only the original company (bitaccess) might be able to help you.... However, if you deposited 2+ weeks ago, there is defenately a reason to get worried. Transactions are broadcasted instantly, and with the very low average fee we're seeing lately, a broadcasted transaction usually ends up in a block pretty soon.

So, you either entered a wrong address, they didn't broadcast your transaction or they messed up the transaction.... Those are the only things i can imagine happening right now.
2804  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is using a pushtx service safe? on: March 13, 2018, 07:55:38 AM
Any specific push tx services you guys would recommend?? So that there is no way we can run into that specific problem (of censorship)?

But not web-based, preferably something that can be used through an API or something similar.


Thanks in advance!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1938621.0

This post contains links to several tx pushing services (including mine), AND a link to Coding Enthusiast's Pusher, which is an application that uses a bunch of API's to allow you to push your tx to several nodes...
2805  Other / Meta / Re: [ACCOUNT HACKED] Please Restore My Account on: March 13, 2018, 07:35:08 AM
Since nobody else seems to be doing anything, i gave a neutral tag to the account referencing this thread... However, since i'm not in DT, i doubt many people will read my warning.
OP: if you ever recover your account, please PM me to remove my tag.
2806  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: New Place to buy bitmain miners on: March 08, 2018, 02:36:56 PM
warning signs:
  • no address on their about page
  • no contact info
  • no online help
  • free xyz domain
  • no ssl
  • no vendor endorsement
  • no vouches
  • no images proving any stock or purchase
  • only 1 day old
  • whois info not hidden, but has the name of a private individual i can't directly find using google
  • whois info says owner lives in franklinville VA 22134 US, i don't know how US zipcodes work, but this site says it's the zip for QUANTICO, not franklinville: https://www.unitedstateszipcodes.org/22134/#cities
  • company name only has 3 hits via google
  • the image on the main page (http://bitmain4less.xyz/) was taken from any of these other sites : https://bitshopusa.com/pages/about-us , https://digigoldllc.com/ or https://cryptominersusa.com/... Or all 4 sites are owned by the same owner (since all 4 look like a potential scam)
  • logo's on mainpage are stored locally
  • it seems like no payment gateway was used, you pay directly to the vendor eventough the mainpage shows a (locally hosted) image of the (unknown to me) gateway gourl.io
  • The quality of the site seems a little basic for my taste, especially for a company that sells such expensive equipment

These are warning signs i personally wouldn't ignore... I wouldn't call it a 100% scam, but my gut feeling about this one isn't good at all.
2807  Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk Forum have an Mobile Apps? on: March 07, 2018, 06:55:27 AM
It's not an official app, it's not written by Theymos (or any other admin), however, the person that did write the app did an official announcement here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=327238.0

Personally, i wouldn't run this app on my device... Unless i got the sourcecode from the dev, browsed trough it and compiled it myself... But it seems other longtime members did try it out and didn't file a scam report afterwards... Still, i wouldn't trust it, but it's certainly not proved to be a scam.
2808  Other / Meta / Re: [ACCOUNT HACKED] Please Restore My Account on: March 06, 2018, 06:50:53 AM
Someone from Russia changed my email & password  Angry

and this is hacker's IP : 178.155.4.231

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=330633

Sign Message

I am the owner of s1ng, today February 27, 2018, 03:50:51 PM
My address 1EYzkw5ZzTmigPY764njrL6bwG9boTUdZx

Signature

HDEbZVZc+lkhSZUF27hvkwxazWQQD63y7SUC6P1scYZRe/vx72PZtGbNDolXLkCQxlJLDBA26sZ8JTspX6i2F74=

BTC address : 1EYzkw5ZzTmigPY764njrL6bwG9boTUdZx

Quoted address : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671689.msg7738603#msg7738603

For what it's worth, the signed message checks out. I've checked out the staked address to, and it was staked in 2014 (which is certainly good enough).
Have you followed the steps in this stickie'ed post? : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497545.0

In the meantime, you can always try to send the same information to one or two people in default trust and ask them pollitely to give a red tag to the hacked account to warn everybody not to deal with the hacked account untill it's recovered.
2809  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Buying a new computer (or building) on: March 06, 2018, 06:28:19 AM
you are in the bitcoin subforum, so i'll give a bitcoin answer: there is no pc you can ever build that will mine bitcoin profitably. Even worse, even the best GPU with free power will make about ~20 cents a year at current diff, block reward and btc price. Since such a GPU costs ~$350, it'll take you (on average) 1750 years before you mined enough BTC to pay back your initial investment IF you got your power for free, IF the diff didn't rise, IF the block halvings were removed with a hardfork and IF the price didn't drop.

Here's an auto-updated list of some non specialised mining hardware, it's hashrate, it's power consumption and it's revenue @ certain fixed power prices: https://www.mocacinno.com/nonspecialisedmininghardware.php

Bottom line:
- you can't mine BTC profitably with a cpu (any cpu)
- you can't mine BTC profitably with a GPU (any gpu)
- you can't mine BTC profitably with a cellphone (not with it's cpu, not with it's gpu)
- you can't mine BTC profitably with a botnet (a botnet with 1000 PC's with an i7 will make you less than $10 a year if you run them at 100% load 24/7 for a full year)
- you can't mine BTC with a supercomputer (since a supercomputer is basically just a collection of hundreds of 'nodes', which are basically small, stipped servers)
2810  Other / Meta / Re: how to recover banned bitcointalk account? on: March 05, 2018, 09:30:40 AM
I think banned account cannot be recovered. so, you have to register for new account.
It isn't the account that gets banned, it's you (as a person). If you are permabanned, and register a new account, it's called "ban evasion", which is a bannable offence if you get caught.

You are allowed to create a new account and open 1 thread (only 1) in the meta subforum to discuss your ban. That's all... If you PM, open a second thread, create a thirth account, you're evading your ban and risk your other account(s) to be banned as well.

If you are permabanned and you don't know why, create this new account, open 1 new thread in meta and ask why you were banned... After you get your explanation, log out and stay away from the forum for a couple of months.... When several months have passed, you can (potentially) appeal using the one (and only) allowed thread in meta you opened earlyer and hope the admin is in a really good mood and gives you a second chance (altough i wouldn't get my hopes up)
2811  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Self generated wallet seed on: March 05, 2018, 08:49:53 AM
You could get a Trezor, add a passphrase (works like the 25th in the seed and It can be anything so no need to be afraid of Brute force attacks), even If someone have access to your 24 words, nothing much can be done to retrieve your funds as the last one will be memorized in your head or you can use Electrum extended seed feature (cheaper but safe as long as your PC contain no malware).

agreed, the brain is a terrible source of entropy (that's a quote i picked up a long time ago, but i don't remember from who).
An other option would be to generate a seed using a hardware wallet or electrum, then use an algo like Shamir's Secret Sharing Scheme, for example with 5 shares and a subset of 3 shares needed to restore the secret. Hide each share with a different friend/family member and use one strong root password. This way, 3 of your closes friends/family members would have to collaborate AND know your password in order to restore the 24 word seed...
2812  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it worth having more than one hardware/paper wallet if you hold just one curr on: March 02, 2018, 08:14:44 AM
Hardware wallets are pretty safe as-is, however, personally, i haven't put all my eggs into one basket either Wink It never hurts to have 2 brands of hardware wallets if you hold enough crypto imho...
2813  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: With Electrum i don't need to worry about how many inputs i have, right? on: February 28, 2018, 11:18:22 AM
Because I can simply select the coins I want to use for small payments.

Sure, you can manually pick unspent outputs that will be spent in a new transaction. That being said: it's never a good idear to collect dust, since sooner or later the avg fee/byte needed for a fast confirmation will rise again, and at this point you'll have to pay a lot of fees to spend that dust...

It might be a good idear to use all your dust outputs to fund a new address you own, combining your dust when the estimated fee/byte is low can save you a lot on tx fees afterwards
2814  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: when will release LIGHTNING BITCOIN hard fork ? on: February 26, 2018, 04:50:54 PM
I thought Lightning has already been released.

Hum, but its not profitable like other hard fork , Nor a big change in crypto market cap.

The lightning network is not a fork. It's a protocol that allows people to create payment channels that can be settled on chain when they are closed after usage. Only 2 on chain tx's are needed: one to open a ln channel, one to close a ln channel. All other tx's in the channel are off chain, this makes them instant and results in less tx's in the blocks
2815  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Managed to restore an old paper wallet - how to roughly proceed with forks? on: February 26, 2018, 09:19:35 AM
I suggest you try https://www.excrypts.org/ easy and secure way to get fork coins

I highly suggest people avoid closed-source wallets posted about by people who sound like shills. When your bitcoins disappear into the night because somebody uses this garbage, don't blame me.

Agree. I would not do that. My plan is to look for electrum now which seems to be the wallet of choice for many.
I did not come very far with armory.

I personally moved my bitcoin cash and bitcoin gold to a new wallet, a simple tip i might add: start by creating a new BTC wallet and moving all your unspent outputs on the BTC chain to this new wallet(you already did this), then start with the most valuable fork and work your way down to the least valuable fork, skip the forks without replay protection and move those ones after all other transactions on all other forked chains have confirmed.

Also remember: if you want to keep 2 BTC wallets disconnected from eachother for privacy reasons: don't move unspent outputs from both wallets on a forked chain to the same forked wallet... This will destroy your anonimity, since people can analyse these forked chains as easily as they can analyse the BTC chain
2816  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sherlock_er - Scammer on: February 23, 2018, 07:46:03 AM
Where’s the scam patrol crew on this one?  Why didn’t they tag this user?  They have opinions on every user on the forum, but when a scammer gets caught in the act suddenly they’re nowhere to be found. I wonder why...

Gave him a tag. In general, I don't like to give negative feedback on scam accusations without PM/screenshot evidence of the deal in question. In this case, it's pretty clear cut, but I think it's best practice to include that info if you want others to tag too.

Thank you.  In this case, the evidence would expose the buyer's address.  The only other evidence is the lack of communication.  Mostly I wanted to document it in public and get multiple confirmations from community members that the right thing to do at this point is to refund the buyer before doing so.  That way it will be crystal clear what happened if the seller magically appears with a scam accusation right after I refund the buyer.

Since i'm not in DT, a neg tag from me wouldn't really help your cause, if it was helping i'd probably tag him.
If i understand correctly, the last communication you had with him was only 5 days ago? I'd probably wait another 3 days before releasing the escrow, that way it would be a full week without response, and you would have covered your tracks by making this problem public 3 days before actually initiating a refund.
Don't get me wrong: if you initiated a refund today, i'd still think this was fair, since the seller didn't provide reliable tracking info within 18 days.

In any case, i'm going to bookmark this thread to refer to as a perfect example the next time i'm telling a newbie to use an escrow service... This is a standard case to proof why escrow services are badly needed, you probably saved the seller...
2817  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented on: February 22, 2018, 10:59:30 AM
Why i get an destroyed session id for a new one ?
---snip---
i got the same id again when i start a new session.
---snip---
and an  deposit wallet address is also predifined in the wallet field

I think it has something to do with web cookies and the way the system assign new sessionID and depo address
if I completely close the browser and start mixing again I'm getting new session ID
but yes I'm still getting the SAME deposit address again
it might be put in place for good reasons to avoid a few future problems (lost/expired session ID?)
I'm pretty sure once the address is funded, you won't be getting the same one if you destroy it and start a new one

I can verify this answer...
If i create a new session, fund the address, wait for a confirmation, sweep the private key, destroy the session THEN create a new mixing session, i get the same sessionid, but a different deposit address.

If i create a new session, fund the address, wait for a confirmation, sweep the private key, DON'T destroy the session (never go to step 4) THEN create a new mixing session before the session expired, i get the same sessionid and deposit address. However, if i fund this address for the second time, i get new chips equaling the value of the second deposit and when i go to step 3, i see the private keys for the "first" session and the "second" session... I think it's working as designed, and i have no problem with this.
2818  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Why do people buy bitcointalk accounts? on: February 22, 2018, 10:47:46 AM
it easy high rank acount have more credibility so they are more trusted ex: two sellers in this forum one newbie and one legendary even if the legendary sell in higher price people will buy from him cause he is more trustable . you have less chances to be scammed by a legendary acount . that why high lvl acount are more precious abd even if it illegal some people sell or buy them . Wink Wink

Buying and selling accounts is not illegal (not against the forum rules). It is frowned upon, and, if caught, the buyer AND seller will probably receive negative trust from DT... However, the buyer and seller will not be banned, since account sales are not forbidden...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0#post_rules
read rule 18 Smiley

Don't get me wrong: i'm not an advocate of account sales... I'm just saying that the claim that account sales are illegal is false... They are frowned upon, discouraged, distrusted,... but not illegal.

OP: i think you've gotten your answer in the first 2 posts in your thread, in my opinion the other answers were just rehashing the first two answers... Please close this topic to avoid clutter.
2819  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BTC mempool cleared out completely for the first time in 3 mths - ‘historic’ pic on: February 22, 2018, 10:40:29 AM
Cause: Many people aren't using bitcoin as before

Consequence: fees are very low. Even 1 sat per byte confirms very quickly.


While lower fees are a good thing, lower bitcoin transactions means losing adoption -- or maybe transactions are being batched more efficiently?


You can see a drop in the number of transactions confirmed per day, but I don't think the drop in activity is big enough to fully explain it.
Increased efficiency might also play a (small?) part.

Just compare both charts:
https://i.imgur.com/nW0LzVf.png (number of confirmed transactions per day)

https://i.imgur.com/WWAmjE5.png (Mempool size)

Does anyone have another theory?

What do you mean by increased efficiency? The diff is still rising a little bit, the average time between two blocks is still ~10 minutes...
I did notice more and more people are using segwit wallets, that might result in slightly more transactions per block (i see a lot of blocks that are 1,1-1,5 Mb in size nowadays). This does not account for the drop we're seeing tough.
An other explanation might be that a few people might actually be using the LN, altough i doubt that at this point this would contribute largely to the drop we're seeing...

The only reasonable explanation is that somebody (a person, a group, several people, several groups) for some reason stopped broadcasting an insane amount of transactions. Given that the drop was achieved in a relatively short time, it is my hypothesis that a group or organisation was behind the massive amount of transactions. The reason behind this flood is unknown and might be bening (for example, a large group of traders, or a network that uses these transactions for alternative purposes), accidental or a malicious spam attack (either for political or financial reasons)... We'll probably never know. The only thing we know is that, for now, they stopped flooding the network.
2820  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: I run a full node. Is there a desktop client to connect to this full node? on: February 22, 2018, 10:21:30 AM
2) directly connect your raspberry PI with your PC and change the data directory of your PC's wallet to the data dir of the full node on the raspberry pi.
This makes it not necessary to have the whole blockchain downloaded on your desktop PC.

As far as i remember, this only works if the daemon on the rPi is no longer running... You can't run a daemon on the rPi and while it's running use the blockchain stored on the rPi for running an other daemon or a QT client.

OP... If you're comfortable using the cli, there is the option of just using json-rpc commands, altough i would recommand setting up an stunnel between your local machine and the rPi for encryption purposes Smiley.

To do this, first setup stunnel, then edit your bitcoin.conf to allow connections from your client machine and setup a strong user/pwd , then install bitcoin-cli on your client. Offcourse, you'll need to add the following parameters to each command you send: -rpcconnect=<ip>, -rpcport=<port>, -rpcuser=<user>, -rpcpassword=<pw>. You can also looking into rpcauth instead of rpcuser and rpcpassword...

I've had the same question a long time ago, and as far as i know, that's about the only way to do this using bitcoin core... I didn't find a way to run bitcoin-qt by connecting to the daemon on a secundary machine (and i did search for a sollution for quite a while)
Pages: « 1 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 ... 262 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!