Here we have yet another admin wannabe. great.

I think where he said "sir" to LoyceV caused this finding right? nice to see that you guys are doing what you are supposed to do. tag them green trust garbage posters.

Nobody is using my service yet.

Beside the three tags from you, marlboroza and actmyname, those 2 other cases are completely voluntary and I have received no money for them. thanks for asking.

Here is my argument:

If we could find a way to stop people from abusing other people with DT position they were given temporarily, we'll have a healthy community where people could do their businesses right.

I believe that Vod has misused the trust system by tagging Anduck with red after 2 years, actmyname misused the trust system by tagging Anduck with green without having any past dealings with Anduck, and I also believe that Vod has also misused the trust system by tagging actmyname with green after actmyname countered Vod's feedback on Anduck. however I am willing to forgive both Vod and actmyname if they accept that what they have done is wrong, they are not going to because they think whatever they are doing is right unless somebody in a position of power says otherwise. unfortunately the people in any position of authority around these forums are busy doing God knows what? then I have no other choice than publicly posting about the wrong doings of people in hopes of getting the attention of community members and letting them know who they are dealing with here.

Bump, free service here. I will soon include 2 new cases of power abuse by Vod and actmyname in the second reserved post of this thread.

Cheers.

This is yet another reason as to why Vod should be removed from DT2 position, those who have included him on DT2 seem to not care about Vod's actions, they don't care if what he is doing is damaging our reputation. if they refuse to take any action after seeing all of his abuse of other people, they are also not fit to be on DT1.

BUT from the looks of it, they are busy with their businesses, they are busy lining their pockets elsewhere and they have left us all to get abused by these rogue DT2 members. if you see that people are ignoring the truth is because most of the people in this forum are garbage posters, they are earning money here by garbage posting all the time, they are afraid to say anything because they could lose their earning opportunity, they are the worse people on this earth. sad truth OP.

Please note that whatever rating a global moderator leaves for people is not endorsed by this forum. what don hilary has done is the definition of a trustworthy individual, he is trying to protect people from getting scammed and he is trying his best. you could grow in some other area, I'd suggest you trying to criticize people constructively.

I'd suggest to you start reporting garbage posts/off topic posts in Bitcoin discussion board and after a month and after reporting at least 1000 posts accurately ask him for a chance. if by then you have improved your behavior of course.

Cheers.

Thank you. due to the language barrier, I can not express myself perfectly, however it seems that you understand my point.

I see that marlboroza and don hilary's alt are earning their positions on DT2 by doing right for this community. kudos guys. I might tag you both with some green if you keep at what you are doing. I am sincerely thankful to you both.

Well, people on default trust should keep their own opinions to themselves since their opinions is visible to everybody  by default, so if every one of them tries to have a different opinion, their feedbacks says otherwise.

You on DT2 would tag A as untrustworthy, actmyname then would tag A as trustworthy (according to default trust being visible to people).
You have tried to take advantage of DT2 position to dictate your own opinions and make them appear as default trust rating to everybody in this community. you have proven so many times to be abusing people with your DT2 power you hold over 99.99% of forum members.

Anduck clearly states that he is not going to bid on his auctions after seeing the reactions of this community's members, yet you insist on tagging him for something that happened 2 years ago.

As it appears, Vod has been abusing his DT2 status for years, he has given positive trust and negative trust to anybody he sees fit, when he is called out to play the role of a trustworthy person, he would dismiss it with posting an image and would move on.

I have done some digging and it is clear that he is favoring some people over others and this person should not hold any power. it is once again clear that Vod is not fit to be on DT2. he tagged anduck for something from the past, actmyname abused his DT2 status by countering Vod's feedback while actmyname had no past dealings with Anduck, then Vod goes and leaves a positive trust for actmyname for abusing his DT2 position.

This is a blatant case of abusing DT2 position by both Vod and actmyname, they would artificially tag each other red/green whenever they want, therefore I'd like to request for removal of Vod and actmyname from DT2. unless they both agree that what they have done was wrong and accept that they have made a mistake. but that is not the case, they think what they are doing is right because no one in any position of power is doing anything to stop them.

What matters here is:

Did mprep use his mod power to edit a post in an auction thread?
If yes then that is bad. IMHO he should never do that again ever. did he learn from his mistake and never repeated the same thing? if yes then we need to forgive him and allow him to improve himself. if he insists on doing it and says what he has done is right, he shouldn't stay as a mod.

I don't see him saying that, so he should stay as a mod.

Now, did he tag the OP for pointing this abuse of mod position? that's bad and he needs to reconsider the tag.
Did OP tag mprep because mprep tagged the OP? that's retaliatory feedback but it shouldn't be worrying for mprep.

IMO, you both should give each other another chance and move on.

So the whole reason for my tag is based on wrong wording? red tag removal: click for more information=hire me to defend your case. end of story.

Let me explain it in another way:

One would say:

Rapist for hire. click for more information.
After clicking you'd see this:

Hello, I'd like to offer my raping service, I'd come to your house and would rape you if you are of legal age and with your consent, my fee is xx.xx.
Then you'd see that what he is doing is legal in his state/country.

Could you then throw such a person to jail as a real rapist? no because there has been misunderstanding and wrong wording. that is all I have tried to say all along, suchmoon and marlboroza tagged me for my wrong wording. note that I am not native English speaker.

Lol, you are here to commend a trust abuser? good on you man. actmyname had no past dealings with Anduck, countering Vod's feedback is abuse of power by actmyname, unless actmyname feels that since Blazed had some trades with Anduck it justifies his feedback for Anduck?

Somebody is trying to become a mod of off topic section by posting with newbie accounts and then reporting them?

They all joined facebook campaign? did they spam this forum?

So it seems that suchmoon, actmyname and Vod all three agree that they should use the trust system to hide the truth.
Here is my argument:

Vod has tagged Anduck stating that he was trying to scam people by bidding on his own auction. great and thank you for your vigilance.

Actmyname comes here and would counter Vod's feedback to hide Vod's negative trust on Anduck's profile only from the public, Vod's tag on Anduck is still accessible and people could read it, now Anduck only has the look of a trustworthy person on his profile, nothing has changed.

Vod then goes and leaves a positive feedback for actmyname after I have already tagged actmyname for trying to hide the truth, that means Vod is trying to double hide the truth from the public's eyes.

This seems trustworthy behavior? hell no. am I a loon in the eyes of these trust abusers? hell yes. now here is my question to admin:

Do you really want these kind of activities on this forum? dig a little deeper and you'll see that these people have tried to do this garbage for years, they have constantly tried to hide the truth from the public. this is not new at all, this is what caught my attention, there is more.

They are blatantly running around and would tag people red or green for any reason they want and because of the lack of moderation they have gone rogue, if they are not stopped, they would continue to do this and would say what they are doing is justified.

Read the title of my thread which is accessible via reference link from first tag of suchmoon on my profile. it says : hire me to defend your case!

So now Vod has given a positive trust to actmyname because actmyname tried to hide the truth by countering Vod's feedback? I'm disappointed in you man. tagged Vod for colluding with DT2 member actmyname.

Note that actmyname has no past dealings with Anduck, he had no right to counter Vod's feedback, Vod is also misusing the trust system. therefore my tag on him is valid.

Would you stick around and post like that if you have no signature on your profile? if the answer is yes, I'd suggest you to do it. remove your signature and start posting like that then come here to say why your posts were deleted.

If the answer is no, then FHF has done his job correctly.