Haha, lets see how that's gonna work out for you.  The latter one looks like fallout.  |
|
|
|
possible bottom is $44 (but in zero sum game it is not possible to sell @ $90 and buy back @ $45 for everyone) :-)
LOL somebody is showing colors. What a hypocrite!  |
|
|
|
Come on! Gogogo!  |
|
|
|
Now is the chance to turn this around.
Or should I say?
"Now or never.."
not yet Oh yes it is. |
|
|
|
|
Now is the chance to turn this around.
Or should I say?
"Now or never.."
|
|
|
|
Every BTC traded for LTC keeps the cash reserved for other folks. That said I hope LTC goes as high as possible. |
|
|
|
He's having a party with Max Kaiser.
Are you sure you didn't mean Anderson Cooper? Quite |
|
|
|
If you are bored LTC had a nice suckers rally today. (Like you can't already tell by the suckers making threads here ) Why are they rallying? They shouldn't be being so pegged to btc as they are.. mtgox mentioned Litecoin, yes it's that pathetic. |
|
|
|
If you are bored LTC had a nice suckers rally today. (Like you can't already tell by the suckers making threads here ) |
|
|
|
|
Also option #2 is BTC price "catches up" with LTC price, which is entirely possible.
|
|
|
|
MtGox's success has overloaded the blockchain and therefore Bitcoin txs can't be processed.
do you have more info about that issue ? and why would they shutdown their chat support and wont replying tickets on this issue ? would have been a lot simpler if they'll just explain the situation to users HAHAHA my sides! |
|
|
|
|
He's having a party with Max Kaiser.
|
|
|
|
|
Most likely it's gonna be dumped to oblivion. Unless there is a reason for it, for example we are having this discussion in a Litecoin forum, it's Litecoin which is in the news, and so on...
Get the picture?
|
|
|
|
Not enough activity in here so to get things rolling again...
pic
Any credence to our triangle we will solve in around 48 hours following the breakdown observed on Bitstamp? We are trading over 7% higher on Gox at this time, a price not followed on any other exchanges?
Is it possible the price is being kept artificially higher on the high volume exchange? Why?
http://www.coindesk.com/what-to-expect-at-bitcoin-london-2013/Ok, so why have we not seen an increase in price on all the other exchanges? Because for many the only way to withdraw fiat from Gox - is to withdraw BTC from Gox and sell for other exchanges. There's so little of proposals purchase , a kind of dumping for the down in price other exchanges (collusion to buy coins for less of the market) it works this way, not vice versa, as everyone here speak IMHO No sorry it's not. if that were true Litecoin could never have risen the way it did. People transfer fiat to and from other exchanges all the time, |
|
|
|
|
We aren't really in the discussion about a real bear case, all this is yet is a correction. And it will be until the price is above $20.
A real bear case would be a multi-year downturn ending below the 2011 low of $1.98.
|
|
|
|
im out but ive saved 600k of BTC for price of 5000$
YOu became the bigger bullshitter than rpietila and that's some achievement. rpietila wasn't lying like that. He really did believe his 300$/mBTC prediction and he never lied about his holding afaik. You thought he did, which means he might have just been doing a good job at fooling you. |
|
|
|
Trying for a breakout as we speak.
More like breakdown... lolamirite??? |
|
|
|
Yeah a lot of people "truly appreciate" numerology too. (Or "investing" in Bitcoins for that matter  ) I'm guessing you're a hardened disbeliever, ElecticMucus. What characteristic about Elliott Wave is troubling you? No check for consistency is done. (Usually by the drawing lines on a chart approach) But I hold about every other method in the same regard, that includes traditional indicators, candle sticks and whatnot. I would even say every approach which isn't fully automated isn't worth the effort. Interpreting the chart as a continuous non-differentiable function is ok, but attribution of arbitrary constraints is not. (Like Fibonacci ratios which are literally Numerology) Don't come with a "track record" unless you show me statistical proof I call BS. Price is certainly not continuous. But the function you can describe it with can be. The concrete description becomes non-continuous once you calculate it. An EW is continuous on it's own for example. @RyNinDaCleM Bullshit. I told I'll do it. |
|
|
|
Yeah a lot of people "truly appreciate" numerology too. (Or "investing" in Bitcoins for that matter ) I'm guessing you're a hardened disbeliever, ElecticMucus. What characteristic about Elliott Wave is troubling you? No check for consistency is done. (Usually by the drawing lines on a chart approach) But I hold about every other method in the same regard, that includes traditional indicators, candle sticks and whatnot. I would even say every approach which isn't fully automated isn't worth the effort. Interpreting the chart as a continuous non-differentiable function is ok, but attribution of arbitrary constraints is not. (Like Fibonacci ratios which are literally Numerology) Don't come with a "track record" unless you show me statistical proof I call BS. |
|
|
|
Yeah a lot of people "truly appreciate" numerology too. (Or "investing" in Bitcoins for that matter ) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
