Adding Westbrook should not make the Lakers a super team. It's no secret to anyone that there's no perfect pair on Westbrook since then. The expectation to Lakers is not because they are a super team but they should have a tough way to work on their chemistry.

Actually, most of their core players are contributing in every game but where's the problem?

Number 1, when they are big lead, they are confident.
Number 2, they are not playing defense.
Number 3, players rotation. If someone is off-night even after playing for almost 20 minutes, the coach should bench them and give way to others regardless if it's a superstar, all-star, or bench.
Number 4, there are still missing players which might fill the hole of what's lacking to them, e.g Austin Reeves, Kendrick Nunn, the veteran Trevor Ariza.

Now putting again Los Angeles Lakers as a part of my parlay to win against the Indiana Pacers. I failed to win on some of my parlays previously because of them.

In their last 2 games, they always make a rally after being down by a big lead means there's something lacking at their offensive phase at the start of the game. They are just finding the rhythm at the later part of the game which is not good.

Like to include them on my parlay because of the odds boost. I will risk again including them on my bet. Hopefully this time, my timing is correct.

Since we are talking about success, obviously, should be both. Good development with hard and strong marketing will somehow give an assurance to the investors that those developers behind the project are really doing their best effort while at the same time, spending money for developments and marketing.

For just building a hype, eventually, it will be failed. If there's an attempt of hyping the project, it should maintain the status of being popular. And to make it popular, it should achieve investor's criteria and having good development and technology is one of it.

If I'm not mistaken, there is/are related thread before about this.

That was subjective and varies per gambler. We can really see gamblers putting their superstitious beliefs in betting as part of increasing the winning chance. Technically, there are no related doings wherein someone can lead the desired result favored to them. However, with these methods of how to increase the winning chance, there are lots of ways that gamblers do to somehow make it happen and aside from doing analysis, relying on luck is also considered.

Applying superstitions in gambling is already part of the gambling world for a long. It should not a big deal for those who don't believe in that.

That was exactly the reason why age should not be considered as a disadvantage for Donaire.

Remember that he's the one who gave Naoya Inoue his first cut damage on the champion's career (a cut above his right eye) and the first boxer to make Inoue struggles to win.

Gaballo surely knows that he's up against the monster. I'm looking forward to him giving Donaire a tough match.

Yes, GGG's 43 fights over Murata's 16, their experience has a large distance. We should also take note that on that 43 fights of GGG, he only lost 1 by decision (against Canelo) and that's a controversial one. Almost a perfect and clean record.

This will be a tough job for Murata. He just attained the full WBA Super Middleweight champion because Canelo vacant the position. He should prove now that he deserves that status by pulverizing GGG.

Still can't think of how Murata will be able to snatch a win against GGG. The gap is so wide.

Can you give an example of the arranged fight that was manipulated? Or something else like an event where we can say that the fight is crap? Do you think the mandatory fight assigned to Donaire was a trash?

A mandatory challenge is part of the regulation of sanctioning bodies. In this case, it's WBO. It was the term ever since.

If you can elaborate more and give support to your statement, let's discuss it.

The aftermath of the Terence Crawford vs Shawn Porter fight:

- Shawn Porter announce his retirement. He said that win, loss, or draw, he will really retire and hang his gloves.
- Terence Crawford says he’s moving on from Top Rank with his contract expired. Tired of Bob's not arranging a fight with Errol Spence and the status is always "possible" for long.

The much-awaited fight between Terence Crawford and Errol Spence Jr. might likely happen next year.

Shawn Porter announces retirement following loss to Terence Crawford
Terence Crawford leaving Top Rank: “Bob Arum couldn’t secure me the Errol Spence fight, I’m moving forward”

Donaire's last goal might be a rematch to Inoue before retiring. But he needs to finish the task first by beating Gaballo.

I'm supporting both Donaire and Gaballo here but maybe it's time now for a younger generation to enter the big picture. If Donaire will lose in this match, he should retire now for good as Inoue won't show any interest in a rematch. If Gaballo, on the other hand, losses, he should take that loss as his inspiration and fuel to improve more.

I expecting a while ago that the Lakers will have again a lot of criticisms if they lose on that game against the Pistons. Fortunately, they were able to make a rally and even won in that game. Thanks to the team's effort especially with the most haters in their roster, Russell Westbrook. The nice adjustment he made and I hope the consistency is there. Although, in the first place, they shouldn't have a problem dealing with the Detroit Pistons but it turned out they struggle.


If someone from the audience threw a plastic cup of Diet Coke to Lebron, that will be a start. Westbrook will be the Stephen Jackson since he's the one from the Lakers that aggressively react to Stewart . Anyways, far from happening.

That makes sense. If a person will buy a team today, it will just have a much longer time to reach ROI compared to several months ago.

What matters there is and more importantly, everyone will reach their respective ROI no matter what regardless of the current exchange rate. SLP seems to have a strong floor at around $0.04-$0.06 and takes that price level as a reference for any computations regarding investment. If the SLP price increase, then a bonus.

MATIC is currently on the rise and showing good progress since then. Their game, Ethermon now established a good number of players.

WAX Blockchain is also one of the top-performing chains today and showing a good price movement for weeks now. Most of the DAPPS under that network is able to attract new people to try the network.

KAI network is also in bloom because of their DAPP, MyDefiPet.

But overall, adding BSC as an alternative network is really necessary. It's now the general chain that was mostly used. It will give convenience to users who want to try the other network's DAPP.

Data and information about a certain coin are sometimes wrong or outdated. It's normal and common to encounter.

No need to judge if one of those tracking sites is sh*t. If you want certain information, you can check that particular coin on all tracking websites. See if there's any information that different from another.

I consider CMC and Poocoin as a good references for coin information. If there's an outdated one, we can always reach them for a prompt.

That's the main concern of others, how to determine if the price can now be called "low"?

In that particular situation, people should make their own factors and criteria on how to able to know or determine if the coin's price is now good to buy.

I suggest that they just need to continue working with any strategies. As soon as they are used to it, they can now, at least, make a decision if the certain coin is now reaching its buying point without looking at the market chart.

What's next for Crawford then? Looking for him to compete next with the best-of-the-best after this winning against Shawn Porter. Watching it live yesterday (at my time), we can see already on the early rounds the distance between these 2 fighters.

Kudos to Shawn Porter though that he try to keep up with his phase. Crawford is just too much to handle.

Honestly, to any boxer, moving up on weight class is more efficient compare to going down. It's hard to reach much lower weight requirements and that results in a dehydrated body. Canelo has a good decision to step up since no room for any achievements now on his current stage as he already claimed the title "undisputed" champion.

But don't be deceived by Ilunga Makabu from being a not-known or unpopular boxer to others here. I'm sure he will give a Canelo a difficult match.

Can't pinpoint some of them but you can check out the daily performance on Binance or Kucoin. There are altcoins that are rocking despited of the current trend. You can start there as your reference then choose if it's worth putting your money.

That's my first pitstop when choosing new altcoins to test and if possible, be part of my portfolio list.

Actually, that's not weird as he always like that at most. He really needs to be confident or else, his momentum will be spoiled. I'm sure he is well-prepared for the fight and will show his 100% as he is against all odds. On the other hand, Crawford will also do the same.


If no choice but to bet on Crawford, or should I say, I really don't like to bet on Porter, I will bet on Crawford by decision @1.76. Hard for me to bet on a KO win by Crawford as even he's the clear dominant on that fight, I think Porter can stand strong until the final bell rings.

I will share a Livestream here if I can find one.

Almost every project has a good roadmap and future plans. There are also lots of projects who have a good team. But that's not an assurance that you are in a good place as we don't know what will happen along the way.

Your decision if you will buy tokens for new projects should have criteria. Create yours. After risking and putting money there, hope for the best.

Stake.com minimum withdrawal is BTC0.0005 regardless of BTC/USD conversion rate. Not BTC0.002.

Can you elaborate on the disadvantage of Stake.com that you provided in the reviews?

- What do you mean by their VIP program is not clear?
- Lack of bonuses?
- Sportsbook coefficients are not the best by what means?