Bitcoin Forum
November 07, 2024, 03:52:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 [142] 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 ... 236 »
2821  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [4000 GH] BTC Guild - PPS, PPLNS with TxFees+Orphans, Stratum+Vardiff ASIC Ready on: February 12, 2013, 02:23:35 PM
Still stuck on 16 diff after many reconnects. Any Ideas?

I've found the problem!  Working on a fix now.  It's related to case sensitivity.  Fix will be deployed soon I hope.

EDIT/UPDATE:  Fixed your settings Joshwaa, all your workers [non-hidden] have been reset to diff=1 [most won't drop below diff=2 without a reconnect though].  Future changes will go through as expected.
2822  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [60 GH/s] HHTT - User Selected Share Difficulty/PPS/Paid Stales on: February 12, 2013, 02:16:16 AM
(snip) I expect tons of silly endian problems.

Oh, you have no idea.  Your blood will boil with the endianess and byteswappery nonsense.
2823  Economy / Gambling / Re: SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game on: February 11, 2013, 10:24:59 PM
2 BTC and up -always- requires confirmation [this is after hundreds of games], regardless of the fee attached.  I know my 1 BTC bets used to get instant response when they had a fee attached, but I never made any between 1 and 2 to determine where the exact cutoff was.

It would be nice to have the old instantaneous SatoshiDice back, but I can certainly understand the need to wait for confirmations on large bets.  It's just too easy to attempt a double spend when you lose, and on large bets, there is significant incentive to do so.
2824  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3700 GH] BTC Guild - PPS, PPLNS with TxFees+Orphans, Stratum+Vardiff ASIC Ready on: February 11, 2013, 01:28:33 AM
Not using the proxy. Adjusted down my diff a while ago and restarted the miner. Still no change yet. I am sure variable diff would have adjusted me by now.


Alright, I'm seeing on my worker that vardiff isn't reducing difficulty on an already connected miner after minimum difficulty is decreased.  However, a reconnect is immediately fixes the problem.

Still looking at why vardiff won't eventually reduce difficulty on an established connections when you decrease the minimum.
2825  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3700 GH] BTC Guild - PPS, PPLNS with TxFees+Orphans, Stratum+Vardiff ASIC Ready on: February 11, 2013, 12:59:10 AM
Still not working(difficulty setting). Tried restarting miner still no luck.

I saw in the logs your worker immediately bumped up to a higher difficulty as soon as the server restarted.  Additionally, looking at the Stratum proxy for my own farm, it IMMEDIATELY changes the difficulty when I increase the minimum.  Note:  It will never allow you to decrease difficulty on demand.  Lowering minimum difficulty will have to wait for your miner to naturally get adjusted downward by the normal vardiff formula.  Also note that the Stratum proxy by default [I think] will continue to serve work as diff=1 to your workers, but will only relay shares of the proper difficulty upstream.
2826  Other / Archival / Re: Mining pools list on: February 10, 2013, 11:44:27 PM
Hi organofcorti,
  2 small changes for BTC Guild.  As of last night all the servers are now running at 20 SPM target variable difficulty.  I also added user-definable minimum difficulty to the Stratum interface.

Hi eleuthria,

I changed your "Variable difficulty" field to " 20 SPM / User Defined  " - that ok?

Perfect Smiley.
2827  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3700 GH] BTC Guild - PPS, PPLNS with TxFees+Orphans, Stratum+Vardiff ASIC Ready on: February 10, 2013, 11:29:13 PM
I'm in the US and running a few miners off one stratum proxy.  I've tried restarting the proxy (pointing to stratum.btcguild.com:3333 and redirects through btcguild.com:8332).  My diff target just climbs to the usual number.  I have all miners set for higher diff targets at BTCguild.

I've done a brief restart on the pools, and the logs now show that once your worker reconnected you were immediately increased to the minimum difficulty you specified.
2828  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3700 GH] BTC Guild - PPS, PPLNS with TxFees+Orphans, Stratum+Vardiff ASIC Ready on: February 10, 2013, 10:27:35 PM
I have tried to adjust difficulty for my miners and it is not working. Do I need to connect to a different server for it to work.

It should work on all Stratum servers.  This is a MINIMUM difficulty though.  If you mine too quickly, variable difficulty will still retarget your difficulty to the ~20 shares per minute target.



EDIT/UPDATE:  Fixed!  When adding the Germany server to the list, I used the same variable for opening the socket to push the command to that server as the one used for one of the two US servers, overwriting the connection.  I'm going to manually push some difficulty changes so all servers have the same difficulty settings cached for workers.
2829  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Why do some transactions have multiple inputs from the same address? on: February 10, 2013, 07:25:51 PM
I often see transactions with more than one input with the same address. Why?

When sending coins, the inputs used are previously received amounts [outputs from other addresses, or possibly even the same address].
The balance of an address is the sum of unspent inputs.  When sending coins, you must reference these unspent inputs to create the outputs.

- Address 1Guy has 10 BTC in total, made up of 10 individual 1 BTC payments from various sources.
- 1Guy wants to send 3 BTC to 1Girl.
- 1Guy's transaction to 1Girl requires 3 separate inputs to complete the transaction.
2830  Other / Archival / Re: Mining pools list on: February 10, 2013, 04:24:53 PM
Hi organofcorti,
  2 small changes for BTC Guild.  As of last night all the servers are now running at 20 SPM target variable difficulty.  I also added user-definable minimum difficulty to the Stratum interface.
2831  Economy / Gambling / Re: BitMillions.com - More than ฿ 1,400 in Prizes - Now Play with ONLY ฿ 0.01 !! on: February 10, 2013, 03:22:58 PM
Love the site, very well done.  Only one thing I'm a bit confused over:  Is there a reason you decided to have the tickets pay out for each play?  The current method is going to end up filling wallets with a lot of small inputs, making it harder to spend without long delays and/or high fees.  Perhaps a separate address to purchase a ticket which sends your total winnings after the ticket fully matures?  This saves you money, and the player as well in the long run.

It's possible to buy a ticket that runs for several years.  You probably wouldn't want to wait for the end for it to pay out.  A compromise like paying out every 100 draws would seem reasonable though.  That would mean payouts every 16.7 hours on average.  And if they always paid out on draws ending with 00 then players could easily know how many more draws until their next payout.

Good point, I hadn't thought of the idea of buying a single ticket that lasted for a significant time.  An every-100 blocks payout ticket would definitely be a good compromise there.  I just hate seeing the blockchain bloat and difficult to spend outputs filling a wallet [glares at SatoshiDice].
2832  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3600 GH] BTC Guild - PPS, PPLNS with TxFees+Orphans, Stratum+Vardiff ASIC Ready on: February 09, 2013, 10:19:03 PM
Minimum difficulty settings are now enabled for the US-based Stratum servers.  The EU/Germany Stratum server will be updated later this evening to include the API calls needed to update difficulty.

The link can be found under 'Manage Workers', labeled "Difficulty Settings".


EDIT:  I know the interface is a little clunky for users with a large number of workers.  I will be making subtle changes to the interface over time to make it easier to mass edit and keep track of which workers you're changing.


UPDATE: EU/Germany stratum server has been updated to the latest version, and now supports minimum difficulty modifications.
2833  Economy / Gambling / Re: BitMillions.com - More than ฿ 1,400 in Prizes - Now Play with ONLY ฿ 0.01 !! on: February 09, 2013, 09:29:19 PM
Love the site, very well done.  Only one thing I'm a bit confused over:  Is there a reason you decided to have the tickets pay out for each play?  The current method is going to end up filling wallets with a lot of small inputs, making it harder to spend without long delays and/or high fees.  Perhaps a separate address to purchase a ticket which sends your total winnings after the ticket fully matures?  This saves you money, and the player as well in the long run.
2834  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why does the difficulty adjust every 2016 blocks? Why not every block? on: February 09, 2013, 07:41:08 AM
As the rules are now people can enter their own timestamp on a block up to some distance from other nearby blocks. Over 2016 blocks inaccuracies of an hour or so don't matter, but it would be severe if we changed the difficulty every block. There are even blocks with timestamps before the blocks that they come after, what would difficulty be then?
Let's change the valid timestamp. Every timestamp has to be greater than the previous block's time and less than the network-adjusted time + 10 minutes. What happens then?

Thank you all for your help.

Your solution is impossible, since there is no guarantee of blocks being generated within 10 minutes, and forcing timestamps to show up as if they were 10 minutes apart would just be putting purposely bad information into the block headers.

As for the main question, there is still the massive problem of luck.  Creating a block is a purely random process.  If you've never looked yourself, you should leave blockchain.info up on your screen one day and take note of the varying time between blocks.  Some blocks are generated within seconds of each other, while other blocks have an hour gap between them.  This isn't the result of network hash rate growing/shrinking, just the standard variance associated with mining, spread across the entire network.

The only way to "guarantee" a block is made within 10 minutes would be to set the difficulty so absurdly low that blocks average LESS than 30 seconds.  It is not impossible for a block to take more than 20x the expected amount of work to be completed.
2835  Economy / Gambling / Re: DiceOnCrack.com | If you thought dice was addicting... on: February 09, 2013, 06:47:54 AM
Fun game.  Been making my rounds through some of the various Bitcoin casinos/games.  First couple bets went well, though for some reason my 4 latest bets aren't showing up even after 4/5 confirmations each.  I'm sure they'll probably show up eventually, just pointing out that something seemed to get stuck [possibly due to how long it took for the first confirm?].
2836  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Data Usage on: February 09, 2013, 05:35:19 AM
Hello

I am trying to figure out my monthly data usage for my mining operation.
Does any one know how much data is used per Mhash?
I am switching from an unstable internet source to something more stable.
The downside is I will have a data cap, so I have to chose what size of plan to use
Thanks all

Getwork was a bit more of a bandwidth hog in the old days, especially on fast miners. With the Stratum protocol, bandwidth was reduced significantly, since it's using a persistent TCP stream and sending condensed messages.

An average Stratum work push is about 1 KB. Most pools push work every 30 seconds, which means you're at 16 kilobits per minute downstream, roughly 273 BITS per second.

Submitting a share on Stratum is [roughly] 80 bytes of data. With a variable difficulty pool, you're looking at 12-30 shares per minute depending on the pool. Using the highest (30 SPM), that translates to 2.4 KB uploaded per minute, roughly 330 BITS per second.

The pool then responds with the status of your share, roughly 50 bytes, which would be 1.5 KB per minute, or 200 BITS per second.

Grand total with Stratum: Upstream is ~330 bits per second. Downstream is ~500 bits per second.  That is 101 megabytes uploaded per month, and 154 megabytes downloaded per month.

These are using above average estimates/approximations. Pool settings, the size of the block being hashes, etc., can make these numbers higher or lower, but generally lower.  This bandwidth is per Stratum connection.  cgminer opens one connection per machine (or per cgminer instance launched).  poclbm requires one per GPU I believe.  If you have a large farm, you can combine all of your machines into a single connection by using the Stratum proxy from slush (https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxy).  When using the proxy, the above data rates are roughly the same regardless of how many machines you have, as long as the pool is utilizing variable difficulty.

2837  Economy / Gambling / Re: SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game on: February 09, 2013, 03:47:52 AM
Looks like it's starting to catch up to the backlog.
2838  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3600 GH] BTC Guild - PPS, PPLNS with TxFees+Orphans, Stratum+Vardiff ASIC Ready on: February 09, 2013, 02:00:46 AM
Minimum difficulty interface is almost completed.  Very sorry this did not get released last weekend like I had hoped.  Unfortunately, it's hard to come up with an easy to use interface for settings like this, especially when some users have a large number of workers, leading to very unwieldy form entry.

There will likely be one restart on each Stratum server to complete the change, currently planned for 12:00 PM (noon) PST on Sunday.  The minimum difficulty interface may go live before this time, and will work on the US based server.  The stratum server on Germany will not support minimum difficulty until the restarts.
2839  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for people to store some of the forum's money on: February 06, 2013, 03:53:08 AM
I would be more than happy to help theymos.  Registered member for almost 2 years, and I have had  ~750,000 BTC pass through BTC Guild since inception (exact records from before the pool changed to PPS aren't available to give a concrete BTC generated amount).

100% reserve available, multiple backup encrypted wallet file stored offline, and available for being returned in a short time frame (generally under 12 hours unless requested on the rare occasion where I don't have physical access to my storage for a few days).  Only restriction would be I would need a very clear writeup on how requests for returning the money would be handled/authorized to ensure they don't go where they're not supposed to.  Available at no charge, or a nominal amount like 1 BTC/month you want it to be a clear business arrangement.

Also, my personal information is readily available, I make no attempts to hide it [points to real name under his avatar].  And while the BTC Guild whois information is registered through a proxy, other domains [tradewithcoins.com, infocircuit.com, thoseoldgames.com] are not.
2840  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Pizza for bitcoins? on: February 05, 2013, 11:35:43 PM
Bumping so we can keep our 10k BTC pizza story around through the ages.  Also:  http://blockchain.info/taint/17SkEw2md5avVNyYgj6RiXuQKNwkXaxFyQ?reversed=true  - Reverse taint analysis to show addresses which have received coins from the legendary pizzas.
Pages: « 1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 [142] 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 ... 236 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!