Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 11:17:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ... 236 »
1821  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [275'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 11, 2013, 04:57:28 AM
Seeing a huge drop off in estimated speed, by about half. BFGMiner on my worker showing all devices are ok and hashing away, no issues or errors. The estimated speed on the site was ok after the db migration and this is hours after that so I don't think it was directly tied to that.  This did start happening around midnight Eastern Time, so any chance this could have anything to do with the time zone issues you mentioned?  I've restarted my miners and OS a few times, but all indications from BFGMiner and my PHP RPC status page shows hashrate is normal and healthy with no errors in stdio display and logs.

Also account balance for PPLNS seems to have been moving at a snails pace and should have hit my auto-payout setting hours ago by my reckoning.

Luck went pretty bad during/after migration, so PPLNS hasn't moved much much.  We had 3 bad blocks - 1 hour between 19995 and 19996, 1 hour 40 minutes between that and 19997, 1 hour between that and 19998.  In that time frame we should have had 6-8 blocks.  

Restarting multiple times will definitely impact your estimated speed, since it uses 1 hour worth of data to estimate your speed and all that time lost restarting just means you're going to have to wait for the dead time to leave the average window.

As normal, my usual response:  The pool speed estimate uses the same data your workers do for their estimated speed.  As of this moment, it's showing 281 TH/s.  There's no way for the pool server to discriminate against you, so if there was an issue with the pool it would affect every user on that same server (or all servers if it was database related).  Obviously that isn't the case.
1822  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [19 TH/s] BitMinter.com [ASIC support: var diff, Stratum, GBT, rollntime] on: September 11, 2013, 02:17:47 AM
Is it normal that we find a btc block pratically the same time as à nmc block or the inverse lately ?

Finding a BTC block should always produce a matching NMC block assuming nothing was wrong in the NMC block creation (outdated NMC info/orphan).  The only time this wouldn't be the case is if NMC somehow had a higher difficulty than BTC.
1823  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [265'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 11, 2013, 01:15:45 AM
What abou payments?
I see huge gap there...


2013-09-11 01:37:15 PM.   Link   0.02000000   
2013-09-10 09:37:42 PM   Link   0.02000000   
2013-09-10 08:37:41 PM   Link   0.02000000   


That gap is because you have an extremely small payout.  The scripts limit the number of total payouts made with each batch.  If too many payouts are trying to trigger each hour, some are skipped and picked up on the next cycle.
1824  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [265'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 11, 2013, 12:34:21 AM
Database migration is complete!  There's a little tidying up left to do, and a pesky time zone issue I need to fix, but for the most part everything is now complete.

still speedy.  Shocked Cool! Keep up the good work Eleuthria!

No data on charts... Huh
No data on rankings...

The rest looks fine.

The old chart data was not copied over, so it will take time to repopulate the data for them to start drawing again.  They should start showing up again in an hour or so.  Rankings were the same situation, but they've already started to regenerate.
1825  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [265'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 11, 2013, 12:04:39 AM
Database migration is complete!  There's a little tidying up left to do, and a pesky time zone issue I need to fix, but for the most part everything is now complete.
1826  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [265'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 10, 2013, 11:19:29 PM
eleuthria,

What is the proper procedure to exchange a bad erupter? One of the erupters I got from you is not working.

Thank you.

Please send an email to webmaster@btcguild.com and I will try to respond as soon as the database migration is finished.



RE: Database migration.  Since this is a live move, there is going to be an extremely small window where shares are not counted when the servers get pointed to the new database.  I'm preparing all the SSH sessions so I can very rapidly restart the servers immediately after the snapshot is taken of the live PPLNS shift database.  The estimated loss of mining time is only a few seconds.
1827  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [265'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 10, 2013, 09:47:50 PM
Website/Database Maintenance Reminder

The website and API will be unavailable for an estimated 1 hour of maintenance to migrate the database to a new server.  The pool servers will remain online during the migration, and experience a brief restart when the maintenance is finished.

This maintenance will start when the next shift is finished.  The goal is maintenance will be finished before the following shift is ready to close.


EDIT/UPDATE:  Maintenance has been pushed back to ~4 PM (when the next shift closes) due to one minor oversight that can be addressed prior to entering maintenance mode.
1828  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 10, 2013, 04:28:09 PM
I wonder if i will have to restart my Raspberry pi inorder for it to reconnect to the pooling server. I really hope not. It may not restart. Its at that stage where its working and i dont want to touch it. It may not work anymore if i do.. Cry

So did you move DataCenters again or you staying up there?
Should of gotten with me at the beginning of this year i have a rack full of server i sold for $1k i had 4 - poweredge 2850, 1 Poweredge 1950, 2 poweredge 2650, and 3 poweredge 6600 i think they were.

Holy smokes someone has a 26.83Th monster on the pool.. Shocked

Reconnecting is normally transparent with modern mining software, a lot of the early issues where miners would never reconnect to Stratum have mostly been fixed.  I think the last time the pool servers were restarted the drop in hash rate from miners that failed to reconnect wasn't even measurable compared to the normal hash rate variance.

Same datacenter, just migrating to much better hardware for the database.  The current DB server was never intended to be running something like BTC Guild.  New server is a 1U SuperMicro, E3-1230v2, 32 GB ram, and an LSI 9260-4i with SSDs in RAID1.

Funny that is the exact specs of my VMWare server. Same LSI Raid, Same CPU funny, same mobo manufacture.  I have 256GB Vertex 4's for the RAID. Didn't see the need for enterprise SSD's. You will love the speed.

The 1230v2 CPU is just an amazing processor, and even better price.  I use them on all the newer stratum servers as well.  I talked with a lot of people who have experience with using SSDs in RAID for high volume servers, and the recommendation I got was Samsung 840 Pro SSDs.  These recommendations came from people who could have easily gone for enterprise drives, but the bang for your buck is that drive, and longevity issues can be easily handled with RAID and having a few spares to hot swap if one ever does have an issue.
1829  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [265'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 10, 2013, 07:26:09 AM
supermicro makes some nice hardware but SSD still has not made me all giggidy in the server world. There lifespan still is not where i want it.

Are you kidding me with raid1?  Shocked  Why not raid 6? raid5 is too glitchy
You sure a single quad core will be able to cut it?

Honestly, MySQL is so terrible when it comes to threading performance for large table queries that a dual core would work just fine, as long as it's clocked fast enough.  E3-1230v2 is 3.3 ghz (3.7 turboboost) per core, which is a more than 50% increase in raw clock rate than the current 2x quad core processors it's sitting on (also 6 year newer CPU architecture).  The new server is being tweaked in a lot of other ways too prior to the migration.
1830  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 10, 2013, 06:52:10 AM
I wonder if i will have to restart my Raspberry pi inorder for it to reconnect to the pooling server. I really hope not. It may not restart. Its at that stage where its working and i dont want to touch it. It may not work anymore if i do.. Cry

So did you move DataCenters again or you staying up there?
Should of gotten with me at the beginning of this year i have a rack full of server i sold for $1k i had 4 - poweredge 2850, 1 Poweredge 1950, 2 poweredge 2650, and 3 poweredge 6600 i think they were.

Holy smokes someone has a 26.83Th monster on the pool.. Shocked

Reconnecting is normally transparent with modern mining software, a lot of the early issues where miners would never reconnect to Stratum have mostly been fixed.  I think the last time the pool servers were restarted the drop in hash rate from miners that failed to reconnect wasn't even measurable compared to the normal hash rate variance.

Same datacenter, just migrating to much better hardware for the database.  The current DB server was never intended to be running something like BTC Guild.  New server is a 1U SuperMicro, E3-1230v2, 32 GB ram, and an LSI 9260-4i with SSDs in RAID1.
1831  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 10, 2013, 01:59:52 AM
Website/Database Maintenance

There will be a maintenance period tomorrow at approximately 3 PM Pacific Time.  During this time the website will be temporarily unavailable as the database is moved to the new server!  The pool servers will also have a brief restart once the new server migration is ready to be completed.

The website will simply have a placeholder message during maintenance notifying users that it is under maintenance, in order to make the migration as quickly as possible.  This transition will speed up website response times on data heavy pages, and significantly reduce the lag when major scripts execute.
1832  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 10, 2013, 01:49:06 AM

Those prices are the cost for resellers to obtain the units.  There will always be a markup from resellers for shipping and a profit.
1833  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 09, 2013, 08:03:16 PM
Block Erupter Coupons have now been distributed to any order placed above the current retail price.  These coupons have no expiration.  Currently coupons are limited 1:1 on past orders, but this will be extended as new inventory is received.
1834  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 09, 2013, 04:54:26 PM
USB Block Erupter coupons (0.15/unit + 0.05 handling per order) will soon be extended to any order placed above 0.29 BTC, once the currently ordered units are packed & shipped.  This will probably be in the next 2-3 hours.
1835  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 09, 2013, 04:06:46 PM
there is an error in spec

I got 5 blades not overclocked (1.09V old ones but new have same specs)
it took measured 360W so it takes about 72W each.
Hashrate reported was about 52GH/s from pool so 10.4 GH/s per blade
 


The new blades default to 1.2v according to everything I've read, and are overclocked as a result compared to the original models.
1836  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 09, 2013, 05:06:05 AM
hmm well my only true options around the houston area i have is SoftLayer,Level3, and HostMonster.  (HostMonster- I think i wanna puke  Shocked). Have you played with the SoftLayer servers?

I haven't dealt directly with SoftLayer, but I was on a SoftLayer reseller (I think).  I was also at CoreXchange which primarily used Level3 peering for the traffic at the time.  Obviously a reseller adds another step in the chain for the connections to break, but normally traceroutes would reveal the problem outside of their system and somewhere at the peering to get out of the datacenter.


EDIT:  Let's clear this out of the pool thread going forward.  I'm sure people have had enough posts about dedicated servers/datacenters for one night Smiley.
1837  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 09, 2013, 04:59:03 AM
I have moved around but Like i said i have been happy with softlayer. They just build a new Level3 colation datacenter(or so i think it is. it says level3) I might be looking at to move some hardware to.

Sadly, level3 is normally the cause of a lot of packet loss in my experience with all the dedicated servers BTC Guild has moved between over the years before it went to full colo in the US.
1838  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 09, 2013, 04:47:45 AM
I know it maybe out of the question but i know Softlayer has datacenters all across teh world. I have a server with them in Houston and Dallas. Been happy with there service and support. Not a blip of down time during Hurricane IKE in my houston server.

Most datacenters have good uptime, but I've yet to have one that didn't at least have periods of high packetloss once a month or so.  Additionally, the setup in Chicago has significant upstream filtering, fat pipes, and I'm able to push nullroutes for my IPs to their network during attacks as well.  99.9% is not enough, especially when they never count periods of very high packet loss as downtime.
1839  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 09, 2013, 04:24:21 AM
You know something that makes me laugh is the fact that people come on here complain that the pool sucks. WELL considering that BTCGuild is the only pool that is racking in 252.58TH<- They GOT to be doing something right!  Grin

Rock on BTCGuild.  Cool

I just question why people always seem to blame the pool, like it's discriminating against them specifically while the other 240-260 TH/s worth of users run without issue.  Code does not discriminate.  The problem is always user settings/hardware settings, otherwise it would be affecting thousands of other users.  You'd get a lot more than one person posting if that was the case.


That said, right now, there is a small problem on 1 of the EU servers Sad.  Trying to route everybody to the other server right now until the problem is resolved (ETA: 10 minutes).  Looking into options for what to do with the EU servers right now, since those are the only ones having issues these days.  It's very tough to get a provider that matches the quality of our US datacenter, especially when you have no physical presence internationally.
1840  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [250'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: September 08, 2013, 11:45:24 PM
I don't know what the problem.
On else pools I have 85 Ghash, about 0.47 BTC/day, and in last day on btcguild drop to 0.37.


It's called variance.  Other pools have it too unless you're on PPS.  It can be good or bad.  Last 50 shift luck: 71.026%, roughly 29% less than expected payout.  The only way to avoid variance (LUCK) is PPS.  Otherwise, you'll have bad times where you make less, and good times where you make more.  It evens out in the long run but most people can't seem to go more than a few days without bitching when it turns bad, then become blissfully unaware when it's the other way around and they're getting paid 30% more than they normally would because luck flipped around.
Pages: « 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ... 236 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!