Yeah seems to work but really really laggy. Hopefully this pool doesn't crash like the previous 3 I tried in the last 24 hours...
Don't worry, it won't  |
|
|
|
This site can’t be reached
etc.suprnova.cc took too long to respond.
Try:
Reloading the page
Checking the connection
Checking the proxy and the firewall
ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT
Hmm weird, works here.. |
|
|
|
|
Stratum is fully supported on stratum, just check the header of the pool or even the getting started pages...
You can use nicehash, claymore, genoil... Let me know if you need to mine with a client that is not yet supported
|
|
|
|
|
Ah if you have any problem with any miner which can't connect, please tell me so I can integrate it into Suprnova's stratum code as well
|
|
|
|
Can you actually connect to suprnova ETC?
Offline for me for some hours now.
Working perfectly fine here, which Error do you get? There is also a separate EU and us chain available for mining. eth-eu and eth-us |
|
|
|
Do I have to register to mine? What is the rejection rate. It is quite high in other pools. Is that due to DDOS?
Yes, you should register. Rejection rate? You mean invalid shares? It depends if you use stratum or not. Without stratum it is a bit higher but with stratum it should be quite low |
|
|
|
|
I get lots of PM's asking for Claymore, use:
ethdcrminer64 -epool etc.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1
replace suprnova.1 with your username/worker
|
|
|
|
I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..
./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1
Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...
Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed. Edit: Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores. Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular? Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1) Seems ok. I got this line on of the miners. But only once.. and its finding shares right after. So i guess its ok. Ill watch it for while to compare reported and actual hashrate. ETH: Received error: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]} ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4) ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)! ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6) ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)! ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3) ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)! Update. @ ocminer I noticed a "problem" Im not sure if its the claymore miner or the nicehasd stratum. But the hashrate is 40-50% lower there. Example pic. http://imgur.com/a/g4p97Miner 1 = genoils Miner 3&5 = claymores They should all be 110-130 As u can see the claymores are way lower. Should i test the low diff? Hmm, when you use this genoil: https://github.com/nicehash/cpp-ethereumIt works 100% as it's the native implementation for nicehash's stratum. I'll try Claymore now again, and adapt my stratum to the native claymore protocol too, the problem is just, that it uses Wallet adresses instead of usernames which is a bit uncommon on MPOS pools but i'll get something around it... Tried low diff too (3332) but got even lower rate. But!!! Isnt this just the reported rate. The miner mines at 125mh, even tho the pool says 55mh. And it finds share like f**k.. every 5th second or something. Isnt it the shares that count? I dont get any rejected.. just low reported hashrate, but still finding shares (locally) very fast. Yes, it's the share that count but your hashrate should also match. For me my Rig which was mining with this: https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/110(with -SP 2) And is now mining with Claymore has no problems (4 x 280x) and the hashrate matches. Even when I test-rent at nicehash and point it to the dedicated nicehash port, my hashrate matches the one displayed at nicehash's site. Genoils works nicely. The pool even reports higher hashrate than the miner. Claymores still very low... but the shares fly by. Miner 3 is R9 380s Miner 5 has R9 390s Ah, I think I found the problem, should be ok now |
|
|
|
I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..
./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1
Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...
Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed. Edit: Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores. Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular? Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1) Seems ok. I got this line on of the miners. But only once.. and its finding shares right after. So i guess its ok. Ill watch it for while to compare reported and actual hashrate. ETH: Received error: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]} ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4) ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)! ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6) ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)! ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3) ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)! Update. @ ocminer I noticed a "problem" Im not sure if its the claymore miner or the nicehasd stratum. But the hashrate is 40-50% lower there. Example pic. http://imgur.com/a/g4p97Miner 1 = genoils Miner 3&5 = claymores They should all be 110-130 As u can see the claymores are way lower. Should i test the low diff? Hmm, when you use this genoil: https://github.com/nicehash/cpp-ethereumIt works 100% as it's the native implementation for nicehash's stratum. I'll try Claymore now again, and adapt my stratum to the native claymore protocol too, the problem is just, that it uses Wallet adresses instead of usernames which is a bit uncommon on MPOS pools but i'll get something around it... Tried low diff too (3332) but got even lower rate. But!!! Isnt this just the reported rate. The miner mines at 125mh, even tho the pool says 55mh. And it finds share like f**k.. every 5th second or something. Isnt it the shares that count? I dont get any rejected.. just low reported hashrate, but still finding shares (locally) very fast. Yes, it's the share that count but your hashrate should also match. For me my Rig which was mining with this: https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/110(with -SP 2) And is now mining with Claymore has no problems (4 x 280x) and the hashrate matches. Even when I test-rent at nicehash and point it to the dedicated nicehash port, my hashrate matches the one displayed at nicehash's site. |
|
|
|
I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..
./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1
Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...
Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed. Edit: Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores. Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular? Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1) Seems ok. I got this line on of the miners. But only once.. and its finding shares right after. So i guess its ok. Ill watch it for while to compare reported and actual hashrate. ETH: Received error: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]} ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4) ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)! ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6) ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)! ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3) ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)! Update. @ ocminer I noticed a "problem" Im not sure if its the claymore miner or the nicehasd stratum. But the hashrate is 40-50% lower there. Example pic. http://imgur.com/a/g4p97Miner 1 = genoils Miner 3&5 = claymores They should all be 110-130 As u can see the claymores are way lower. Should i test the low diff? Hmm, when you use this genoil: https://github.com/nicehash/cpp-ethereumIt works 100% as it's the native implementation for nicehash's stratum. I'll try Claymore now again, and adapt my stratum to the native claymore protocol too, the problem is just, that it uses Wallet adresses instead of usernames which is a bit uncommon on MPOS pools but i'll get something around it... |
|
|
|
I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..
./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1
Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...
Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed. Edit: Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores. Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular? Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1) Seems ok. I got this line on of the miners. But only once.. and its finding shares right after. So i guess its ok. Ill watch it for while to compare reported and actual hashrate. ETH: Received error: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]} ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4) ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)! ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6) ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)! ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3) ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)! Thats normal, you just did some stale work and that share got rejected - as long as your hashrate is correct and shares after that get accepted all is fine. |
|
|
|
Oh and yes, MPOS API is enabled !  |
|
|
|
Mining on the original Chain (Ethereum CLASSIC): https://etc.suprnova.cc- MPOS based with self written stratums. Not just another clone of the free open-ethereum based pool soft - Protected against the available exploits - DDoS Protected - VarDiff - Stratums for Claymore, genoil, eth-proxy, Nicehash and MRR - Idle Worker notification - Payouts every 60 seconds - Support through IRC, Mail or PN - Separate Server Locations in EU and US |
|
|
|
I've added Nicehash Stratum to https://etc.suprnova.cc which also supports Claymore by using: ./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1Let me know if you have any problems or if its working fine. |
|
|
|
I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..
./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1
Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...
Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed. Edit: Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores. Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular? Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
