Any DT member who trusts Anduck can counter Vod's rating if they feel that this is too harsh. You are suggesting DT2 members to abuse their power? didn't expect anything less from you. this is a bad practice. one does not simply favor some people over others just because they were given a position of power> DT2. Just because things didn't work in your favour doesn't mean they are wrong.What he meant is, if there are any more members on the DT who don't agree with the feedback left by Vod,they're free to give a counter feedback to restore his trust ratings.That way,the trust system remains decentralised to an extent.By the way you can still get people from DT1/DT2 to leave you positive ratings if they fell you're right and have your trust restored Wrong, that is just wrong, that is misuse of DT and that could mean that Vod's feedback worth nothing, in other words: "Vod, we are not happy about your feedback, instead of providing our reasons we would like to screw you over and use our DT position as a personal tool and not to use it to better the forum and it's community's business affairs, we just want the OP's profile to look OK by default when people only are looking at his profile without reading his trust page, therefore we would like to deceive people by countering your ratings". The right thing to do is: Dear and respected forum member Vod, we believe that tagging the OP for something that happened 2 years ago is not the right use of your DT power, we as the community members would like to voice our concerns and ask you to correct this issue please. Then the community would see Vod's reaction, they could then tag Vod if they see that he is not listening to reason, if Vod has done more good than bad, they shouldn't kick him out of DT, they should show him the same treatment> tagging him for not complying to the wills of the general consensus. Countering Vod's feedback is equal as telling him to go fuck yourself.
|
|
|
You want to KYC DT members just to take away their chance at having multiple alt accounts on DT list? go away.
|
|
|
That is not abuse. What the hell is wrong with you? Do search up what abuse means. Misuse would make sense but abuse, no. Tomato or tomato. result is still bad and untrustworthy thing to do. I have one question for you vod, for now atleast : Why did you change back your rating against Anduck? Is it because of you believing Anduck's feedback to be retaliatory? Or is it because of some other reason. Stop cornering Vod like this, simply say that dear Vod you need to change your rating. it doesn't give you the right to tag the OP for something that happened 2 years ago.
|
|
|
Any DT member who trusts Anduck can counter Vod's rating if they feel that this is too harsh. You are suggesting DT2 members to abuse their power? didn't expect anything less from you. this is a bad practice. one does not simply favor some people over others just because they were given a position of power> DT2.
|
|
|
Have you contacted Blazed?
Sneaky bastard updated the thread title. I don't think that counts as "contact" though. You asked for it. I most certainly didn't. You're lying again. You are a lier, how many times have you asked me to contact DT1 members? however after giving it some thoughts, I have decided it would be better to change the title instead of directly contacting them, they are not my personal tool to use them as I please. I'd only call them out publicly because that's all I can do, contacting them via PM could be considered as if I am asking for personal favors from them and that is a wrong thing to do.
|
|
|
Have you contacted Blazed?
Sneaky bastard updated the thread title. I don't think that counts as "contact" though. You asked for it.
|
|
|
Lol. who is now stalking who? Still you? suchmoon is just responding to the quote, not bringing up other shit that you've posted. They've just decided that since the thread you posted in has nothing to do with them, that they would rather redirect the conversation here.
Have you contacted Blazed? Now that you are here, can I ask you a question? would you like to tag me for offering the service? or will you tag me later saying that it wasn't needed to tag me because suchmoon and marlboroza had already tagged me?
|
|
|
Lol~snip Good luck with this never ending battle. now that I think about it, why am I still here moaning about my tags while I should be out there cheating like 90% of the whole Bitcointalk population?
|
|
|
Have you contacted DT1 members yet?
If I do contact dooglus and if he refuses to take any action, people would say that he is an irresponsible person. if he says that the tags on my profile are not valid and you refuse to remove them as you have already stated that you wont remove them under any circumstances and if he keeps you on DT2 regardless, he would lose his credibility and people would say that he is an irresponsible person for keeping you on DT2. If he kicks you out from DT2, you'd lose your credibility and this forum could lose a potential useful asset. I am trying to give you a chance but you are unable to see it. People would say that you're full of shit. You just don't want the drama to end. You keep stalking me in various threads and bringing up your "abuse" case yet you refuse to take the one action that you can actually take. You keep referring to "people in position of power" yet you refuse to even talk to people who can do something about it. (Hint: it ain't just dooglus) Asslicking or threatening won't work, don't bother. Lol. who is now stalking who?
|
|
|
IMO Jr members need to get their signatures disabled globally. even I could start participating with hundreds of accounts and then after earning the money I could come here to pretend that I have found cheaters.
No offence OP.
|
|
|
I think based on the evidence, it is probably fair to say that Gleb was in fact *not* hacked/sold.
I am not sure if he actually wanted to join that campaign or if he was trolling, I am guessing probably the later.
Maybe you bought the account and are covering your own tracks by saying this? there was no need to change the email as well. That is a negative ghost rider. Lol. is that what I am, ghost rider from hell?
|
|
|
I think based on the evidence, it is probably fair to say that Gleb was in fact *not* hacked/sold.
I am not sure if he actually wanted to join that campaign or if he was trolling, I am guessing probably the later.
Maybe you bought the account and are covering your own tracks by saying this? there was no need to change the email as well.
|
|
|
Here are some of the trust ratings you have left: You sound like a 12 year kid whose mom bought the wrong flavor of doritos and was just killed one too many times on Xbox Live. I'm sure you will forgive me for treating your opinions on the trust system with the utter derision they deserve. What is it with you people and underaged kids? am I the only one here who'd talk about legal age of people when mentioning something about young people? This o_e_l_e_o is an alt account of some deranged pervert who likes 11, 12 years old kids very much.
|
|
|
~Snip~ Usually people who are deaf and blind can't hear and see the truth. I think God doesn't like you to see the truth so he has made you deaf and blind to it. BTW, obvious alt account: o_e_l_e_o funny how you are the only one telling me that what I say is nonsense. this is the reason why people use alt accounts, they are cowards and want to hide behind their alts.
|
|
|
But your methods aren't good for the forum if they let scammers come back with a simple payment: that's my problem.
Now look, who are you and who am I? Who are you to have a problem with my political stance on how we should deal with people? that's my problem here, who are you to say anything? you are not in any position of authority, that's clearly now over your head.
|
|
|
Note that even if you remove your tag on me, people couldn't say that we were colluding and were playing roles just so that I could get 0.02 from people in hopes of them getting their tags removed by me helping their cases because my service is free and will remain for free forever, so I have also removed any doubts for people by making my service a free service. I'm not going to charge a fee ever. how is that for transparency?
Bullshit lol... you tried charging .02 btc for your useless "service" and when people called you out on it you decided to make it free to save face. You are already known as a massive troll and are almost reaching Game Protect levels of trolling. Every single red tag on you was your own doing and making threads like these won't remove it. At this point nothing will so you should just move on. Shame on you. have some decency man/woman. you are getting paid some shitcoin for your posts, at least try to earn it by staying fair. don't post garbage and don't say garbage just to get paid some garbage coins. everything about you smells like a garbage. Note: this member's PM says that he signs all important messages, don't get scammed. one has to wonder, what would be so important about a member rank with 33 merits?
|
|
|
According to your own logic, why would you consider my action as untrustworthy You were trying to get them to pay money rather than actually do something concrete.
Also, a case that you might want to check out is that of Slow death, who was negged but has since then proved to be someone that is vigilant and on the lookout for scams. They were initially involved in ponzis, and now they attack ponzis. Funny how that works out, huh? Do something concrete like reporting garbage posts and helping the moderators? Funny how you are trying to do exactly as I have done, I have asked either for money or garbage reporting, you are also expecting people to attack scams and Ponzis. we both want the same thing: helping this forum and it's community to the best of our abilities. you have your own methods while I have mine. You are a DT member and I am a nobody, now which one worth more in your own opinion? my actions that has caused me to get tagged red or your actions which has caused you to get on DT? I believe this is the double standard people were talking about even before all of this starts. Note that even if you remove your tag on me, people couldn't say that we were colluding and were playing roles just so that I could get 0.02 from people in hopes of them getting their tags removed by me helping their cases because my service is free and will remain for free forever, so I have also removed any doubts for people by making my service a free service. I'm not going to charge a fee ever. how is that for transparency?
|
|
|
Time = money. Since this topic is about the abuse of trust system, I'd like to remind you that I am a victim of abuse by suchmoon, marlboroza . according to KWH time is money, I have asked for money in exchange of my time by offering a service but suchmoon tagged me red twice, marlboroza has also tagged me for it. this is a clear sign of abuse, therefore I'd like to ask for assistance from the people in position of power in this forum. Have you contacted DT1 members yet? If I do contact dooglus and if he refuses to take any action, people would say that he is an irresponsible person. if he says that the tags on my profile are not valid and you refuse to remove them as you have already stated that you wont remove them under any circumstances and if he keeps you on DT2 regardless, he would lose his credibility and people would say that he is an irresponsible person for keeping you on DT2. If he kicks you out from DT2, you'd lose your credibility and this forum could lose a potential useful asset. I am trying to give you a chance but you are unable to see it.
|
|
|
Time = money. Since this topic is about the abuse of trust system, I'd like to remind you that I am a victim of abuse by suchmoon, marlboroza . according to KWH time is money, I have asked for money in exchange of my time by offering a service but suchmoon tagged me red twice, marlboroza has also tagged me for it. this is a clear sign of abuse, therefore I'd like to ask for assistance from the people in position of power in this forum.
|
|
|
|