destroying wont win. We have ~100 commitee votes for keeping around 2000 coins and destroy the rest.
No 3rd IPO will be done!
Hmm... that sort of brings up a concern I had. If the committee holds so much sway that they can alter a vote, regardless of what regular people choose, why even have a public vote? Not that I am against the committee idea, as it brings focus for the coin and will help get things done. I just wonder if perhaps they may hold a bit too much voting power, or why even bother with public votes, if they can just change the final outcome regardless? I do agree that the 3rd IPO would be very problematic. I am just thinking that perhaps the 2nd IPO should have went on a bit longer, since there were so many coins leftover. Commitee members have 10 votes to 1 vote for normal people. This is a very good solution in my opinion! I am not sure if you understood what I meant. If committee members have 10 votes per person and can alter any poll anyway they please, why even have a public vote? Might as well have a private polling amongst committee members then? Or less votes per committee person. there are about 15 communittee members and about 7 billion people? I even think that 10 votes is way to little for somthing that has such severe impact into the big stakeholders belongings...
|
|
|
some update from dev? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) They said they will be quiet until bitcoinj client is released! I support that ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
destroying wont win. We have ~100 commitee votes for keeping around 2000 coins and destroy the rest.
No 3rd IPO will be done!
Hmm... that sort of brings up a concern I had. If the committee holds so much sway that they can alter a vote, regardless of what regular people choose, why even have a public vote? Not that I am against the committee idea, as it brings focus for the coin and will help get things done. I just wonder if perhaps they may hold a bit too much voting power, or why even bother with public votes, if they can just change the final outcome regardless? I do agree that the 3rd IPO would be very problematic. I am just thinking that perhaps the 2nd IPO should have went on a bit longer, since there were so many coins leftover. Commitee members have 10 votes to 1 vote for normal people. This is a very good solution in my opinion!
|
|
|
It looks like destroy shall win, but I voted for a mixture.
One problem with destroy is that it benefits big coin holders more than the small guys, or those who don't own the coin yet, so it could appear as if committee members are voting to benefit themselves, rather than the community as a whole. I'm not even saying that is the case, I just mean by appearances it may not look ideal.
Although a 3rd ipo or giveaway opens up a different can of worms, as then it could possibly devalue existing coins. Hence why I voted for a mix of options.
Save some coins for regular giveaways, social media tasks, BTT people giveaway (limit one giveaway per acct via some form of verification, IP check, etc), and bounties.
Offer a 3rd IPO with a limited number of coins. This serves a dual-purpose, as it provides some coins to those who missed the previous IPOs. And perhaps more importantly for the community, it stifles trolls/fud spreaders who cry about an unfair initial distribution. As to how to set it up so it's fair, that may be tricky. You can't just list coins at .001 again on Poloniex.
Either list a secondary coin/placeholder on Poloniex at a arbitrary price, cheaper than current prices, but not super cheap ... say at current rates, .002-.005/coin. Or offer coins through an ipo via BTT using more traditional methods (sending coins manually). If you want an even distribution, you can even put a limit on how many per person.
And destroy the rest. So say half of remaining coins are destroyed outright. For the remaining half, use them for giveaways/bounties and a partial IPO. Neither should affect the current price negatively, as the destruction of the other 1/2 would balance it out. Longterm it'd still result in a higher value of coin than you started with, perhaps with a fairer balance, and more publicity.
destroying wont win. We have ~100 commitee votes for keeping around 2000 coins and destroy the rest. No 3rd IPO will be done!
|
|
|
chance?a gable coin?
Yes! A decentralised dice game. You can play or be the house!
|
|
|
What can we do to speed up Coinmarketcap.com listing? Would you like me to submit it to Gliss or has someone done this already?
Sitting at $140k market cap with 50,000 coins. And even only $280k with 100,000 coins.
Most coins are hitting 400k-600k market cap pretty easy so there is the opportunity to do at least 3x more in the very near term based on what other even moderately successful coins are doing this last month.
I will contact gliss once the explorer is online. He won't list it before, he never does!
|
|
|
The /r/NEM link was removed from the NXT subreddit sidebar... What did we do to deserve this?! ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) actually I can clarify this. I am a mod at /r/NXT and I posted a thread on the nxt forum asking what should be changed. And all people there said NEM is clearly distancing themself from NXT so there is no reason whatsoever to link there. Do you disagree? Well /r/NXT is still at /r/NEM so I think we deserve to be at /r/NXT as well, but seeing none of other cryptos are at sidebar of /r/NXT I would certainly not insisting ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I put NEM there, but I understand why the NXT majority wanted it removed.
|
|
|
The /r/NEM link was removed from the NXT subreddit sidebar... What did we do to deserve this?! ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) actually I can clarify this. I am a mod at /r/NXT and I posted a thread on the nxt forum asking what should be changed. And all people there said NEM is clearly distancing themself from NXT so there is no reason whatsoever to link there. Do you disagree?
|
|
|
Offer my 1.5 BTC stake (1st stage, with Anon136) for 3.5 BTC. Offer is valid for 48h only due to a hardware purchase opportunity. Transfer and payment by Anon136 escrow. PM me if interested.
this is a very generous offer!
|
|
|
Pick whatever random coin happens to be on the uptrend for this particular week, and that's what people will vote for.
Yes, but it's not really different elsewhere in the world, is it?
|
|
|
You guys should take a look at XBC!
Lol, you sly devil ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Dont hate the player, hate the game!
|
|
|
Holy shit! 480 BTC burned. Didn't realize, it was so much :O
yesterday it was like BTC200+ yeah, that's why I am so confused right now!
|
|
|
Holy shit! 480 BTC burned. Didn't realize, it was so much :O
|
|
|
You guys should take a look at XBC!
|
|
|
I'll admit that it's not DEV's fault., I was just angry, It's just I worked hard to trade my way upto that amount of bitcoin, i'm not a person of means, and i've taken a massive hit now, it will take me ages to get it back. Is there anything I can do? if you look at the bitcoin address I sent to, it hasn't even cleared, there's 28 conformation on one transaction, and 32 conformations on the other, so it's not like the thief has transferred them to another address. Here's the blockchain info: https://blockchain.info/address/1JLmRoZ3NGEzderUzK6LkY1REfSkzYGNzAnyone? Join a signature campaign on this forum, you can get back 1 BTC in about 1 month! How does that work? choose one here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=52.0an follow the instructions. (Ritz pays best)
|
|
|
now nas fall a lot of ,the market seem to no confidence. how about the price to go up? now the price is very very embarrassed. very helpless!
Did you see the other coins? Pretty much all coins are down the last 2 weeks. So don't jump to conclusions! When BTC price rises, all coins increase in value too. NXT did also fall much. In 2 weeks when the 2.0 features are launched the coins will be much higher valuated!
|
|
|
I'll admit that it's not DEV's fault., I was just angry, It's just I worked hard to trade my way upto that amount of bitcoin, i'm not a person of means, and i've taken a massive hit now, it will take me ages to get it back. Is there anything I can do? if you look at the bitcoin address I sent to, it hasn't even cleared, there's 28 conformation on one transaction, and 32 conformations on the other, so it's not like the thief has transferred them to another address. Here's the blockchain info: https://blockchain.info/address/1JLmRoZ3NGEzderUzK6LkY1REfSkzYGNzAnyone? Join a signature campaign on this forum, you can get back 1 BTC in about 1 month!
|
|
|
I have deleted a post accusing myself of being a scammer behind an exchange I listed which looked legitimate at the time. I am incredibly sorry for your loss but you should always conduct due diligence. I strongly encourage legal action if possible. I was only trying to help the community by offering a third exchange.
I publicly say sorry to those who lost money with coinopend. I have no affiliation whatsoever with them.
You should conduct with due diligence also, if it weren't for your action I would not lost 80% of my money. I guess you can't trust anything the DEV posts in the ANN? it was a link to an exchange. Do you bash all guys that ever posted Mtgox links? Grow up...
|
|
|
Why do I see this thread only now? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
coinopend has been removed. DO NOT TRADE THERE!
If you can, please spread the love to peercover, I think you will find some arb opportunities.
Mother fucking cock sucking bastard!!!!! I just got caught with that exchange with 1.5 BTC Thanks for the scam link!! Here's the BTC block chain: https://blockchain.info/address/1JLmRoZ3NGEzderUzK6LkY1REfSkzYGNzanthing I can do? Ah fuck that sucks. Is it 100% sure they never payout? Maybe its ponzi like and they let you make 1 withdrawal to get your trust?
|
|
|
|