oh and thanks |Sub|AC8DG84KD|AdamStgBit ---(0.1)->jubalix|Add|ACICAHJFKJ| confirmed
|
|
|
How to keep track of user balances? lets say a transactions looked like this /---amount of coins i'm sending thats my name!----\ | |Sub|AC8DG84KD|AdamStgBit ---(0.1)->jubalix|Add|ACICAHJFKJ| ^ \_____ jubalix wallet ID |___ wallet i am sending coins from if you search "|Add|ACICAHJFKJ|" we'll see all the coins that were sent to him. if you search "|Sub|ACICAHJFKJ|" we'll see all the coins that were sent from him. if you search "|ACICAHJFKJ|" we'll see all the coins that were sent too & from him. ok I like it, though why we can't use (-) and (+) rather than add and sub also I kinda liked the return address notation to remain, as you can see totals of what sender has ans is easy for sender to include this idea can work as long as the string can be easily pulled appart for a program to confirm a valid chain. Then your set. |-|(0.200)AC8DG84KD|AdamStgBit (0.1)------>|+|jubalix|ACICAHJFKJ|or (m)(200)AC8DG84KD|AdamStgBit (-100)------>(m)(+100)|jubalix|ACICAHJFKJ|(u) defines transaction notation maybe better on this note I may make 2 wallets now should we aslo institute m,u,n notation now milli micro nano in other news, I only have 0.2AC left, and my head hurts!
|
|
|
I'll be at the Bitcoin Conference probably as a panelist on the Alt-Coin panel. I might do a little short lunch talk about adapting the experiences from the post-communist transition to starting new crypto-economies, but that's a might at the moment. The real world is preventing me from getting time to do my research.
In any case, I look forward to seeing everyone there and would be happy to get a beer with anyone who wants to talk Alt-Coins or even Terracoin!
I would have loved to have been there!
|
|
|
|AC8DG84KD| (0.250AC)AdamStgBit(0.200AC) (-0.05) -> (0.05)RichG(0.1) (+0.05)
Confirmed. |AC8DG84KD| (m250AC)AdamStgBit(m200AC) (-m50) -> (m50)RichG(m100) (+m50) lets start m,u,n (milli, micro and nano) early as in now
|
|
|
it is already dying i stopped mining those new useless coins and i don't think I am alone These features will make the final superior coin [1] 0.5 - 1 second payment [2] no need for exchange, P2P (eg interface with 99% of world bank accounts) [3] low energy [4] partial "block chain" needed only
|
|
|
But the article was really quite damaging with Bitcoin being associated with every imaginable cyber crime yeah, it will only push the price up don't worry about it none of us own bitcoin's anyway
|
|
|
[1] Either alts will die or [2] fast evolution will produce a mutant superior coin to BTC [3] Some alts live but superior alt will take over. [4] Other
your pick
|
|
|
but how would you know the (value) in first bracket!
I dont want o have to add up the wallet for some one else
also this is going to be come hard to check integrity more than 10 blocks deep
|
|
|
with enough hero members at the start and in the chain it will lent is legitimacy also double confirmations would secure the chain better and avoid sock puppets agreed I believe this crazy idea might just work! maybe we should maybe create a new forum of our own, exporting the quote chaine should be really easy. and it would add legitimacy to Abstract Coin Abstract Coin FTW! to work you need to be able to back up the quote chain easily otherwise is too easily lost
|
|
|
with enough hero members at the start and in the chain it will lent is legitimacy also double confirmations would secure the chain better and avoid sock puppets
|
|
|
|AC8DG84KD| (0.400AC)AdamStgBit(0.300AC) -> jubalix
confirmed! |JZARK777| (0.1 AC)Jubalix(0.0999AC) -> wachtwoord
confirmed! test2
|
|
|
|AC8DG84KD| (0.400AC)AdamStgBit(0.300AC) -> jubalix
confirmed! Test
|
|
|
at least they got the regulation push price up bit
|
|
|
I *agree* please send me your bitcoins, with give you $1 each.
also money velocity, you have not idea
once out that's just transaction rate between everyone, miners are irelevant, 1 bit coin can be split into 10^8 parts thus enough bitcoins out already to run many times the world economy
|
|
|
Fun experiment. Can I have a fraction of an abstract coin too?
wachtwoord |JZARK777| (0.1 AC)Jubalix(0.999AC) -> wachtwoord Thanks a lot! As it stands the tx is invalid though you forgot a zero: |JZARK777| (0.1 AC)Jubalix(0.099AC) -> wachtwoord would be valid. yes I see, rejected, hey this a pretty fault redundant system |JZARK777| (0.1 AC)Jubalix(0.0999AC) -> wachtwoord
|
|
|
it will go down. it is fighting the inflation. future inflation is guaranteed. future demand is speculative. if you cna find reasons that demand will increase faster than the rate of future inflation then price will go up.
ppcoin currently has the lowest inflation rate (20~30% annual) among all altcoins, only second to bitcoin (~10% annual). Look at that real DEV who is on the case, do you seen why this coin is going places also I really like http://www.ppcoin.org/love the map at the back etc
|
|
|
Fun experiment. Can I have a fraction of an abstract coin too?
wachtwoord |JZARK777| (0.1 AC)Jubalix(0.999AC) -> wachtwoord
|
|
|
I am anti Twitter, I want to live off the grid! I will add my public AC wallet in my sig., with the current amount it holds. AC is so secure no one will be able to steal it from me anyway! hang on no your on the grid being on this board, the more forms you store the data the stronger it is. this board goes, your ac goes.
|
|
|
|