You are probably talking about swapping tokens on decentralized exchanges like Uniswap and Pancakeswap?

The fee you have to pay is the sum of the transaction fee and trading fee.

Trading fee is a percentage of the trade volume and shouldn't be high. (It's usually between 0.1% and 0.3%.
The transaction fee depends on the network state.

If you use ERC20 USDT or any other token on ethreum network, you will have to pay a very high fee. (It should be at least 50 dollars at the current rates, if I am not wrong.)
If you use BNB or any BEP20 tokens on binance smart chain, the required transaction fee would be much lower.

I haven't ever mined any altcoin and I don't have much information about it. But I think whattomine can be helpful to you. You can use it to calculate profitability of mining different cryptocurrencies.

You should either have a high-performance GPU (Graphics processing unit) or buy an ASIC miner.

Email address changes are not reported on BPIP at all. Therefore, there's still the possibility that the user's email address has been changed.
Email address changes are only reported on user's trust summary page and the message saying that disappears after 30 days.

In addition to giammangiato's tool, there are three other tools that can be used for getting notifications when someone mentions you or quotes a post made by you.

[new topic]LoyceV's notification bot (Created by LoyceV)
[TELEGRAM]Yet Another BitcoinTalk Notification BOT (merits, mentions, topics,+) (Created by TryNinja)
[TELEGRAM]Bitcointalk Notifier |merit and quotes| push notifications | telegram (Created by hatshepsut93)

All of them are free.

The waittime is the time you have to wait before making a new post, reporting a post, sending a PM or using forum's search tool. These are all considered as posting.
So, assuming your waittime is x, it's possible that you can't make a new post, even if you haven't made any post in the last x seconds.

The real price is the price you see on uniswap.
So, yes. The value of your tokens at the time you took the screenshot was 62 dollars and the value shown on trustwallet was wrong.

In the OP, you said that you can't swap the tokens. Do you get any error when trying to swap the tokens?

The forum itself doesn't have such a feature. But there are some tools provided by users of the forum. You can use them.

1. [new topic]LoyceV's notification bot (Created by LoyceV)

2. [TELEGRAM]Yet Another BitcoinTalk Notification BOT (merits, mentions, topics,+) (Created by TryNinja)

3. [TELEGRAM]Bitcointalk Notifier |merit and quotes| push notifications | telegram (Created by hatshepsut93)

See this post.
I can't really understand why khamisi9 copy-pasted that post here.


Edit:
See this post too.
The address comes from mybitcoin. (I don't know whether this service exists now or not).

Edit 2:
Seems that mybitcoin was a custodial service [1, 2]. So, no one should have access to the private key of the address in question.

You are right. Sometimes, it may be better to create a 2 of 3 multi-signature wallet instead of using the electrum 2FA wallet. In this way, you won't have to pay an extra fee to trustedcoin.
The problem is that a newbie who has no knowledge about a multi-signature wallet can't do that. Most of the newbies don't know they are actually using a multi-signature wallet when using electrum 2FA wallet. They don't even know they have to pay an additional fee for their transactions.

Although, a 2 of 3 mutli-signature wallet can be used instead of the electrum 2FA wallet and I would prefer to do so, this doesn't mean the electrum 2FA wallet has no benefit.

Let's say I only have 1 computer and I can't use an offline device for signing my transactions.
In the case I use a 2 of 3 multi-signature wallet, two of master private keys and a master public key have to touch the internet. These keys are enough for a hacker
In the case I use a 2FA wallet, one master private key and two master public keys touch the internet. These keys aren't enough for a hacker.

If a token/coin hasn't been listed in any exchange, it cannot be listed in coingecko or coinmarketcap at all.
In both coingecko and coinmarketcap, the first requirement for a token/coin to be listed is to be tradable in at least one exchange.


They don't. Read coinmarketcap listings criteria.



Coingecko also doesn't get any fee for listing a coin/token. [Ref.]

Safepal (as a VIP user of binance) is probably using the sub-accounts feature in binance. (Click here to see the guide provided by binance)

According to the guide, the master account (which is owned by safepal here) is able to create the sub-accounts using virtual emails. In this case, withdrawals can be made only by the master account.
So, once a safepal user requests a withdrawal, that's actually requested by safepal to binance.

Assuming Sapefal account on binance is VIP9, a single account can have up to 200 sub-accounts [Ref.]
So, anyone using binance on safepal is actually using one of those sub-accounts.

Since there are definitely more than 200 people using binance on safepal, there are two possibilities:
1. Safepal has many verified accounts in binance.
2. Binance is allowing safepal (as a corporate account user) to have more sub-accounts.

As the replies title start with Re:, you can exclude them from the search result with adding -"Re:" to the post title.
For example, to get all the topics posted by Ratimov, the parameters should be set as shown in the image below.


ninjastic.space

Since users can remove the Re: from the post title, this method is not 100% accurate. But It may be still helpful.

Google authenticator has nothing to do with your email address.
Anyways, as suggested by vv181 in the above post, you can use authy as an alternative to Google authenticator.

The other alternative is Aegis. But the problem is that it doesn't have a desktop version.
Aegis is open-source and it's the best choice, in my opinion.
I recommend you to use Aegis whenever the problem with your phone is solved.

You are 100% right. I would never recommend anyone to use electrum 2FA wallet. It's really wasting money and I would never use it.
OP should make a new standard wallet and move all the fund to that. In this way, he won't pay any additional fee for the next transactions. I mentioned this in my previous post as well.
But if OP persists in using a 2FA wallet for any reason, it would be better to create a new 2FA wallet and pay the trustedcoin fee (the fee that is paid in batches of 20/100 transactions) again. That's worth it, because OP will have the seed phrase of the new 2FA wallet.

The best: a new standard wallet
The worst: the current 2FA wallet
Better than the worst: a new 2FA wallet

I recommend you to not use this wallet anymore. If you still have any fund in that, move it to a new wallet.
Since you don't have the seed phrase, now you only have 1 of the master private key(s). In the case trustedcoin disappear one day for any reason, you won't be able to make any transaction. ​

Just note that if the new wallet is 2FA again, you will have to pay the trustedcoin fee one more time. But I think that's worth it.  (You won't pay any additional fee if you make a standard wallet.)

I don't think being listed in any of these price-tracking websites has any effect on the price.
At the time I am making this post, there are 14,000 coins/tokens in coinmarketcap and more than 10,000 coins/tokes in coingecko. So, being listed in these websites doesn't seem to be a big achievement.

I have used QR codes for bitcoin addresses many times and have never gotten a wrong address.
Even if the QR code gives you a wrong address, it is very very unlikely that it's a valid address. Bitcoin addresses must pass a checksum to be valid.

Also note that you should always check the address before making a transaction, whether you have used a QR code or you have copy-pasted it.

You didn't buy any bitcoin. You gave your money to a scammer and didn't receive anything.
Also, as stated in previous posts, if you don't have the private key of the address in question, that's not yours.

I feel you invested money on a scam website and they showed you a fake number as your bitcoin balance.
If that website is closed now, it means that you got scammed and you have never had any bitcoin.

As OP said, both screenshots show a same transaction.
If I'm not wrong, the first screenshot has been taken from bscscan and the second one has been taken from trustwallet transaction history.


I just checked one of my own transactions in both trustwallet and bscscan and found out the problem.
The problem is with how trustwallet calculates the network fee.

In Bscscan the transaction fee is gas price * used gas.
In trustwallet the transaction fee is gas price * gas limit.

The number shown for network fee in trustwallet is wrong. Because the extra gas is always returned to the wallet and trustwallet doesn't consider this.
The fee paid for the transaction in question is 0.00079712 BNB.

It won't work.
The IanColeman tool can be used only if your seed phrase is BIP39.
The seed phrase generated by blockchain.com before their 2016 upgrade were not BIP39. These old seeds were generated by blockchain.com using their own algorithm.

OP should use the link shared by DaveF in the above post.