What is the purpose of this thread and why this thread is in the meta section? Can someone explaine me (thanks)?
Because Theymos is easily mistyped as Thermos. Get with the action.  Oh thanks, all this thread about the mistyped of the nick thermos instead of theymos. The same story with my nick. I remember when the people wrote redsnow instead of redsn 0w. |
|
|
|
|
What is the purpose of this thread and why this thread is in the meta section? Can someone explaine me (thanks)?
|
|
|
|
People are posting "scam confirmed". Pretty sure they are just shorters CUNTS.
'people' would be a bit of a stretch for some of these entities... ...SCUM CONFIRMED! 800BTC for a scam?
That's like robbing a bank for the candy and pens, not a whole lot in the grand scheme of things. I'm sure it's a tech issue and will be resolved. Shorters are just talking their book like usual spreading bs to get their orders filled. Bitcoin is still fine and dandy.
I don't think they have not scammed .... maybe they have only transferred the bitcoin to another address (only for a security purpose). |
|
|
|
Thanks for the negative trust ... if you want to receive one from me then you have only 'try to scam me'. Good luck with your life (if you have a life, outside of this forum). |
|
|
|
snip
Are those pinksheets? How dare you compare Bitcoin to those pump and dump junk stocks. Why? A lot of penny stock pump&dumps end up at $5-$10 billion marketcap before crashing. Guess where bitcoin is and was at around $1000 in terms of marketcap. Woops  ath of bitcoin was faked by willy bot, and unless willybot was playing with those rubbish stock too, i don't think there is much to compare bitcoin is actually rising, despite the recent down-trend those charts share somehow the same beginning, but how they will evolve will be different without question I do not think it is rising (if we compare it to the old 1'000 dollars per bitcoin). However until one bitcoin will be valued 0.01 $ I think it is more better than other alternative. |
|
|
|
Buying and selling should be constant thing for the real bitcoiners.
Buying & selling bitcoin for FIAT value? Is this what you're saying? They always buy and sell something and keep their activities on the market. They do not just wait around and spread around foolish words.
I think the primary use of bitcoin is "to spend & use it directly to buy something (not only fiat value)". If you are using it only for a speculation purpose then I think you (only as example) cannot proclaim yourself a bitcoiner. |
|
|
|
....
Why are you encouraging me to TRY AND SCAM the community? What if I targeted a section where:
- trust rating isn't shown
- non-english (simple, use google translate)
Then I would still have the same chance of scamming as i would with a different account.
Seriously, you're asking me to attempt to scam the community and you have a green trust next to your name... what type of person are you?
Do you want your negative trust? If your reply will be 'yes I want a lot of negative trust" then try to scam me , ok? Edit- you can't receive a negative trust if you 'are not a scammer' or didn't do nothing. I hope you understand what I am saying. |
|
|
|
Buying trust isn't against any rules, moderators don't have any special say in trust system "rules" or anything else regarding it. I don't know anything about your original negative trust, nor do I care, but to anyone participating, I would be cautious. Buying negative trust would be a clever way to water down the meaning of the original negative trust you recieved.
"Yeah guys, check out my thread, I only have negative trust because I bought it, thought it would be funny LOL"
That or you could be trying to make a point which is fine. I will be curiously watching to see how things play out.
I think it is against the forum rules buy and sell 'trust' (positve , negative or neutral).... beware . Buying trust is not against the forum rules as you can see above but there are good reasons that anyone on default should not do what is asked, not that i believe they will that is why they are trusted because they will not be bribed by $2  Also Op you have gone the wrong way if you wanted negatives you should have asked to buy trust and i am sure you would have lit up even more red than you are. Can someone tell me why he only has 20 ve- with all them negatives? EDIT: i see 4 are from one member probably has something to do with it If it is not against the forum rules... then come on guys ! Leave him a negative trust  // I am just kidding. However , yes of course if he wants a negative trust (or multiple negative trust) he should only continue to scam or try to scam someone here in the forum /and he probably will receive the correct 'feedback'. So you want me to restart ripping off the community with alternate accounts instead of just buying the neg feedback  Nah ... I am only saying that if you want a negative trust (instead of buying it) why don't try to scam someone and you will receive the negative trust for free in just 5-10 minutes (or less). So, what if I succeed in trying to scam them... So now you're encouraging scam attempts on the forum? wtf? You will not succeed in your scam attempt (with all those users that are watching you) . Do you want other negative trust? The only legit way to receive them is try to scam someone .... or maybe I can't explain my thoughts better. |
|
|
|
Buying trust isn't against any rules, moderators don't have any special say in trust system "rules" or anything else regarding it. I don't know anything about your original negative trust, nor do I care, but to anyone participating, I would be cautious. Buying negative trust would be a clever way to water down the meaning of the original negative trust you recieved.
"Yeah guys, check out my thread, I only have negative trust because I bought it, thought it would be funny LOL"
That or you could be trying to make a point which is fine. I will be curiously watching to see how things play out.
I think it is against the forum rules buy and sell 'trust' (positve , negative or neutral).... beware . Buying trust is not against the forum rules as you can see above but there are good reasons that anyone on default should not do what is asked, not that i believe they will that is why they are trusted because they will not be bribed by $2 Also Op you have gone the wrong way if you wanted negatives you should have asked to buy trust and i am sure you would have lit up even more red than you are. Can someone tell me why he only has 20 ve- with all them negatives? EDIT: i see 4 are from one member probably has something to do with it If it is not against the forum rules... then come on guys ! Leave him a negative trust // I am just kidding. However , yes of course if he wants a negative trust (or multiple negative trust) he should only continue to scam or try to scam someone here in the forum /and he probably will receive the correct 'feedback'. So you want me to restart ripping off the community with alternate accounts instead of just buying the neg feedback Nah ... I am only saying that if you want a negative trust (instead of buying it) why don't try to scam someone and you will receive the negative trust for free in just 5-10 minutes (or less). |
|
|
|
Buying trust isn't against any rules, moderators don't have any special say in trust system "rules" or anything else regarding it. I don't know anything about your original negative trust, nor do I care, but to anyone participating, I would be cautious. Buying negative trust would be a clever way to water down the meaning of the original negative trust you recieved.
"Yeah guys, check out my thread, I only have negative trust because I bought it, thought it would be funny LOL"
That or you could be trying to make a point which is fine. I will be curiously watching to see how things play out.
I think it is against the forum rules buy and sell 'trust' (positve , negative or neutral).... beware . Buying trust is not against the forum rules as you can see above but there are good reasons that anyone on default should not do what is asked, not that i believe they will that is why they are trusted because they will not be bribed by $2 Also Op you have gone the wrong way if you wanted negatives you should have asked to buy trust and i am sure you would have lit up even more red than you are. Can someone tell me why he only has 20 ve- with all them negatives? EDIT: i see 4 are from one member probably has something to do with it If it is not against the forum rules... then come on guys ! Leave him a negative trust // I am just kidding. However , yes of course if he wants a negative trust (or multiple negative trust) he should only continue to scam or try to scam someone here in the forum /and he probably will receive the correct 'feedback' (for free). |
|
|
|
I think it is against the forum rules buy and sell 'trust' (positve , negative or neutral).... beware . |
|
|
|
When you will have the bitcoins (also through cash) I suggest you to try a double spend transaction, but I do not know if it will work at 100%. Try to check this section ' https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=53.0' maybe you will find someone who will sell you some bitcoins. It is very hard to attempt a double spend attack which will give you confirmation. Any hacker would want their ransom to have confirmations though. Shvdb has a service which allows exchange of paypal to BTC if you have PayPal. The process was abit complicated but at least it protects the seller. Maybe you are right, I have never "tried a double spend attack" against a ransomware. Maybe with the oldest version of those ransom. it could be possible double-spend a transaction ... Who knows? |
|
|
|
We have come to an agreement. I just don't have BTC ready right now so have asked for his paypal id for partial payment. Most of it is solved. Should be all resolved by tomorrow. Will keep everybody updated.
Edit: killyou72 logged off and I am now waiting for him to reply. Have also given him my skype contact so that we can have a quick chat and get this solved. Waiting for him to come back online.....
Since it appears that you now have some BTC it would probably be a good idea for killyou72 to request a refund in BTC. Already PMed him today morning...you should relax a little. You look more worried than me or OP. Sure there's no connection between you and OP? Op was very active while you were unable to find a solution for this situation, and now there's no more input from him on this thread.. If kashish is ready to return overpayment, this should be settled now, to void any possible new turns. @op please update situation, and let this be over already, now ure the one lagging behind. He is in touch with me on PMs but logged off suddenly this morning......im sure he will be back. He has to receive money  Perfect, I will remove my negative trust againts you when all this situation will be resolved. Good luck. |
|
|
|
I dont think they have the power to take bitcoin mainstream. Taking bitcoin mainstream would take a change in society, not a signle organization.
Yeah agreed. True change will take time and change in not only social constructs btu also attitude toward technology. Patience. .... in a few words : we need a real revolution (not only from an economic point of view but also from a society view). people don't have patience. they want global adoption to happen tomorrow so they can sell their coins with high profit. they don't realize that it doesn't work like that.
people can't work together, they work always individually when money are involved, this is the reason why only rich guy can do something about the current price of bitcoin, then the "noob"(people) will follow naturally it's like the boss of a gang of bandits... I hope that this problem will not 'born' also in the bitcoin economy (but I am sure it will cause a lot of trouble like the FIAT value). |
|
|
|
I was checking out the service announcements sub-forum and came across this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=995695.0which is currently locked by the owner. He usually bumps the thread every 24 hours, and locks it. I feel he is avoiding an escrow for any kind of trading while doing so and has locked it to avoid any posts by consumers or people who want to use an escrow to go ahead for a trade. Should threads like these be allowed to be locked to avoid any posts on the thread ? I feel a self-moderated thread would be better suited than locking the thread. Why someone should be obliged to 'don't lock his thread'? If someone want to use the escrow and that user (seller) does not agree .... in that case I will not suggest the 'possible buyer' to continue the deal. However I do not think it is against the forum rules 'lock the own thread'. |
|
|
|
Once when I first started getting into crypto, I accidentally sent sone altcoins to the wrong address and of course, that was that. The coins were gone.
That made me wonder if the following scenario is possible: Could someone create a brand new Bitcoin address and find Bitcoin sitting in his wallet if someone accidentally sent coins to that address a year or so ago? Or will coins only show up if someone sends them to the wrong address and that address already exists.
I was just curious.
Hmmm it will be extremely difficult (to find an address with some deposited bitcoins) or maybe I don't understand your 'question'. |
|
|
|
I don't thing meta is discussion about the forum anymore  . I was thinking that while reading this thread. We should rename this section in "Quickseller & Meta" // Sarcasm However, I think the freedom (of speech) will prevail for ever in this forum and this type of thread will be really useful (because everyone will know the truth about some user). |
|
|
|
[...]
No, it doesn't mean anything.... only "buying & selling" are discouraged but not against the forum rules. Another thing, how do you know if someone 'owns' more than one forum account (or better uses more than one)?
>No, it doesn't mean anything.... only "buying & selling" are discouraged but not against the forum rules. If "discouraged" means nothing, why even mention it up in the [coyly named] "Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ"? I don't create the forum rules but I know that buy and sell (bitcointalk) forum account is not against the forum rules, and also it is would be not against them I am sure the forum staff can't stop that practice. >how do you know if someone 'owns' more than one forum account
The same way I'd know the identity of any other scammer - he slips up & gets owned.
Quickseller, for instance, was forced to admit to controlling ACCTSeller account. Not sure what point you're trying to make.
Continue attacking the members of default Trust is very useless, I know you have created this thread only for this purpose. |
|
|
|
Long time lurker here. Finally want to start posting. I'm a developer and want to create games. Now I'm interested in anything related cryptocurrency. I want only to say you welcome in this forum and good luck to all your project (bitcoin related). The best What's the best way for a developer to contribute to the bitcoin community? I'm not that experienced but willing to learn.
The best thing is to open a repository at github so anyone can improve and contribuite (and after open a thread here in the forum). |
|
|
|
When you will have the bitcoins (also through cash) I suggest you to try a double spend transaction, but I do not know if it will work at 100%. Try to check this section ' https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=53.0' maybe you will find someone who will sell you some bitcoins. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
