These are more accounts which belong to the already known bounty cheater and ban evader. Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg57394923#msg57394923Accounts Connected
# cryptooracle2021 (Active)
# Btczaddy (Active)
# Cook11 (Active)
# Ligendarise (Active)
# Justinlake22 (Active)
# Lite11 (Active)
Proof:
~
Wallet address: 0x04Acc8B46893EfECcf95cdD742dF976184c28F33
Wallet address: 0x04Acc8B46893EfECcf95cdD742dF976184c28F33
~
ETH Wallet Address: 0x04Acc8B46893EfECcf95cdD742dF976184c28F33
~
Eth wallet adress : 0xcf4b1EFd8EB92E7b0A9A8Caec169cd4B0978739F
~
ERC-20 Wallet Address: 0xcf4b1EFd8EB92E7b0A9A8Caec169cd4B0978739F
~
ETH address: 0xcf4b1EFd8EB92E7b0A9A8Caec169cd4B0978739F
~
Telegram Username: @hvitserk
~
Telegram Username: @hvitserk
~
Telegram username:@hvitserk
Related Addresses:0x04Acc8B46893EfECcf95cdD742dF976184c28F33
0xcf4b1EFd8EB92E7b0A9A8Caec169cd4B0978739F
Telegram Username: @hvitserk
Reddit Username: vineekegwu
Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed. |
|
|
|
It makes sense that Fiat monetary systems as we know them today will eventually die out. Whether it will be replaced by cryptocurrencies or some other form of electronic form of payment I am not sure. Bitcoin is conceived primarily as a digital currency and electronic payment system. However, these days, for most people, it is primarily used as an investment tool. Only time will tell whether bitcoin is a good buy as an investment vehicle. But, while bitcoin as an investment vehicle is gaining traction, its market for currency is dwindling. In fact, its daily volume has been in decline since since April as shown in the chart below. However, while this makes bitcoin less appealing as a currency, it makes it a better store of value in my view.  Number of daily Bitcoin transactions worldwide from January 2017 to August 15, 2021 |
|
|
|
And, as far as I know, you are only required if you're a "whale" playing on their site. Not everyone is required undergo KYC and pass documents.
Level 1 KYC is mandatory for all players and only requires basic personal information. At least that was the case a few months ago when I first received the notice. I don't know if it's still the case now since I've filled out my personal information since then. That's still the scenario on Roobet, level 1 KYC is still mandatory even if you are not whales. You can provide false information but that's too risky especially if you are going to gamble with a good amount of money or if you just want to try the platform, then you can do that. At first many are on panic with this implementation even without the announcement, but gamblers have no more choice but to comply, anyway Roobet is a good gambling site let's just hope that our personal information are safe with them. It's good to know that you can edit your data later on, so even if you enter a fake name the first time, you will be able to change it in your profile. Despite this, I wouldn't recommend it, since I'm unsure of possible negative consequences. |
|
|
|
|
What kind of entertainment industry are you referring to? Isn't gambling also part of the entertainment industry?
What are your expectations from a specialized board for the entertainment industry? And why only the entertainment industry, why not the other industries as well? For example, the automotive or agricultural industries. And we could go on forever...
|
|
|
|
And, as far as I know, you are only required if you're a "whale" playing on their site. Not everyone is required undergo KYC and pass documents.
Level 1 KYC is mandatory for all players and only requires basic personal information. At least that was the case a few months ago when I first received the notice. I don't know if it's still the case now since I've filled out my personal information since then. |
|
|
|
|
I am sorry to see you go! I only recently became a member of BetBTC, but it is always sad when we hear of a good and reputable site closing its doors. Last year Luckybit and Yolodice, and now BetBTC...
In my opinion, you did an excellent job and it is commendable that you made sure everyone could depart BetBTC gracefully.
Wishing you the best of luck in your future endeavors.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I think it's good that gamblers have a choice and can choose the casino that meets their needs.
As a KYC casino, Roobet complies with all laws and regulations, and that's okay. On the other hand, there are casinos on the market that don't ask for KYC at all, and that is also fine. However, I don't like the allusions some members have made that they would rather pick a casino that requires KYC than one that does not and could be a scam. It's important to remember that Roobet gained its reputation long before KYC became mandatory, so one should not be confused with the other. KYC has nothing to do with the legitimacy of a casino, since there may be casinos that ask for personal information and scam people, as well as there may be legitimate casinos that don't ask for it.
The main reason I enjoy playing at Roobet is that it's been proven to be a good casino, but I first became a fan of it because it offered players anonymity back in the day. For me, the introduction of the mandatory KYC was a bump on the road that I simply had to cross to continue using the platform. Fortunately, the Level 1 KYC only requires basic personal data.
|
|
|
|
Just don't pay for posts in Bitcoin Discussion for an easy solution.
You can read actmyname's explanation of why an ad-hoc solution isn't actually a solution a few posts up. |
|
|
|
It has been my observation that many popular gambling websites end up denying to pay back the funds in the name of KYC and point out all sorts of ridiculous reasons. Roobet, in that respect, redefines what it means to be royal. Other gambling platforms should adopt the same attitude as Roobet.
There are many respectable casinos that only require KYC when withdrawing large amounts of money in accordance with AML laws in many jurisdictions. There are also casinos that do not require KYC at all, such as the casino from your signature. As for popular casinos refusing payouts based on KYC verification, that's a feature of scam casinos, and I wouldn't call them popular, at least on this forum. As much as I support Roobet's decision of requesting KYC in advance of deposits, if this is their policy, I do not believe that other casinos should adopt the same approach. |
|
|
|
I am not saying that what @BlackHatCoiner suggested is right approach either, but I definitely wouldn't mind (or felt oppressed) if forum is more strict when it comes to spam/shitposters. The same way I don't feel like having less freedom due plagiarism rule and I wouldn't want it to get lifted just so we can say that we are more free.
Exactly. Having rules does not necessarily imply restricting freedom of expression. As in the real world, rules and laws exist to prevent anarchy. If everyone were allowed to do what they want, this would be a very shitty place. |
|
|
|
As long as your investment is long term I think it will bring positive result in the long run, I don't see any other investment that will be profitable and easy to manage as btc investment, anyone can manage their investment from the comfort of wherever they are, aside that, investment involves risk as much too, all you need is invest according to your ability.
Bitcoin investment has proven to be profitable, I believe the trend of using bitcoin will continue to increase because more and more global companies are investing in bitcoin, all types of investments are certainly risky including bitcoin which can go down without tens of percent in a week, we must be aware and understand the risks before investing in bitcoin. It is very important to properly manage your risk and not get caught up in the hype of crypto investing. If the market volatility gets too high, you may lose a lot of money on your investment. However, there is still a trend for crypto investments to increase. In fact, with the recent surge of bitcoin price, many people are thinking of buying and investing in bitcoin instead of investing in real estate, stocks, and other assets. However, there are risks associated with crypto investments, which people are worried of losing their money. That is why it is very important to invest wisely and invest only in bitcoin that has been very stable for many years. |
|
|
|
I have huge respect for the athletes who take part in Paralympics. But unfortunately these games doesn't have the same level of excitement as Olympics. Unlike Olympics, the United States is not the favorite to top medals table in Paralympics. Back in 2016, it was China which topped the medals table, with Great Britain and Ukraine taking the second and third places respectively. Unfortunately in 2016, there was a tragic accident which resulted in the death of one athlete (Bahman Golbarnejhad). Let's hope that no such incident occurs this time. US athletes have competed at every Summer Paralympic Games since 1960. With more than 2,180 medals won, the United States has traditionally been the most successful country (source: wikipedia). However, China has surpassed them and have been the top-ranking nation for the last four Summer Paralympic Games, since 2004. |
|
|
|
Ako mislis da grijesim, potkrijepi to dokazima, u suprotnom prestani brbljati o stvarima koje ne razumijes i davati ljudima pogresne savjete zbog kojih mogu snositi ozbiljnu prekrsajnu ili kaznenu odgovornost (ovisno o tome radi li se o utaji poreza ili samo izbjegavanja placanja poreza).
A sto mislis sto 90% ljudi ovdje hoce saznat? Radno vrijeme saltera porezne? Prestani sam sebe zavaravat.. Ili ti ne vidis ove teme na nasem podforumu ili sam ja blesav: Porez na bitcoin i kriptovalute 2018-2019Odgovor porezne o cryptuA to je samo na prvoj stranici, ima ih jos ako hoces. Sto tek govoris ljudima koji konobare? Jeste prijavili tu baju poreznoj -.-
Ne govorim ja nikom nista o stvarima koje ne razumijem dovoljno. Nisam porezni savjetnik. |
|
|
|
~
Super, znači odluka je pala, krenuo si po ''hero'' rank  Dobro, drago mi je da ipak još uvijek ima lokalnih članova koji se trude oko merita i prijavljuju ovdje svoje kvalitetne postove, inače bih morao zatvoriti ovaj topic zbog manjka interesa. Samo se prijavljujte i dalje, mislim imate sada 3 lokalna merit source-a, iskoristite to Tko je slijedeći? Ah, idemo polako. Ako, pritom, jos otkrijemo i izbacimo kojeg spamera s foruma, zasto ne? Win-win! |
|
|
|
Pa govori za binance karticu, sto tu ima prijavljivati? Ako prodaje i salje lovu na banku da, ali ne razumjem ako placa karticom sto se tu ima prijavljivati.
To sto ti ne razumijes ne znaci da si u pravu. Ponovit cu jos jednom ako nisi shvatio, svaki prihod se treba prijaviti poreznoj i platiti porez prema vezecim zakonima RH. O tome smo vec puno raspravljalo u drugim temama pa se malo informiraj. Ako mislis da grijesim, potkrijepi to dokazima, u suprotnom prestani brbljati o stvarima koje ne razumijes i davati ljudima pogresne savjete zbog kojih mogu snositi ozbiljnu prekrsajnu ili kaznenu odgovornost (ovisno o tome radi li se o utaji poreza ili samo izbjegavanju placanja poreza). |
|
|
|
Is this going to introduce another layer of freedom restrictions and centralization to the forum? Definitely. However, I don't see any problem with that. We already have various rules that we are required to follow as well as people who enforce them (moderators). So why would it be a problem to add another rule, or two? I read this Benjamin Franklin quote recently: Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. This quote applies here too. As much as I hate spam, "online freedom" is becoming more and more scarce. And once it's gone, you won't easily get it back. As it appears, you misunderstand my point. I am not advocating the abolition of individual liberties, but a more civilized community. There are already defined forum rules? Yes. Should all community members follow the default forum rules? Yes? |
|
|
|
As long as the campaign manager doesn't risk a ban, many of them don't care. This is what it has to be fixed. There has to be a risk otherwise they'll continuously incentivize users to spam. That is it. There must be someone who has authority to supervise and penalize campaign managers. And not just managers, but also organizers. Is this going to introduce another layer of freedom restrictions and centralization to the forum? Definitely. However, I don't see any problem with that. We already have various rules that we are required to follow as well as people who enforce them (moderators). So why would it be a problem to add another rule, or two? |
|
|
|
~
I like BCH and I think it has a place along with BTC. Roger Ver is a bad omen on the project which makes BTC users distrust it.
Then, how about Litecoin (LTC)? Litecoin is a libertarian-friendly digital currency and it offers quicker transactions and cheaper fees compared to Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
