Update: Mempool is down to less than 6 5 sat/vbyte ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) It keeps dropping. Did the ordinal-scamspam finally fail?
|
|
|
The Banks already flag transactions at a much lower amount (I think something like $10 000) .. so the Tax authorities will know, even if you do this with small amounts. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) I'll remind people again: you want the tax man to know about it, so you can pay your taxes and enjoy your money. What are you going to do with $100M black money? You're much better off with $50M in money that you can spend to buy items legally.
|
|
|
That amount might be questionable to any exchanges if you're just a new user. So the best thing to do is to withdraw a couple amount gradually and use Bitcoin mixer to make sure that your address is clean and not connected to any suspicious address. That's the dumbest thing you can do! If you have old Bitcoins you can easily prove your wealth came from capital gains. Depending on the tax system you either pay your taxes when you sell them, or you should have paid annually (like where I live). And that's the reason to report your holdings to taxes: if there's a paper trail, you can cash them out without worrying about the IRS. All you have to do is pay, and keep the rest.
|
|
|
You should move (bottom-left) this topic to the Beginners board. Short version: you don't need Bitcoin Core to store Bitcoins, but Bitcoin Core is one of the many wallets that can be used to send your Bitcoins. Longer version: see Choose your Bitcoin wallet.
|
|
|
Is there any way to find out the time of trust feedback? I mean date and exact time? Nope. Unless you checked right before and right after the feedback was left.
|
|
|
I understand this frustration, but you have to remember that smoothie has always stated he will never give the addresses out except to original buyers.
This is the privacy-centricness in him I wasn't around early enough, but if he always said he won't share addresses, he shouldn't change that now. That's the risk of buying second hand coins. It's good to know before buying them though. @OP: have an avatar ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) That's all I could do for you.
|
|
|
What do you think? Try it ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Then test restoring the seed before funding it. The tricky part is finding the exact dimensions back 10 years later, if you don't have a printed table anymore. It may take some trial and error to print the exact format again for recovery. And you should probably not keep it in the same safe ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Thanks again for your flawless timing!
|
|
|
If you have to ask, you shouldn't hand out negative feedback. I can't tell if they deserve a tag, but if you do, do it for the right reasons. From your tag: This user woke up from a long period of inactivity, and straight away deleted every single comment on self moderated threads of a project(Live stars) he or she created and managed in 2018 or so, project I believe is failed, this user is deleting every thing so as to hide his or her track record, he or she is should not be trusted - I will change or delete this rating if given a good reason to believe otherwise. Waking up is not a reason to tag someone, deleting posts is not a reason to tag someone. Even better: most posts on the altcoin board are spam anyway, so they won't be missed. Asking for a good reason to change the tag is like reversing the chain of evidence. It's bad.
|
|
|
I've seen several incorrect posts by now. To be clear: Mixin lost $200M, not Mixin Safe.
|
|
|
Do you think it was a bad choice? It's good this way. It's still very large. The only alternative would be to add an URL tag to the image, so clicking it shows the full size.
|
|
|
I always imagined part of the reason to introduce the Merit system was to use it to differentiate between posts once enough good posts have been Merit. It just never happened. I can think of many pitfalls, so it's probably a good thing. However, a third party would be able to do this! @TryNinja has a very nice database with posts, and he could probably sort them based on the Merit they received. I did it for Bitcointalk's 10th anniversary art contest (for some reason none of the images work through the image proxy anymore, so it's useless now), and for that topic it made sense. For most topics it will completely mess up the discussion, or show very old posts. Imagine sorting by Merit on the Wall Observer thread, you'll end up with more or less random posts instead of a discussion.
|
|
|
Good news, I can sync again ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Is Unstoppable having inbuilt Tor? It must have it, I don't use Orbot.
My initial estimate of long-term bandwidth consumption was way off. It's "only" 1.4 GB in a few weeks now. Not great, not terrible.
|
|
|
And who's saying that Mixin wasn't trustworthy? I'm not defending, but as far as we know, they got hacked The fact that they kept $200 million of other people's money in a hot wallet is what makes them not trustworthy. If a bank loses their customers' money, I don't trust them. The same goes for any other company. From what was said by the founder Feng Xiaodong[1] they lost 50% 100% of customers' money, but they would refund 50% through issuing bond tokens out of thin air for the victims to claim, and this bond tokens would be repurchased by the platform in the future. I don't think that's going to happen, and i believe Mixin network may be insolvent right now. That sounds a lot like what a large exchange did in the past. Who's going to buy made up "bond tokens" of an insolvent company hoping they won't lose more money in the future?
|
|
|
Is it posible that you can add this feature where once we search a bitcoin address the profile bitcoin addresses will be included to the search result? Your best bet it probably just to use Google: site:bitcointalk.org 1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD Downloading all profiles once would take at least 6 weeks, and about 150 GB forum bandwidth. Checking them all on a regular basis is even worse. If you know which profile you're looking for, you may find an old snapshot on one of the archive sites (archive.org, archive.is and more).
|
|
|
I already have everything configured, but even if I didn't, it should be working, since the image link is via the forum proxy. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Does it only happen in this post or in others too? Good point: it works in other posts. Maybe the URL is really just wrong in the other one (but it's hard to check with Bitcointalk's proxy in there).
|
|
|
*just note if we need eXch node ID just to exchange BTC LN to BTC (or another coin). We don't need that to receive BTC LN (just invoice with 0 amount) You don't need to connect to eXch's node to send them a LN payment. That's the "Network" part of "Lightning Network". This was our QR imager truncating large strings which was the case for LN invoices, which got a fix already. I can confirm it now works as expected.
|
|
|
Even though those 100 users who review their service did not continue to use it afterwards but everyone of them (expect a few) review their service top notch and excellent ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Many paid reviews are like that. It's so obvious when reading those reviews.
|
|
|
the topic archive link is no where to be seen Could it be related to the bump button? That changes the code and may not work with the extension. Try a few other topics. I'm not using this extension, so I can't check for myself.
|
|
|
It might be nice if you can create a Offline App that can be used to import private keys for paper wallets. Imagine if you can encrypt the private key offline, before you use it and when you go online to import it.. then it quickly decrypt it before you import it. That's called BIP38 encryption. (It does not give the hacker the time to capture and use it, before you use it) ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) That's a huge gamble! Chances are "the hacker" is just a piece of automated malware, and chances are it's a lot faster than you are. That is of course what you should assume, and take measures to prevent it. So instead of risking everything by decrypting your private key on an online computer, it's much better to sign the transaction offline and never expose your private key to an online machine. Many people have malware / Clipboard hacks etc... that collect private keys, when you paste it in text ... and if the hacker is fast enough, he or she can exploit that.... but if the private key are encrypted "offline" and then decrypted just before you use it online to import, it will help you to prevent that exploit. You seem to think hacks happen when someone is manually monitoring your computer.
|
|
|
|