Doubling the money would directly double up the prices , it means if you used to have x amount of money and now you have 2x and if you wanted to buy a new house and it's value was x before it will now be 2x , so in both cases you have nothing at last , now the bad part is the price , price in case 1 could be controlled and can go down but since inflation is on in case two the price will of course go up and will cause a lot of loss .
We aren't solving any problem we are just adding another that is inflation to it.
Good point, in reality what we do is masking problems, it's just a matter of time when it will explode. Now even Argentina wanta to print money. In reality deal is following: set limit on how much money one person can own. Why the hell do someone owns billions when he/she can't use it during his/her life? There must be a limit on net profit on person. And also, do you know what breaks us? Money that is spent in military, we don't like piece, we war, we rob, we steal, we damage, we break, we do all shit. |
|
|
|
What are the main functions of the Bitsler API?
What would it be used for?
I think it is known only developer and admin others not. And I also think they will not is close it as they want to maintain their privacy sothat any unwanted thing cant happen. Dear Victorycoin That question was asked months ago and it was already answered too, if you were looking for posts deep further, then a little scroll would make you near to answer. What is only known for admins and developers? Bitsler API is for automated betting softwares like seuntjie. Currently Bitsler's API is not public as far as I know and only seuntjie/mydicebot has access on it. |
|
|
|
Why is alt more profitable? And how much will I be making?
According to your thread, you question is related to profitable mining with GPU so there is no chanse you'll get any profit with bitcoin mining, that's simply impossible on GPUs, there are asics in game for years. But altcoins are open gates for you, even some altcoins which were thought to be asic resistance, failed and GPU mineable coins turn into asic minables where asics had high hashrates and left GPUs in shadow. Personally I wouldn't mine with GPU as for now. For check of profitability, there were some websites suggested, also check whattomine.com |
|
|
|
|
Didn't know about trueflip, see this ANN thread at the moment and to be fair I liked how you began the whole introduction story of Tony's reel, it's similar path of my favourite rock band's story (starset if you know).
Well, UI is amazing, on smartphone game works like you had downloaded app/game and are playing this way, everything works well, interesting game.
Wish you success.
|
|
|
|
35 days ago I started a thread and I told you btc will go 9k$ bcz china banned miners, but some of you dont believed me, Today BTC is 8100$ in some exchange, Here is that thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5130327.msg50545198#msg50545198Now I have a good news , BTC to 50k$ bcz china banned miner, my friend in China confirmed 90% of miner in china are shutdown. BTC can easy go to 50K$ and more. Less miners = More Demand = increasing price, as simple as that. What if we use 100% of our brain? lol Have you heard anything about mining difficulty? Many miners = higher difficulty, less miners - low difficulty. If I could mine 1btc among 100 miners and now half of them are gone, situation has changed better for me and I can mine 2 btc instead of one. Also less difficulty opens path for others to join mining so this is just a task of time, difficulty will rise asap. Also 90% of miners from chine can move their miners into areas where mining is legit and there are a lot of places, for those who had 1-2 antminer it doesn't worth but if I have 300 antminer, then I'll move of course and won't sell them. Consider this too while thinking around this task. |
|
|
|
|
The higher the demand, the higher the price, the higher the tx fees because of high demand which automatically leads to increased amount of transactions, peoplr want to get confirns as soon as possible, because of increased competing, fees rise overally.
There is ine solution for you to use bitcoin tx accelerators (viabtc for example) or convert your bitcoins and use another coin, a lot of altcoins have ultra low tx fees.
Current period is nothing, situation was insane when price hit to 20k.
|
|
|
|
|
What so you think guys, they'll just stand up and give yes to all of your wishes? Maybe they'll say yes but it won't happen in action. Overally, they won't let you to mine coin like they won't let you to print money and if we consider mining mechanism, they need something that will be exclusively available for specific cpu or something similar for governments and will be resistance to any other thing or no, there will be limited supply and that will be all (maybe some change in supply sometimes because fed loves doing such things in charge of us).
To sum up and say truth, it won't happen unless they can't control who you are and where your money goes.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm, seems microsoft is looking for big changes, as I read lately, they are going to move on paswordless system, on a new type of signing option, seems interesting (google microsoft goes passwordless).
But to be fair, whether microsoft will "try" to protect our privacy, it can't take part of linux because this is the only operation system that really takes care of it, I am amazed why they didn't come with such proposal.
Everyone knows microsoft is centralyzed and they'll never protect our privacy, nor google, nor apple, nor any american or chinese company.
|
|
|
|
|
nauane
No, speed matters and if yolodice let's you to control speed of bets, then that's a great feature. I know a lot of people choose some dice websites over others because of bet speed too. Win/loss doesn't matter here, you can test different strategies quickly on high speed, it plays huge role when you are in wagering contest or on billionth bet like our casino offers. Overally dice websites offer betting on full speed (the most of it they can offer) but I like this feature of speed control.
|
|
|
|
Reputable bloggers with millions of subscribers do not often take up a developing project. And for developing crypto projects, reputation is very important. So contact bloggers who advertise everything its bad idea.  Do you know crypto bloggers who value their reputation and advertise developing projects?You are very wrong, facebook/google advertises everything from scam to trustworthy websites but this doesn't affect their reputation. You can even get paid articles on reputable websites like cointelegraph, ccn and so on, it's not publishers' duty to control whether advertiser runs trustworthy project or not. To my mind best way for developing project is to get attention on bitcoin related news websites. Advertisement here plays a huge role too because almost everyone started from this website. Personally don't have experience of advertising via bloggers. |
|
|
|
This message is to anyone who think being on a mission to kill Bitcoin is a "wise" decision. Use Craig Wright as a case study and compare it to the life he'd have if he were to focus on building his own platform and promoting it in his own way.
Secondly, take a look at all those so-called "Bitcoin killer coins" and look at their fate without Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is the most loved asset in this ecosystem and so it's meaningless to try to make it your hunting mission. Together, Bitcoin lovers are stronger than anyone or any coin.
So next time you think about killing Bitcoin, remember you'll be "dead and forgotten" before you even start.
Have a nice evening!!!
Which coins do you consider as a bitcoin killer ones? Bitcoin cash? Because attempt/support of creating it was to turn bitcoin into shadow? Well, bch is nothing new, just an increase in tx size. But on another hand, I amn't against bitcoin killer coins and in this coins I mean something that will be better than bitcoin. Why not? Why to just attach with bitcoin and nevet seperate even if better options excist? I like bitcoin and personally prefer it over most of others but as time pass, it will be "killed" by better one, then this better one will be killed by best and this will continue endlessly. |
|
|
|
I see a lot of mad people who spam all around the internet and argue about the money they lost in cloud mining. These people claim that they INVESTED a lot of money and lost everything.
At first, I felt sorry about these people. But after I've found out what cloud mining is, I started to think, that their loss is just their fault. Cloud miners services offer you to buy mining power. That's alright. Also, they say, when your account profitability turns negative, a system closes your account automatically. That's fair too - your account should profit.
But that is the stumbling block between users and cloud mining services. Users think that they've scammed when their account just stopped making a profit. But some users start flooding saying that one or another company is a scam and nobody should trust it.
They spoil the reputation of good products. Just because they were too stupid to read a contract. I have nothing left to say. I don't understand these people!
"Good products"? Do you really call cloud mining good product? Because they are just legit scam. Would you agree if having slaves were legit again (contract where are written how much they pay in order to be their slave and etc details). I think there are some norms and standarts, what cloud mining companies do are shame and it's even more shame when people can't analyze that they are scammers who offer you mining because with you they get more profit. This is the question which 90% of people can't ask themselves: Why do they offer me mining while they can mine for themselves? |
|
|
|
Just came across this thought. We all know what happened after the housing debt bubble burst near 2008 which led to a global level depression in 2008 which really ruined lives of millions of people worldwide. It even raised some great question about fiat debt and it's working. Lots of people lost their jobs, houses and everything.
Another fact that Bitcoin was created right after one year in 2009. So do you think there is some chance that satoshi was someone who lost his everything in 2008 crash, his job, his assets and his house.
He was so frustrated with it that his trust on the fiat financial system completely broke. He was sick of government, sick of corporate and sick of banks because of which he thought of creating real money thus creating bitcoin over blockchain and completing it in the very next year. So that people don't lose their money just because of debt bubble
Really one of the greatest question that has been asked here, really. Maybe it was one person who lost everything or maybe a group of "avangers" that decided to fight against fiat and government and offer something new that would protect our privacy, freedom of choise and will be seperate from government. But I have another question, one variant is it's the war that they wage but why they disappeared? Sometimes it's a good and clever action but did they continue fight after creating btc? I think again everything turned into personal interests, bitcoin has lost it's first face, aim is lost, it's now financial benefit. |
|
|
|
|
I think it's not always neccesary to "think" because as I see usually, the more governments think, the stupidest ideas there come and tragically they get released too.
This is direct disrimination, if they let sikhs to choose themselves whether wear hemlet or not, then why can't I do the same? Let's respect everyone decision, even if someone commits crime, it was his/her choise and religion tells us to not judge anyone, then follow this rule and not judge, soon world will turn into full chaos.
There are so silly rules, if you have chance to use it for benefiting yourself, then let's use it. Personally I agree with you OP.
|
|
|
|
@bill gator Far future time-locks aren't really advised, so I'd personally put a limit of around 6 months, which could be broken by changing something in the advanced settings of the wallet perhaps. The bitcoin wiki says this about far-future time-locks: It is not advised to lock up bitcoins into the far future because it takes on risk of the bitcoin network changing. For example, if there were an ECDSA or RIPEMD160 algorithm break that made any coins spendable with a few months of CPU time, the network might need to to prohibit moving old unspent coins after some transition, but long locktimed coins could not make such a transition.
OP_CheckSequenceVerify allows locking for at most 65535 blocks (about 455 days) or for at most 65535*512 seconds (about 388 days). OP_CheckLockTimeVerify could be used to lock up coins for several centuries.
Source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Timelock#Far-future_locks In the end, it's really something for hobbyists, but it could also be quite useful for people who just have trouble with their spending in general. I would make sure there are double or even triple checks before locking Bitcoins, so there's a minimal chance of user-error. (people accidentally locking coins for too long) Yeah, far future time-locks aren't recommended in anyway, at first no one knows when they'll have a need of money. Sorry but personally I am against this idea, it's my opinion, right or wrong but money has to be in circulation, we don't have to stop it, this means stop of developing. On another hand I would wish to see online wallet with price-lock feature where for example I choose a date and lock price (my 1 btc worths 3k and I chose to lock it, then for me price movement doesn't matter because I'll always know when I visit my online wallet, I'll have a bitcoins that will worth 3k usd). |
|
|
|
I don't see a problem to go back to $6k. I'm not saying I believe it will happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if it would.
I'd rather have a steady slow continious increase than a bubble/burst like candle that will eventually fall even harder.
I thought movements like this are getting less and less frequent with bitcoins increasing liquidity and usage worldwide, but I guess it is still too early.
To be fair this "Burst" is what causes strady rise of bitcoin's price. When we were in stuck in 3k usd, then one burst up to 4k caused steady rise up to 5k. Even in past, that bursts pushed bitcoin to go up to 20k. As I see slow rise/fall only gives us steady price and doesn't benefit in further rise but one big burst somehow makes hope of rise among people. It was exciting moment when I checked price today and it was over 7k but some hours later I got so dissapointed, bad. |
|
|
|
Just confirming what's already been said. Can not withdrawal BTC or XMR. No response to emails from administrator. No MOD in chat. I haven't seen anyone playing in the last few days other then "Nieuwendijk60".
There doesn't seem to be any recourse which is forcing me to reconsider the other gambling investments I have going.
This is the third casino in I've been in where the owner just vanished with peoples money. The other two on the Burst platform. Snakeeyes was the name of one. can't remember the other.
Happy times!!
To be fair it doesn't need confirm, it's already 100% clear and it's a little bit curious if you really tried to deposit and gamble on that website and came here after not being able to witbdraw money. Moderators, I think it will be better to close this thread since we no longer get any answer from admin/mod team and this website is like an abandoned empire. |
|
|
|
|
The first step was taken when bitcoin rised by 1k usd in one day. After that price went up and uo from 4k with some falls but quick fixes.
Now 6K will be a stable line, maybe we will see price under 6k these days but soom it will become stable amd rise will continue slowly up to 7k and more. I think this will be a logical continues of current situation, especially when binance's hack had zero negative affect on bitcoin's price.
|
|
|
|
1. Binance has good security system and this hack is false, they just wanted to give a bad reputation to cryptocurrencies (this work comes from governments and financial institutes) because now there will be a rain of articles about how bad crypto world is, how unsecure it is and etc.
Do you seriously believe that "governments" (like if they all conspire together?) would spend 40 million dollars to give some temporary and very tangential bad rep to Bitcoin? And that Binance would sabotage their reputation and future profits because governments and financial institutions told them so? This forum is always quite tinfoily, but this is just ridiculous. And look at the aftermath, Bitcoin kept growing in the recent days as if nothing happened, and no one really cares, just like no one cares about Tether and Bitfinex. Why? Because usually this is time when a rain of bad words come around bitcoin, for example see this new article and statement from European Central Bank president: https://cointelegraph.com/news/ecb-president-mario-draghi-cryptos-are-not-currencies-they-are-very-risky-assets/ampMan, I don't claim but still there is a chance of it, game has to be played like it is real and has nothing common with it. Bicoin does different things, once it fell by 200$ in some hour (was 10% loss at the moment) because of withdrawal stop by chinese exchanger and recovered in one day. Binance's situation didn't cause panic, yeah, agree but also it's a well known fact they had reserves too (10% of fees). |
|
|
|
This is not making any sense.
Makes perfect sense. Give this new user your business idea and if it is liked, it is taken. Ok, which ideas, unique ones or those with huge potential of profit? Or may I ask him to choose one from it? OP Before negotiating with you, can you write what kind of projects won't be accepted from the very begining? (for example social media, streaming or etc). Email adress sucks, looks very ugly. Can't think of serious offers but get ready for massive spam. In such cases it's usually better to meet people on blockchaim, crypto and IT meetups, just consider. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
