Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 04:04:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 ... 590 »
2921  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin Wallet v0.8.6 beta on: June 18, 2017, 03:57:20 AM
The wallet.dat file is a Bitcoin Core specific thing, just as the Electrum wallet format is an Electrum specific thing. In order to move your Bitcoin to Electrum, you will need to export your private keys by using the dumpprivkey RPC command. You must use this command for all of your addresses, including change. Then you can make a new Electrum wallet and go to Wallet > Private Keys > Sweep and sweep the Bitcoin into your new Electrum wallet. Sweeping makes a transaction that spends all of the Bitcoin from the private keys you specified and sends the Bitcoin to an address in your Electrum wallet.
2922  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / MOVED: Payments and Mining Issue on: June 17, 2017, 10:49:53 PM
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.

Begging
2923  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: blockchain.info "Not accepting transaction version 2" on: June 17, 2017, 10:49:12 PM
Thanks, i tried it without luck so far.

{
   "result": null,
   "error": {
      "code": -25,
      "message": "Missing inputs"
   },
   "id": null
}
Can you post the raw transaction that you are trying to broadcast?
2924  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / MOVED: The Best Place To Earn Bitcoins. on: June 17, 2017, 04:24:05 PM
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.

Reflinks are not allowed
2925  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory error on: June 17, 2017, 03:56:48 PM
https://snag.gy/roe015.jpg   - screen

https://pastebin.com/nww6Gsuj - dblog

Is it right? Thanks for all help
We also need the armorylog.txt file too.
2926  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: need help with lost wallet.dat file on: June 17, 2017, 03:53:38 PM
Private keys are randomly generated. Downloading and installing the wallet software will on a new computer will always give you a new address, otherwise everyone would be getting the same addresses and that is not secure.

If you do not have the wallet file and do not have any backups of it, then there is nothing you can do, the Bitcoin is lost. Even knowing the password to your wallet does not help because your password is completely unrelated to the private keys that you need. The password is only for the wallet file and its encryption, but nothing to do with the contents of that file.
2927  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: blockchain.info "Not accepting transaction version 2" on: June 17, 2017, 03:50:39 PM
Transactions have a version number. There are currently two accepted (and considered standard) version numbers, 1 and 2. Bitcoin Core by default creates transactions with a version number of 2. It seems that blockchain.info is incapable of accepting transactions that have a version number of 2. Since you are using Bitcoin Core, I suggest that you use it to broadcast your transaction. Just use the sendrawtransaction command and it will broadcast your transaction to the network, so long as you are connected to it.
2928  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Bitcoin Core 0.14.2 Released on: June 17, 2017, 03:45:50 PM
Bitcoin Core version 0.14.2 is now available from:

  <https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.14.2/>

This is a new minor version release, including various bugfixes and
performance improvements, as well as updated translations.

Please report bugs using the issue tracker at github:

  <https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues>

To receive security and update notifications, please subscribe to:

  <https://bitcoincore.org/en/list/announcements/join/>

Compatibility
==============

Bitcoin Core is extensively tested on multiple operating systems using
the Linux kernel, macOS 10.8+, and Windows Vista and later.

Microsoft ended support for Windows XP on [April 8th, 2014](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/WindowsForBusiness/end-of-xp-support),
No attempt is made to prevent installing or running the software on Windows XP, you
can still do so at your own risk but be aware that there are known instabilities and issues.
Please do not report issues about Windows XP to the issue tracker.

Bitcoin Core should also work on most other Unix-like systems but is not
frequently tested on them.

Notable changes
===============

miniupnp CVE-2017-8798
----------------------------

Bundled miniupnpc was updated to 2.0.20170509. This fixes an integer signedness error
(present in MiniUPnPc v1.4.20101221 through v2.0) that allows remote attackers
(within the LAN) to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified
other impact.

This only affects users that have explicitly enabled UPnP through the GUI
setting or through the `-upnp` option, as since the last UPnP vulnerability
(in Bitcoin Core 0.10.3) it has been disabled by default.

If you use this option, it is recommended to upgrade to this version as soon as
possible.

Known Bugs
==========

Since 0.14.0 the approximate transaction fee shown in Bitcoin-Qt when using coin
control and smart fee estimation does not reflect any change in target from the
smart fee slider. It will only present an approximate fee calculated using the
default target. The fee calculated using the correct target is still applied to
the transaction and shown in the final send confirmation dialog.

0.14.2 Change log
=================

Detailed release notes follow. This overview includes changes that affect
behavior, not code moves, refactors and string updates. For convenience in locating
the code changes and accompanying discussion, both the pull request and
git merge commit are mentioned.

### RPC and other APIs
- #10410 `321419b` Fix importwallet edge case rescan bug (ryanofsky)

### P2P protocol and network code
- #10424 `37a8fc5` Populate services in GetLocalAddress (morcos)
- #10441 `9e3ad50` Only enforce expected services for half of outgoing connections (theuni)

### Build system
- #10414 `ffb0c4b` miniupnpc 2.0.20170509 (fanquake)
- #10228 `ae479bc` Regenerate bitcoin-config.h as necessary (theuni)

### Miscellaneous
- #10245 `44a17f2` Minor fix in build documentation for FreeBSD 11 (shigeya)
- #10215 `0aee4a1` Check interruptNet during dnsseed lookups (TheBlueMatt)

### GUI
- #10231 `1e936d7` Reduce a significant cs_main lock freeze (jonasschnelli)

### Wallet
- #10294 `1847642` Unset change position when there is no change (instagibbs)

Credits
=======

Thanks to everyone who directly contributed to this release:

- Alex Morcos
- Cory Fields
- fanquake
- Gregory Sanders
- Jonas Schnelli
- Matt Corallo
- Russell Yanofsky
- Shigeya Suzuki
- Wladimir J. van der Laan

As well as everyone that helped translating on [Transifex](https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/bitcoin/).

2929  Economy / Exchanges / Re: what's the difference trading from bitcoin.com to localbitcoins.com on: June 17, 2017, 03:41:32 PM
Hi, I'm a beginner. This is my third day learning bitcoin. So far this is my understanding on how to earn money from it, pls pls correct me if I'm wrong so i can get better understanding.
1. Mining
Mining is the process of including transactions in blocks to make them irreversible and permanent. Miners are rewarded for spending the time, electricity, and energy required to produce a block.

2. buy low sell high (this is what I'm interested in  Grin).Questions:
a. Why some people use localbitcoins to trade? Why not using the official www.bitcoins.com? WHat's the difference? Undecided
Bitcoin.com is not official in any way, shape, or form. There is no official Bitcoin website nor is there an official Bitcoin exchange. People use LocalBitcoins and other exchanges because they have existed far longer than any service provided by Bitcoin.com and are more trustworthy.

b. and the money you received will be using paypal. I don't like paypal. Is there any other method beside paypal where i can receive my money safely? Roll Eyes
There are multiple ways to exchange Bitcoin, not just through Bitcoin.com. If you use LocalBitcoins, you can receive cash (either in person or by mail), money sent to a bank account, MoneyGram transfers, Western Union transfers, etc. There is no need to use PayPal. You can use other exchanges too like Bitstamp where you link a bank account directly to the exchange so you deposit and withdraw fiat via your bank account.

c. Wallet is where you keep your bitcoin, wallet ex is coinbase, coinjar, etc. What is the difference between blockchain.info and your wallet?
There are many different types of wallets. There are web wallets like coinbase and blockchain.info. There are also desktop wallets like Bitcoin Core, Electrum, and Armory. Web wallets are far less secure than desktop wallets. You are trusting the service to not steal your Bitcoin. You are relying on them to still provide the service so that you can access your Bitcoin. Furthermore, most web wallets do not provide you the level of control and advanced utility that many desktop wallets do. You get far more control over your Bitcoin by using a desktop wallet.

d. i've got an offer to buy bitcoin from $55, while current bitcoin price is $2500. They said they're using platform. How do they earn their money from bitcoin? are this trading company joining people's $55 and buy 1 bitcoin in a group or what?
It's probably a scam.
2930  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk standard time? on: June 17, 2017, 05:33:44 AM
Bitcointalk's default timezone is UTC. Melbourne Australia is UTC+10, so the forum will be 10 hours behind you. However, you can go into your profile settings and change the timezone (only for you) to your local timezone so all times will be your local time.
2931  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Cannot enable UPnP on: June 17, 2017, 03:53:17 AM
I've installed it via the following ppa, which I was under the impression was the 'standard' way to do so.

http://ppa.launchpad.net/bitcoin/bitcoin/ubuntu/

Is there a better, 'best practice', or official method aside from this?
The PPA is built without upnp support (and a few other things). Instead of installing from the PPA, you should download the tar package from bitcoin.org and move the files to the right places.
2932  Other / Meta / Re: It is just me or does the search function do poorly? on: June 17, 2017, 02:54:21 AM
The forum's search function is fairly poor and works very slowly. It is far better to use Google to perform your searches. This is easily done by appending site:bitcointalk.org to your search. This will limit the search to just pages on bitcointalk.
2933  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Problem importing a Private key into Electrum on: June 17, 2017, 01:36:16 AM
I see what you mean, but on the blockchain.info, it shows that the private key belongs to that address. This is really confusing! That means that Blockchain.info is showing me the wrong private key, how could that be possible?  Sad Sad
Blockchain.info could have yet another bug in their wallet (it's a common occurrence for their wallet to be full of bugs) which is displaying the incorrect private key.

Alternatively you are looking at the wrong address or the transactions to that address have not confirmed yet.
2934  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Problem importing a Private key into Electrum on: June 17, 2017, 01:02:14 AM
Yes, you are right, it was the sweeping function. If it is showing the address that belongs to Electrum, how do i get it to show the address that is associated with the Private key and has a balance?
Thank you for your help.
You can't. You can only see that info after you have clicked "Sweep" and it attempts to create the transaction. When that happens, you can review the transaction before it is signed and broadcast. Before that, it does not lookup any information about the private keys that you have entered. If it says that there are no inputs, then that means that you may not have the private key for the right address.
2935  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Problem importing a Private key into Electrum on: June 16, 2017, 11:42:46 PM
There is no import function in Electrum anymore, only sweeping. I presume you are sweeping? In that case, the address you see is not the address that you are importing but rather one that is in your wallet that Electrum will send all of the coins from your "imported" address to.
2936  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Trouble importing private keys to Electrum 2.8.3: on: June 16, 2017, 11:39:07 PM
Are you sure you have entered the private key correctly? Make sure that you are not missing any characters and you don't have any extra characters (e.g. non-breaking spaces) in the private key that you entered. You can also try a different wallet and see if that wallet recognizes the private key.
2937  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: CPubKey from pubkey string on: June 16, 2017, 04:32:20 PM
What you are doing is interpreting the pubkey as a string. However a pubkey is not a string but rather a blob of binary data that is 33 bytes long. What you want to do is to convert your hex string into a vector of unsigned char first and then pass that to the CPubKey constructor.

It would be better for you to just initialize an array with your pubkey instead of performing a string conversion.

Edit:
Your code should look something like this:
Code:
unsigned char pk[] = {0x03, 0x96, 0xf8, 0x78, 0x1a, 0x49, 0x00, 0x37, 0x2a, 0x5d, 0x72, 0xd8, 0x47, 0x18, 0xd1, 0x46, 0x17, 0x0d, 0x59, 0x83, 0xe6, 0x7d, 0xff, 0x8b, 0x4a, 0x28, 0xfe, 0xf8, 0x06, 0x90, 0xc0, 0x97, 0x67};
std::vector<unsigned char> vec(pk, pk+ sizeof(pk));

CPubKey pubkey(vec);
if (pubkey.IsValid()) {
    cout << "valid" << endl;   
} else {
    cout << "invalid" << endl;
}
2938  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Cannot enable UPnP on: June 16, 2017, 06:31:26 AM
AFAIK it's the official one: Bitcoin Core version v0.14.1.0-g964a185 (64-bit)
IIRC having the commit hash at the end of the version number like you do here means that the binary wasn't compiled via gitian (the official release process) but rather something else. Either this is self compiled, or done by a software repository. This means that if whoever compiled it did not include the miniupnp library, your install of Core will not be able to us upnp.
2939  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: ARMORY headache thread. Avoid. on: June 15, 2017, 10:22:54 PM
Thanks.  HOLD the phone!  Does Bitcoin Core have its own secure wallet?  And all the other wallets are spinoffs?
Bitcoin Core has its own wallet functionality that is reasonably secure. Not all wallets are based on Core or use Core.
2940  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: ARMORY headache thread. Avoid. on: June 15, 2017, 12:14:24 AM
The 20.00 usd in btc I sent to my wallet is as good as gone to me.  I will give away the key and pw so its not lost forever.  Who wants it?
You can export the private key(s) and import them into another wallet which does not require the entire blockchain, like Electrum. Read the second paragraph of this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1927293.msg19130832#msg19130832 for instructions for exporting.  Follow the instructions here: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/faq.html?highlight=sweep#can-i-sweep-private-keys-from-other-bitcoin-clients to sweep the keys into Electrum.
Pages: « 1 ... 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 ... 590 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!