Miguel Diaz-Canel is not a "corrupt dictator." He's the first non-Castro to be president since 1979 and he's only been in office for about 3 months.

If you're talking about Raul Castro, he did oversee the office of the presidency up until April, but he retired because he's 90 years old.

This doesn't really make sense. They reduce transmission of the virus. Without masks, undoubtedly millions more people would have been infected, and thousands more would have died.

Hypothetically speaking:

If you're sick with the rona and you cough a giant loogie, and chunkies of it fly up your grandmother's nostrils and she catches the virus, its because neither of you are wearing masks.

I don't know what metric you're using to establish what "doing something" entails, but simply reducing transmission of virus-containing respiratory droplets definitely counts in my book.

---

Everybody else, keep your panties on: most of you are literally at Stage 1 or Stage 0; you just don't realize it because its more exciting to pretend the government is after you.

You didn't actually refute a single thing I said.

I explained very carefully why you should not be trusted, laying out the evidence necessary to back my claim.

Then you countered it with a series of non-sequiturs, trying to assert that even when you're wrong you're right because you were "just trolling."

I'll say it again sgbett: nobody should listen to you for financial advice, and nobody wants to use a coin led by a fraud.

Without the backstory, that's kind of weird, but congratulations.









<-----------

I have a similar problem and want to change my name too. I didn't think I'd have this account for very long, so I'd like to change my name to something a bit more catchy, like "Balls." with the period at the end of it. Because there's probably already somebody named "Balls". There is and he was pretty boring. Make way for the New Balls..

Just wanted to say I'm all for reinstating the newbie jail, except this time it should be more like a newbie prison, and you just need to keep them in there long enough until I figure out who's alt account they are.

Timelord seems to be losing it as he just posted the same feedback in my profile and suchmoons.


A year and a half later, my feedback rings true now more than ever.


I guess that's what this is all about at the end of the day...

Well if you wanted me to change it, you should have tried to prove me wrong instead of right.

You insist you should be in DT yet your methods are... unsound.

Page for Mr.VCC

This user was banned last year after spreading malware links. They keep coming back with new scams but were dumb enough not to change their Telegram name this time around.


joelitoup was part of a huge collection used to spread malware links for something called Ethpill, but its hard to say if the old account was hacked or they were in on it.

In any case, absolutely nobody should be trading with this member.

You've already been banned from the forum.



Kindly GTFOH.

Here is what you want to avoid and what you're looking for:



Here is the proper extension link.

You can tell its the right one because the author is axieinfinity.com (it also has over 700,000 downloads, which is kind of mind boggling).

Already people have lost thousands of dollars worth of Axies to these clever Google Ads scammers.

I've re-bolded the word you seem to have misinterpreted.


Your examples aren't of people who have "mistaken" the two. Nobody has mistaken the two.

Nobody owes you a PM, and everybody should ignore your feedback.

Safe to say Google totally dropped the ball here if they can't get basic conspiracies right.

Definitely not a bad idea and I will probably do the same.

And I agree with you that these types of account sales should just be banned. These types of sales are in no way necessary or within the company's TOS.

We could, as a community, just decide to start tagging accounts for selling accounts not meant to be sold. Of which Revolut account sellers definitely fall into this category.

https://www.revolut.com/en-US/legal/terms


Just because theymos won't ban scammers, it doesn't mean we can't start tagging what are basically bank account sellers.

Google came up with this nifty fact checking utility.



Welp, guess that's the end of fake news!

Might not be the worst idea. Last quarter's numbers were through the woof.

Nothing is wrong with Bitcoin SV by itself. It's a fork that has active developers, and even though it doesn't have actual use cases or economic utility, I can admit its a step up from Bitcoin Gold or Bitcoin Diamond.

And that's it. Every cent above $50 or so is sustained on the lie that Wright is Satoshi.

And as I stated before, nobody wants to use a coin led by a fraud. You should be more embarrassed defending his foolish exploits.



Congrats on reaching a multi-year low in mining difficulty.






Price of BSV on Feb. 17: $182
Price of BSV today: $127


You're big on loosely reinterpreting your old quotes into creating tenuous cases for being "right". Well how about this? I told you what actually mattered, was right, and you bulldozed over it in order to continue being wrong, inevitably leading anyone who listened to your advice to financial loss.

You insist that you are an intelligent person but then you open threads with gross misinterpretations of fact, like this one:

Craig Wright recognised by US Govt as Satoshi, author of white paper

So of course that was a lie, or "false."    Not at all incongruous to simultaneously demand respect as an intellectual and be capable of making such "honest" "mistakes."..  

Been seeing a lot of this guy lately:


Weird, because his name is Indonesian.

I knew it was you ChartBuddy.

You broke my heart.

You broke my heart!

Why does that matter to you?

Seems like you should be comfortable enough in your own skin by now to understand that occasionally people say mean things on the internet.

What accusations are you talking about anyway? Ones like this?

https://azcoinnews.com/hex-founder-richard-heart-was-revealed-to-be-a-notorious-scammer-known-as-the-spam-king.html


You're saying its not true?

You harbor a lot of anger and resentment for someone whose coin has been on a tear. If you already won, what do you still have to prove?

Here's the problem: if you are too lazy to come up with your own words for your white paper, what does that say about the effort you're going to put into the actual project?

Besides that, plagiarism in white papers is _always_ a big no-no among any project asking for money.

Nobody here is personally against you. Having a plagiarized white paper is simply one of the pre-eminent warning signs of a crypto scam.

You're free to continue advertising your project here or anywhere on the rest of the internet.