Russians lost just about everything else. Why not empathy as well?  |
|
|
|
Looks like you are using the wrong avatar.  |
|
|
|
Gaynesss is creates by stupid pupils and not by God if he exist.I even dont beleive that God exist.Gayness is most eorst thing in the whole world because it is dedtrosing human population.2 boys cant make children so they are gargbage.If God create gayness why I have never saw that male dog fck in ass male dog?
Gays can adopt kids and be better parents than some heterosexuals who abuse or ignore their biological kids largely. Feel free to educate yourself on animal homosexuality: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animalsDidn't look at the site you referenced, but one thing about it can be deduced right from its wording. People aren't animals necessarily. But all homosexuals are. |
|
|
|
^^^ And now it is time to keep the guns, but to move on towards some homemade armament that makes the guns look like a kid playing on the beach. |
|
|
|
My question is, why are you promoting something that nobody knows if factual, and especially when there is strong evidence that it is not factual? Oh, that's right. You are Fluffer Overblow. *sign* The thread topic is asking the age of the earth. If nobody was allowed to say anything unless it was 100% factual, nobody would able to make any posts. Be a pretty dull thread. However, until another theory comes along with more evidence than what we have now, old earth is simple the best we have. Is it perfect? Of course not. But the evidence is certainly conclusive, and nothing yet has even come close. Old earth won't be losing any sleep over young earth, any time soon. Maybe 4.54 billion year old earth theory is wrong. Maybe it's trillions of years old! Bible history is documented eye-witness reports. No theory needed. Eye-witness beats theory, hands down. The earth and universe is less than 7,000 years old. *yawn* Where you've gone so wrong is start from the premise that your interpretation of the Bible is the literal description how the universe began, and then proceed to hammer your square peg into round holes. Then when it doesn't fit, you blame the hole, not the peg. Almost childlike in behaviour. Your big mistake is not realizing that God exists, even when the points of proof are shoved right in your face. Since you won't accept God, none of the things you say about Him and the Bible have any value. Perhaps if you come to understand that God exists, then you can start on the journey to understanding His power, and that if He had wanted, He could have made the universe in all of its vast array, faster than a snap of the fingers. He chose to do it in 6 days so He could savor the beauty of it. |
|
|
|
Cop Who Shot Philando Castile Had Special Training
that Taught Him the Public is the Enemy In May of 2014, reports the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Yanez underwent a 20-hour seminar on "Street Survival" taught by Illinois-based Calibre Press, which teaches courses on the subject to police officers nationwide. The company's "Street Survival Seminar" overview displays a monomaniacal focus on that most important of all policy considerations, "officer safety." It treats every police encounter as a combat situation in which only one life truly matters – that of the government's armed emissary, not that of the citizen who is supposedly being protected and served by him.
Although Calibre co-owner Jim Glennon has written that viewing "police as the enemy is not a healthy or helpful position for a society to take," the courses presented by his company relentlessly teach officers that the public is their enemy. As one instructor summarized the course for the benefit of his students, "We've got to survive this job!" Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/cop-castile-bulletproof-warrior-training/.
|
|
|
|
Why do people still believe in god,even if it is 2016 already and we got no proof of existing god,
after 2016 years,anyone not surprised?
Im not,it is obvious there is no such place like "heaven" or "hell",am i right?
Actually, science has proven that God exists. Scientists often don't want to show the proof. I would not go THAT far, as to say that scientists have proven the existence of God. Scientists do say, however, that science still leaves room for God for many things. Of course, nobody needs to believe anything if they don't want to. Study cause and effect, as upheld by Newton's 3rd Law. This scientific law almost proves the existence of God all by itself. When you add complex universe and universal entropy, God is proven. Here is the distraction that causes people to fail in understanding that God is proven. When people think of God, they have preconceived notions about what God is like. Scientific proof doesn't suggest that God is like any of the religions say He is... except a little. When you look at the complete dictionary and encyclopedia definition of what God is like, the scientific proof for God fits the basics, but not necessarily all the little attributes that people suggest God has. |
|
|
|
No one really knows how old is the earth. Even science had difficulty on it, in religious state it says 6000 years and in scientific says million years which could actually bring question to our minds regarding to this mystery.
Except that the Bible is not vague. It is very clear, as is the history of the people who wrote it down. Even today, Israel is one of the toughest and shrewdest nations around. And that is after God kicked them out of their position of strength because they failed Him. Think of what they were like when they obeyed God fully. |
|
|
|
The real question is, will there be 20 more years for the human race? |
|
|
|
Gun control can't be put in place in USA in my opinion.
But the important fact is that there is no reason to see gun control imposed to a population who doesn't want it or removed in a country where it is needed.
Just let USA with their guns if they want it :3
I think gun control must be implemented not only in the USA and the other country as well. There are lots of crimes occuring because of the gun. Private people shouldn't have guns as they didn't need that. Only the police, and other government officials are the one who need guns for protection. Well for me I don't need to have a gun and I don't want to have a gun anyways. Im contented to what I have now and besides, I dont need it anyway. Why not do you say? What USA got to do with no gun control,it is a country same like each other countries on the world,so you mean that no country in the world should even ban anything with guns? Gun control is needed,but only in some part for example,you cannot get automatic weapon,it is just stupid if you can. Gun talk is fine. But it helps people to forget that there are many other things, some far more dangerous than guns... and far more available to average people, be they sane or not. |
|
|
|
My question is, why are you promoting something that nobody knows if factual, and especially when there is strong evidence that it is not factual? Oh, that's right. You are Fluffer Overblow. *sign* The thread topic is asking the age of the earth. If nobody was allowed to say anything unless it was 100% factual, nobody would able to make any posts. Be a pretty dull thread. However, until another theory comes along with more evidence than what we have now, old earth is simple the best we have. Is it perfect? Of course not. But the evidence is certainly conclusive, and nothing yet has even come close. Old earth won't be losing any sleep over young earth, any time soon. Maybe 4.54 billion year old earth theory is wrong. Maybe it's trillions of years old! Bible history is documented eye-witness reports. No theory needed. Eye-witness beats theory, hands down. The earth and universe is less than 7,000 years old. |
|
|
|
Meet Riffle, the next-gen anonymity network that hopes to trounce Tor Next week, top eggheads will unveil a new anonymizing internet tool that they claim is snoop-proof and faster and more reliable against attack than Tor.
Dubbed Riffle, the system was developed by MIT and the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. It uses the same onion-encryption system as Tor, which wraps messages in layers of encryption as they travel through the anonymizing network to disguise the route they've taken.
Like Tor, Riffle [paper PDF] runs connections through a mix network of nodes, bouncing packets from system to system to obscure the origin. What separates Riffle from Tor is that the former has extra defenses to potentially prevent spies from unmasking its users Read more at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/13/riffle_next_gen_anonymity/.
|
|
|
|
^ If your getting your "science" from "creation.com", it's little wonder you're so confused. The site is 100% interested in pushing their agenda, and 0% interested in the truth. You are confused  You don't understand much about anything and yet you still creating content here. Please continue... Let's hear what you got to say. can show old-age-earth easily by throwing in all the links in the site I linked to above. Then he can add a bunch more from Googling "age of the earth." But you can do this, yourself... I was going to add "can't you" to the end of my last sentence. But I am realizing that maybe you can't. If I Google "age of earth" I would get 50 links for proof of young earth and 100 links for proof of old earth. Your point? Assuming you are being truthful with your numbers^, all this proves is that there are more propagandists out there than truth tellers. *shrug* If you can't even look at the other side of the argument in case there something there that frightens you, what's the point?  You've made up your mind. You've submitted to misinformation sites like "creation.com", designed purely to mold you like soft candle wax, into the shape they want, their way, by their rules. That's the foolish path you've chosen, burdened with the consequences it carries. Good luck with that. This sounds exactly like you! You are so close to home that you can't seem to say anything that isn't about yourself, right? When you read what the scientists say about dating the earth and universe, in their papers, they say it right out, that they are essentially guessing. Further, science theories are not science fact. If they were, they would be called scientific laws. This doesn't mean that they are NOT laws. All it means is that nobody really knows for sure. My question is, why are you promoting something that nobody knows if factual, and especially when there is strong evidence that it is not factual? Oh, that's right. You are Fluffer Overblow. |
|
|
|
America is creating war everwhere.They created war in Iraq and Syria so I hate America,EU and NATO.America was created therorist attack in America and they will be punished for that.They cant be master of the world we will mot allow that.Europe hate America and we will hate them forever grrrrrr.
But the average people of America are just the same as people of everywhere else. All they want is peace and prosperity to live their lives. If they knew how to stop the wars, they would do it. It is the greedy big bankers, and wealthy people who want the wars so that they can conquer lands for their own. You want to stop America? Learn this - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1512214.0 - and use it and spread it to people all over the world. Why? Without tax money, the governments that are doing the damage will fail. And if you learn it for America, you can use it to collapse almost all the laws of America. |
|
|
|
^ If your getting your "science" from "creation.com", it's little wonder you're so confused. The site is 100% interested in pushing their agenda, and 0% interested in the truth. You are confused You don't understand much about anything and yet you still creating content here. Please continue... Let's hear what you got to say. can show old-age-earth easily by throwing in all the links in the site I linked to above. Then he can add a bunch more from Googling "age of the earth." But you can do this, yourself... I was going to add "can't you" to the end of my last sentence. But I am realizing that maybe you can't. If I Google "age of earth" I would get 50 links for proof of young earth and 100 links for proof of old earth. Your point? Assuming you are being truthful with your numbers^, all this proves is that there are more propagandists out there than truth tellers. |
|
|
|
Its a though life being a globot this days. Breaking laws of thermodynamics (we all know it cant be done), rail-gun projectiles first accenting then descending, traveling at different speed and still hitting a target.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lladSqEFOF0And all this on a globular earth. Trajectories are simply different on a globular earth than what they would be on a flat earth. If the rail gun were large enough or powerful enough, shooting a projectile parallel to the ground would produce an "arced tangent," as the projectile left orbit. The further the projectile moved away from earth's gravity, the less arced its flightpath would become... until it was essentially straight. |
|
|
|
^ If your getting your "science" from "creation.com", it's little wonder you're so confused. The site is 100% interested in pushing their agenda, and 0% interested in the truth. You are confused You don't understand much about anything and yet you still creating content here. Please continue... Let's hear what you got to say. can show old-age-earth easily by throwing in all the links in the site I linked to above. Then he can add a bunch more from Googling "age of the earth." But you can do this, yourself... I was going to add "can't you" to the end of my last sentence. But I am realizing that maybe you can't. |
|
|
|
I heard also another point that it was Mossad who did it.
Would make a lot of sense, since Israel has close ties with America and they went to war with muslim countries after 9/11
Then again, Israel is always going to war with one or another of the groups of people that want to kill all the Jews, aren't they? So nothing different here. Close ties with America? Yep, because America does not want to kill any of the Jews. What makes a lot of sense is that enemies of Israel try for a decade and a half to spread rumors and lies that the Mossad was behind 911. Then you have exactly the painting on the wall that Muslims in the Middle East want. At least some of them. Not all, though. The Evil Jews, the Great Satan, blah blah blah. The poor victims the innocent Muslims. Packs of lies through and through. Its not the mossad or the Jews but many sources say that it was the US itself. It was just a military practice turned into a catastrophe. And to cover the truth the government blamed alkaida chief osama binladen. different people have different idea about bitocin. some people says that it was a game of USA itself while some says that Jews responsible for that. other says that it was really attack of the malitant. no one yet conform that who did so. that is why it is still a mistry. The real truth will not be reveal forever, but we can get some of things that happened if we get a viable information, unfortunately that information is the thing that we don't know. A complete list of facts will never be revealed. However, the fact that there wasn't enough heat to do enough structural damage in the Twin Towers to bring them down is fact, and the fact that buildings don't fall into their own footprint at near free fall speeds without demolition is fact. So, the fact that 9/11 was an inside job is fact. |
|
|
|
<<bunch of stupid, idiotic WHY questions>>
Now we are supposed to believe that questions are facts. What idiocy. Science was the in-thing. Science is propagated by a bunch of questions. Then science theory comes along, in which we are directed towards believing that a bunch of stupid questions are fact. Then we come to using science to find out something important - the way that the 9/11 inside job was done - and suddenly questions are stupid some more. LOL. |
|
|
|
Major flaws in standard scientific dating of the age of the earth: http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth: ...
51. Carbon-14 in coal suggests ages of thousands of years and clearly contradict ages of millions of years.
52. Carbon-14 in oil again suggests ages of thousands, not millions, of years.
53. Carbon-14 in fossil wood also indicates ages of thousands, not millions, of years.
54. Carbon-14 in diamonds suggests ages of thousands, not billions, of years. Note that attempts to explain away carbon-14 in diamonds, coal, etc., such as by neutrons from uranium decay converting nitrogen to C-14 do not work. See: Objections.
55. Incongruent radioisotope dates using the same technique argue against trusting the dating methods that give millions of years.
56. Incongruent radioisotope dates using different techniques argue against trusting the dating methods that give millions of years (or billions of years for the age of the earth).
57. Demonstrably non-radiogenic ‘isochrons’ of radioactive and non-radioactive elements undermine the assumptions behind isochron ‘dating’ that gives billions of years. ‘False’ isochrons are common.
58. Different faces of the same zircon crystal and different zircons from the same rock giving different ‘ages’ undermine all ‘dates’ obtained from zircons.
59. Evidence of a period of rapid radioactive decay in the recent past (lead and helium concentrations and diffusion rates in zircons) point to a young earth explanation.
60. The amount of helium, a product of alpha-decay of radioactive elements, retained in zircons in granite is consistent with an age of 6,000±2000 years, not the supposed billions of years. See: Humphreys, D.R., Young helium diffusion age of zircons supports accelerated nuclear decay, Chapter 2 (pages 25–100) in: Vardiman, Snelling, and Chaffin (eds.), Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth: Results of a Young Earth Creationist Research Initiative, Volume II, Institute for Creation Research and Creation Research Society, 2005.
61. Lead in zircons from deep drill cores vs. shallow ones. They are similar, but there should be less in the deep ones due to the higher heat causing higher diffusion rates over the usual long ages supposed. If the ages are thousands of years, there would not be expected to be much difference, which is the case (Gentry, R., et al., Differential lead retention in zircons: Implications for nuclear waste containment, Science 216(4543):296–298, 1982; DOI: 10.1126/science.216.4543.296)
... There are many links within the text, at the website ( http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth), to back up what is said there. Too bad your source of information is as biased as your perspective in life. Lol. Seeing the name of the site will give you an idea that it's a site for theist people looking for argument that they can use in scientific datas. If you knew much of anything about science, you would see that the old-age-earth is a far more biased picture. Scientist want to promote old-age-earth simply to remove the thinking of people from the fact that God exists. It's a plan to enslave the people for monetary purposes, so that the scientists can gain wealth... and prestige, I might add. Looking at the links in the site shows us the fact that the proofs for old-age-earth are flawed through and through. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
