you are cleared until 08:00 UT Mic
Did you just send Mic to bed? |
|
|
|
Have Fun watching them
BTW, I had no idea your partner was so fucking based. I can respect the idea that you are averse to marriage, but don't lose this one, broheim. You have snagged yourself a very special woman. Treat her well. He can't eat meat ... Yeah I once turned pescatarian when I was dating this girl. She was smoking hot. We would go to bars and guys would buy her drinks while I played pool with the lads. She would bring the drinks to me. It was a good arrangement. |
|
|
|
2014 fractalPurple line is 2019 200 Week Moving Average. Green is 2019 price. Blue line is 2014/15 price lined up with 2014/15 200 Week Moving Average. It looks like we are front running the 2014/15 crypto winter model by 1 - 2 months. Bullish. Still more dippity doo das ahead but nothing we can't handle easily.  Flippening the Moving AveragesGreen is 30 Daily MA Yellow is 50 Daily MA Orange is 100 Daily MA Red is 200 Daily MA During a bull run, the MAs are stacked in order, green on top, followed by yellow, orange and red. See left side of chart. During a bear run, the MAs flip, green on bottom, followed by yellow above, then orange and red. Today, we currently have a full flip with green on bottom, yellow above, orange then red. BUT within one or two weeks, if we can just hold the current price, we should get a partial flip back, with green above yellow above orange (a golden cross on all of 30 MA, 50 MA and 100 MA). That would only leave red on top. Then, if we can hold this price for another month or two, we should be able to flip red back under the other MAs, putting us in bull run formation. It won't necessarily be this fast or easy - but something that I am watching closely. 
|
|
|
|
If you win, send him a mate's address.
Hey buddy, I won something on the internet. Can I send it to your place? It’s too dangerous to send to my place |
|
|
|
8- Last of the V8s dude  Bring the rest of your hat buddies here  ..i see many have been in collectables recently chance of a bauble, but you have to be quick note some opsec snags #dyor Interesting. Do you load your own addresses onto them? |
|
|
|
|
2 - I choose you !
Hat buddy avalanche to commence
|
|
|
|
Australia probably doesn’t have any gold because it sold it for beer and bug spray 30 years ago.
I don't think bug spray is going to be very effective in Australia. “Tropical Strength” |
|
|
|
cannot quote ^^^it properly.
It's not mining elitism, it is how it works since Satoshi made it public.
If you think that owning btc makes you or anyone else a contributor, no it does not (in a POW system), but it does in a POS system where you mine using your stake.
IN POW system miners and node-owners control the system.
Simply owning btc is OK, but you are effectively cut off out of all decision making that might affect your btc.
This is just a statement of fact, nothing personal.
You are taking a technology centric view and ignoring economic soft power. UASF proved the strength of economic hodlers. No, it did not. That battle was never fought. “The other side ran away from the battlefield with their tails between their legs therefore no one can ever tell which was the stronger side because the battle was never fought” |
|
|
|
Oopsie daisy  |
|
|
|
|
Australia probably doesn’t have any gold because it sold it for beer and bug spray 30 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Hmmmmmm  |
|
|
|
KEEP CALM AND ACCUMULATE!!The bottom is near.
| Gyrsur
Time Traveler
from 2040 CE | | Price of a Big Mac
in 2040 CE
42895 mSAT | | Price of Purified Water (3L)
in 2040 CE
6498 mSAT | |  | | | | |
There’s a BET being placed around the bottom HM and V8 I saw something. but what astonished me the bet is about one LiteCoin.  The currency is just a placeholder. We are betting reputations. |
|
|
|
|
I must have been unclear when I said I wasn’t going to discuss it with you because you have got big old bags and only talk your book
|
|
|
|
|
All good. I am teasing you a bit as well!
|
|
|
|
I concede that if you have a large financial stake in Bitcoin and are not running a full node, then you are a fool.
Mentally, foolish me, I take back the merit that I just foolishly sent to your previous post, before I realized that I was a fool. You have ruined my foolish free-rider mood.   Well, that's like, just my opinion, man I have returned your merit. I hope we are square now. |
|
|
|
cannot quote ^^^it properly.
It's not mining elitism, it is how it works since Satoshi made it public.
If you think that owning btc makes you or anyone else a contributor, no it does not (in a POW system), but it does in a POS system where you mine using your stake.
IN POW system miners and node-owners control the system.
Simply owning btc is OK, but you are effectively cut off out of all decision making that might affect your btc.
This is just a statement of fact, nothing personal.
You are taking a technology centric view and ignoring economic soft power. UASF proved the strength of economic hodlers. Don't get fooled by Bcash propaganda that miners vote. They can just fork off and take their hashpower elsewhere and good luck to them. UASF proved the power of users with nodes, NOT the hodlers. Hodlers were totally out of the loop and were not in the decision making. In fact, economic powers such as coinbase and barry silbert's fund were not able to do anything because nodes said (indirectly) that they will go with the core and it was not economical for miners to go and do a split. They would have been losing many millions a day. It is a bit funny that you are indirectly arguing for POS (power to hodlers) while saying that POW is better. No paradox here? "UASF stands for User Activated Soft Fork. It’s a mechanism where the activation time of a soft fork occurs on a specified date enforced by full nodes; a concept sometimes referred to as the economic majority." https://cointelegraph.com/explained/uasf-vs-uahf-explained"The network is robust in its unstructured simplicity. Nodes work all at once with little coordination. They do not need to be identified, since messages are not routed to any particular place and only need to be delivered on a best effort basis. Nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. They vote with their CPU power, expressing their acceptance of valid blocks by working on extending them and rejecting invalid blocks by refusing to work on them. Any needed rules and incentives can be enforced with this consensus mechanism." by Satoshi N. Cutting through all of it, the miners will follow the money, because they have to follow the money. They have to pay electricity expenses (which is in sharp contrast to POS where stakers pay nothing - hence the nothing at stake problem even if Vitalik thinks it doesn't apply - he's wrong) I concede that if you have a large financial stake in Bitcoin and are not running a full node, then you are a fool. But in this case, economic soft power and nodes are aligned. |
|
|
|
cannot quote ^^^it properly.
It's not mining elitism, it is how it works since Satoshi made it public.
If you think that owning btc makes you or anyone else a contributor, no it does not (in a POW system), but it does in a POS system where you mine using your stake.
IN POW system miners and node-owners control the system.
Simply owning btc is OK, but you are effectively cut off out of all decision making that might affect your btc.
This is just a statement of fact, nothing personal.
You are taking a technology centric view and ignoring economic soft power. UASF proved the strength of economic hodlers. Don't get fooled by Bcash propaganda that miners vote. They can just fork off and take their hashpower elsewhere and good luck to them. We will sell their shitty fork coins and buy more BTC. Meanwhile Bitmain is sitting on a pile of Bcash that no one wants. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
