|
For several years, I was offered to advertise several suspicious DeFi projects. These projects have probably already closed due to reduced demand. And if I agreed, I would have received negative reviews.
If some sugnature campaigns close after a few weeks, then it is very difficult to hope for long-term contracts. Most likely your account will be used in fraud.
|
|
|
|
"This Market Notice sets out details of the Bank’s temporary purchases of long-dated UK government bonds from 28 September 2022.
As set out in the accompanying press notice, in line with the Bank of England’s financial stability objective, the Bank will carry out purchases of long dated gilts in a temporary and targeted way. The purpose of these purchases is to restore orderly market conditions. "
I think resuming quantitative easing is way too early to increase the liquidity in its financial system; in my opinion, the current economic conditions of the UK aren't that suitable to resume QE while raising the critical rate. Moreover, it would badly impact the Bank of England's stability, and restoring orderly market conditions would be challenging. They are basically working towards making sure that the inflation rates go up and that is a problem. I have to say the best thing that UK could have done would be increasing the rates, and they did not do that and instead they have put more money into the world, which means more money equals less valuable money and that equals more inflation. With this move it may not be a lot, it’s not a huge amount of money that would increase the inflation all that much, but it is still the wrong move, and wrong way they are going, they should turn it around and do the opposite, find a way to take money out of the market, and not put more money into it. Maybe I'm a bad specialist and I don't understand anything in economics, but the biggest markets in the world are the bond markets. If inflation in a country exceeds bond yields, then investors will sell bonds and flee the country. According to various estimates, only the rise in oil and gas prices increased inflation by 5-15%. |
|
|
|
How Many Bitcoin Forks Are There? You will be surprised!!! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5221882Maybe not everyone remembers how many different bitcoin hard forks there were, but most of these coins are dead. If another worthless coin that was created as a result of the hard fork is removed, then the crypto world will only get better. |
|
|
|
But this is definitely not a hack, otherwise all the savings would be stolen.
I am not technical guy but some analysists have confirmed that it's an attack of sorts where the hacker profits from returned gas fees This tweet has some details - https://twitter.com/Supremacy_CA/status/1582789430368092160When you send your money to a smart contract, you should be stopped by a high commission. In this case, the validator made a profit. The most reliable way to interact with mart contracts is to use separate wallets that do not have a lot of money. |
|
|
|
I just wonder why this coin has not made any noise this past few years and maybe because they cannot seem to find any partners to make their coins more usable or have some number of utilities for it to be used. sadly this is not the case for Litecoins and it remained underrated for the past years since they don't have working developments or some updates to further escalate the number of people using it. What they really need to do nowadays is to make partnerships with some top coin owners or businesses in order not to be left behind and LTC price will only depend on bitcoins price nowadays which is not recommendable for investment.
There was a lot of news about Litecoin and this ecosystem is constantly evolving. Last news https://www.crypto-news-flash.com/bitcoin-and-litecoin-coming-to-stellar-lumens-network-with-sep-6-transfer-service/Bitcoin and Litecoin coming to Stellar Lumens network with SEP-6 transfer service "Coinqvest surfaces as the Tier SEP-6 transfer server on the Stellar Network. Investors can support Stellar in building rich liquidity for Coinqvest." Litecoin does not have a convenient service for working with stablecoins, so a huge number of transactions are observed in the Tron ecosystem. |
|
|
|
Как вам комиссия за газ после слияния? https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4a84d0872887f91546cd5400cf99763b654975efb3376ee55e4463bcfbca4e97https://cryptobriefing.com/suspected-ethereum-exploit-drains-wallet-of-121-eth-in-gas-fees/Tom Carreras(С) "По данным компании по безопасности блокчейна PeckShield, сегодня пользователем Ethereum манипулировали, заставив заплатить 121,56 ETH (около 158 000 долларов на момент написания статьи) в качестве платы за газ за транзакцию. Затем эти сборы были присвоены валидатором, который обрабатывал транзакцию. Подробности эксплойта и того, как он произошел, в настоящее время неясны. Похоже , что PeckShield считает, что атака каким-то образом связана с MEV — практикой извлечения ценности из транзакций путем их переупорядочивания во время создания блока. В Ethereum реле MEV-Boost позволяют стратегам MEV использовать такие возможности в сети. Транзакция была обработана ретранслятором MEV-Boost, принадлежащим Flashbots, самой известной организации в сфере MEV, и использовала сборщик блоков от builder0x69. Тем временем валидатор, передавший свои обязанности по производству блоков ретранслятору, связан с протоколом ликвидного стейкинга Lido. Однако на момент написания статьи неясно, какая из вовлеченных сторон (если вообще существует) несет ответственность за манипулирование платой за газ до таких высот. Сообщения PeckShield в Twitter предполагают, что компания считает, что эксплойт продолжается. Вскоре после публикации о своем открытии организация также заявила, что 24 разных адреса « играли за этот тип вознаграждений». Любопытно, что затем PeckShield уточнил, что ни один из них не имел отношения к Lido, предполагая, что злоумышленники могут использовать другой валидатор, чем для первоначальной операции. PeckShield еще не ответил на запрос о комментариях. Аналитик GBV Capital Сонджэ Хан выдвинул другую теорию: пользователь Ethereum, возможно, намеренно заплатил 121,56 ETH газом и отправил транзакцию только после того, как знал, что будет ее проверять. Эта практика теоретически позволит оператору отмывать средства с помощью своей деловой практики валидатора, сжигая при этом лишь небольшое количество ETH (0,32 ETH, по словам Хана). Однако эта гипотеза не учитывает многочисленные другие транзакции, которые, по утверждению PeckShield, были обнаружены." |
|
|
|
the answer is very simple - there is no demand.Everything is much simpler than many may think, the event did not affect the new fork in any way, exchanges are not interested in it and miners, including, are in no hurry to switch to it.On another form, one user proved to me that we are still waiting for a big price increase, but I strongly doubt it.
The price of cryptocurrencies needs to be reduced for one reason, so that hamsters sell their coins and become disillusioned with investing in cryptocurrencies. The price may fall, but if there are no sellers in the market, then there will be no liquidity, so such markets are easy to manipulate. |
|
|
|
"The Central Bank of Russia revealed 782 cryptocurrency financial pyramids At the same time, in the first quarter, 403 organizations with signs of financial pyramids were identified, in the second - 551, in the third - 527. In the first nine months of 2022, the Central Bank identified more than 3.5 thousand companies with signs of illegal activity in Russia. Of these, about 1.5 thousand companies with signs of financial pyramids, more than 1,200 illegal creditors and over 900 illegal forex dealers. "The number of identified financial pyramids is much more than in the nine months of last year (424 financial pyramids)," RIA Novosti quotes the words of the press service of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation." https://tvzvezda.ru/news/20221018633-3ZiF5.htmlAre there a lot of scams in your countries too? |
|
|
|
Mixers and privacy coins don't provide same service and same experience. They give different levels of privacy.
Governments are stricter with mixers and gamblers but they are more easily managed privacy coins. If I don't have illegal capital source and use it to buy cryptocurrency for moneey laundering, I will not choose mixers or privacy coins. The longer I use it, the more risk I will get with governments.
Some exchanges and platforms have their public or internal criteria to mark your account if they detect suspicious things from your deposits. I also don't want to get my account being frozen or suspended for investigation.
I see another problem in this situation. A scammer can send coins to any wallet from a sanctioned address through services that allow you to bypass restrictions and the owner of the wallet will have big problems, as the exchange or other custodial service can block transactions. |
|
|
|
I have two questions pertaining metamask wallet, both mobile and PC
Is it possible to make multiple transactions using metamask instead of sending one after the other?
Is there any difference is performance between metamask mobile and metamask PC wallet? Security wise.
Is there any other more effective way?.
Check out these services, they support metamask and also support multi-payments in other ecosystems. First, make test payments and see how the projects work. I did not check these services, but this was advised to me by good specialists. https://multisender.app/https://cointool.app/dashboardhttps://multisend.org |
|
|
|
Уверен что любой опытный менеджер кампаний без проблем отсортирует шитпостеров на старте~
Сомнительно. По крайней мере в гемблинге я вижу кучу щитпостеров в самых топовых кампахах. Некоторые даже не укладываются в лимит символов хотя он везде символический. В целом менеджерам как было так и есть наплевать на качество сообщений - главное формальные параметры соблюдать "ради приличия". Не читаю гемблинг. Но если менеджеров кампаний и рекламодателей проектов такое положение устраивает, то наверное это дает свои плоды. Хотя много кампаний сворачиваются за несколько недель. |
|
|
|
https://cryptopotato.com/polkadot-development-activity-peaks-in-q3-report/перевод выборочный Polkadot децентрализация Кроме того, данные Messari показывают, что Polkadot является самой децентрализованной сетью среди своих аналогов. Интеллектуальная платформа блокчейна заявила, что у нее высокий коэффициент Накамото, указывающий на большое количество узлов, которые должны быть скомпрометированы, чтобы повлиять на блокчейн и помешать его надлежащему функционированию. В отчете говорилось: «Относительно равномерное распределение доли валидатора усиливает уровень децентрализации Polkadot. Коэффициент Накамото Polkadot в среднем составляет 99, что дает ему самый высокий уровень по сравнению с аналогами базового уровня». За ним следует Солана с коэффициентом Накамото 31, за ней следуют Avalanche с 30, NEAR с 9, Binance chain с 8, Cosmos с 7 и Polygon с 4.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
