|
Username: Saint-loup
Current post count: 11701
BTC SegWit Address: bc1q4qp6rg28e9swmvjnlwnujj9szfmasktgqc83du
|
|
|
|
Non car le partage de Shamir nécessite qu'il y ait une clef unique qui soit partagée, et donc connue de celui qui la partage. Dans un wallet multisig il n'y a pas de clef unique, chacun dispose de la sienne et cosigne les transactions avec, c'est ça l'intérêt d'un wallet multisig. |
|
|
|
|
14. Magomed Ankalaev
13. Song Yadong
12. Sodiq Yusuff
11. Khalil Rountree Jr.
10. Drew Dober
9. Alex Pereira
8. Matthew Semelsberger
7. Gillian Robertson
6. Javid Basharat
5. Damon Jackson
4. Miranda Maverick
3. Dalcha Lungiambula
2. Kris Moutinho
1. Azamat Murzakanov
|
|
|
|
Bonjour, J'ai quelques questions concernant le fonctionnement du multisig. Prenons l'exemple d'un multisig 2/3. Si j'ai bien compris, pour (re)constituer un multisig, il faut 3 clés publics maîtres (3 public master keys or Xpub). Et pour signer une transaction il faut au moins 2 clés privés (Xpriv). 1) Est-ce exact ? Dans le software wallet qu'on utilise pour faire l'interface il y a la possibilité d'extraire le "configuration setup" du portefeuille mulitsig. 2) Est-ce que ce fichier contient uniquement les 3 Xpub ou contient-il un autre type d'information ? 3) Est-ce que l'ordre des Xpub importe lorsqu'on essaie de reconstituer le multisig ? D'avance merci pour vos retours. Bon week-end  1) Oui il faut que chacun ait les 2 autres clefs publiques des 2 autres cosignants. Pour signer la transaction il faudra qu'elle soit cosignée par seulement 2 wallets pour être valide c'est le principe du multisig 2/3. 2) Tu parles de quel logiciel précisément? Pour configurer un multisig il faut savoir quel est le type de multisig (2/3, 2/2, 1/3, etc) et avoir les clefs publiques des autres. 3)Non pas d'ordre à respecter, il faut juste que chacun entre les clefs publiques des 2 autres pour pouvoir cosigner les transactions avec son wallet. |
|
|
|
|
a) 10 b) 1:17
a) 7 b) 1:21
|
|
|
|
My Betja Username - SaintLoup Screenshot -  |
|
|
|
I see that you are using "Demo mode" as a testing for your strategies, but I doubt if that would actually give you accurate indicators of what the "Real play" results will be. A group of my friends tested the difference between "Demo mode" and "Real Play" and all of them agree that the RTP and volatility are not the same for both modes. It seems as though the RTP and volatility are VERY good with "Demo Mode" to give the perception that the Slot is good, but once you switch to "Real Play" ....the wins and free spins goes down dramatically.  It would be an obvious scam if it's true, it would mean the RTP level is different between the demo mode and the real one, or more concerning it could mean the game is not really random in one of this mode. I warmly invite you to expose this case here or in the Investigations section. On which game of which provider did your friends find a difference precisely? There may be a psychological bias when it is noticed by one single player, because he could have paid less attention to his losses in demo mode than in real one, but if several of your friends noticed that it's more serious. |
|
|
|
|
username : Saint-Loup
PM sent
|
|
|
|
|
1. West Brom - 1:0
2. Fulham - 0:2
3. Birmingham - 1:0
4. Blackburn - 2:0
5. Blackpool - 1:0
6. Bournemouth - 2:0
7. Cardiff - 1:0
8. draw - 1:1
9. draw - 1:1
10. Nottingham - 2:0
11. Stoke - 0:1
12. Luton - 1:0
Sportsbet username: SaintLoup
|
|
|
|
Mais pour les transactions "régulières",, parmi les pays cités russie bresil chine (et d'autres)?? pensaient un certain temps même à constituer un bloque économique independent..!
Ah les BRICS (Brésil, Russie, Inde, Chine, Afrique du Sud), oui je ne sais pas où ça en est mais à part la Chine, je vois mal le Brésil, l'Inde et l'Afrique du Sud s'aventurer sur ce terrain là. Les Etats-Unis ne rigolent pas avec ça, et je pense que les pays européens seraient également très sévères avec eux si ils se lançaient là-dedans. |
|
|
|
Oui, et pour traiter avec qui d'autre encore ?
- La Chine , Le Brésil , .. La Corée du Nord?? !
Si ils prennent bien les occidentaux risquent de recevoir l'effet inverse en voyant se former un bloc économique autonome et indépendant.
Les russes n'ont pas besoin de passer par les gouvernements des pays pour commercer avec les citoyens de ces pays. Les cryptos peuvent permettre aux commerçants de faire des affaires avec des russes sans se demander si ils pourront payer ou se faire payer sans blocage de leur transaction. |
|
|
|
il devront juste virer les fond sur leur compte en russie . Virer les fonds ou les cryptos.. parceque le swift ça ne passe plus ! Et quand tout compte russe sera(ait) suspecté de blanchir ou de passer des fonds pour je ne sais qui,, . mais avec le zèle! que tout le monde ici doit bien connaître, puisque je suppose bien que comme les banques, les échanges doivent bien toucher leur commission (sur les trucs saisis et machins)! La solution la plus simple serait que l'Etat russe monte un gros exchange capable de gérer de gros volumes de transactions et de fonds, pour que les citoyens russes puissent changer leurs roubles contre des cryptos et inversement en toute sécurité et avec facilité. De toutes façons je ne pense pas que les sanctions vont toutes être levées du jour au lendemain comme si rien ne s'était passé. Sergueï Lavrov a dit que la Russie allait faire en sorte que les sanctions qu'on lui a imposé ne puissent plus la pénaliser à l'avenir, si ils veulent continuer de commercer avec le reste du monde, l'utilisation des cryptos semble inévitable. |
|
|
|
|
Game 1: 6' 1-0 Southampton
Game 2: 6' 1-1 draw
Game 3: 6' 2-0 Arsenal
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure that's a good move since all those companies have nothing to do with the russian army and the russian government and even if all are really russian. But why didn't you include platforms like the famous russian blue and white exchange for example? AFAIK they're also russian and they are offering gambling games. You have some hidden specific criteria? BTW several websites in your list are just mirrors of 1xbet. |
|
|
|
Actually this method has been implemented in pragmatic and PlayNgo providers not only livecasino but almost all casinos if you are a gambler you must already know
I don't know how the exchange system works but this has been implemented since the first modern crypto casino was launched including Sportsbet and Bitcasino. I know many providers including live providers convert the balance of the user into fiat before starting to play but it doesn't mean it's a good deal for the user because I'm not sure providers will chose to favor players instead of favoring themselves, so I'm not sure the exchange rate applied is usually advantageous. When you gamble directly in cryptos, you don't mind about that. |
|
|
|
Réunis à Bruxelles, Les représentants des Etats membres ont également adopté de nouvelles sanctions ciblant le secteur maritime et les cryptomonnaies, et ajouté des dirigeants et oligarques russes à leur liste noire. ce matin.Ca veut dire quoi? Que les exchanges européens ont l'interdiction de détenir des cryptos sur les comptes appartenant aux citoyens russes? Ils vont en faire quoi de ces cryptos? Ils vont les saisir? On passe du boycott à la dépossession des biens des citoyens russes lambda. For Belarus, the measures introduce SWIFT prohibitions similar to those in the Russia regime, clarify that crypto assets fall under the scope of “transferable securities” and further expand the existing financial restrictions by mirroring the measures already in place regarding Russia sanctions.
[...]
Finally, the EU confirmed the common understanding that loans and credit can be provided by any means, including crypto assets, as well as further clarified the notion of “transferable securities”, so as to clearly include crypto-assets, and thus ensure the proper implementation of the restrictions in place. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_1649Il parait que c'est la France et notamment Bruno Lemaire qui a demandé ca. Cette sanction intervient après que le ministre français des Finances, Bruno Le Maire, a défendu que les actifs numériques, tels que les crypto-actifs, devraient être inclus dans les ensembles de sanctions. https://www.netcost-security.fr/actualites/81176/nouvelles-sanctions-contre-la-russie-approuvees-actifs-cryptographiques-sur-la-liste/ |
|
|
|
-snip
Quite rare, to see a suggestion VPN from the Casino itself.  But, I'm still paranoid to use VPN even my country is only restricted by the provider not casino. Just want to avoid such a problem, while there has some issue and my VPN activity can be brought to the issue. I know, some casino can allowed VPN in case want to avoid only provider restricted. But, I still paranoid about that ~XD It's interesting indeed and I hope bitcasino will provide a high quality VPN service free or at a low price one day, but it would be more efficient to convince third party providers to remove all their weird and arbitrary geographic restrictions based on IP addresses. It should only be the matter of the casino to allow or to prohibit users from specific countries. The problem is that all restrictions are not the wishes of third parties and the casino but it's about the law, meaning if you want to remove all restrictions then you have to ask permission to all regions and it's impossible, if we ask third parties and casinos they definitely want everyone to be able to play because it is a wager potential this is one of the reasons the article was published with the hope that everyone can play here. No AFAIK it's not about local laws, many people have explained in other threads that even if their country prohibits crypto/online casinos and bans their URLs, third party providers and casinos welcome them with no restrictions when they are able to reach them. Actually third party providers and casinos are mainly offshore companies and they usually avoid to set up their official headquarters in non-gambling friendly countries so it's mainly a matter of gambling licenses and irrelevant fear of retaliations from illiberal "powerful"(or perceived as such) countries IMO. |
|
|
|
Anyone who complains pair game using mBTC or uBTC in the game.
I already suggested they to have some feature change pair using USD/EURO in the game. If you play Pragmatic Provider, the pair currency is still using $ but don't know for other slot provider.
Just wait until they also add this feature.
Hi ryzaadit, we are working on providing USDT as betting currency Regards, Flávio from Livecasino.io team I'm not sure if you mean USDT as the new deposit method or USD pair in games like in the Betsoft provider this is a different case If we hold BTC in Livecasino account and want to play Betsoft provider then obviously the available pair is mbtc/ubtc, so the request is that we want the USD pair in the game even though we hold BTC balance. This is specifically for Betsoft providers only because for pragmatic it works. You should be careful about that because in order to convert your BTC balance into USD or EURO an exchange rate has to be applied and if this rate is lower than the average rate you can find on exchanges, it's equivalent to selling your BTCs at a low price. |
|
|
|
-snip
Quite rare, to see a suggestion VPN from the Casino itself. But, I'm still paranoid to use VPN even my country is only restricted by the provider not casino. Just want to avoid such a problem, while there has some issue and my VPN activity can be brought to the issue. I know, some casino can allowed VPN in case want to avoid only provider restricted. But, I still paranoid about that ~XD It's interesting indeed and I hope bitcasino will provide a high quality VPN service free or at a low price one day, but it would be more efficient to convince third party providers to remove all their weird and arbitrary geographic restrictions based on IP addresses. It should only be the matter of the casino to allow or to prohibit users from specific countries. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
