I think he's high likely want to abuse the campaign rules since most of his posts created per week are around 25-28 and spread for 5 days.
Yeah that's probably the reason he is doing this, and its not the first one who did something like this in order to meet signature campaign rules. What I am more surprised it that no one reported these type of posts where he would quote someone and wrote only "yes" and sometimes not even that. Yes, you are right, I remembered a similar story. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5395403.0I'm starting to think it's the same alternative account. And the OP found it too. Probably this behavior is becoming popular, but as we understand from the past history, managers do not approve of this. Not quite decent from AndySt. |
|
|
|
|
The OP writes that his friend helped him with information about cryptocurrency. But I think this friend regrets it a lot. Instead of thanking him, the OP now accuses him of not paying attention to his messages.
OP, you probably need to understand that the world doesn't revolve around you. And if a person helped you once, he no longer owes you anything. All in your hands. Did your friend somehow achieve something on his own? Maybe you should also try not to distract people, and also not to teach them what and how to do in the matter of paying attention to people.
Just think, if someone does not answer you, then you are not important to him. And also think about what or who is the reason? Is it not in you?
|
|
|
|
But I was disappointed to understand that I could not merit myself. In same vain, can our outstanding merits sources have the supper power to send themselves a few merits every month? (Not actually a proposal, but an idea decorator).
You lifted my spirits on my morning coffee. Say, a person who distributes wages, or anyone who is entrusted with the distribution of things, has the right to have a superpower? Take from the general treasury? Probably you often pat yourself on the head, praise yourself for good deeds, and then tell everyone else? No offense OP, but the post is funny. Everyone knows who is the source of merit, why is the topic with a question? Have you decided to gather everyone and regret everyone? And, as always, the way you acted when you were a rookie, suck up. Good advice, close the topic.  |
|
|
|
|
This is what is often written about on the forum. Buying bitcoin should always be understood from many angles. "Always hope for the best, but prepare for the worst" is a truth for life. If someone is investing, don't invest in something that can only benefit your livelihood. You might forget about the money, which is an old lesson.
So today, the faint of heart should not read various shaman-analysts prophesying the next steps for bitcoin. No matter what happens in life, there is always someone who will say: "I warned about this." Therefore, be calm and patient; otherwise, it’s time for you to understand that bitcoin is none of your business.
|
|
|
|
|
Pay $10 to join a campaign? These poor bounty hunters can't earn enough to pay for it. Is there a guarantee that the campaigns themselves will pay?
In order not to be disappointed, just do not participate in dubious campaigns paying in tokens. Leave this "fun" to those who are completely unable to read and educate themselves on the forum, but can only click links and repost unnecessary spam.
|
|
|
|
|
I am more than sure that any cryptocurrency exchange has all the necessary equipment to track any client. Regardless of whether we use a VPN or other means of anonymity, we must understand that in the event of a serious violation, all information will be known. And since not everyone has the necessary knowledge and experience, changing their IP, for many, is believed to be already anonymous.
Just imagine the entire path that the user begins on the Internet; there will definitely be holes that will give it away. Therefore, asking newbies or non-newbies to keep their privacy seems like empty advice.
It is better to provide complete step-by-step training that guarantees safety. But as you know, this is expensive and not everyone can handle it. Also, excessive highlighting of the uniqueness of your system from the crowd of other users only attracts monitoring bodies for deeper surveillance.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the forum. The first message of Newbies seems to be an oath of good behavior, but unfortunately, many remain in one post.
Hearing a newbie's admiration that you rejoice in protecting the forum from cheating is a bit strange.
If you came to study cryptocurrency, then I do not see the connection. If you came to "earn money," then yes, scammers are not welcome here. However, cheating is not tolerated and is very strongly frowned upon.
Just go to the forum with pure intentions, build your reputation, and don't bombard it with questions that have been answered a thousand times.
I'm sure the next post will be about merits. So, a good literate question will bring you a reward. It is important that it be unique.
|
|
|
|
|
It is no secret to everyone that participating in a bounty is most often associated with many alternative accounts. These people look like robots to me. Nevertheless, they agree that they are not interested in learning and further development or they are incapable. But they amuse themselves with their stupid tokens, which lie like dead weight in their wallets.
The section on bounties and announcements of alternative coins can be easily ignored, especially for those who are unnerved by them, and thus save your nervous system.
|
|
|
|
|
The Arab section consists of a very small number of people, and it seems to have its own merit source. What's so outrageous about people sharing merits on their local bulletin board? I know that similar support exists in all locales. And I don't see anything wrong.
You also need to stop being jealous and learn Arabic, in which case local users will reward you with their merits.
|
|
|
|
|
Can we assume that your brother learned some bad experiences with the moderators?
Just wondering, did you come to the forum from the link your brother gave you? But if you look a little lower, there is a section very clearly and expressively called "Beginners & Help", it's strange that you don't see it.
This whole topic will also be convenient in that section.
|
|
|
|
2 Accounts Connected
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)
1.TranTrongit
2.gabriela1999
Proof:
[ archive ] [ archive ] Related Addresses:Reddit profile URL: https://www.reddit.com/user/phamloan90
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, in line with JollyGood's warning, I also informed MonsterV that participating in this scam will result in a negative reputation score. But besides the fact that the user is already aware that the company he advertises is not welcome on the forum, he left his signature unchanged. Should we understand that he does not care what to advertise, and how this will affect his reputation?   |
|
|
|
As of now, all 1xbit scammers signature campaign applicants will not receive a negative tag by default when their application is seen.
I wonder how you can name the user who applied twice for this scam. Probably the first time he escaped the negative tag from being warned. But he again applies for participation in a month. Can this be considered ignorance? Or do we now have to run after such users with "handkerchiefs" and warn them every time so that they do not stumble?  Remarkably, he appears on the forum only to apply. And one more
There are many other accusations against 1xbit, to much to all discuss here.
That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.
This user seems to be another victims as well, as many others.
|
|
|
|
4 Accounts Connected
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)
1.Lordrift
2.The Author
3.Baronjoe
4.Cicil
Proof:
[ archive ] [ archive ] Btc Address: bc1q7yvdvu6jkceup009f5llfskndr4lf2kqnva2ez
[ archive ] BTC bc1q7yvdvu6jkceup009f5llfskndr4lf2kqnva2ez
[ archive ] Telegram username: @njo197860
[ archive ] Telegram username: @njo197860
[ archive ] Related Addresses:[btc] bc1q7yvdvu6jkceup009f5llfskndr4lf2kqnva2ez
Facebook link: https://www.facebook.com/allen.akwaowo
@njo197860
Most of the newbies here begging for the merits are simply here to make money from the bounty sections and not contribute towards raising this forum. And at such, users that take such actions should be made to understand what they are really here for.
When I read the rules some days ago I realized that merits are earned by
- Making relevant contribution to the forum,
- Bringing new ideas to help educate other members,
- And presenting your contributions to help promote bitcoins
Not by going around begging and sending PMs to other higher members for merit awarding which in my case I would consider disturbance that needs ignoring
I don't know why YOSHIE didn't leave the found accounts with a negative tag. But now these accounts clearly deserve a negative mark. Since the owner of these accounts understood that it was impossible to break the rules, he nevertheless broke them. Also applying to participate in a fraudulent project. 1xBit https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5401757.msg60314905#msg60314905Transferring merit to your alternate account. 
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, this was simply meant to attract attention. 137.21GB of data? There must be a lot of transcripts of the conversations.
Anyway, I would download the files to find out what it is all about. There is no harm in downloading, even if it is a virus.
You can download and view everything on a virtual machine like Virtualbox. I like people who are not too lazy to download such large file sizes just for the sake of curiosity. To some extent, I even envy your enthusiasm. As for me, I'm lazy and, other than that, I don't use social media. But the question is, you downloaded and found shocking information, so what? What then? There may be so many enthusiasts like you that someone will definitely tell you about it later. You just need to wait. |
|
|
|
BTC address (Segwit): bc1qqplme0rdmj8aqmnwq7m4juf502452ztwgvnxg4
BTC address: bc1q2aw48zfc00cafh4tr24zwaxku3e2pxetm69hj9
BTC Address: bc1q4dp3c3jwewqrw9eve0dqnu7ka4envzdyn8hp4h
By being careless, you reduce your chances. Look again at the manager's requirement.
Please use the BTC address only starting with 1 or 3.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like the negative feedback from Timelord2067 only affected you. I looked at the others and didn't see anything like that, which might not be the right policy either. If one has it, then logically, everyone should have similar reviews. Other than that, I don't see any reason for a neutral review. I think Timelord2067 should reconsider his review. Furthermore, it's been a while since punishment like this was given and the OP has surely figured out and learned from his mistake.
It shouldn't have such a harsh punishment.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
