|
There is no need to force yourself to be present on the forum if something seems boring to you. It’s good to be obligated, but ask yourself: are you so important to the forum, or, on the contrary, do you need the forum? You need the forum as a storehouse of knowledge, first, and those who understand this and come to read regularly will receive only advantages. Therefore, those people who sincerely understand that the forum is already becoming a part of their lives, with all the interesting events, stay for quite a long time and do not experience the pain of reading.
|
|
|
|
Can you show me the connection between the agustina2 account and those of chaser15 and Heartilly? I will support your flag if there is proof that all three accounts are connected and part of a larger farm with the intent to scam people and/or participate in signature campaigns.
I would also like to see a connection between these accounts, if it is true, they all deserve to be negatively tagged. I haven't found a closer connection to this account, but if you follow the merit submission for all accounts, it's very noticeable. If you also notice that they have one scenario: appearing on a forum, applying to a company signature, receiving a loan, some activity, and non-payment, I think, and have repeated this many times, that another account will soon end up with a flag. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=525508I hope this is the last one from this farm. |
|
|
|
This topic is locked so I can’t quote it directly
It's still do-able with a minor work around which will take less than 20 seconds or so.
1) Navigate to the post you want to quote and click on its title. The page will reload with that post's message number in the URL (the last 8 digits). Copy these digits, but don't close this window yet.
2) In the thread you want to post the quoted message in, click on "quote" on any post. Once that reply page loads, paste your copied 8 digits over the 8 digits in the URL after "quote=". Hit enter to reload your reply page with the locked post quoted.
3) Go back to the window from step 1 containing the message you want to quote. Copy the 7 digits after "topic=". Go back to the window from step 2 containing your new reply, and paste these 7 digits over the 7 digits after "link=topic=" on the top line of your reply. This is to ensure the quote links back to the correct thread if someone clicks on it.
Try it  https://timestamp.online/ |
|
|
|
|
It would be a good addition, but I often see that beginners or even not-so-newbies can respond to topics created several months ago that have long since lost their relevance. Therefore, hanging a sign for those who have no eyes will be a waste of time. Normal people should monitor the author’s activity on their own; it’s not difficult.
In other cases, you can ask the moderators to close the topic since the author has already received dozens of replies, and the moderators, fortunately, are always very responsive.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are the OP, think that you were manipulated, then you allowed this person to do this, and, first of all, you were interested in removing this person. Therefore, the answer was given that it is in vain to search for the truth on the Internet when others do not want to hear it since the truth is always different for all people. If you see that you are being played, do the same, but show the person that you know his goals. It's not difficult to guess who you were talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
OP, is it better to trade or hold? For me, these are completely different activities. A person who only learned about Bitcoin yesterday cannot engage in trading. At the same time, any beginner can invest and keep Bitcoin for a long time. There's no big science here. So I don't think your question is correct. I know that those people who try to trade for years are not successful every time. You can reframe your post by saying: if you want to lose more Bitcoins, trade; if not, then just hold.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone who creates such topics probably understands that the same topic, but with a refutation, can be created for discussion. I see such topics as a banner that contains information that, in the opinion of the author, is the truth. But unfortunately, people do not understand that such a conclusion requires the opinions of not only the other party but also the entire community. Otherwise, such posts can be perceived as something uncivilized written on a fence. No more. Although we always have an understanding that posts without discussion quickly go into deep history and remain unattended.
|
|
|
|
You handled the situation very well. Perhaps the negative tag is very useful for those managers who will not take any action without a kick in the ass. But I would leave a neutral tag as a reminder of the current situation, so that the manager always has the habit of paying debts on time. As for the bounty hunters, the real accounts should probably get paid. But let the one who cheated be in the same situation. https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6402/64025196.html |
|
|
|
- Is Bitcoin gender specific ?(is it meant for a specific gender?)
I'm interested to know the resources by reading which you determined that you belong to a certain gender in Bitcoin. In general, who conducts these statistics, and what does it mean? What do you think prevents women or men (of course, if you don’t come up with some other genders) from being interested in Bitcoin? What will happen to your thinking if you suddenly don't belong to the majority gender that is into Bitcoin? Will you quit studying, realizing that this is, for example, not a woman’s business? In general, what do you need to smoke to think about this? And why does this bother you so much? It's quite strange to see such questions, especially if you consider them the first.  |
|
|
|
What is 9ja board? I am assuming Nigeria because if I am not incorrect then Agbe is from that local board, earlier I saw flumpnuggets becoming a staff. I would like to know where exactly you kissed theymos? In the butt hole or somewhere in the opposite side 😂 Please take no offense Too much cynicism.  |
|
|
|
|
People often tend to do what others do out of fear of missing out. But they do not take into account either their financial capabilities or the knowledge that is necessary for this. I especially see young people who are always copying the actions of their more successful comrades, hoping in one way or another to be like them. Buying Bitcoins as an investment is also becoming fashionable, but those who do this not out of an instant desire inspired by someone else’s idea, but by carefully studying all the good and bad points, will definitely be more successful than other investors.
|
|
|
|
|
Let your friend make his own decisions, but show that you are glad that Bitcoin's price has fallen a little since there is still an opportunity to buy at a cheap price. Your friend will be discouraged, and later you can show him that with Bitcoin you need to have strong hands, not react to small price jumps, but, on the contrary, look for ways to buy more at such moments.
|
|
|
|
|
OP, have you read all the replies in the thread created by the person whose tag you are worried about today? Firstly, the topic itself was not written correctly. There was a serious error in the date, which he did not try to correct, even after receiving several comments from users and being on the forum at that time. Besides, if you OP like that some people play with their vanity by creating useless threads and treating others with disrespect, then many users are offended by this behavior. The tag is sometimes useful for making a person think about their actions. A neutral tag about him being a liar will help open the eyes of other people and make them not take him seriously. And if he is concerned about his mark, he will fulfill his obligation; if not, then the topic looks like another merit fishing incident in which the author screwed up.
But if you look at the whole situation from the other side, then the topic created as a competition only speaks of the lack of attention of the author himself, which he tries to compensate for by regularly creating such useless topics. I think you know that if someone lies once, then the next time they may lie twice.
The tag is justified; the forum should know its "heroes."
|
|
|
|
|
There is another question: how many of these would-be managers are needed for bounty hunters to begin to realize that they are wasting their time? It can be assumed that whoever hired such a manager had a good relationship with him, and his entire scam was planned in advance. We are waiting for the next new manager who teaches hunters to be smarter.
|
|
|
|
There is another alternative account that seems to operate in a similar manner. He is trying to sign the company's signature, but will he continue to participate in it? If you look at the tags in his trust, the payment terms are also overdue. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=525508Have you confused chaser15 with goinmery? Ultimately, he must explain his connection and receive appropriate feedback. |
|
|
|
|
Op, I would recommend you read the book "The Richest Man in Hollywood." Your vision of working hard to become rich is not entirely correct. The energy that is spent on making money should be redirected to ensure that the money works for you and that you do not struggle to get it. If we relate everything to Bitcoin, then this is where all the prerequisites for developing passive income are.
|
|
|
|
OP, You can actually pass your message without those foul words, because how are you different from the people you are complaining about, "he who comes to equity must come with clean hands" they say.
It seems that he simply does not understand that such language is acceptable only in his village. OP, who offended you or attacked you? I see the last few merits you received. Is it not enough? But based on your manner of communication, I simply don’t want to give merit since you are ready to attack everyone who doesn’t agree with your opinion. And you know, as long as you have such an embittered attitude towards people who want to correct you, you will receive the same attitude; at best, you will be added to the ignore list. |
|
|
|
A similar problem has existed for a long time. But Windows users write about it. If you carefully read the recommendations given on GitHub, the problem will be solved if you reinstall the extension and download the new version. If your problem is solved, try to update the topic so that users don't rack their brains anymore. https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/issues/21874 |
|
|
|
Its very hard to report 1000 posts with 90% accuracy but considering the amount of scam posts I can say 80% you can be accurate but that's also near to your target. When you read the forum a lot, you already understand which posts are made in order to simply leave a post to be counted towards the companies’ signature quota, or a post that was actually thought out in advance by the author. And every time you report empty posts or posts that do not adhere to the forum rules, you quickly come to an understanding of when and how to submit a report. I can say that achieving 99 percent accuracy will be easy for that person who reads the forum a lot and does not just write a few posts, not paying attention to the discussions. If you do this regularly, then the number of reports will be well over a thousand. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
