I am American.

Also, attempting to link all your NWO theories to this mural, proves my point: the murals are a honeypot for the paranoid, the  delusional, those who easily accept conspiracy theories without evidence.

Can you put forth one piece of evidence linking the bankers directly to the artists? No.

You keep pointing out the capstone. If this is evidence of a global conspiracy, then every small town in America has a link in this mesh of an Illuminatiesque control system. My point being that this makes the Denver Airport no more special than thousands of other buildings with similar capstones--you need to do more work here to convince me. Starting with some actual evidence would be a start.

You also keep pointing to artist getting a 3 year extension. This backs my earlier point that the artist knows his work better than those trying to expose a conspiracy. Staring at a work for years, most likely hundreds of hours, analyzing it, planning it, makes the artist in this case the best expert. The more time an artist (or any craftsman or developer) spends with a work the more they know its details, its story, and its vision. How long did you stare at it? One hour? Two? Ten? This doesn't disprove your theory that he somehow was influenced, but how can you disprove an infinite maybe? I imagine someone could say maybe "mind control or aliens," but that doesn't mean I can't point out that one possability is more plausible than another and that an untestable theory is lazy, unscientific, and grand waste of everyone's time.

There are numerous conspiracy theories about the Denver International Airport www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/the_denver_international_airport_conspiracy/. Yours isn't the most convincing nor the most interesting nor even the most weird. And piling onto it with all the minutia of your world view without directing anyone to evidence of a sinister link between the actual execution of the art and those planning a NWO hardly gives any credence to the direct statement you asserted:

"the murals depict the plans of the global elite for a period of global war, death, and destruction starting roughly 2018."

Does it? Or does it show an artist's conception of a world that has thrown off the shackles of war and each country given equal footing in a globe that respects nature and human rights? I respect artists enough to believe them. His view may be a bit chimerical in my estimation, but more influenced by John Lennon's Imagine than bankers looking to rule over humanity.

Please refrain from throwing a kitchen sink argument in your response. I am not interested in your general theory as it does not prove or disprove any banker (or other global cabal) involvement with the art-- I find the tactic a bore and feel that it lacks the efficiency I've been generous enough to show you.

CryptoKingdom registration being opened up again after the Ultima release will probably open some doors for Monero also. I've already got two guys from work signed up and they just heard me talking about it and asked how to sign-up. Apparently the investment/play aspect of the game appeals without any selling.

Unless you find some documentation of the said bankers engaging in manipulation of the said artist, you're just drowning yourself in information created to protect a meme that has become a large part of  your identity. You have yet to come up with one piece of evidence that bankers created the mural (or any of the artwork for that matter) to show everyone their plot to overthrow the world. I maintain my theory that the airport, and especially the mural acts as an ink blot revealing the favorite conspiracy of those who indulge in such wastes of imagination. If you decided to take up an art as a hobby, you would probably learn how to discipline your imagination thus making it stronger and more perceptive. And in case you don't believe that art hones your imagination to see more than others and in a definable way, go look at Michelangelo's genesis and tell me what you see. And I'll come back and tell you what you don't see.

I just want you to say that you have no real proof that the artists had your theory in mind when they created the work. Is that debatable at this point?

And if you can put forth hard evidence of the bankers using a manipulation strategy on the artist, I'll give you credit for that point.

Dude, i don't read all your posts. I only read the interesting ones or the ones directed at me. Sorry, I just don't follow people. But why do you only chose the question that is easiest for you to grandstand on?  

Also, i'm asking for evidence in regard to the artists--the only thing that's on the table at the moment.

Because artist never will their own beliefs into a work without the payer knowing.  

What i'm saying is that artist are usually smarter than the people who buy their work and are usually smarter than the people misinterpreting it. You could be right that the bankers (would be nice if you provided evidence and not supposition) wanted Taguma to do his thing unabated, but that doesn't change that his interpretation is most likely the best one--even if it is thrown into a hodgepodge of banker strategy.

But three questions come to mind:

If the bankers were so arrogant to show their evil plans to the world, why didn't they do so more explicitly? I mean did they just go, "we wanna expose are plan, but not too much, so lets hope these artist reveal just enough, but not too much, and totally without any knowledge of our aims that we want to post to the world...."

And do you have any hard evidence? You've got supposition and interpretations, but no hard facts: letters, witnesses, phone calls.

Why is it so hard for you to believe that there is no conspiracy at the Denver Airport? That it's just your imagination taking the conspiracy you already had and latching it  to a bunch of weird (and already over interpreted)  art?  

Ask Rockefeller Center about trying to leash a Latin artist (a very impractical choice for bankers working on NWOs).

Do you have any evidence of the manipulation of the artists? Papers? Eye witness accounts? Or just the assertion that artists are controllable (pretty dumb if you ask me) and the Man has outwit the artist again?

I smile because I know something you don't  

Do the rules for a HAW apply to non-ancient Barons too?

Exactly, and now that we have the artist in his own words talking about this painting, it looks more John Lennon's Imagine saying "Hasta la vista" to the War Pigs than a How-to guide for a NWO created by bankers. I'm not going to argue the point anymore as I just woke up and want to play CK and get some writing done and think the matter is done (for me).

Did you meet him? Psychoanalyze him? Know his mom, his sister, a family friend? Or are you just saying that because it fits the narrative you want?

The artist said what his art meant. Kind of presumptuous to state otherwise.

He's even advertising this incredible offer.

I like his theory. As a poet who has to read people interpret their work (weirdly and very badly sometimes). There's a lot of misreading in art--sometimes for the better. I once read a reviewer say that a love poem i wrote was the best 911 poem he ever read.    

I'm getting the same error when trying to make a bid.

Now apply those same detective skills to your theory and see where it leads you.   I'll get you started--I noticed already that there aren't any bankers in that mural.

Go edit the wiki page to fit what you want gargoyles to be and I'll go edit the Denver airport page to fit the height of the cold war 

If you don't want me to think you are talking about revelations, don't mention or cite it. I gotta confess i skim past most of your text as it is long winded and doesn't get to the point.

Again, the murals are an inkblot for every tin foil hat to throw whatever meme they are currently harboring at. It's weird and vague enough to entice suspicion and grant the imagination its wildest fantasy. But I guess we'll find out 2018, won't we.

Next time type, "the murals depict the plans of the global elite for a period of global war, death, and destruction starting roughly 2018." The rest is indulgence.

Dude, using inanimate objects to scare off ghosts isn't logical, it's that special way some people think. Or else the idea of ghosts or bad spirits or charms or cursed dolls wouldn't exist at all.

Also, for my theory, I said it was races uniting to destroy Russia (an American fantasy). And it is as good as your revelations dependent theory--I didn't say you were a christian (more that you succumbed to the Revelations ink blot) but you did say I hated god with no evidence.   At heart I don't even think our theories are that far off. The major difference is switching banks and America and the world for Russia. But seeing as it was put on American soil at the height of the cold war, I give mine the edge.

I have no hatred for god (I don't believe in a god to hate), so save the sermonizing for another thread. Gargoyles are commonly known to help with water run-off and to ward off evil (i thought everyone knew this)--maybe your encounter with one as a child should be reevaluated with that in mind.   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gargoyle When I was a kid I was bored at church because I knew the preacher was full of shit, but that's me.

As for the airport, who's to say my crappy theory isn't better than any of the other crappy theories? Why is your crappy theory that you pigeon hole around your Revelation's inkblot beliefs any different than my pigeon holing it based that it was built during the cold war and could possibly have been funded by pro-democracy anti-communist who asked the artist to convey a certain political message--but I can't be certain (nor be bothered to care that much) because i don't have god on my side.  

Monero isn't a fork of Bitcoin. Revolution.

I put a bid to buy 200,000 sto9 this morning and now it says I have -200,000 stone. Worse, I think it charged me for the stone i didn't have to sell.