Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 05:43:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 [149] 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 ... 334 »
2961  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why is VARINT not used in serialization of CBlockHeader and other core classes? on: October 02, 2014, 04:42:27 PM
Any ideas regarding the above quote?

Sorry - I don't know exactly why that might be (endian issues perhaps?).
2962  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why is VARINT not used in serialization of CBlockHeader and other core classes? on: October 02, 2014, 03:49:09 PM
Or is it just a legacy thing, that the protocol didn't compress from the start and the format has stuck around since then?

My guess would be that - personally I really dislike "binary" protocols (and the internet mostly doesn't use them) as you just end up with a lot of headaches with serialization.
2963  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Platform-independent & 'easy to audit' basic tools to sign offline transactions. on: October 02, 2014, 02:35:08 PM
It might be a good idea to lock two of these threads so that the discussion doesn't become fragmented and difficult to follow.

Agreed (much better to just have the one thread).

You could take a look at CIYAM Safe also (https://susestudio.com/a/kp8B3G/ciyam-safe). It uses QR codes for 100% "air-gapped" security and does the tx signing with an "offline" computer running bitcoind (and is built mostly from "bash scripts" rather than "proprietary" software).
2964  Other / Meta / Re: [CRUSADE] Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: October 02, 2014, 01:33:08 PM
Before I forget, title should be Crusade**.

Oops - fixed.

And as I think that this "crusade" seems to have an army of one I am officially "calling it off" (to spend more time doing useful things like "coding").

Smiley
2965  Other / Meta / Re: [CRUSCADE] Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: October 02, 2014, 09:19:59 AM
The problem is that the mods aren't having any great effect on "stopping the crap posts" so basically this is "a protest" at the poor quality of posts on this forum due to ad sigs but I don't think anyone is "joining in" so I doubt that my occasional "report" is hardly going to have any effect one way or the other. Sad

I refuse to "waste my time" on maintaining an ever growing Ignore list (which also quite likely increases the server work for processing each request) so instead I am just now ignoring more and more of the forum Boards - I'll probably end up with just one or two Boards that I bother with eventually.
2966  Other / Meta / Re: [CRUSCADE] Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: October 02, 2014, 03:15:52 AM
I tried, but the only reward for reporting is to see accuracy slowly drift lower point by point.

Sadly I have noticed the same as well - I guess most of the mods here "are in support of rubbish posts".  Sad
2967  Other / Meta / Re: Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: October 01, 2014, 03:04:50 AM
Luckily for you, then, there has been an influx of new campaigns that pay per term and don't depend on post count. Satisfactory?

I'd be curious to know "what criteria they use to choose who they will pay to have their ad sig?" but yes hopefully that might improve things.
2968  Other / Meta / Re: [FIGHT] Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: September 30, 2014, 01:14:46 PM
I am not reporting *any post* made by "ad sig posters" - only ones that "have no value".

Let's be very clear about what my "campaign is about please".

In particular "pointless or uninteresting posts" is what I am against (it is just annoying to have to "wade through crap posts to find anything of interest").
2969  Other / Meta / Re: Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: September 30, 2014, 12:28:57 PM
so now if i have a "paid" signature I can't post , this is so ridiculous . //  Roll Eyes

Stop posting crap please.

Post your "useful posts somewhere else please" - here you are obviously just trying to "defend your *right* to post crap" as you don't want to "lose your precious ad sig BTC".
2970  Other / Meta / Re: Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: September 30, 2014, 12:24:19 PM
is crap ? I think is not crap , because I've told only my opinion  Roll Eyes .

Reported - as I said "this is a campaign" (that is not *sponsored at all*) and if you want to end up on the "wrong side of it" that is entirely up to you.
2971  Other / Meta / Re: Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: September 30, 2014, 12:12:52 PM
Anyone can have whatever  he want in his signature , I'm with you when you told the useless posts are increasing . But there are  users don't post  "rubbish"  Wink ; so finally I think "ban" the sig. campaign is pointless .

As I stated - I would be happy enough if we just get the forum "cleaned up" so don't miss that point please (and people with "ad sigs should not really be replying" to this).

You are warned not to reply again unless you really have something relevant to add (or you will be reported - your above post was basically *crap* but I'll let that one slide).
2972  Other / Meta / Re: Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: September 30, 2014, 12:08:48 PM
So just to let all those "ad sig posters" know that I am now reporting all the crap posts I am seeing (off-topic or just plain stupid posts as well as the more like "+1" posts).

I suggest others thinking of supporting my "campaign" should include the text "ad sig post" in the "report" (such as "obvious ad sig post" or "looks like an ad sig post").

I guess the mods might get pissed off at me for reporting so many posts (as I am going to do this for every single shitty post that affronts me) but really - if this forum would prefer to read "that crap" than anything I have to post then "I am okay with getting banned" (i.e this is a "declaration of war").
2973  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Australian coinjar.com to charge 10% GST on all AUD->Bitcoin sales on: September 30, 2014, 11:58:09 AM
"The primary business of BTC Markets is to provide an exchange platform for users to buy and sell Bitcoins off each other. BTC Markets does not buy nor sell Bitcoins in its own right therefore we are not liable to collect GST on the value of Bitcoins traded on our marketplace."

Hmm... well that is not so bad I guess (assuming the ATO agrees).
2974  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Australian coinjar.com to charge 10% GST on all AUD->Bitcoin sales on: September 30, 2014, 11:32:37 AM
seems good for me as a user.. for business I feel 10% GST is too high.

What you're missing is that if you "buy your BTC in Aus then you will have to pay 10% GST for that" so from the point of just "using BTC as a currency" there is basically *zero* incentive to want to *buy BTC in Aus* unless you can actually *save more than 10%* on whatever you plan to *purchase with your BTC* (i.e. cheaper to just use a credit card and maybe even PayPal).

If you are a "investor" hoping for BTC to become "worth more" then perhaps the 10% "surcharge" is not a big deal (especially if you don't have to declare capital gains).
2975  Other / Meta / [CRUSADE] Report "ad-sponsored rubbish posts" on: September 30, 2014, 11:28:14 AM
Although I know the mods are trying their best to "weed out the ever increasing amount of crap posts" we are seeing due to "paid sig posting campaigns" I see more such campaigns being created and more and more rubbish posts being posted.

Please consider clicking the Report to Admin link on any "useless post" posted by someone with an "ad sig" (whether or not you know it is part of a "paid sig posting campaign" because if the post is "rubbish" then it is more than likely than not that is why it is there annoying you).

If enough of us do this then either it'll result in "a clean up of the forum" or a "banning of paid sig posting campaigns" (the latter being my preference but either result would be better than the current situation).
2976  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: balance differs from bitcoind and bitcoin-qt on: September 30, 2014, 11:06:17 AM
You might want to try this:

Code:
getbalance * 0

or this:
Code:
getbalance "" 0

(assuming that the problem is unconfirmed amounts)
2977  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Australian coinjar.com to charge 10% GST on all AUD->Bitcoin sales on: September 30, 2014, 10:31:56 AM
Amazing that something that is neither a "good" nor a "service" attracts GST - you certainly can't imagine the Australian government getting away with applying this approach to "stocks" (I can understand GST applying to "fees and commissions" but not to the BTC itself).
2978  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: BIP38 cold storage question on: September 30, 2014, 08:12:59 AM
That 4 char password had unicode characters in it. That's why it was hard to break. A 6 char password with only letters ("gibberish word") isn't going to be so hard.

I ran a competition with 4 character password of just upper, lower and numbers (just ASCII) and it wasn't cracked in 5 days (by forum members with some fairly powerful PCs who were trying very hard to get a BTC reward).

So IMO a 6 character password with just letters (non-dictionary) is not going to be very easy to crack (i.e. even with some very fancy hardware you are still looking at days if not weeks).
2979  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Proposing new feature in Bitcoin protocol to reduce the number of thefts on: September 29, 2014, 03:37:12 PM
Correct, and with Bitcoin it doesn't have to be an either or proposition.

Agreed 100% - if one of the banks I use decided to offer a BTC account I think I'd probably put some BTC there.
2980  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Proposing new feature in Bitcoin protocol to reduce the number of thefts on: September 29, 2014, 03:32:02 PM
The lesson to be learned with all these "hacked" exchanges and hot wallets is that by exchanging your private keys for IOU tokens
you are defeating one of the main purposes of Bitcoin being p2p and not needing a middleman.  

Agreed - services will always be created "above Bitcoin" and numerous of those will "turn out to be scams".

Not everyone is *ready* to take *responsibility for their own money* (so if banks ever decide to allow "Bitcoin accounts" I am sure they'll be very popular).
Pages: « 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 [149] 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 ... 334 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!