last time I checked, this was a thread about LISK, so why the hell is this fucking Waves shite doing on here?
You've got your own thread...fuck off back there you muppets...........
there...I tried to be as polite as I can........eventhough this waves spam is being done by a bunch of C**TS.....
i will take sometime to look what this waves thing is.. lisk side scam? no need to be polite when personal insults are posted. why are you even here shithead? Why we need to be polite to you when you come into our house and talk shit? Your mom never teach you any manners? Maybe you a lonely kid and no money or family? maybe you have the worlds smallest micro dick? you tiny bro? |
|
|
|
is MAX a ´cryptocurrency DEVELOPER?
what is his background,expertise. also please can we see coding history of OLIVIER?
~CfA~
google tells all they want you to know. no history. all is fake. why do you idiots keep on showingup? shame on u haters having issues with waves--lisk i like both and i endorse both. ~CfA~ if they didn't sound like they were all cheerleading waves when they come over it would be ok but the only things I hear are lisk scam crap and it happened like the day the waves ico started. U'll find this with most bigger coins- some ppl are simply crazy when defending their bagz of coins. I wouldnt mind- there've been worse , just look at DASH vs MONERO etc. It's standard on BCT. ~CfA~ oliver is a good point. go find out the mistake they made.. like this cryptic fud shit. This is only the second time I've seen this booger and the only things he said was scam. lol. faucet spam.. newbie or ignorat code. volume, faked but how.. do they want to pay the fees for fake volyme? think twice. lol simple fix. it's testnet. Your shitty waves doesn't even have that. |
|
|
|
is MAX a ´cryptocurrency DEVELOPER?
what is his background,expertise. also please can we see coding history of OLIVIER?
~CfA~
google tells all they want you to know. no history. all is fake. why do you idiots keep on showingup? shame on u haters having issues with waves--lisk i like both and i endorse both. ~CfA~ if they didn't sound like they were all cheerleading waves when they come over it would be ok but the only things I hear are lisk scam crap and it happened like the day the waves ico started. U'll find this with most bigger coins- some ppl are simply crazy when defending their bagz of coins. I wouldnt mind- there've been worse , just look at DASH vs MONERO etc. It's standard on BCT. ~CfA~ oliver is a good point. go find out the mistake they made.. like this cryptic fud shit. This is only the second time I've seen this booger and the only things he said was scam. lol. |
|
|
|
is MAX a ´cryptocurrency DEVELOPER?
what is his background,expertise. also please can we see coding history of OLIVIER?
~CfA~
google tells all they want you to know. no history. all is fake. why do you idiots keep on showing up? |
|
|
|
LOL you think everyone searching waves on google are looking for your coin and not the real thing the coin was named after? AHAHAHAHAH crazy. lol just what i think you would do. you think i didnt know that million things waves can be searched for. you clearly ignored the first chart of ethereum and lisk  i like this one better |
|
|
|
LOL you think everyone searching waves on google are looking for your coin and not the real thing the coin was named after? AHAHAHAHAH crazy. |
|
|
|
@LiskHQ - All the talk above aon testnet whales has me wondering about mainnet whales.
We can use the blockchain explorer to do a snapshot of the top 100 accounts (or even all accounts) at launch to get some idea of what is in the genesis block. However, individual ICO investors had multiple exchanges. So at launch many people will have multiple accounts spread over the genesis block.
Can you / will you please release a spreadsheet showing how many accounts (not exchanges) there were in the ICO, and the total amount of Lisk to be allocated to each ICO account?
This would be very interesting information to understand the initial distribution of Lisk.
+1 yes, please release a list. |
|
|
|
There's more things to think of than that. What about duplicates and scammers who used more than one email to try and get more lisk? not that it matters cause you get them in like 4 weeks.
i hoped they checked that before sending e-mails. but again: this was not the questions. and i think nobody can answer my question at the moment..... and please don't just write anything if you don't have to say something useful  how can they check that if they don't have the information to cross reference with? You are a fucking retard. I was trying to help you out but I guess you wana bring on the mean banana.  just turned to:  better hide now... lol |
|
|
|
There's more things to think of than that. What about duplicates and scammers who used more than one email to try and get more lisk? not that it matters cause you get them in like 4 weeks.
i hoped they checked that before sending e-mails. but again: this was not the questions. and i think nobody can answer my question at the moment..... and please don't just write anything if you don't have to say something useful how can they check that if they don't have the information to cross reference with? You are a fucking retard. I was trying to help you out but I guess you wana bring on the mean banana. |
|
|
|
Newsletter Subscribers — 200,000 LISK but how may subscribers are there? gezus man, have you not thought that they haven't completed the calculations yet? they are sending e-mails. so they have to know how many e-mails they sent. the calculation is not that difficult. 200,000 LISK / "number of e-mails sent" = amount per address. There's more things to think of than that. What about duplicates and scammers who used more than one email to try and get more lisk? not that it matters cause you get them in like 4 weeks. |
|
|
|
Newsletter Subscribers — 200,000 LISK but how may subscribers are there? gezus man, have you not thought that they haven't completed the calculations yet? |
|
|
|
so a delegate will need the support of at least three hundred voters to become a member of the magic 101 circle?
There's other considerations. Not all testnet users are equal, some are now whales. Several have hit the faucets repeatedly and accumulated a lot. Plus, the 101 have forged a lot and most now have 10,000 - 20,000 each. So you can become a testnet delegate if you get 15-20 out of the testnet 101 to sponsor you.Max, Oliver and Joel have pulled out of instantly putting people in the 101 with their testnet millions and the testnet is now adjusting to "new rules and realities" that came into effect only a few days ago. It is not "voting chaos", but almost. Wasn't the faucet limit one per address? How did they accumulate a lot of lisk? Can you tell us some nicknames? most faucets can be spammed by changing your ip address |
|
|
|
if you zoom out on yobit charts it looks very standard for a coin except sped up very fast due to the amount of coins on the exchange. It's in its oversold area right now we should see a solid pump soon on yobit i'm guessing.
Well, Bloombit give a bit of a different picture. Still active, and as I write this you can snap up ~2 BTC's worth of Bloombit-IOU at ~0.0017 or less than $0.75. But it does look to me like the IOUs have anchored the price of "Lisk-for-real" at ~$1 early on in. If it's going to go parabolic a la Ethereum and hit a $1 billion market cap, current buyers are looking at somewhere between a 5-for-1 and a 10-for-1 at the current IOU prices. imo bloombit is a little off because of the trust issue. yobit already had quite a few traders before the LISK thing. I think the $1 bottom is becoming solid in peoples minds. I think we're not done with the pricing moves before launch. but you never know. I'm sure it will go below but for how long. |
|
|
|
When will LIsk go live?
April 31st or May 1st you pick April 31st? I'm doubting that.  Myself, I was planning for launch on April 35th.   |
|
|
|
i Just Buy some Lisk on Yobit.net what do you think about this
cheap buy. just hodl long enough, like some years. microsoft shares, or google you had to keep years to get rich. Speaking of "cheap buy," Yobit's IOU-Lisk has dropped to ~0.004-.0005 while the 24-hr volume collapsed to < 5 BTC before perking up to ~15 BTC as I write this. From what I've seen of post-ICO coins, there's a dormancy period where the volume is low and the price flatlines. Based upon what Yobit's showing and of course my own hopes , it looks like the post-ICO floor is going to be somewhere around $1 or ~0.002-0.0025 BTC. I feel you're right. if you zoom out on yobit charts it looks very standard for a coin except sped up very fast due to the amount of coins on the exchange. It's in its oversold area right now we should see a solid pump soon on yobit i'm guessing. |
|
|
|
When will LIsk go live?
April 31st or May 1st you pick April 31st? I'm doubting that. |
|
|
|
When are the rewards for TWITTER and NEWSLETTER?
Twitter will be announced soon. Newsletter infos are starting today. I already got an e-mail. I have not received any notification whatsoever.. I got my email. Check your spam box or you might not qualify. |
|
|
|
When will LIsk go live?
April 31st or May 1st you pick |
|
|
|
How much lisk in votes would it take to make the 101 delegates as of now?
dunno, we don't know who has how much lisk yet because it's not released. So impossible to tell you what it would take to get into the top 101. It will be large though i'm guessing. More than just one person has total for the top ranking of the 101. So the current 101 delegates arent actual users? The current top 101 delegates are on a testnet. It currently takes about 300,000 testnet Lisk to be voted into the testnet top 101 delegates. Nobody knows how many Lisk it will take to be voted into the mainnet top 101 delegates after launch. 300,000? what's the maximum number of test Lisk that will be credited to each testnet delegate's account? none. We all grabbed the 1k testnet lisk from the faucet to start off with. |
|
|
|
YEAHH THATS BECAUSE YOU ARE FUCKIN IDIOT ..
FAKE ICO!! Who the fuck are you coming here to insult people? If you don't like the project you don't invest, that's simple as that. You don't have right to flame and blame others for your other ICO losses. WAVES is a great Bitcoin 2.0 project and it'll be as big as Bitcoin in cryptographic financial system. i think he lost on LISK or so , and is jealous that he couldnt buy waves and missed the 20% extra, cause he put all his money on LISK and seeing that waves has more potential, poor guy  i pity him why waves has more potential it's a copy of lisk which is a copy of ethereum? none has good potential but lisk has better potential due to the fact that is a one less copy lol A copy of lisk? Are we watching the same concept mate? Are you on crack? The two projects totally differ from each other. they are all the same mate, you really think there is something innovative here lol, all copy paste with little variation, tell me what this offer over ethereum and lisk? LISK come straight from Crypti with little changes if you dont know that. Seeing as the guys who copied Crypti to Lisk actually worked on Crypti, it is more reasonable that they forked the project. Waves just stole some code from other groups. They never contributed to the code at all and lied about affiliation to raise funds. Sure both projects are copies but one is just a straight jacking. (hint: waves) thank you for your valuable feedback! if you build using php it means that you stole php. great logic, thanks again! yeah the difference is that new PHP projects don't say that they have Rasmus Lerdorf as their lead developer LOLZ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
