That's right, you are right. I completely agree with you, we need to trust only large exchanges with a good reputation.

KYC verification is not directly related to this. I participated in projects where KYC verification was required and earned money there.

On my work computer is the Linux operating system. I think this is a basic level of security. The Windows operating system has too many "holes".

The reputation of the exchange strongly influences the interests of coin buyers. However, I think this is a temporary phenomenon, just like the hype around the ICO (in 2017).

Cryptocurrency is not just a way to make money. We need to not forget this. However, I agree that now is a great time to invest.

This is a little strange self-promotion. What message did you want to convey to people in this thread? I don't understand how you are different from others.

I don't like this coin. I think it's just a waste of time and money. I followed the project for a while, and then I just forgot about it.

I do exactly the same as you. This strategy guarantees maximum profit and minimum risks. I think this is the best strategy.

Wow, that looks very interesting, but somehow very strange. Are you talking about blockchain technology or some kind of sect? I like the message of this topic, but I'm a little scared.

Buy coins only because of "Binance" - no, thanks. I want to see where the token price will go, and then decide to buy it or not.

It happens to me too. I think you need to study in more detail the coin in which you invest money. I think luck has nothing to do with this.

No, listing does not kill coins. There are many causes of death for coins. Bad project idea, lack of money, coin manipulation, and the like.

Bitcoin Cash is a trash coin. When will everyone understand that a bitcoin fork cannot be a good coin? The King of Altcoin will win this battle.

Maybe I don't know much about such predictions, but I think that it is just a lottery. I often read such messages, but in reality everything happens completely differently.

I do not agree with you. IEO is very difficult and expensive for the project. Only the largest projects can afford the IEO.

This is an interesting idea, but I think it is difficult to implement it. I mean that such a decision can have many pitfalls.

Over time, we are improving together with the market. We better understand how this market works, we make more correct decisions.

ICO can last forever if developers want it. But, if ICO lasts a very long time, it's a bad sign. Very few successful projects that lasted a very long time.

ICO and IEO are almost the same. I think IEO is more interesting for developers, project owner and investors. However, it is important not to write off ICO.

Do not panic, everything is fine. The success of IEO does not mean the end of bounty campaigns. Bounty campaigns will exist for a very long time, but conditions will change a lot.