Sure thing, I will not. Please contact me on Discord. Thanks!
|
|
|
No idea what you are referring to.. we didn't created the miners. This is ur github right?? https://github.com/LightBitDev/LightBit/blob/master/src/crypto/yespower/yespower.c#include "yespower.h"
int yespower_hash(const char *input, char *output) { yespower_params_t params = { .version = YESPOWER_1_0, .N = 2048, .r = 32, .pers = "LITBpower: The number of LITB working or available for proof-of-work mining", .perslen = 73 }; return yespower_tls(input, 80, ¶ms, (yespower_binary_t *) output); } This is CPUChain : https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain/blob/master/src/crypto/yespower/yespower.c#include "yespower.h"
int yespower_hash(const char *input, char *output) { yespower_params_t params = { .version = YESPOWER_1_0, .N = 2048, .r = 32, .pers = "CPUpower: The number of CPU working or available for proof-of-work mining", .perslen = 73 }; return yespower_tls(input, 80, ¶ms, (yespower_binary_t *) output); } Apparently replacing CPU with LITB results in an additional 1 charaction and hence ur Personalisation string is now 75 instead of 73 characters. Im just explaining the post from the cpu-optiminer dev, if u use the actual 73 characters (aka, cutting the last 2 letters ), this coin is minable with the offical cpu-optiminer as well !!! Aah now I get it. Thanks for the kind answer. Will definitely forward this information to our dev. But we are listed on 4 pools now and they already modified the miner to support it. Thanks again for the information. Thanks to the cpu-optiminer dev too. No need for a new miner, the official cpu-optiminer works fine cpuminer.exe -a yespower -N 2048 -R 32 -K "LITBpower: The number of LITB working or available for proof-of-work mini" -o stratum+tcp://XXX -u YYY Note how the personalisation string cuts off with just 73 chars instead of the full string. Yep. Got it. Thanks again for the information and support. Much appreciated.
|
|
|
No idea what you are referring to.. we didn't created the miners. This is ur github right?? https://github.com/LightBitDev/LightBit/blob/master/src/crypto/yespower/yespower.c#include "yespower.h"
int yespower_hash(const char *input, char *output) { yespower_params_t params = { .version = YESPOWER_1_0, .N = 2048, .r = 32, .pers = "LITBpower: The number of LITB working or available for proof-of-work mining", .perslen = 73 }; return yespower_tls(input, 80, ¶ms, (yespower_binary_t *) output); } This is CPUChain : https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain/blob/master/src/crypto/yespower/yespower.c#include "yespower.h"
int yespower_hash(const char *input, char *output) { yespower_params_t params = { .version = YESPOWER_1_0, .N = 2048, .r = 32, .pers = "CPUpower: The number of CPU working or available for proof-of-work mining", .perslen = 73 }; return yespower_tls(input, 80, ¶ms, (yespower_binary_t *) output); } Apparently replacing CPU with LITB results in an additional 1 charaction and hence ur Personalisation string is now 75 instead of 73 characters. Im just explaining the post from the cpu-optiminer dev, if u use the actual 73 characters (aka, cutting the last 2 letters ), this coin is minable with the offical cpu-optiminer as well !!! Aah now I get it. Thanks for the kind answer. Will definitely forward this information to our dev. But we are listed on 4 pools now and they already modified the miner to support it. Thanks again for the information. Thanks to the cpu-optiminer dev too.
|
|
|
No idea what you are referring to.. we didn't created the miners.
|
|
|
Good team, good project, I like, I mean even if they are copy them, they are doing a better job, Its like if Microsoft starts attacking apple that they have stolen the PC idea!
Move on, if they are scammers, people will know in your future, Focus on your project and just move on!
Thanks a lot for your support. I am just plain ignoring them now. Its the same person spamming on our thread with new account. Even his community is not supporting him. Thanks again, we will do our best to make LITB the best project in every possible way.
|
|
|
Looks interesting. Its cpu mineable coin? So I think its good for my old PC It will be even more interesting once we launch the use case! Thanks a lot for your support.
|
|
|
Hello. I’m testing my exchange here and added your coin. If interested, then I am ready for cooperation. Anyway, I’ll be glad if you drop a couple of coins on my exchange to check operations =) https://ex4ange.org/?LIGHTBIT-DOGE(google translate) Hello! First of all, thanks for adding LITB Second, your exchange design looks really great! So simple and clean. But, majority speaks english in our community, so if you can add a English language page to it, then we can co-operate even better! Thanks again!
|
|
|
Wow! This must be the most _lame_ rip-off through the history of crypto!? A bunch of kids spending two hours "making their own crypto" - HAHAHA! And no; forking bitcoin and actually making it into something unique like CPUChain did with loads of work and ideas is not the same as just forking and replacing 2 or 3 words in the source-code. Anybody still wonder why they want to stay anonymous? Good luck if anything happens with their chain; I bet the funds will be the opposite of safu. I'd rather throw my money in a toilet and watch it flush down the drain, than investing in this. And re-brand it to to what it is: "LightShit" - AAHAHAHAHA! If you can't do good, don't do bad. New account created by Mink (dev of cpuchain) to spread FUD. Why don't you invest your time in doing good? Its a fresh account with 1 post. Really great developer and person you are.
|
|
|
This is a fucking joke? 1:1 Scaled CTRL+A -> CTRL+C of CPUchain. You don't respect the work of Mink, that's ungrateful. Mink has spend thousands of dollars on CPUchain, and now you wanna clone his cryptocurrency and told us, this is yours. For ex. i respect the work of Mink, and even support him. EVEN, YOU AREN'T ASSOCIATED WITH https://myspes.org/ Proof: cryptohubexchange.com:: [United Kingdom] [46.101.34.100] [DigitalOcean, LLC] myspes.org:: [Germany] [2001:8d8:100f:f000::26a] [1&1 Internet AG] So, SpesCoin run two websites, and both of them have different ISPs, different hosted service providers, and... SpesCoin didn't buid a SSL certificate for cryptohubexchange.com? lol btw, cryptohubexchange.com use free Responsive CSS Themes, you also have outdated libraries. I think it's even a free trial from DigitalOcean hosted website... BTW, https://cryptohubexchange.com/ - Let's Encrypt Authority for a stock exchange? It's time for me, i saw everything in my life. It's just a project with some shitty CTRL+C devs, same as their project. I just hate people like you. Get the fucking out of there, and respect Mink work, - he did one of most grewing from newest cryptocurrencies right now, from scratch. - Ray As I see, SpesCoin already gave you the right answer. We are not affiliated with their exchange. They saw potential in our project and they listed us. And we are happy about it btw, we appreciate everyones support. And for you CTRL+A -> CTRL+C - Every coin is a CTRL+A -> CTRL+C of Bitcoin. Are you trying to say Mink created Bitcoin? If yes, give us the proofs please. His cpuchain code is taken from Bitcoin too. Every coins is. If anything, he should be happy that others appreciated his work and trying to do more with it. But the way he snapped, his every chat is openly readable in our #Old-General channel on discord which if you read, you can see how professional he is. Anyways, don't wanna go into that, really busy. Anyways, please mind your business. You should focus on yours and let us focus on ours. Thanks!
|
|
|
Please stop spamming in BOLD and huge characters. Thanks for your understanding.
|
|
|
I believe LightBit is a SCAM coin in high odds, here is why
1. Identical Source code with CPUchain
LightBit has an identical source code with CPUchain https://cpuchain.org https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain without any modification and they clam to be a non premine coin without any evidence,
The genesis block has been mined 1 day ago before they've announced their coin on bitcointalk ( CPUchain have announced on bitcointalk 4 days before they mined an genesis block )
2. Poor homepage roadmap
Lightbit doesn't have any identical roapmap or features compared with CPUchain
3. No Whitepaper
Lightbit doesn't have any whitepaper although it is a clone of CPUchain
4. Developer's identity are hidden
No public identity for developers, likely to be a scam.
5. Copy of CPUchain's work
According to the community manager ( AL!CE ), they are planning to clone the mobile wallet, mobile mining application of CPUchain's.
Don't be scammed by anonymous developers We are very busy to even respond to this, but since this is our thread, we are obliged to respond. 1. Identical Source code with CPUchain LightBit has an identical source code with CPUchain https://cpuchain.org https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain without any modification and they clam to be a non premine coin without any evidence, The genesis block has been mined 1 day ago before they've announced their coin on bitcointalk ( CPUchain have announced on bitcointalk 4 days before they mined an genesis block ) Answer - Your source code is identical to Bitcoin. Does that make you a scammer? And about the genesis block, we announced the project on BTT 24 hrs ago before the final launch. Old ANN can be find here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174240.0;all (PROOF) Also, when we launched, there were 30+ people active on our discord and they all saw the genesis block on the explorer. Which you can still see btw. 2. Poor homepage roadmap Lightbit doesn't have any identical roapmap or features compared with CPUchain Answer - We never compared LightBit with any other coin. But FYI, WP will be launched in Q4. Thanks! 3. No Whitepaper Lightbit doesn't have any whitepaper although it is a clone of CPUchain Answer - Same as answer 2.4. Developer's identity are hidden No public identity for developers, likely to be a scam. Answer - If team wants to stay anon, that does not make them scammers. Looks like Satoshi Nakamoto is a scammer to you? And if you are not familiar with the term "0 premine" - It means the team holds only the amount of coins which they mined after the announcement, same as the community. I personally mine and hodl just 130 LITB so far. 5. Copy of CPUchain's work According to the community manager ( AL!CE ), they are planning to clone the mobile wallet, mobile mining application of CPUchain's. Don't be scammed by anonymous developers Answer - I am AL1CE from discord. I never said such things to the owner of Cpuchain, which makes it a false claim. Thanks!At last, it is up to the community to decide if its a scam or a great project. All we can do is work on it. So please focus on your own project, and let us focus on ours. Thanks! 1. You have plagiarised our entire roadmap & website Answer - Don't know about yours, but our website is completely different. Check here - https://lightbit.xyz/ [PROOF]
You should at least change the diff algo or block time, block size ( even the modified block size match with our coin ) to make it unique Answer - Cpuchain algo is CPUpower, LightBit algo is YESpower_LITB [Custom algo]. Also, our block time is 60 secs and its 10 LITB per block with 21M supply [WHICH MAKES US COMPLETELY DIFFERENT]
2. About your identity
My identity is fully public and I am Min Khang Aung from CPUchain, I've tried to contact the real developer and you've refused, that makes your project scam! Answer - Our devs are busy developing, unlike you, they don't accuse projects. They have faith in every project and developer out there. Thanks! Compare the source code https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp https://github.com/LightBitDev/LightBit/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain/blob/master/src/consensus/consensus.h https://github.com/LightBitDev/LightBit/blob/master/src/consensus/consensus.h you are lying!We have already answered to all your false accusations. Even the community knows who is lying. Please stop it now or continue, whatever you prefer. But we do not have time to spare. We want to use our time for productivity instead of falsely accusing others. WE WON'T RESPOND TO YOUR LIES ANYMORE. THANKS!
|
|
|
I believe LightBit is a SCAM coin in high odds, here is why
1. Identical Source code with CPUchain
LightBit has an identical source code with CPUchain https://cpuchain.org https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain without any modification and they clam to be a non premine coin without any evidence,
The genesis block has been mined 1 day ago before they've announced their coin on bitcointalk ( CPUchain have announced on bitcointalk 4 days before they mined an genesis block )
2. Poor homepage roadmap
Lightbit doesn't have any identical roapmap or features compared with CPUchain
3. No Whitepaper
Lightbit doesn't have any whitepaper although it is a clone of CPUchain
4. Developer's identity are hidden
No public identity for developers, likely to be a scam.
5. Copy of CPUchain's work
According to the community manager ( AL!CE ), they are planning to clone the mobile wallet, mobile mining application of CPUchain's.
Don't be scammed by anonymous developers We are very busy to even respond to this, but since this is our thread, we are obliged to respond. 1. Identical Source code with CPUchain LightBit has an identical source code with CPUchain https://cpuchain.org https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain without any modification and they clam to be a non premine coin without any evidence, The genesis block has been mined 1 day ago before they've announced their coin on bitcointalk ( CPUchain have announced on bitcointalk 4 days before they mined an genesis block ) Answer - Your source code is identical to Bitcoin. Does that make you a scammer? And about the genesis block, we announced the project on BTT 24 hrs ago before the final launch. Old ANN can be find here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174240.0;all (PROOF) Also, when we launched, there were 30+ people active on our discord and they all saw the genesis block on the explorer. Which you can still see btw. 2. Poor homepage roadmap Lightbit doesn't have any identical roapmap or features compared with CPUchain Answer - We never compared LightBit with any other coin. But FYI, WP will be launched in Q4. Thanks! 3. No Whitepaper Lightbit doesn't have any whitepaper although it is a clone of CPUchain Answer - Same as answer 2.4. Developer's identity are hidden No public identity for developers, likely to be a scam. Answer - If team wants to stay anon, that does not make them scammers. Looks like Satoshi Nakamoto is a scammer to you? And if you are not familiar with the term "0 premine" - It means the team holds only the amount of coins which they mined after the announcement, same as the community. I personally mine and hodl just 130 LITB so far. 5. Copy of CPUchain's work According to the community manager ( AL!CE ), they are planning to clone the mobile wallet, mobile mining application of CPUchain's. Don't be scammed by anonymous developers Answer - I am AL1CE from discord. I never said such things to the owner of Cpuchain, which makes it a false claim. Thanks!At last, it is up to the community to decide if its a scam or a great project. All we can do is work on it. So please focus on your own project, and let us focus on ours. Thanks! 1. You have plagiarised our entire roadmap & website Answer - Don't know about yours, but our website is completely different. Check here - https://lightbit.xyz/ [PROOF]
You should at least change the diff algo or block time, block size ( even the modified block size match with our coin ) to make it unique Answer - Cpuchain algo is CPUpower, LightBit algo is YESpower_LITB [Custom algo]. Also, our block time is 60 secs and its 10 LITB per block with 21M supply [WHICH MAKES US COMPLETELY DIFFERENT]
2. About your identity
My identity is fully public and I am Min Khang Aung from CPUchain, I've tried to contact the real developer and you've refused, that makes your project scam! Answer - Our devs are busy developing, unlike you, they don't accuse projects. They have faith in every project and developer out there. Thanks!
|
|
|
We are very busy to even respond to this, but since this is about our Project, we are obliged to respond.
1. Identical Source code with CPUchain LightBit has an identical source code with CPUchain https://cpuchain.org https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain without any modification and they clam to be a non premine coin without any evidence, The genesis block has been mined 1 day ago before they've announced their coin on bitcointalk ( CPUchain have announced on bitcointalk 4 days before they mined an genesis block ) Answer - Your source code is identical to Bitcoin. Does that make you a scammer? And about the genesis block, we announced the project on BTT 24 hrs ago before the final launch. Old ANN can be find here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174240.0;all (PROOF) Also, when we launched, there were 30+ people active on our discord and they all saw the genesis block on the explorer. Which you can still see btw. 2. Poor homepage roadmap Lightbit doesn't have any identical roapmap or features compared with CPUchain Answer - We never compared LightBit with any other coin. But FYI, WP will be launched in Q4. Thanks! 3. No Whitepaper Lightbit doesn't have any whitepaper although it is a clone of CPUchain Answer - Same as answer 2.4. Developer's identity are hidden No public identity for developers, likely to be a scam. Answer - If team wants to stay anon, that does not make them scammers. Looks like Satoshi Nakamoto is a scammer to you? And if you are not familiar with the term "0 premine" - It means the team holds only the amount of coins which they mined after the announcement, same as the community. I personally mine and hodl just 130 LITB so far. 5. Copy of CPUchain's work According to the community manager ( AL!CE ), they are planning to clone the mobile wallet, mobile mining application of CPUchain's. Don't be scammed by anonymous developers Answer - I am AL1CE from discord. I never said such things to the owner of Cpuchain, which makes it a false claim. Thanks!At last, it is up to the community to decide if its a scam or a great project. All we can do is work on it. So please focus on your own project, and let us focus on ours. Thanks!
|
|
|
They launched their own exchange without company license, beware! https://cryptohubexchange.com/I believe LightBit is a SCAM coin in high odds, here is why
1. Identical Source code with CPUchain
LightBit has an identical source code with CPUchain https://cpuchain.org https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain without any modification and they clam to be a non premine coin without any evidence,
The genesis block has been mined 1 day ago before they've announced their coin on bitcointalk ( CPUchain have announced on bitcointalk 4 days before they mined an genesis block )
2. Poor homepage roadmap
Lightbit doesn't have any identical roapmap or features compared with CPUchain
3. No Whitepaper
Lightbit doesn't have any whitepaper although it is a clone of CPUchain
4. Developer's identity are hidden
No public identity for developers, likely to be a scam.
5. Copy of CPUchain's work
According to the community manager ( AL!CE ), they are planning to clone the mobile wallet, mobile mining application of CPUchain's.
Don't be scammed by anonymous developers Another false claim from you. This is the ANN of the exchange - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174091
which was announced on 9th Aug by SpesCoin project, which clearly means that you haven't even researched anything and are just blaming us for no reason. Please focus on your project instead. Thanks!
|
|
|
I believe LightBit is a SCAM coin in high odds, here is why
1. Identical Source code with CPUchain
LightBit has an identical source code with CPUchain https://cpuchain.org https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain without any modification and they clam to be a non premine coin without any evidence,
The genesis block has been mined 1 day ago before they've announced their coin on bitcointalk ( CPUchain have announced on bitcointalk 4 days before they mined an genesis block )
2. Poor homepage roadmap
Lightbit doesn't have any identical roapmap or features compared with CPUchain
3. No Whitepaper
Lightbit doesn't have any whitepaper although it is a clone of CPUchain
4. Developer's identity are hidden
No public identity for developers, likely to be a scam.
5. Copy of CPUchain's work
According to the community manager ( AL!CE ), they are planning to clone the mobile wallet, mobile mining application of CPUchain's.
Don't be scammed by anonymous developers We are very busy to even respond to this, but since this is our thread, we are obliged to respond. 1. Identical Source code with CPUchain LightBit has an identical source code with CPUchain https://cpuchain.org https://github.com/cpuchain/cpuchain without any modification and they clam to be a non premine coin without any evidence, The genesis block has been mined 1 day ago before they've announced their coin on bitcointalk ( CPUchain have announced on bitcointalk 4 days before they mined an genesis block ) Answer - Your source code is identical to Bitcoin. Does that make you a scammer? And about the genesis block, we announced the project on BTT 24 hrs ago before the final launch. Old ANN can be find here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174240.0;all (PROOF) Also, when we launched, there were 30+ people active on our discord and they all saw the genesis block on the explorer. Which you can still see btw. 2. Poor homepage roadmap Lightbit doesn't have any identical roapmap or features compared with CPUchain Answer - We never compared LightBit with any other coin. But FYI, WP will be launched in Q4. Thanks! 3. No Whitepaper Lightbit doesn't have any whitepaper although it is a clone of CPUchain Answer - Same as answer 2.4. Developer's identity are hidden No public identity for developers, likely to be a scam. Answer - If team wants to stay anon, that does not make them scammers. Looks like Satoshi Nakamoto is a scammer to you? And if you are not familiar with the term "0 premine" - It means the team holds only the amount of coins which they mined after the announcement, same as the community. I personally mine and hodl just 130 LITB so far. 5. Copy of CPUchain's work According to the community manager ( AL!CE ), they are planning to clone the mobile wallet, mobile mining application of CPUchain's. Don't be scammed by anonymous developers Answer - I am AL1CE from discord. I never said such things to the owner of Cpuchain, which makes it a false claim. Thanks!At last, it is up to the community to decide if its a scam or a great project. All we can do is work on it. So please focus on your own project, and let us focus on ours. Thanks!
|
|
|
addnode 45.76.153.204 onetry -
this help me, wallet work
Yeah, just need to add addnode 45.76.153.204 onetry in Console. Its just a one time thing. Wallet will sync instantly.
|
|
|
What about the slow confirmations?
If they are getting confirmed, then its good. If not, then you were mining on your own chain. So originally, you never mined any $LITB on official chain. Well..... I did mine three lovely personal chains with lots of coins!!!! All dust in the wind!!!! Better luck next time for me!!! Aww.. it happens don't worry. Maybe contact me on Discord? I can help you there to get on the right chain and mine.
|
|
|
What about the slow confirmations?
If they are getting confirmed, then its good. If not, then you were mining on your own chain. So originally, you never mined any $LITB on official chain.
|
|
|
|