Bitcoin Forum
August 10, 2024, 11:43:33 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »
301  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin transaction Times SUCK on: July 15, 2015, 01:47:15 AM
BTC transaction time right now is more than hour on average. I think there is a problem and hope it will be solved  Grin

i can't see how this is contemplated as a problem, when with fiat bank or paypal is the same

with the above services, that i mentioned you see your transaction processed immediately like bitcoin

but the true is that the money are not yet arrived to the recipient, only the order of it was recieved, which can be comparable to confirmation

this mean that bitcoin is anyway, miles ahead of any fiat system albeit it seems the contrary, in the last days

Bitcoin  brags and advertises FAST 10 minute transaction times (a transaction for basic users, is when they have access to the funds and can safely spend them NOT just when it hits the chain!)

Bitcoin brags and advertises low fees yet in order to have a nice transaction time you are asked to increase the fees. Which I have found does not actually lower the time it takes to actually allow the transaction to be safely spendable by the networks advice.

Bitcoin  is not (in my eyes) "miles ahead" of anything yet. For me, I see a lot of false advertising, inability to come thru with what they promise, a lot of back peddling to cover up thier false advertising, and very little ambition from the developers to actually fix problems and make their product more user friendly and easier adaptable.

At the end of the day it all comes down to the developers, and for the past 2 years they have done nothing but sit back and watch the time go by. They seem to worry more about the programmers and coders and forget they need regular people to be using their product as it is them who make transactions internationally every day not the programmer who can decipher RPC commands and understands C++




302  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin transaction Times SUCK on: July 14, 2015, 01:14:15 AM


In the "traditional" system there is a developed trust between parties. So even if it takes 30 days for a card payment to clear, I can eat my burger that I bought 30seconds ago right away, without having to wait a month.

On that note, I don't really mind waiting for my coins to arrive when I am receiving them. I know they will be there. However when I send and it takes exceptionally long it gets frustrating. Maybe there could be a time forecast feature telling how long it will take approximately with x amount of fee instead of "include more fees for faster transaction". I don't want to over-pay, just make it go through in a reasonable amount of time.

This is the worst possible solution you guys have "include more fees for faster transaction"

So let me get this straight, Bitcoin says 10 minute confirms yet delivers 30 minute to 2 hours (or maybe more I guess from reading some of these posts). So now it can't come thru with the first advertised benefit, so the first thing the bitcoin gurus come up with to compensate for the broken system is "include more fees for faster transaction" So now lets take the second advertised benefit and destroy that to, So basically what i can read here if I were a new user is Bitcoin promotes itself as a fast transaction with low fees, yet it does not provide actual fast transactions unless you pay a high fee, so at the end of the day what ambition do new users have to adapt to Bitcoin if they are in the same boat as sending cash with Western union?

So now for a new user looking  to get into bitcoin the only thing they have going for them is anonymity which actually if you are not careful is not as anonymous as they preach. So I have to ask you guys out there who love Bitcoin so darn much, if the developers cant deliver on their fast transactions, and if you want fast transactions you have to pay more in fees, and it can be tracked easier than lead on to be, what real benefit do new users have to adapt and use it.


303  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin transaction Times SUCK on: July 14, 2015, 01:03:14 AM


That's strange can you provide a set of tx ids
My transactions tend to be in the standard 10-30 minute range of blocks even with fees usually I haven't sent recently seeing as its being tested but since you mentioned over a year I find that suprising.
That said I can understand your irritation seeing how time sensitive transactions are a pain like Bitpay with its timer...

Sure www.stakeminers.com/transactions2.php then just follow those transaction on pages 2 thru 4 and you can see some of the transaction times. now on page one I lowered the fee and those ones are not the transactions I am complaining about I am complaining about the high priority transactions that take 30 minutes to 2 hours for 1 confirm.
304  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XRA] RateCoin | 30% PoS | 30 Second Blocks | Community Take Over Thread on: July 13, 2015, 12:00:15 AM
stakeminers.com was looking at possibly encorporating this ill see if i can talk to the folkes there

If Presstab is involved StakeMiners will definitely be looking to add this coin now. Lets wait and see.

Presstab is a POS GOD. everything he touches turns into Bitcoins.

EDIT: Greatly anticipating the coin control that comes with Presstabs work. God I love his coin control features. I wish all POS coins had it.
305  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin transaction Times SUCK on: July 11, 2015, 01:47:53 AM
Maybe you could advise your clients about the speed of confirmation in a transaction. Not to mention the announcement above isn't cleared yet.
Quote from: News
News: ♦♦♦ If you are using any wallet other than Bitcoin Core 0.10.x or 0.9.5, then you should not trust incoming transactions until they have ~30 confirmations. More info. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1108304.0)

Yes I am sure they know about the transaction times, and I understand the recent attack attempt (its what I am calling it) but these transaction times are not new in any way, this is a problem users have been facing for at least a year if not longer in some cases. This is a problem that the developers need to address as their competition can make transactions in 15 minutes and this includes exchanging them from one currency to another. Just to send bitcoin from one person to another takes well over 15 minutes in most cases. Getting it from Bitcoin to local cash can take 5 to 8 hours in a lot of cases.

As developers, they have to ask the question, what incentive does a new user have to use Bitcoin, if he can send his cash from USA to his friend in Australia, and his friend can ahev ti exchanged and put in his hand in 15 minutes. If he uses bitcoin his friend still has to find a way to exchange that BTC to AUD and have it put in his bank account or picked up at western union.
306  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin transaction Times SUCK on: July 11, 2015, 01:41:21 AM
Transaction times are instantaneous. Confirmation times are not. I also send my transactions with a 10,000 Satoshi fee, and they confirm anywhere from 5 to 20 minutes. Right now though, there is an ongoing spam attack, so transactions will take longer. It is recommended to use a higher fee right now for anything urgent. Also, your confirmation times vary because of the block time variation. Blocks are actually not found every ten minutes, but on average, are found every ten minutes. Sometimes they come out very quickly, other times it can take up to 2 hours.

I wonder if mining pools like F2Pool would split their hash evenly over 3 different pool servers and mine to 3 different wallets instead of all that hash mining to the same wallet if this would help to speed up transaction times. Not saying they would even be willing to do it because they have well proven securing Bitcoins Network is not something they are interested in any way at all, but just a thought. It would give like a fishnet of miners under one big area, thus also giving them 3 different sources to hit different blocks instead of all that hash working on the same block.

Just curious
307  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin transaction Times SUCK on: July 11, 2015, 01:32:50 AM

Really? Well in a month, I always receive and send an amount varying from 0.5-2BTC and I never had any longer confirmation time of 20 minutes.

Yea it is beginning to really get on my nerves, I have clients who needed a BTC withdraw form our site the other night for a time sensative trade, and it took almost an hour just for 1 confirm I was so angry. It makes me look bad HAHA. I sent ti out as soon as I saw the request but wow it took forever to confirm.

Are the payments from one output? Have you tried using other alt currencies such as Fastcoin which apparently has a confirmation of around 12 seconds or Litecoins (Which take a few a minutes)

Just saying but economy protest is one of the most effective methods of protest

The most recent one had 3 outputs, but my other wallet has only 1 to 2 usually still with the same times.

Yes I use a variety of different coins on a weekly basis actually, I run a stake mining pool and deal with 11 to 15 different coins thru-out the week including LTC Bitcoin DOGE which are used for payment and deposits, and the 10 wallets we are running as well. Bitcoin has by far the absolute slowest transaction times compared to all the others I use.
308  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin transaction Times SUCK on: July 11, 2015, 01:02:05 AM
In my experience it takes around 10-15 minutes for a conformation. How much are you sending and how much are you spending in transaction fees?

Brother I send payments all day long anywhere from .5 BTC up to 3 BTC at a time, always use 10,000 satoshi for transaction fees. I have not had a 10 to 15 minute transaction in over a year, 20 minutes is the fastest I have seen in a year. average of 35 minutes longest 2 hours and 25 minutes.
309  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Bitcoin transaction Times SUCK on: July 11, 2015, 12:51:41 AM
So when are the developers of Bitcoin going to fix the horrid transaction times of Bitcoin, waiting 35 minutes to 2 hours for a transaction to confirm one time is getting a bit ridiculous.

And for you Bitcoin lovers Dont waste our time quoting any crap from bloickchain.info, I dont want to hear it, because you know what, those stats and charts on blockchain.info are not accurate and it doesnt matter what those things say when the end user is experiencing actual times of 30 minutes to 2 hours.

I mean you guys want acceptance, you want adaptation yet your biggest competitor in what Bitcoin  is supposed to be used for can transact cash in 15 minutes. it takes me 5 to 8 hours to get cash for my bitcoins, its time to step up the game a bit.

EDIT: oh and yes before the bitcoin lovers even go there, I pay a 10,000 Satoshi transaction fee for High Priority on all of my personal transactions I send. So lets not try the pay a bigger fee for faster transaction times.

So the question remains what are the Bitcoin developers doing to fix this problem with transaction times we have been facing for the past year or more, that seems to keep getting worse as they ignore it and keep posting biased charts from unreliable sources.
310  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Altcoin staking - the new way to get altcoins and stay in the game on: July 09, 2015, 05:12:59 PM
I only mean... the markets btc-poscoin mostly dont react on moves in the btc market. In fact, when these poscoins would have a fixed value they would get a lower value when bitcoin goes up and a higher when it goes down. Though that does not happen as far as i see.

again NO COINS move just because the BTC USD market moves. the only reason any coins market moves is becasue something in that specific pair has been bought or sold. the only way to move the BTC DMD market is to either buy DMD with BTC or sell DMD for BTC. What on earth ever made you think buying or selling on the BTC/USD market would have an effect on any other pair than BTC/USD I just cant understand. There are no indexes in crypto exchanges yet. So altho i said BTC was the gold of crypto it was only meant as the basis of crypto not the way gold serves the foreign exchange.

So what everyone would need to watch about is that the bitcoin price is stable. It doesnt make sense when the bitcoin price is dropping by 25% in a week and your 100 pos coins are still worth the same amount of bitcoins. All the staking would be useless then.

ahh grasshopper the POS force is weak with you, more research on POS coins you need.

You would need to be very careful about what you hold, you not only need to observe the btc-poscoin price but the btc price on top. Otherwise you can lose fast and your portfolio only has risen on the paper.

You need to be just as careful when buying bitcoin, I know a lot of people who complained in this very forum because they lost all their money buying bitcoin, the difference is at least with POS coins you have a way to earn some of your losses back. You cant do that with bitcoin, you wont earn BTC by holding it in your BTC wallet now will you. So when the price falls at least you are earning a few coins here and there to make up the difference.

And the forks (2 happened) are nothing that can risk bitcoin in total. Bitcoin wont break down to zero over night. Though that can happen with pos coins if one isnt cautious.

And here is why we have 2 hour transaction times in bitcoin, the developers, much like the bitcoin enthusiasts, feel as long as its worth more than their level of expectancy, theres no real problem to fix. To be quite honest absolutely any coin can go to zero overnight, ANY COIN including Bitcoin, if the right people with the power to make it so wants it that way it will be that way.we can already see huge manipulations in the bitcoin market . With enough coins anyone can make any crypto coin market go to 0 overnight, its that simple.
311  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Altcoin staking - the new way to get altcoins and stay in the game on: July 09, 2015, 01:28:15 AM

I see i wrote my sentence not correct. I mean that not all pos coins are maturing so that you can stake more once you put your wallet online. Some, for example clams, only stake when you are online. Being offline does not give you an advantage. For those coins its best to stay in a pool since they will make sure to be online all the time. Having many coins doesnt bring much more reward because of lower variance. Over time it should be similar with solomining. Though of course a pool has a bigger chance of orphaning other blocks.

Of course there are the coins too that you mean, where you can earn more by manipulating blocks and staking overproportional more with more coins.

Clams are in a bracket of POS all thier own. To understand POS, using Clams as an example is the worst coin to use,. The mechanics of Clams is not like most POS coins, so the information you have is not based on the basic mechanics of POS it is based on clams and this is why you are so confused as to how POS functions in a larger aspect of things. The fact you believe holding more coins will not gain you higher rewards faster tells me you have a lot to learn about the real mechanics of POS coins.

Here is an example you buy 100 DMD put it in a wallet and just leave it connected, Ill buy 10,000 DMD and do the same who do you think will earn more coins staking after a 2 month period?

You do not manipulate a block, I really hate that terminology, no one is "manipulating" anything its called structuring. We are structuring blocks we dont manipulate them, its not like once you make a block you can change that value without effecting the age or maturity of the coin, to Manipulate a block there must be some unfair or unscrupulous action going on, what we do is structure the blocks in sizes that allow us to gain maximum rewards in the fastest amount of time. which is what all real stakers are attempting to do.


You mean value balancing? I observed clams a bit but i didnt see that they react on the btc price. With rising bitcoin price the btc-clam price should be lowering but it didnt happen. So when holding altcoins you might always have the risk of holding bitcoins at the same time. Which means you have to observe both prices if you dont want to lose.

As I stated before the value of one coin is not based on the value of another coins market, it is based on the buys and sells of that particular coins market. if there is no movement on a market of a coin that is because no one is buying or selling it. If you see bitcoin value increase dramatically and an altcoin value does not rise in a day or two, this means investors in that altcoin market are not investing their BTC profits to buy into that market (this should tell you where that coins stands in the overall scheme of things) As you pointed out, there is a lot a trader can see from watching the markets. BTC is your basis, it is the gold of the crypto exchange, it tells you a lot about other coins and their value than just a bunch of numbers after a decimal place.


Thats right. Im not sure though if bitcoin will become obsolete once. I believe pos-coins have their own flaws though they dont come to mind now.

Bitcoin may never become "obsolete" but the flaws it is facing will hold it back and possibly move it out of popularity, once that happens the bitcoin developers will finally fix the real problems of bitcoin, and this new "No Fork" policy they have tried to implement will be abolished all together. Because in order to fix Bitcoin right now it is going to take a hard fork update.


Thats correct. But no one should forget that pos-coins broke already often in the past. Its not like they are a so stable currency like bitcoin. Most might be stable but they are a bit riskier. Thats something to keep in mind when using them.

hmm I have only one comment to this. https://bitcoin.org/en/alert/2015-07-04-spv-mining that about sums up that assessment of POS being broken in comparison to Bitcoin. And FYI in POS you will soon find out when something is broken the developers actually work together to fix it, I have been in a hangouts with 5 or more developers from 5 different coins working on a situation they found in the code and working together to fix the problem.


Thats right. Though theoretically staking should lead to inflation, price should adjust to the amount of new coins. Though thats not happening for most coins for some reason. Guess its the peoples believe in the price.

It is not happening because more and more people are realizing the true benefits of using POS coins. From the benefits of profits on sold products to the efficiency of mining them awareness is spreading like wildfire. As you saw in my post above its much easier to use an altcoin than it is Bitcoin. Transaction times are faster, the benefits are much bigger and mining them is more efficient.

As most newbies in POS you have a misguided understanding of POS coins in a large aspect of longevity. POS coins have inflation controls built in. If you find one that does not have some kind of inflation control built in than its not a coin to be using. FOR POS you do not need a huge Premine at all, its good to stat one as a POW/POS hybrid to jump start the chain, then offer a big reward phase in the first year of the launch then you will notice all good POS coins have some kind of diminishing reward system in place. Each one is a little bit different based on what the overall goals are for each coin.
312  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Altcoin staking - the new way to get altcoins and stay in the game on: July 08, 2015, 01:59:32 PM

I know you mostly speak about DMD but thats not the case for all pos coins. Most of them only stake when your wallet is connected and you lose staking when youre not. Thats why pool staking or having a server is best for these coins i think.

Actually in order to actually "Stake" every wallet must be connected to the network, once you have staked you can then turn the wallet off and wait again until the coins have matured so you can Stake again. The benefits of joining a pool are not so much the fact we are connected to the networks but the fact you have the ability to gain more in returns, where your wallet may stake once a week, by adding your coins with ours you have the ability to possibly stake 10 times a day allowing you to earn much more in the long term of things.

You will not necessarily "lose" any stake actually, you have to know the coins you are staking, coins have a max age/weight. Watching this will really tell you the best time to be opening your wallet Smiley Other wallets have a reward based on something totally different its really a matter of the coin and its staking mechanics (passive, competitive, compounding, flat rate) not so much the time elapsed between when you open and close your wallet.

Another thing you might want to mention, that i only learned lately, is that the price of altcoins often dont react on the price of bitcoin. So btc-dmd would most probably not adjust to a rising or falling bitcoin price. In theory it should, but it doesnt. So holding small altcoins mostly is like holding bitcoins on top. When bitcoins rise you will earn on top but when they drop you might make minus even though you stake or altcoin price is rising. Might happen.

Actually history has proven Altcoin prices are heavily impacted by the value of BTC. The value of bitcoin itself is not what impacts the altcoin markets its the sell offs of the alts to recoupe the losses people see in the value of BTC. As BTC drops people sell (lets say DMD) they will sell a portion of their DMD portfolio to recoupe the losses they took from BTC value decrease. Because of this the DMD/BTC value goes down. As BTC rises up the opposite would happen now people have a little extra value in BTC at which point they can take their profits and buy some DMD to earn a little interest on the profit they have earned and wait for the drop again. Values of coins have absolutely no impact on the crypto markets its the buys and sells that impact the markets and their values.

Though there are some coins you can use to secure yourself against the bitcoin price. Though those arent pos coins i believe.

POS coins will be the future, POW coins have a lot of flaws ahead of them in terms of userfriendlines, transaction times, difficulty rises, and mining efficiency, all of which will drastically impact the value of that coin. Look at right now for example, I can buy a new computer from crazyivan for 1 BTC it could take up to 2 hours for him to get the BTC with their transaction times (and dont quote any stats from blockchain.info i'll use real time experience not a biased chart that has misleading information) (EDIT: example I just sent 2 transactions 25 minutes ago, I sent one in bitcoin first "HIGH PRIORITY", to an investor requesting a fast withdraw, and one in Netcoin to our wallet, the funds from the Netcoin transaction have confirmed and are there, the BTC transaction has not had even 1 confirm in 25 minutes and its high priority) So from real user experience, it takes 30 minutes to 2 hours for an actual bitcoin transaction to go thru and be confirmed. Or I can send him 652 DMD for the computer and the transaction will be completed in less than 10 minutes. This is where adaptation comes in, who wants a coin that's going to take up to 2 hours to confirm when I can use one that takes less than 10 minutes.

How is using POS coins more beneficial to the seller than using POW coins? Well in our example, now crazyivan has 652 DMD he can break down into 3 blocks and put them in his wallet and he can actually earn a bit of extra profit on the coins he just accepted, if he puts his bitcoin in his wallet 3 weeks later he will still have 1 BTC. POS coins are a great utility for businesses actually as they can set their wallets up to stake and earn profits on the coins they accept after the sale of their products. This is something POW coins can not do.

So in conclusion if you accept a non POS coin and the value drops before you sell them off you take a chance of loosing some of your profit on the product you just sold, where as if you accept a POS coin and stake on those coins before you sell them off, if the value drops a little bit you may have earned enough in the staking to recoupe that dip in price and put you even farther up in profits even tho the price fell.
313  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] CLOUDMINR.IO 100k User celebration SALE, 0.76 BTC / THS on: July 06, 2015, 09:11:23 PM


ARE YOU SERIOUS HuhHuh

I have managed web servers for several *very* large companies....

If you even *think* a server may have been compromised, you tear it down, wipe and reformat the hard drives and build from scratch...


ALWAYS


Ahh yes but the problem is they were not hacked, just need to make it look that way, they are siting in thier beach house right now having conversations like this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjtLszt7MTo

HAHA OMG that video is to ang funny I was laughing so hard, its not funny that people get scammed but the honesty in the video is the best I have seen in a while.
314  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] CLOUDMINR.IO 100k User celebration SALE, 0.76 BTC / THS on: July 06, 2015, 01:59:59 PM
Hello!

We will have to stop accepting new orders until a new version of CLOUDMINR.IO is made from scratch. Our developers have estimated that it may take 2 - 3 weeks.

What we can tell now is that we have been hacked, and the hackers were able to access our source code and database, as well as editing it. Right now we cannot be sure that the payout addresses are the correct ones, as well as emails and other data. We do have backups but we need to know when exactly when the hackers gained access to our server.

Part of the bitcoins went to hackers addresses instead of our own payment addresses. Currently we are looking for any logs related to the hack and estimating the losses.

We need to create a new website from scratch on new servers as hackers usually leave backdoors for later access.

Stay tuned. The website should appear blank with a similar warning text to this announcement soon. If it's changed, please do not trust it.

I call bullshit on all 3 accounts in bold above

Number 1 my payout address is still the same thus still pulling the information from the database.

Number 2 if you backed up your system you wont need to create one from scratch you can just get new servers and like windows do a restor point to right before the hackers gained access then audit the remaining accounts and bring back up to speed. Oh dont worry once you restore the site those missing funds and hashrates will gladly notify you by support ticket.

Number 3 so let me get this straight hackers got into your server, you deleted everything becasue a blank page is "should" appear with a warning message, but as I just went there all the information is current and correct and my account is still mining. So the "hackers" were nice enough to hack your servers create an exact replica backup without adding their payout address in mines place right. FYI call them and ask them for the backup they are using because it seems quite accurate.

I am so sorry to those of you who have lost double and triple digits in BTC here especially since the price is going up. Heck Im sory for anyone who lost even 100,000 satoshi here. Maybe we will see a new side of cloud mining and cloudminr.io will be the first ones to come out of an authentic hack situation and get back up and running. unfortunately judging by the post of thiers I quoted backed by the common sense I put together I fear this may not happen.

To cloudminr, if you did get hacked and you really are as ignorant as your post above espouses, good luck putting it back together, if you were not hacked and you just scammed again, thanks a lot for not being a leader in the industry.

315  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockchain split of 4 July 2015 on: July 04, 2015, 06:54:46 PM
Where are you guys getting this 4th of July date from?

https://bitcoin.org/en/alert/2015-07-04-spv-mining

oops someone beat me to it,

however to sum it up in a sarcastic way we got the info by completely reading the whole OP including his edits and reading the links he provided.
316  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Cryptsy on: June 25, 2015, 04:36:23 AM
Thought we should update some info about Cryptsy. I have been here for a while and have a nice 14 day trading volume there so dont think I am some 14 day 0.035 BTC volume trader there.

Their bottlecaps wallet, they are doing something weird with this wallet, you process a transaction to send 10,000 CAPS to your wallet and you get only 5,000, thus having to send another transaction. But if you process a transaction for the remaining 5000 CAPS you will only get 1200 to 2500. So once all the coins finally get to your wallet you have to recombine the block costing you more in transaction fees. Why is this crappy, well you now have paid 5 transaction fees for the 1 withdraw you originally processed. How has cryptsy accepted responsibility for this?

Thank you for contacting Cryptsy.

I apologize for having this issue. The remaining amount was returned to your account.

I do apologize the reason the withdrawal is being chopped is due to a large build up of inputs from all the transactions
in the wallet which become to large to fit into the block chain so it chops the withdrawal to a size where it will fit into the block chain.
I have alerted our wallet specialist who will merge inputs to help larger withdrawals process.

Thank you for your patience as he works on merging inputs.

EDIT: I just researched the most recent transaction that was split in half,

Inputs and Outputs   
Total Input (7)   0.000000 CAP
Total Output (2)   5,113.957771 CAP

You will notice the date on that response? well guess what it is happening again today and yesterday and it happened 2 days ago as well. It seems they keep making the same mistake over and over again, and it is costing their customers in fees. Just so you know 3 transaction fees are not so expensive, but myself had a day when i was trying to move a substantial amount of Bottlecaps and it cost me over 52 transaction fees to get the job done.

I have to wonder if they are actually staking on their bottlecaps wallets because the excuse they have given (blaming the blockchain is a common occurrence for Cryptsy) their excuse just does not make sense to me.

Next situation, we have had times where their hot wallets are not monitored good enough and it takes 12 to 24 hours to process a withdraw. We missed 3 stakes on 1.6BTC worth of Netcoins because their hotwallets were empty. How did cryptsy accept responsibility, they claimed their hot wallet was not full and their cold wallet was not synced in because it is offline and not updated until it is needed to be opened and the coins can be sent to the hot wallets. Awesome I accepted that excuse however just 5 days later the same exact thing happened again costing us another 3 stakes on a withdraw, and it took longer to get my coins. Now explain how just 5 days ago they synced the cold wallet and this time it took longer to get the coins from the cold wallets to the hot wallets.

Another case of the same mistake happening over and over.

I have a Starcoin deposit that has hit their wallets the ticket is over 4 months old and also they already have the coins but they will not give my account the credit for it. its on the blockchain, its in their wallet I gave them the proof and nothing is happening on their end.

The bottom line about cryptsy, is over time they are going to cost you money on top of the trading fees you pay them. You are just another support ticket to them and it does not matter what your problem is the blockchain is always to blame. They do not accept responsibility for thier human errors. There certainly seems to be some fishy things happening on the backend in these wallets, and being straight forward with you and just telling the truth is not something they are willing to do.

For low volume altcoin traders trade with caution, imagine if all you had in your portfolio was Starcoins look where my deposit is, been stuck for 4 months. If this would be a new user whose complete BTC was invested in those starcoins he would be out of commission for 4 months now waiting for cryptsy to credit his account so he can get paid. So be careful if you are a small time altcoin trader, you can get stuck with no way to get your coins if its on the wrong market at the wrong time. And they will just ignore your tickets.

The biggest problem with cryptsy they do not accept responsibility for their human error mistakes or neglect and because of this they have no ambition to make sure the mistakes do not keep happening over and over, so what we have is the same problems happening over and over and over, and the total lack of accepting responsibility for thier actions.
317  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Which Bitcoin Exchange do you use and why ? on: June 25, 2015, 04:30:00 AM
Same problem again today with cryptsy. bottlecaps wallet sending 1/4 of what i request.
318  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Withdraw/verification on cryptsy on: June 24, 2015, 04:53:05 AM

No help from BitJohn

You wont get help I have a support ticket that is 14 days old about thier SMS 2FA lagging and sending the codes literally HOURS after I have asked for them, it kept me from logging in, kept me from making withdraws and it was their lagged system or their authy apps lagged system causing the problems. I tested my number with the other services I used before i even submitted a ticket to make sure it was not on my end. The original ticket was submitted 14 days ago and the last response form cryptsy was 8 days ago. They have a problem in their authentication service and refuse to accept its their problem.
319  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Which Bitcoin Exchange do you use and why ? on: June 24, 2015, 03:38:36 AM
Use Cryptsy we just celebrated our 3rd Birthday, and still going strong! You can buy numerous altcoins as well as Bitcoin.

Lets do a little info about Cryptsy. I have been here for a while and have a nice 14 day trading volume there so dont think I am some 14 day 0.035 BTC volume trader there.

Their bottlecaps wallet, they are doing something weird with this wallet, you process a transaction to send 10,000 CAPS to your wallet and you get only 5,000, thus having to send another transaction. But if you process a transaction for the remaining 5000 CAPS you will only get 1200 to 2500. So once all the coins finally get to your wallet you have to recombine the block costing you more in transaction fees. Why is this crappy, well you now have paid 5 transaction fees for the 1 withdraw you originally processed. How has cryptsy accepted responsibility for this?

Thank you for contacting Cryptsy.

I apologize for having this issue. The remaining amount was returned to your account.

I do apologize the reason the withdrawal is being chopped is due to a large build up of inputs from all the transactions
in the wallet which become to large to fit into the block chain so it chops the withdrawal to a size where it will fit into the block chain.
I have alerted our wallet specialist who will merge inputs to help larger withdrawals process.

Thank you for your patience as he works on merging inputs.

EDIT: I just researched the most recent transaction that was split in half,

Inputs and Outputs   
Total Input (7)   0.000000 CAP
Total Output (2)   5,113.957771 CAP

You will notice the date on that response? well guess what it is happening again today and it happened 2 days ago as well. It seems they keep making the same mistake over and over again, and it is costing their customers in fees. Just so youknow 3 transaction fees are not so expensive, but myself had a day when i was trying to move a substantial amount of Bottlecaps and it cost me over 52 transaction fees to get the job done.

I have to wonder if they are actually staking on their bottlecaps wallets because the excuse they have given (blaming the blockchain is a common occurrence for Cryptsy) their excuse just does not make sense to me.

Next situation, we have had times where their hot wallets are not monitored good enough and it takes 12 to 24 hours to process a withdraw. We missed 3 stakes on 1.6BTC worth of Netcoins because their hotwallets were empty. How did cryptsy accept responsibility, they claimed their hot wallet was not full and their cold wallet was not synced in because it is offline and not updated until it is needed to be opened and the coins can be sent to the hot wallets. Awesome I accepted that excuse however just 5 days later the same exact thing happened again costing us another 3 stakes on a withdraw, and it took longer to get my coins. Now explain how just 5 days ago they synced the cold wallet and this time it took longer to get the coins from the cold wallets to the hot wallets.

Another case of the same mistake happening over and over.

I have a Starcoin deposit that has hit their wallets the ticket is over 4 months old and also they already have the coins but they will not give my account the credit for it. its on the blockchain, its in their wallet I gave them the proof and nothing is happening on their end.

The bottom line about cryptsy, is over time they are going to cost you money on top of the trading fees you pay them. You are just another support ticket to them and it does not matter what your problem is the blockchain is always to blame. They do not accept responsibility for thier human errors. There certainly seems to be some fishy things happening on the backend in these wallets, and being straight forward with you and just telling the truth is not something they are willing to do.

For low volume altcoin traders trade with caution, imagine if all you had in your portfolio was Starcoins look where my deposit is, been stuck for 4 months. If this would be a new user whose complete BTC was invested in those starcoins he would be out of commission for 4 months now waiting for cryptsy to credit his account so he can get paid. So be careful if you are a small time altcoin trader, you can get stuck with no way to get your coins if its on the wrong market at the wrong time. And they will just ignore your tickets.

The biggest problem with cryptsy they do not accept responsibility for their human error mistakes or neglect and because of this they have no ambition to make sure the mistakes do not keep happening over and over, so what we have is the same problems happening over and over and over, and the total lack of accepting responsibility for thier actions.
320  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining on: June 20, 2015, 07:37:12 PM


Every one of your posts is a novel, your signature is a bright red ad for another mining scam, and you still participate in Cloudminr.io. If I'm grasping for attention, you're fighting and clawing for it, and a scam is a scam is a scam.

No wonder you no longer work with s0br, you clearly do not understand business. Your post just "reeks" of uneducated/unresearched nonsense. I can go on and answer all your accusational slanderous attempts and questions, which  by the way have explanations and reasons, like why Bitbean is one of the coins we use, why it is not represented on the site, how little you know and understand POS coins, why we have ads on the website, when and why my cloudminr account was started and why its still there. (FYI I also have an eobot account, am a member of handful of mining pools, I have a website full of faucet referral links, I have a couple facebook groups and the list of crypto things I am involved in goes on). About my novel sized posts, One thing is for sure no one can complain they dont get enough information from me huh. But either way, I am not your teacher here to educate you on the proper ways to evaluate something before calling it a scam, nor the correct way to assess your competitors.

For the last time, stop being childish and STAY ON TOPIC, this is not a cyberpinoy thread nor a stakeminers thread its a Scrypt.cc thread, lets talk about them for a while now.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!