I hope they will stake instead

Source code will be better on github instead of mega i think

why x2 ? it's only 4.57 btc on yobit and 1 btc to cryptopia to go to the moon 

Nice idea, count me on 

Can you request http://coinofview.com/coin/IncaKoin.html too

It seem there are in v1.2.0 too ( "Our node Sub-version: IncaKoin: 1.2.0 Version: v1.2.0.0-Beta" in the page )

thanks

Order placed to buy 11432 Amber @3004sat on Cryptopia exchange if you want.  


----


Thanks AmberCoinDev for the news

Oh it's unlock for minting only, good

No they are not (at this time) https://www.payservices.com/currency.php?type=&q=inca#

Look like their wallet in now updated to v1.3 ( good )

PoS change 9%/5weeks voted few month ago and some fixs

Just a reminder : It's important to have our/yours wallets updated to v1.3 before the 5/5 (in 4 days)

As i see there are still few wallets running in v1.2 and the very old v1.0.0.2 

woot nice weight 

OK i havent played/restored the old wallet.dat, i just waited , seat and see and i got a stake from my old addy then it's only a minor display bug at the stake age in the curent wallet.

a yay now will double the community coins i think ?
a yay after the 5/5 will give 9% each five weeks.

i have no nay and no yay to say and i will be ok with a yay or with a nay.

my first thoughts are yay now to double if you think it's better for all of us, for newcomers, for incakoin community and if you have plans for them but nay after
my second thoughrs is nay now but yay after 5/5 if you have plan with the 9% earned each 5 weeks.

But as i say i'm ok with any 'yay' or 'nay'  

Damn what did you dont understand and why you got fired on me ?

I'm not the dev lol and i have'nt purpose a swap, or a change or anything, i only give my opinion on what the dev purpose because i dont agree all what he purpose.



And yes we need some services, and i would like to make some (i buyed several incakoin since october, i host a node, i rent on 3rd partie another node, and i rent a server since february to make from scratch some service for incakoin) but first we need to have a wallet and deamon working correctly because this old source is not good if we want service working like a charm.

For me a swap to have :

- A new and light blockchain,
- A recent source code
- Few ajust change like 1 min block time instead of 30s block time.

is OK and in this case, Incakoin can stay Incakoin

But a swap where our wallets are divised by 1000 while PoW is only divised by 2 (25 coins per min instead of 30s.) is NOT OK.

I Love Node, I Like Coins, i Will Be in Edon

Your concept is very good

If you can, make an IRC chan (with a irc<->slack relay)

Watching...

I think, you dont understand me.

Since the dev create a coin and blockchain, it's better that's he take another name like "Voyager coin" or another one for the coin instead of taking "incakoin" too

that's why i'm saying it's the worst option voting "incakoin" as coin name.

Please keep calm, i'm just saying my opinion.

All opinions are good as long as their are polite and respect others.

A swap to a new blockchain and new coin name is like you want (i think, perhaps i'm wrong?, because it's not a real swap, it's just an exchange). The dev go to a newcoin and people who want to go with him can exchange their incakoins to the new coins while others who dont want can stay with their incakoins and wait for a new dev.

Perhaps i'm wrong ? but that's i was thinking and that's why i prefer the dev go to a new coin name instead of keeping the incakoin name.

Perhaps it's better to call that "an exchange program" instead of "a swap"

That's the worst option i think
A swap to a new blockchain, and a new brand name leave the old incakoin alive for people who dont want to swap as long there is nodes and wallets for it and give for the new coin a real new start

Now if some peoples dont want to swap, and would like to keep the old inakoin alive thats will sound bad for them with the same name.

But perhaps all of us want to swap (in this case,no problem)

Anyway i will swap