I'd guess the opposite. I suspect that Trump will actually do quite well with both African Americans and Latinos over age 40-ish. That's my guess as well. Trump seems to be quite weak among the younger voters (i.e the most heavily brainwashed ones). According to the past opinion polls, he is doing quite well among the middle-aged and the elderly. Also, there is a significant gender gap. Males prefer him by a wide margin, when compared to the females. Another old folk confusing brainwashing with ideals  You're trully a pitiful personn aren't you? And maybe females don't really like him because he's sexist as fuck? That could be an explanation no? |
|
|
|
What your study "proves" is that hispannics are a younger population. What's wrong with that?
Nothing wrong if they were all legal immigrants. Out of the 55 million Latinos, some 12 million are illegal aliens, and a similar number is consisted of anchor babies. Those who took the legal route only compose around half of the population. And worse, they are sucking the state coffers dry by over-exploiting the welfare system. I keep reading this shit about exploiting welfare system... But please explain me how you benefit welfare without American Nationality? They say the same dumb shit about welfare exploitation in Europe. But you don't get shit if you're an illegal migrant! |
|
|
|
Seems like you're not. This why you shouldn't talk about things you don't have a clue about. "Our studies show that globally, volcanoes on land and under the sea release a total of about 200 million tonnes of CO2 annually. " http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/archive/2007/07_02_15.htmlthe global fossil fuel CO2 emissions for 2003 tipped the scales at 26.8 billion tonnes It means it would take 1000 years of eruption to compensate one year of human made CO2. But please, continue to show us how educated you are. So you you are telling me that they are accurately gauging every volcano on Earth including on land and under the ocean when they are only actually studying a handful of volcanoes? One of the rules in science is you need to have an appropriate sample size in order to get any kind of reasonable estimate, and they have neither. Try again comrade.They have the exact number and size of volcanoes on earth. Then they studied a volcano. Then they just made an estimation of the CO2 emited by the whole volcanoes. What's so hard to understand? Of course they're not precise! They can't be! But you're arguing they're wrong by a 10 000 order? ^^ Oh and btw I'm not your comrade, you surely don't deserve my friendship  No, they don't know the exact number of volcanoes on Earth, that is an asinine statement. Sorry they know the exact number of eruptive volcanoes of the past 70 years, but as an eruptive volcano releases more than 500 times the amount of CO2 the not eruptive one release, unless there is more than 5000 times more unerupting volcanoes than eruptive ones it's enough to make an excellent estimation. They also don't even know the exact emissions from the very small handful of volcanoes they actually do test. They take small samples and estimate. When making estimations based on a very small data set within a very small number of actual volcanoes, the estimates will be nowhere near accurate.
Where do you take that from? They simply estimate the amount of CO2 released on average by active volcanoes everyday since 2011! How is that not precise? And I answered you above concerning the number of volcanoes. You even said yourself they can't be precise yet you are pretending the estimates are magically accurate some how in the same breath.
Nothing is precise in science. Everything has some kind of innacuracy that's the very point of Quantum Physics. Difference is you're actually claiming they're not wrong, but wrong by an order of magnitude of more than 10 000. That's how wrong they should be in order to make your claim true (claim that you absolutely didn't prove btw). P.S. I was not offering you my friendship, I was just addressing you as the communist you are.
I'm no more communist that you're "educated". It's not because your limited brain can only separate the world into two parts, the red evil communists and the blue good capitalists that the world is actually divided that way |
|
|
|
Is that how Americans always do things? When they're short on arguments they just insult their opponents?
Well, seems it's a win for me then.
Opponent? I am not your opponent. Hmm... Maybe you have a better word for it? What do you call someone with who you disagree in an argument? In French it's the same word for this and a person you actually fight barehand so I might have been mistaken ^^ None of those apply to us. I am not your enemy, more like your therapist... Well I might consider you as an enemy. But I've got numerous so there is only low relevance in this. Take whatever word you wish though. A simple way of putting things would be: You're just a brainwashed idiot unable to construct a logical reasoning who will prefer insulting others once he gets no argument ^^ |
|
|
|
I could heavily discuss such statement. I see no "success story" in the USA, rather the contrary. It's probably the saddest and most unfortunate story of our time. But the main point of my remark was to explain this thread is not about discussing capitalism, so I won't go further. Want to discuss the benefits of capitalism? Open a new thread. You're claiming that there is something better than capitalism and there's not. That's the point. The USA simply proves that true capitalism works for everyone, there is nothing sad or unfortunate about that. What is a problem are all the leftists trying to undermine the USA for their own gain...which is another topic. Capitalism works for everyone? I think this link is enough to prove how wrong and biased you are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_StatesIt's exactly what I said... You said as "wealth" grows, which implies that everyone with money naturally gets richer with the passage of time and that is not the case. Money must be added as the population grows to minimize price volatility. Has nothing to do with wealth accumulation. Wealth grows as population grow and technological progress grows. I was talking about the global wealth concerned by the currency, not about the wealth of one perticuliar citizen. Fine, and where the money of your job comes from? Let's say a company. The company gets money through customer who gets money through jobs etc... But at the end of the day, there is someone somewhere who borrowed the money to a bank. That's my point. You can start a business yourself, and hire employees as you are able to afford them. Banks came into existence as a means for people to save (store) their money, not as a source of new money. And this money will come from banks and banks will earn interest on it! Besides, if you do the math:
$100,000 loan @ 12% Interest = -$112,000 @ Loan Maturity
That is $12,000 leaving the economy and heading back to the bank, so even if another loan is made by a bank it always results in money being removed not added.
That's here that you're making a mistake. Don't consider one loan. Consider the whole amount of money. Banks earn interest on every penny. It means the world is endebted to them of more than the total amount of money. Which means there is NO OTHER SOLUTION than to create money simply in order to repay the interests to the banks...
What you are describing is a corrupt political system that uses banks to siphon wealth away from citizens as a type of stealth tax - and that is not the proper role of banks in society. That's what happens when people who should be in jail are instead elected to political office.
Nope, again as I said it is mathematically impossible to get rid of the necessity of creating money simply to pay back the banks. THough without a fucking corrupted government we could greatly reduce the gap to the point that it doesn't really matter I agree on that! It seems just a closed system where banks get everything in the end. Basically, with fiat, we're screwed.
That's only the case when citizens cede too much authority over the economy to the government, i.e. socialism or communism. Once economic liberty is quashed, everything else follows. People buy into the false notion that allowing more regulation to happen will make the economy "safe and fair". Well, it won't. Peoples' sense of fairness is distorted when they begin thinking that they are entitled to have the kind of success that only some people realize. Having equality of opportunity does not mean equality of outcome. I don't think you understand my point though...
I'll try to simplify it so you can understand it.
Banks inject money into the society. How? By giving out loans. That's the only way it is done. Which means they earn interest on anything... That's all I'm saying. That's where the problem is...
But the problem isn't the banks themselves; it's the politicians creating regulation and policy that control how the banks interact with citizens. Maybe you support socialism and therefore are unwilling to admit that big, all-powerful governments are the root of all human social problems...but that is the simple truth. Only a blind man would say that governments as they are now aren't the root of 90% of our problems. 100% of them are coming from gov, banks and companies associations. Being a socialist doesn't mean not understanding this, socialism and communism ARE NOT linked to governments contrary to what every capitalist believes. But you're placing far too much faith in an "open economy". It won't change this simple facts: Money is created Money is distributed by the banks ONLY Banks earn interest on the money distributed More money needs to be created to pay for the interests the world owe the banks. This is the base of tha banking system. With or without a government or regulation. Imagine we get rid of every single regulation and government, what will it change about the banking system? |
|
|
|
... I can't give you my work as I never had the rax data. What you gave me (a few hundreds of posts earlier) were plots of raw data not the numerical data. But I can give you a work the worldwide wommunity consideres as rather reliable: http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/The tables of raw data were linked to. However, regardless - they are readily available through your friend Google. So apparently you just want to SAY you refute it. You don't want to actually refute it with simple 8th grade math?
a work the worldwide wommunityIndeed, the WOMMUNITY? Again, easier to point and laugh at a typo than to actually debate. And you're making (again and again) an incredible logical fallacy here. You're making a claim saying work done by NASA is false. THe burden of proof is on your shoulders not mine. If it's simple 8th grade math (I got no idea what that means I don't know what 8th grade is ^^) then just destroy Nasa results and show us your work. |
|
|
|
Full Event: Donald Trump Speaks on Foreign Policy in Washington, DC TRUMP at 34:15. - April 27, 2016 - Thank you for the opportunity to speak to you, and thank you to the Center for the National Interest for honoring me with this invitation. I would like to talk today about how to develop a new foreign policy direction for our country – one that replaces randomness with purpose, ideology with strategy, and chaos with peace. It is time to shake the rust off of America’s foreign policy. It's time to invite new voices and new visions into the fold. The direction I will outline today will also return us to a timeless principle. My foreign policy will always put the interests of the American people, and American security, above all else. That will be the foundation of every decision that I will make. America First will be the major and overriding theme of my administration. But to chart our path forward, we must first briefly look back. We have a lot to be proud of. In the 1940s we saved the world. The Greatest Generation beat back the Nazis and the Japanese Imperialists.
Then we saved the world again, this time from totalitarian Communism. The Cold War lasted for decades, but we won.
Is that what you actually learn in school? Oo Is that really the "official history" of the USA? Well, no surprise you're this way if you get "educated" by learning such things... I feel a bit sad for you, you've got all my compassion! |
|
|
|
Full Event: Donald Trump Speaks on Foreign Policy in Washington, DC TRUMP at 34:15. After watching this I now know he is not anti-establishment. Nooooooooooooooo? You means that this greedy and selfsufficient billonaire is part of the banks/companies/government corruption scheme? xD |
|
|
|
Hmm... And what is your excuse for your ignorance? that education is a weakness too? someone with paid to post nonsense in his sig calling someone who makes 1k+ a day autopilot on amazon dumb, how do i even respond to that Two big mistakes you're making here: 1/ Ignorance has nothing to do with being intelligent or dumb. Those two things might be related on the long term but it's far from being the same thing. 2/ Making a huge amount of money has nothing to do with being intelligent, though I'm very happy for you if you make more than 35k$ everymonth without working  And being paid to post is just a little bonus as it's a real pleasur to expose your ignorance and your limited capacities to logically reason ^^ |
|
|
|
Pointing out a typo rather than answering the question, that's so like you Wilikon It was a typo when you said you were French. typo: a mistake (such as a misspelled word) in typed or printed text—typo in a sentence. Example: Exapmle Or Louis XIV rather than Louis XVI |
|
|
|
Lel climate nasa!  Hmm... Because confusing blog article willingly misinterpreting scientific articles is a better source than the NASA? You know the guys that actually sent us on the moon...? Only Americans...  Us referring to humanity, if you want to be precise, only a very tiny part of the population were sent to the moon All of them Made in USA Perfectly true! The only 12 men who walked the moon were Americans! |
|
|
|
Is that how Americans always do things? When they're short on arguments they just insult their opponents?
Well, seems it's a win for me then.
Opponent? I am not your opponent. Hmm... Maybe you have a better word for it? What do you call someone with who you disagree in an argument? In French it's the same word for this and a person you actually fight barehand so I might have been mistaken ^^ |
|
|
|
Sorry I take back everything I said, I forgot you actually believe that intelligence is linked to the "bloodlines" as you say. With such hypothesis, you can't consider evidences like reality ^^ So if there are mixed bloodlines it's no longer a "negro civilizations"? So the Zulu weren't a developed population neither I guess. Hey it's funny though! Could you give a "white civilization" then? And I never wrote such thing you interprete it. All I say is that the origin of those conflicts find their roots in our previous conflicts and colonization. Doesn't seem too hard to understand no? |
|
|
|
Pointing out a typo rather than answering the question, that's so like you Wilikon |
|
|
|
Lel climate nasa! Hmm... Because confusing blog article willingly misinterpreting scientific articles is a better source than the NASA? You know the guys that actually sent us on the moon...? Only Americans... Us referring to humanity, if you want to be precise, only a very tiny part of the population were sent to the moon |
|
|
|
Lel climate nasa! Hmm... Because confusing blog article willingly misinterpreting scientific articles is a better source than the NASA? You know the guys that actually sent us on the moon... |
|
|
|
"Off NATO? And pay for their own army? Why? Europe can save money and use it to buy more Big Macs and more iPhones and surf even more often on Facebook instead, see?"
So that's what The Great America brought to the world? Useless social network spying on us, fastfood responsible for both malnutrition and obesity, and ridiculously over expensive devices that are neither innovative or necessary but simply get sold every year through agressive edvertising? Whaou I'm so glad we sent Lafayette to free you xD That was probably the biggest mistake of Louis XIV :/ |
|
|
|
Europe needs to stop being free loading whining little leaches and get off NATO if they really want president TRUMP to take them seriously.
"Off NATO? And pay for their own army? Why? Europe can save money and use it to buy more Big Macs and more iPhones and surf even more often on Facebook instead, see?"
Yeah.. I see.
Trust me there is nothing we wish more than to get out of this stupid "alliance" Man how can you even call that an alliance? USA is the worst plague of this world! We pay far too much for their army while we absolutely don't need it! And when they come to "help" us like they did before, the price is so high we could actually wonder if we wouldn't be better under the 3rd Reich xD |
|
|
|
But you agree on the fact that they have the right to chose what they want to do with it?
it is of no consequence to me Yeah sure xD Then if you agree they should have independance you understand that the multiple implication of CIA in south America to maintain pro US dictatorships are the exact reason why those countries have trouble developping themselves? Well that's already a really small part of the world you're talking about here, but I suppose you want to forget the incredible Mali empire then?
arabs No, Mali Empire was exactly in the center of Africa... They were not arabs... They were exactly what you call "niggers"... Ignorance is really your motto isn't it? Hmm... Maybe because they're the only one alive?
Who would you see who did the same things as Europeans and Americans? Nobody did the same thing.
muslims killed 100 million people during their conquests and maintain slavery to this day Lol! And they're not blamed for this? xD Are you even aware about the bombs we're currently dropping on them? |
|
|
|
Like the very notion of empathy, which is the only thing that differs us from animals?
And you let your brain away too, with the culture and the education ^^
Socialist here, though after some times on this forum I feel like people (at least Americans) clearly don't deserve socialism.
empathy is too often brought out as an excuse for weakness and cowardice, the world could do with less of it Hmm... And what is your excuse for your ignorance? that education is a weakness too? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
