Looking at this image and the quoted contents - I do not think cloudfare do much against bots. They only put some limits. May be these bots are designed having these limits in mind.
As someone who works for a gambling site with a faucet, I can tell you that Cloudflare provides no protection against botnets whatsoever. The evil IP system and captcha won't help either as these guys have access to massive pools of IP addresses and captcha solvers. |
|
|
|
Is there a waiting list for the campaign? I see many people applying even there are no free slots for now.
There's no waiting list. If people are applying it is usually because they didn't read the title that says [FULL] or occasionally because they are applying under the 'very trusted person' exception stated in the OP. |
|
|
|
We could do a new post for merit on fit to talk
When is the forum going to move away from merit discussions? Are we going to have an anniversary around it. This is already boring. When it has been in place so long everyone has forgotten what it was like before. That's pretty much what happened when Activity was first introduced or any other major change over the years. If you find it boring you can simply ignore the threads about it. There's nothing quite as boring as someone only joining a thread to say it is about a subject they are not interested in. |
|
|
|
TheQuin is doing a fine job, countering the trolls posts.  Thanks for the vote of confidence. I'll ignore most of his verbal diarrhoea (especially when he breaks forum rule 22 and talks about his service) and just correct the outright lies and most moronic mistakes. |
|
|
|
TheQuin, why feed the troll?  He is just promoting his forum signature. Yeah, I know, but it's important to point it out when he tells lies or just says things that are factually incorrect. He doesn't have the normal decency to go back and edit his mistakes using strikethrough and adding a correction. Like when he lied completely about the provably fair mechanism in our lottery. So I'll just keep pointing out that he's been wrong about almost everything he has said. |
|
|
|
Instead of transering sMerits, why not just ask the person you want to send them to for a list of posts, and Merit them directly? I've made that suggestion, but haven't done it yet. I think that just adds extra work for both the merit source and the person nominating posts. Being able to delegate to someone you trust to make good decisions is beneficial in making systems more efficient and decentralised. |
|
|
|
~
I refer you to my previous answer. Basing your opinions on such a fundamental misunderstanding of how gambling works is bound to make you draw incorrect conclusions. That's why everyone here gave up answering you. You're just the village idiot sat in the corner talking to himself. |
|
|
|
Is this even possible to abuse the faucet until this big hit? Wondering if it is able to withdraw all of it? Since it comes from the faucet then there must be a condition where he should be able to withdraw it.
They just use botnets to sign up thousands of accounts and just keep trying to hit a multiplier big enough to withdraw. Sites use different ways of combatting that, some block withdrawals if they haven't deposited, Bustadice has gone for simply removing the faucet. |
|
|
|
This numbers are just crazy and the contest is still going for 3 more weeks! There are some big gamblers on the site who are risking huge amounts. Based on the success on this contest, I think we will see this more often in the future . We always have a number of big gamblers coming to the site. Just like at every other gambling site they tend to just show up every now and then. The stats are always down for the July 4th holiday so we're really pleased with how much they picked up later in the week. That made higher roller volume higher than normal. Someone earlier was calculating the potential profit from the top 10 being more than the prize pool but that misses the point, to be successful it needs to be calculated from the increase in wagering, not the total.
I think~
Nobody cares what the moron who doesn't even understand the difference between total wagered and risked thinks. |
|
|
|
The noscript is not the issue, i had try in other browser without noscript and i got the same result.
I did just sent an e-mail to the support.
Also, this is not the first time when i use this mixer, i had been using it since months without problems.
Anyone else used the miner in the last few hours?
It's best just to wait for support to get back to you. This was the outcome the last times this happened: Sorry about that. Our bitcoind got stuck. Please check again - it should be solved already. the last time (in January) when the same thing happened, he came to forum and fixed it in less than a day I confirm - this is the same issue as in January. We will need to investigate this more. |
|
|
|
A 27 win streak would be really good still if anyone actually manages to get it without a large amount of gambling in order just to find that pattern.
How are you going to have 27 win streak? I do not think you can get that easily eventhough you have 1.1x payout. May be using 1.01 payout you will get it for sure but if lose once it will be a losing hard. Your next bet can't even recover your losing anyway and this strategy can't be used. It is not a profitable martingale as I can say. And btw about the pattern, is there anything like that? This is gambling site which is has many variances, hard to get the prediction as well I posted this back on the last page: That's a link to documented evidence of someone getting a 30 winning streak on 2x. The best I've done is 20. |
|
|
|
I would wager that its probably just a hacker wasting away his haul. Dude is just plain retarded to risk 60+btc for a measly 15k (10 wagerer and 5k for the referers).
Wagered amount != risked amount. People roll over the same coin many times. Wagered amount is almost always many times higher than risked or deposited amount. Do you have to keep making a fool of yourself by talking about things you don't understand?
Edit: After only one week the contest is going much better than I expected. Wagering usually picks up on the 4x and 5x reward point weekends so there could be a lot more to come. We're thinking we might do it again next month.  |
|
|
|
is the site down guy?
Nope. |
|
|
|
Magnificent how a whale can change your life, if you have one as a referral. The User 712628 is one of User 654092's referrals, because the wager amount is exactly the same. So if this was the same user with 2 accounts that are linked by the referral system, then he/she is winning both the competition prizes. $10 000 for the Wagering Contest and $5000 for the Referral Contest. Funny thing is, he or she still get the 0.40% referral commission from the referral system too. <roughly $2000> on that amount.  Those accounts are old ones as well. I doubt this is the first time this whale a made big bets. They haven't stopped either as that wagered amount keeps rising. Maybe they are going for a free iPhone 7 Plus as well. They've already earned 13,466,800 Reward Points so far. Edit: I forgot that it's the weekend so there are 3x reward points, they're probably there by now. |
|
|
|
Would this work?
Selected, or all merit sources have a button to award dMerits, as well as one for sMerits, Awarded dMerits are taken from their sMerit stock. There is a list of authorised receivers of dMerits. This list is made public, and dMerit awards are also published. dMerit activity can be analysed, and the community can report any abuses. The dMerit awarder would need to ensure that he does not make awards to unauthorised recipients.
This would fit into the current merit structure, but Theymos will need to comment on the software changes involved.
That would be an excellent enhancement to the system. Delegation is the key to managing any large organisation and that principle would work equally well here. There's obviously too much work being done by too few sources at the moment and if theymos can't identify enough suitable candidates then delegating that to the existing sources in this way is an ideal solution. |
|
|
|
The point is to alert other players that this site is run by thieves.
You know now and so will everyone who reads this.
Stay away from Crypto-Games.
They hijack and steal your funds
If that's the point you are failing miserably. All you are doing is alerting everyone to the fact that you tried to cheat the site by multi-accounting. |
|
|
|
TheQuin, has the slow transaction fee been raised? It's been at 200 satoshis for hours and there's less than 1k unconfirmed trx on the blockchain.
Not that I know of, I've asked wetsuit to let me know for sure. The last slow withdrawal we processed was sent with a fee of 5 sat/byte which would make that about right. https://btc.com/ec33f7bcabc4bbfd76e1aa5127b8c07c4c507bf69f8c1f11a211bd3cb76a6a49I think it's just the way the fee estimator works in Core. Thanks for the info! I appreciate the transparency and helpfulness, unlike some people around here... lol I've heard back from wetsuit. He has increased the fee we pay as we were having backlogs over the last few days when transactions were taking over 12 hours to confirm. We got so many complaints it is better to use a higher fee. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
