Price goes up then everyone jumps on the "to the moon" club.
Price dumps then everyone jumps on the "buy the dip, buy now or regret it, never be this cheap again" club
Well sure, when you say it like that, it doesn't sound very good. But the reality is that in this crazy Bitcoin world, that has been a winning strategy. Funny. |
|
|
|
ha luvin it http://Bitcoin.org just removed/censored the 2 largest US Bitcoin companies (@BitPay Payment processing and @coinbase Bitcoin Exchange). It’s a good move: Bitcoin Core is obviously no longer Bitcoin, and should ideally be removed from both @BitPay and @coinbase too. https://twitter.com/olivierjanss/status/1005073093541482496did he tweet wrong gets better Paavo Coin @PaavoCoin Jun 8 Replying to @olivierjanss @BitPay @coinbase Both BitPay and Coinbase would probably like to remove BTC. For some reason they are not doing it. Eli Afram @justicemate Jun 8 More Replying to @olivierjanss @BitPay @coinbase These guys are hell bent on alienating every single entity they disagree with. So much so, that they will end up in self inflicted isolation. Since when has bitcoin been about anti completion? Since when was bitcoin about censorship? Core know nothing about Bitcoin . |
|
|
|
Ordinary paper in many cases won't last 25 years, let alone 100. Careful with those keys.
Hm, how come we have libraries instead of piles of disintegrated paper? Indeed. Library Of Congress is continually researching text preservation media. They still have not come up with anything better to last the millennia. |
|
|
|
 HUZZA!!!!! (This fucking sites image system. ikr? It used to Just Plain Work. Now 50% of the images can't be seen without pulling the URL and navigating directly. WTF, theymos? |
|
|
|
$7100 area, let's see how $7000 holds.
That observation aged poorly. To quote Bob: Sheeeit!Oh well, at least it's an opportunity to scrape up some cheap coinz. I mean not really, I was saying let's see how it holds, it just didn't hold well. Yeah, I got that. I was just venting some gallows humor. |
|
|
|
$7100 area, let's see how $7000 holds.
That observation aged poorly. To quote Bob: Sheeeit!Oh well, at least it's an opportunity to scrape up some cheap coinz. |
|
|
|
Burton Cummings/Guess Who?
No Time (Left For You) |
|
|
|
I think that largely he is criticizing the bcasher nutjobs in their assertions that bitcoin has to "get back to it's original vision," and a lot of the bullshit originalism that bcashers spout out in order to criticize various bitcoin evolutions, including segwit and including lightning, etc.
Get real. We don't dislike Segwit because it is not part of satoshi's original design; we dislike Segwit because it is at best a distracting irrelevant rearranging of the titanic's deck chairs, and at worst a fatal security virus that cannot be rolled back. ummm, just a kind word seeing as you look to be slipping into dementia in your aged state, it appears you have wandered into the wrong establishment. The Fundamentalist Church of Satoshi where they are pounding on the white paper bible is further down the road. Nice try at diversion, MoA, no matter how ineffectual. |
|
|
|
Any comments on this?  Just Luke doing Luke. One more insane rant. What with the earth at the center of the universe, prepare for a PoW change, kill all the non-xtians, and the like. You really believe that POW change is going to happen in bitcoin? No. I have no doubt that the result of changing the PoW for Bitcoin will be yet another forked chain that is NotBitcoin. Yet, this is exactly what Luke-jr has been advocating as of late. Look it up. All y'all need to get out more. FWIW, Gregory Maxwell also believed that satoshi's design was fundamentally and irredeemably broken. And these are the 'geniuses' that so much of the community choose to follow.  As if you have any kind of credibility here to be asserting the ideas of GMaxwell in proper context? You need me to dig up a quote to show how wrong you are? |
|
|
|
You brought two other people into a discussion about Luke.
Well, exactly half that many other people, but who needs accuracy when you have the BTC community on your side? Gregory Maxwell satoshi's Which one are you saying you didn't bring up? That subtle appeal to authority of Satoshi? Haha. Touche'. Mea Culpa, and all that. Of course, we don't know if satoshi (note the capitalization) is a person or a collective, but whatevs. Of course, to truly win that point, you'll need to demonstrate how Luke's invocation of "the original design" is somehow different than "satoshi's design". I await your elucidation. Have at it. |
|
|
|
You brought two other people into a discussion about Luke.
Well, exactly half that many other people, but who needs accuracy when you have the BTC community on your side? Mostly just to create an opportunity to trash another (former?) Bitcoin core dev:
Not to 'trash another (former?) Bitcoin core dev', but rather to point out that it is a shared delusion. And a rather significant one at that. |
|
|
|
I think that largely he is criticizing the bcasher nutjobs in their assertions that bitcoin has to "get back to it's original vision," and a lot of the bullshit originalism that bcashers spout out in order to criticize various bitcoin evolutions, including segwit and including lightning, etc.
Get real. We don't dislike Segwit because it is not part of satoshi's original design; we dislike Segwit because it is at best a distracting irrelevant rearranging of the titanic's deck chairs, and at worst a fatal security virus that cannot be rolled back. So, it’s “we” is it, who else are you speaking for? The BCH community, as gauged by my reading of publicly expressed sentiment mostly outside this here echo chamber. My read may be imperfect, but it is certainly higher fidelity than JJG's woefully ignorant assertions, which is where this branch started. |
|
|
|
You highlighted one of the key differences between bcashers and bitcoiners. Bcashers follow people. Bitcoiners follow ideas.
Haha. In your fuckin' dreams. As is evidenced by your following white knighting: Moving on, then. Luke's a bit nutty, but he's done more for Bitcoin than anyone involved in Bcash:
...
|
|
|
|
Just no. There is a distinct difference between 'limited' and 'impossible'. Completely different.
Join the BCash dev team, put your money with your mouth is and prove it. I have no idea what you are advocating here. Or STFU troll.
No. We've been over this multiple times. Answer always the same. Your imperatives are toothless, you bloviating buffoon. |
|
|
|
I think that largely he is criticizing the bcasher nutjobs in their assertions that bitcoin has to "get back to it's original vision," and a lot of the bullshit originalism that bcashers spout out in order to criticize various bitcoin evolutions, including segwit and including lightning, etc.
Get real. We don't dislike Segwit because it is not part of satoshi's original design; we dislike Segwit because it is at best a distracting irrelevant rearranging of the titanic's deck chairs, and at worst a fatal security virus that cannot be rolled back. |
|
|
|
Any comments on this? What about you? You decided to post it. Do you have any comments? well that doesn't make too much sense as much as i can understand what he's trying to prove.... but still, there must be some sense, guy here not simply a troll lol basically, don't know what to say, asking for some more expert's comments  What LukeJr is saying is: The Linux of today is not the same as the Linux 0.1 version that was Linus Torvalds "original design" The iPhone of today is not same as the iPhone 1.0 that was Steve Jobs "original design" The Keurig coffee maker of today is not the same as the 1.0 Mr. Coffee maker that was Vincent Marotta's "original design" etc., etc... things need to evolve, man Just no. There is a distinct difference between 'limited' and 'impossible'. Completely different. |
|
|
|
Any comments on this? Just Luke doing Luke. One more insane rant. What with the earth at the center of the universe, prepare for a PoW change, kill all the non-xtians, and the like. One of crypto's more ... umm ... colourful characters, to be sure. FWIW, Gregory Maxwell also believed that satoshi's design was fundamentally and irredeemably broken. And these are the 'geniuses' that so much of the community choose to follow. |
|
|
|
then with the news he told was true or not true that Bch deliberately broke away from Btc?
It would be more accurate to say that Bitcoin split into Bitcoin-BCH and Bitcoin-BTC. |
|
|
|
I will concede that perhaps I am a bit resentful of profits made by others during this kind of seemingly low volatility
And you castigated me for setting my interval at 'such a low value' (i.e., less than the interval you chose). Well, you reap what you sow. I will concede that trading $250 increments in the $6k to $10k price arena makes more sense than it would in the $14k to $17k price range, so even I brought down my trading increments based upon where the price is currently... Adaptation to new conditions, right? Neither of us is stagnant, or at least I hope not. We have to adjust with the changing conditions of the market, even though we might be tweaking here and there rather than making large changes... We are on a similar page in regards to ongoing tweaking strategies and attempting to learn from mistakes, no? Adjusting to the reality on the ground can make sense. Note that 'castigated' seems an accurate depiction of your past pronouncements on my strategy. (this viewed in ponderation of other peoples' presently pointing out your posting proclivities may provide probability to give your person pause) We're currently in a $125 range for me. After we go up for a fair bit, we'll be in what is currently my $250 interval range. Which presently continues well past previous ATH. I consider any above previous ATH to be subject to interval change. These standing sell orders above previous ATH are all built from coin-side profits built on earlier transactions. When a trade unit sized profit is made, it gets entered as a sell on the top of the ladder. If I were a more diligent sort, I'd build my interval upon a sliding percentage scale. But such would be more labor intensive to manage. There is also a fair bit to be said for sticking with the parameters once chosen, as that makes the trading automatic. C'est la guerre. |
|
|
|
I will concede that perhaps I am a bit resentful of profits made by others during this kind of seemingly low volatility
And you castigated me for setting my interval at 'such a low value' (i.e., less than the interval you chose). Well, you reap what you sow. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
