OMG! look who's talking super ROFL  dashcoin is the true DASH, darkcoin/DASH are the posers. when dashcoin applies its 10000:1 supply reduction dashcoin/DSH and darkcoin/DASH will be both in BTC market making the confusion bigger. trolling an OP translation of dashcoin/DSH to mud sling on dashcoin is just super lame, why don't you troll this july 2014 OP?? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=678232.0 |
|
|
|
Genesis Mining Added Dashcoin to there Mining coins! The total Hashrate will go up for sure now Genesis Mining is supporting this coin. This is a Huge Thing guys! By using the promo code MOON you will get an extra 3% discount on every purchase, the code is valid for both all cloud mining hashrate at Genesis Mining. So if you still haven’t checked the service out, then you might want to do so with the new lower prices that are more attractive for getting into cloud mining. Website: https://www.genesis-mining.com the mess darkcoin/DASH has done rebranding to an already existing coin LOL  wrong thread buddy here is darkcoin DASH https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.0 |
|
|
|
Do they realise that there is another new coin called Darkcoin now?  if they wont put DASH, just put DSH better than DRK +1 I do agree, keeping DRK is not good anymore, DSH could be cool if the three letter makes them so much difference. Thank you very much, my pleasure  We already discussed this earlier. DSH is already Dashcoin. Using this would be more confusing than everyting else. DASH is the only way to go. +1 @ rux and splawik haven't you stole enough. here you go, spot the "DSH"  |
|
|
|
The coin looks good so far, good name, good algorithm and a good plan. I will watch the coin.
No block explorer= No exchanges. +1 dev, i suggest you make an OTC trading thread for now. |
|
|
|
pacquiao premined his punches, that's why there is only few of his punches are in circulation kinda like DRK/DASH there is only a few in circulation because of the premine/instamine. |
|
|
|
Tok, just ignore them, like all of us did last 5 pages, we were doing good so far...
+1. AdamWhite, qvan, arielbit, icebreaker etc all stayed silent until DRK renamed to Dash and the price went up, now they are fixated on posting here all day about launch some issues 14 months ago which have been covered / explained / voted on 1000 times - I think they post here more than anyone else....and they are all invested in a certain rival anon tech launched off-the-shelf on Darkcoin's coattails last summer...and which is currently falling flat on its face...replying just makes them think like their posts have any value... yeah, i really don't care about darkcoin until evan's filthy hands touched dashcoin and tried to kill it, it is the time DRK is renaming to DASH btw... i see, you dark turds can attack monero by labeling the so called trolls monero shills..what a lame move.. to make long story short, i kinda like it here-makes my day, debunking lies, exposing scam and stopping you folks from circle jerking. |
|
|
|
when price plummet otoh said he bought 16 more masternodes.. but he has already this many coins, why buy?....otoh is playing mind games with DRK/DASH investors  GFY all. show them "the power of dump" by eckdark otohlle |
|
|
|
I also found this post to be very informative and thought it could be for more people. So yes there is ideology behind this coin : privacy, liberty, freedom, try to make the world less directed by "power" and more with the heart...
I hope that changing the name will not make the ideology behind it change too, otherwhise it will failed.
There's no ideology in something that nobody uses. The ideology's in the design, not the name. Vertoe is justified in leaving over not being consulted but less so over 'ideology'. It's not a rock song that's being built here it's electronic money. The name can easily be compromised without any loss of principle but the functionality can't. So Evan has got his priorities right in that regard. no. i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base. the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity. i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be. if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning? good luck |
|
|
|
|
drk/dash supporters are saying "proudly instamined" so instead of arguing why don't you help us figure out a way to objectively label instamined coins as "significantly instamined" like your coin (dash/drk)?
|
|
|
|
thanks smooth.
this coin/community owes you and other people from XMR community, not just for the bounty but also by sharing information that helped this community/coin especially when darkcoin tried to kill dashcoin.
Thank you for the kind words arielbit. I just remembered there is a DSH/XMR pair on Poloniex. If you would prefer I'll trade the 200 XMR for DSH and send it your donations address. If not I'll just hang on to it and pay it for a bounty or whatever you decide. i think you can just hang on to it or maybe dashcoin can have an XMR address on the OP and you can send it there.. what do you think papa_lazzarou? |
|
|
|
|
thanks smooth.
this coin/community owes you and other people from XMR community, not just for the bounty but also by sharing information that helped this community/coin especially when darkcoin tried to kill dashcoin.
|
|
|
|
Regarding the BTC markets, that's just the reason for the proposed supply reduction. Having said that I would really like seeing an exchange as part of the Dashcoin brand. We'd have dsh as THE base pair. If anyone could make this happen ... Coincidently, dev funds and bounty list are scheduled for discussion next. base pair like on exchanges like dashstamp.com or dash-e.com darkcoin/DASH can have mt. drox or mt. dox lol |
|
|
|
|
donated another 100M to fatten the bounties or anything..
|
|
|
|
I'm here because i just spent 2 days arguing with them during their 'bum-rush' of the CoinMarketCap thread and when I asked them basic questions they run off.
...
If your toxic devs weren't ... I wouldn't be here.
If you are saying that you are here bent on retaliation, then you are welcome to leave. If you have substantive points to make, you're welcome to make them, but continuing to repeat that Monero devs are "toxic" according to you "toxic" because we feel that instamined coins should be clearly identified as such does not count as substantive points. My substantive point is that it's my opinion that Monero's value is being rapidly reduced by the toxic actions/behaviour of the Monero core devs (LIKE YOU) and I am giving the reasons for that and asking your investors to fix it for 3 reasons 1) You are taking up a hell of a lot of other people's time including me 2) you are saying 'fuck you' to every Monero investor when you do this sh*t 3) you are the biggest hypocrite on BCT I ever saw - how can you even show your face to your community when you are doing this instead of ***developing***. You jumping in here within 5 seconds and trying to police that / silence me is hardly surprising. BlockaFett, if I wanted to police/silence you here, your posts would already be deleted. What evidence is there for Poloniex being a "fake exchange"? Who pointed out the crippled mining code to us? "BlockaFett, if I wanted to police/silence you here, your posts would already be deleted." Except then you would look more scammy than you already do. "What evidence is there for Poloniex being a "fake exchange"? I don't - it's a subjective opinion. People don't need to prove opinion's Smooth, this is basic argumentation. "Who pointed out the crippled mining code to us?" I don't know but this suggests that you don't either? Why are you asking me? So I responded to your questions, but main thing I notice is you evaded my point - interesting that you don't deny the real point I am making, on this, a thread speculating on Monero value.  djeezes dude, I've been reading the forum for several years now, I almost never post... but I gotta say, you are the worst discussion-partner I ever read, this isn't even trolling, it's worse... best regards though, and good luck in life with your 'opinions' +1 i did scrolled down a lot of blockafett's posts...sometimes i really feel sorry for smooth.. |
|
|
|
i suggests this..
Dash $ 15,935,866 $ 2.99 5,321,001 DASH inst blck
at the bottom of CMC there will be
* Not Mineable
** Significantly Premined
inst Significantly Instamined
blck block reward changed
this way instamined scam coins and block reward changing scams won't be CMC resistant.
Please then also add crip Launched with de-optimized or crippled code That is historically factual, and admitted by the project and its devs. then make minermarketcap.com we are talking about coins not miners |
|
|
|
@OP
I would be interested in adding to the discussion thread header:
XMR vs DRK vs Zerocash
I appreciate that this is a self moderated thread. I also appreciate the risk that there might be a bias towards XMR.
However, Zerocash, while currently not alive, adds an interesting dimension to all existing anon projects.
I am obviously inviting a critique of DRKs anon credentials from XMR supporters by using the words 'anon', but I hope we can see past that for a second to discuss the implications of a valid launch of Zerocash and what that would mean for XMR, DASH and all anon projects.
It may mean nothing, or might be significant.
My wish to introduce Zerocash into the equation is that it poses, in theory, a credible threat to both projects. So a discussion about XMR vs. DRK might be irrelevant in the not too distant future.
If there is no desire to discuss it here, perhaps I might start another thread at some point.
no. where exactly is your zerocash? |
|
|
|
|
i suggests this..
Dash $ 15,935,866 $ 2.99 5,321,001 DASH inst blck
at the bottom of CMC there will be
* Not Mineable
** Significantly Premined
inst Significantly Instamined
blck block reward changed
this way instamined scam coins and block reward changing scams won't be CMC resistant.
|
|
|
|
do it otoh, do it...dump everything you raging whale so a lot of people have a good entry point  he already did, he cant dump what he doesnt have  Let me see if I have this right. Otoh is still hiding his xmr balance in screen shot supposedly showing a trade history after he sold all his xmr.  Yes, congats, you have that right, I choose to not screen shot my XMR balance, I wouldn't obsess about it if I was you, fact being that I sold 36,455 XMR = 82 BTC worth three days ago, I guess that I could buy 40,000 or more back now but I'd rather leave this whole toxicity behind tbh so won't bother most likely. Maybe I still have a few 100k moneros that need dumping more stealthfully, I don't though thank goodness, but if I did that's only my business. As I no longer have any interest in this coin and the posters here ( see below ) I don't plan to follow this thread any more, so bye he may have a few more...so i am encouraging him to dump it all. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
