bugmen

This is indeed a cool pic, and I was forced by the hand of Yehova to send you a merit, but still, I have too many questions....

1. Is it like a Western Union fanclub meeting going on?

2. What is generating so much trash on the beach??

3. Did you guys remember to wear sunscreen???

Anyhow, its a big world filled with billions, and its cool that you two could meet up IRL.

Me and Mic were about 50 miles apart at one point, separated by a $40 flight. I hope to make up for that at some point.

I know it's hard to make it happen, but it would be great to have a picture of all the WO together.

At the moment we only have the photo of the hats, it's a start.

that is fucking awesome!

all along

This is the posited SegWit donations attack, with the booty piling up high in time for May 2020:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@anonymint/ps965c

You’re ostensibly misinterpreting what his statement means. Craig is ostensibly referring to the real Satoshi v0.5.3 protocol BTC network that will have forced the Core protocol to fork off. He means 51+% of the hashrate that was on Core’s protocol will have switched (i.e. it will not be only Craig’s hashrate given that many miners will want partake in the donations booty).

He is pointing out that until all the SegWit donations are taken (since only so many can fit into a block), the real BTC miners will not be accepting other transactions.

Of course transactions might still proceed on the forked off Core protocol if the hashrate doesn’t drop too low yet it might become far too congested with cratering hashrate, and it will no longer than the longest chain and presumably will be collapsing in price. Perhaps you can sell your free airdropped Core BTC while retaining ownership of your real BTC if you had stored your BTC correct with addresses that begin with 1 and not 3. You’d want to mix your Core BTC transactions with some UTXO input that was created after the fork so that it’s invalid to replay on the real BTC protocol (so you don’t spend your real BTC). Problem is exchanges may not split your BTC for you fast enough to profit on the dumping. And Core chain will likely become congested. Exchanges who have their BTC in SegWit addresses will be bankrupted.

So now we see that BSV is just a deco[y]. What Craig (or his backers) really want is the real Bitcoin. They fool the plebs into thinking he wants scaling and BSV.

OK. But of course, Ayre runs SQR, which uses Samsung to fab their ASICs directly.

This made me think,  wouldn't it be a great service to provide an automatic bitcoin savings plan?

I mean the person sets a direct debit, £50/pcm and each time it comes in the system does an automatic market buy for them (maybe less a fee).

The usual I suppose regulation would be hard on a money type business and with the badword as well in there (B)
 
The customer could hold their own wallet I guess to mitigate risk, though they may not want to I suppose. That would add security costs.